Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Wesley Dorian
28 posts


@BattleAxe1689 @RandalxMcMurphy @JayDyer @redeemed_zoomer 2 Tim 3 says profitable not exclusively sufficient. 1 Tim 2:1 literally urges us to make intercessions for each other. Anamnesis in Luke 22 means making a past event truly present. 1 Pet 3:21 still explicitly says baptism saves you. Veneration is not worship.
English

@RandalxMcMurphy @JayDyer @redeemed_zoomer 2 Tim 3:16-17 sufficient for all faith. 1 Tim 3:15 doesn’t override. 1 Pet 3:21: baptism “appeal to God” (not autosaving; see context). Elisha’s bones: miracle, not warranting idolatry. Eucharist: memorial (Lk 22), His once for all sacrifice(Heb 10). Pray to God alone (1 Tim 2:5)
English

@ToubabPreacher @redeemed_zoomer RZ is low IQ, so nothing really
English

@redeemed_zoomer What exactly is making you connect those two?
English

@5Solas2 It's simply laughable. Reading the Church Fathers reconnects you to both Catholicism and Orthodoxy
English

Really struck a nerve with this one because they know it's true.
5 Solas@5Solas2
Don't let Roman Catholics and the Orthodox convince you they own the church fathers. The reformers actually used the church fathers to prove Roman Catholics wrong in the Reformation.
English

@rosary_weapon @FoxNews You aren't a Catholic bro. You are not in unity with the Chair of St. Peter. You are a Protestant that is trying to larp as some kind of fake Catholic. Everything you're saying sounds like a Protest to the current Catholic Church, thus you are are a protesting Protestant
English

Well that makes no sense
Are you aware that your own apostate leaders routinely say actual heretics who deny dogma are not only inside the church, but can be saints and martyrs who are saved? Francis even taught there are Muslim martyrs.
So it is contrary for you to imply traditional Catholics who believe the chair is empty are “heretics” when your own sect doesn’t even consider those who actually reject dogmas of the Church from within schismatic hierarchies to be in schism.
It is important to note that Pro-lgbt, pro-abortion, pro-euthanasia politicians are regularly allowed to take "communion" in the novus ordo as well and continually do so, which is contrary to the spotless discipline of the Church.
Here are some excerpts where the leaders in Rome continually teach salvation outside the Church.
John Paul II, Ut Unum Sint (# 82), May 25, 1995: “All Christian Communities know that, thanks to the power given by the Spirit, obeying that will and overcoming those obstacles are not beyond their reach. All of them in fact have martyrs for the Christian faith.”
John Paul II, Ut Unum Sint (# 84), May 25, 1995: “Albeit in an invisible way, the communion between our Communities, even if still incomplete, is truly and solidly grounded in the full communion of the saints - those who, at end of a life faithful to grace, are in communion with Christ in glory. These saints come from all the Churches and Ecclesial Communities which gave them entrance into the communion of salvation.”
John Paul II, Ut Unum Sint (# 1), May 25, 1995: “The courageous witness of so many martyrs of our century, including members of Churches and Ecclesial Communities not in full communion with the Catholic Church, gives new vigor to the Council’s call and reminds us of our duty to listen to and put into practice its exhortation.”
And Francis who outrageously said Anglicans were on the “path to His Kingdom” with Catholics
Francis’ June 16, 2014 address to “His Grace” Justin Welby, the “Archbishop” of Canterbury: “Behold, how good and how pleasant it is for brothers to dwell together in unity!’ (Ps 133:1) Once again we meet, Your Grace, as co-workers in the Lord’s vineyard and fellow pilgrims on the path to his Kingdom.”
Leo even said that all denominations share the same universal faith. This is outrageous.
Leo XIV, In Unitate Fidei (#12), Nov. 23, 2025: “… ecumenical dialogue, founded on one baptism and the Nicene-Constantinopolitan Creed, has led us to recognize the members of other Churches and ecclesial communities as our brothers and sisters in Jesus Christ, and to rediscover the one universal community of Christ’s disciples throughout the world.”
Leo XIV, In Unitate Fidei (#12), Nov. 23, 2025: “We share the same faith in the one and only God, the Father of all people; we confess together the one Lord and true Son of God, Jesus Christ, and the one Holy Spirit, who inspires us and impels us towards full unity and the common witness to the Gospel.”
Leo XIV, In Unitate Fidei (#12), Nov. 23, 2025: “Saint John Paul II reminded us, in particular, of the witness of the many Christian martyrs from all Churches and ecclesial communities: their memory unites us and spurs us on to be witnesses and peacemakers in the world.
That is to clearly convey that all of those baptized heretics and schismatics belong to the Church of Christ, which is directly contrary to the repeat dogmatic teaching of the Church (Council of Florence, Unam Sanctum, Satis Cognitum etc)
Do you even care about the Catholic faith?
English

CLERGY CRUNCH: Even as interest—especially among younger adults—begins to rebound, America’s Catholic Church keeps running into the same hard limit: it needs priests, and there aren’t enough of them.
Across the United States, dioceses are also confronting aging buildings and shrinking finances, forcing them to merge parishes, close churches, and ask fewer priests to cover more communities.

English

@BibleInContext1 And yet Catholics number in the Billions and it's only projected to grow. You fractured Protestant have nothing on that
English

Catholics want you to believe there is a sort of revival happening in the Catholic Church with an abnormally large amount of conversions happening!
What they fail to tell you is:
“Catholicism has one of the largest net losses of any religion in the U.S.
13% of all U.S. adults are former Catholics
Catholics have experienced the greatest net losses due to switching. About three-in-ten U.S. adults (30.2%) say they were raised Catholic. But 43% of the people raised Catholic no longer identify as Catholic, meaning that 12.8% of all U.S. adults are former Catholics.
Meanwhile, on the other side of the ledger, 1.5% of U.S. adults have become Catholics after being raised another way. Overall, 18.9% of U.S. adults currently identify as Catholics, according to the new RLS.
For Catholics, retention rates tend to be significantly lower than for other faiths,
reasons given by former Catholics for walking away were clergy and religious leader scandals (39%) and dissatisfaction with church teachings on social and political issues (37%).
Another 35% of former Catholics pointed to a gradual drifting away from their religion -- slightly less than the report's overall share of 38%.
Equal shares of former Catholics said that their religion "just wasn't important" in their lives (36%) or that their spiritual needs were not being met (36%).”
***Data is quoted from the Pew Research Center & from the DetroitCatholic.com referencing the new study from Pew Research Center released Dec. 15, 2025
What’s really happening is that Roman Catholicism has a superficial lure promising structure and nostalgia, but once the short-lived experiences fade away these young converts seek truth and fulfillment elsewhere.
Joe McBride@McBrideLawNYC
Over 100k people are becoming Roman Catholic tonight in America. The number across the world is estimated at over one million. Adults become Catholic after 1 year of serious study often go on to be learned and devout. God’s Army is Growing. Long live the Catholic Church!
English

@rosary_weapon @FoxNews So you're just another protestant heretic, gotcha
English

Putting lipstick on a pig doesn’t solve the underlying issue of what has caused this apostasy and collapse - the false religion being imposed on the faithful by those anti Catholics now in Rome
True religion isn’t an ornament you wear.
Either the papacy is the bulwark of true faith and morals or papal supremacy is a hoax. The latter is infallibly false. This leads to a conclusion many find unpleasant
English

@Eziahatoka @FoxNews Interest among them has been growing. It's the entire point of the article
English

@Grace8Muller @FoxNews Marriage hasn't solved the shortage in the Protestant Mainline denominations
English

@dagnello_rudy @FoxNews This guy is clearly a Protestant heretic
English

We've had to endure two popes who were anti-Catholic in the past 14 years, and it looks like Leo is even more adverse to Christ's teachings than Francis. His synodal church, if implemented, will place all who follow Jesus Christ outside of his Church. It is meant to be another Protestant denomination, doctrinally ruled by the laity, amalgamated into a "One World Church" under the auspices of the "One World Government!"
English

@rosary_weapon @FoxNews Just attend a different liturgy such as an FSSP Latin Mass or an Eastern Catholic service, if you don't like the post Vatican 2 changes. Liturgies have changed over the last 2,000 years and this is why you have so many flavors
English


@Suilemer76 @Aaronaeus @JoshuaBarzon 1 Cor 3:11 & 10:4 fully affirm Christ as the ult foundation and cornerstone (Eph 2:20), Catholics agree. This does not contradict Mt 16:18–19, where Jesus explicitly names Peter the rock. Christ is the cornerstone ; Peter is the visible earthly foundation Christ Himself chose
English

@WesleyxDorian @Aaronaeus @JoshuaBarzon This renaming affirms Peter's leadership among the apostles and his place in the church's apostolic foundation alongside others (Ephesians 2:20), but the church itself is built solely on Christ as the cornerstone (1 Peter 2:6-7; Psalm 118:22)
English

@Suilemer76 @Aaronaeus @JoshuaBarzon Why then change Simon's name at all? Would Jesus intentionally try to confuse us?
English

@WesleyxDorian @Aaronaeus @JoshuaBarzon Ahh, that is the kicker. He did not change it to ROCK, but rock. Not the same. Your final sentence is half right. I trust in Jesus and only in Jesus. Not in a Papacy with false teachings.
English

@sincead33 Does listening to Catechism in a Year count as a tradition study?
English

@Suilemer76 @Aaronaeus @JoshuaBarzon Then why change Simon’s name to 'Rock'? Maybe it's because Jesus was calling Simon THE Rock. He could have just kept calling him Simon, but he didn't. Trust in Jesus and not your biased interpretation
English

@Suilemer76 @Aaronaeus @JoshuaBarzon The Aramaic word Cephas is used interchangeably with Peter in John 1:42, 1 Corinthians 1:12, 3:22, 9:5, 15:5, and Galatians 2:9-14. There is no gender distinction in the Aramaic language so Jesus quite clearly meant to call Simon a Rock. Thus he is the Rock
English

@WesleyxDorian @Aaronaeus @JoshuaBarzon ... he avoided words like "lithos" (stone/pebble) for clarity, yet still chose "petros" to differentiate from "petra." This suggests the Aramaic "kepha" (if used) was translated to highlight a conceptual distinction, not identity
English

@Suilemer76 @Aaronaeus @JoshuaBarzon He doesn't make mistakes, that's why he changed Simon's name to Rock. He uses both the Greek Peter (Rock) and the Aramaic Cephas (Rock) to describe his point in scripture
English

@WesleyxDorian @Aaronaeus @JoshuaBarzon It does not matter since the Divine word of God provided to Matthew was originally written in Koine Greek. The Rock on which the church was built is and can only be Christ. He is the ONLY authority we need. God does not make mistakes.
English

@JoshuaBarzon Why did Jesus change Simon's name to Rock (Peter)? Why not just leave it Simon??
English

@Aaronaeus @JoshuaBarzon Peter's name is Petros (masculine, meaning a small stone or detachable rock), while "this rock" is petra (feminine, meaning a massive, foundational bedrock or cliff). Jesus is thus contrasting Peter (a movable stone) with himself as the unshakeable foundation
English

@leonardaisfunny @real_lord_miles The Orthodox Church is balkanized and there is no real unity. They also flip flopped on doctrines such as contraception and divorce
English

@real_lord_miles Before the 10th century, the Catholic Church and the Eastern Orthodox Church were one Church. The apostolic tradition is what they both traced their authority to. The first rebellion was the Pope’s.
English

I’m going to drop a trvth nuke
If you were Christian prior to the 16th century, you were catholic.
You would believe everything the Catholic Church teaches, because in the 4th century at the council of Rome, Carthage and Hippo, the Catholic Church compiled the New Testament and canonized the Bible.
Catholicism is not a Christian denomination, it is the one true church that Jesus Christ founded with direct lineage to Jesus.
Every Christian denomination we have now is a direct result of different heresies and must be dismantled by any means possible.
If someone in the catholic church did something non catholic to damage the image of the church and the teaching of Jesus, they should have been punished, arrested or executed depending on the severity of it. It does not give you authority from God to start your own Church by breaking away from Jesus’ church which he built, aka the Catholic Church.
English



