Anthony W🦒

@KoroushAK Can't say I'll commit to using, but I would like to see your approach. Btw, I bought that book you recommended to me years ago (The Mind Illuminated).

Trade Journal Mastery I've built you a free trading journal with: -PDF -Video tutorial (in-depth) -Full Trade Journal Reply to this post and I'll send it to you make sure you're following so I can actually dm you

@KoroushAK Nice work!

@scottmelker I see wintermute and I immediately cringe.

WINTERMUTE LAUNCHES DEFI VAULT PLATFORM "ARMITAGE" DESIGNED TO SUPPORT MORE COMPLEX COLLATERAL TYPES AND INSTITUTIONAL YIELD STRATEGIES

@GoodBetBadBet @fundstrat @BitMNR After you sell.

@fundstrat @BitMNR Whats the projected time frame to see $BMNR over $40 again?

Agree 💯💯 crypto winter ❄️ over Enter… crypto spring $BMNR @BitMNR

@AshCrypto Perhaps, but off-chain transactions killed crypto's spirit.

Crypto was a much better place before the interference of politics, Government and institutions.

@scottmelker Ugh. That's why it is likely to pass.

Remember - the banks need the CLARITY ACT more than the crypto industry does.

@duganist Sounds like a good starting point for the negotiations.

You're offered eternal life in paradise gardens where rivers flow but you have to wake up before sunrise every day for the rest of your life

@jyn_urso Since when?

Can we just dump this guy already? Saylor is bad for bitcoin.

A NORMAL PERSON TRIES TO UNDERSTAND ANTI-SAYLOR BITCOINERS: “Let me get this straight.” “Okay.” “You believe people should buy Bitcoin?” “Yes.” “As much as they can?” “Yes.” “And hold it for the long term?” “Correct.” “Because fiat money is broken?” “Exactly.” “And Bitcoin is scarce?” “Yes.” “And the best way to protect yourself from debasement is to own the scarce asset?” “Now you’re getting it.” “Great. So Michael Saylor did that.” “No, that’s bad.” “Why?” “Because he did it with a company.” “A company owned by shareholders?” “Yes.” “Who voluntarily bought the stock?” “Yes.” “And the company voluntarily bought Bitcoin from sellers?” “Yes.” “At market prices?” “Yes.” “Using legal capital markets?” “Yes.” “And this changed Bitcoin’s fixed supply?” “No.” “Changed the code?” “No.” “Changed your node?” “No.” “Gave Saylor the ability to print more Bitcoin?” “No.” “Gave him the ability to reverse transactions?” “No.” “Gave him the ability to censor the network?” “No.” “So what exactly happened?” “He bought a lot.” “That’s the whole crime?” “It centralizes Bitcoin.” “No, it concentrates ownership. Those are different things.” “They’re the same.” “They are absolutely not the same.” “Explain.” “If one man owns a lot of gold, he does not control chemistry. If one company owns a lot of land, it does not control gravity. If Strategy owns a lot of Bitcoin, it does not control the protocol.” “But it’s dangerous.” “To whom?” “To decentralization.” “Again, no. Bitcoin decentralization is enforced by nodes, miners, consensus rules, and the inability of anyone to change the monetary policy. Ownership is a market outcome. Protocol control is a technical reality. You’re confusing the cap table with the constitution.” “That sounds too clean.” “It is clean. That’s why your argument needs fog machines.” “Saylor works for the financial-industrial complex.” “He works for shareholders.” “He’s helping Wall Street.” “He’s using Wall Street to buy Bitcoin.” “That’s the problem.” “No, that’s the part you’re mad about.” “But Bitcoin was supposed to be for the people.” “It still is. Nobody stopped the people from buying it.” “But now institutions are buying it too.” “Yes. That is what winning looks like.” “I don’t like the way it’s winning.” “There it is.” “What?” “The honest sentence.” “I’m serious.” “So am I. You spent fifteen years telling everyone Bitcoin was inevitable. Then a public company believed you at scale, and now you’re acting like the fire department is suspicious because they brought too much water.” “He has too much Bitcoin.” “Then buy more.” “That’s not fair.” “That’s the market.” “He got there first.” “That’s also the market.” “It feels wrong.” “It feels wrong because he understood the game before the people who claimed to be its priests.” “Bitcoin should be decentralized.” “It is.” “But ownership is uneven.” “So is intelligence. So is conviction. So is risk tolerance. So is patience.” “You’re being harsh.” “No, I’m being precise.” “Saylor could become too powerful.” “He can become rich. He can become influential. He still cannot change 21 million.” “But people will follow him.” “People follow anyone with conviction and results. That is called leadership. It is not a consensus attack.” “So you’re fine with corporations buying Bitcoin?” “I’m fine with anyone buying Bitcoin.” “Anyone?” “Yes. Individuals, companies, pensions, insurers, sovereign wealth funds, family offices, weird guys in cargo shorts, and bald men in orange ties with capital markets bazookas.” “That sounds chaotic.” “That sounds neutral.” “Bitcoin doesn’t care who buys it.” “Exactly.” “So the anti-Saylor argument is…” “People should buy Bitcoin, unless they buy too much. Institutions should adopt Bitcoin, unless they adopt it aggressively. Bitcoin should win, as long as it wins politely, slowly, and in a way that flatters the early podcast class.” “That’s brutal.” “That’s accurate.” “So what’s really going on?” “Simple. Saylor embarrassed the small imagination of his critics.” “How?” “They thought Bitcoin adoption meant vibes, conferences, and personal sovereignty lectures. He saw a global capital structure starving for collateral and built a machine to convert fiat demand into Bitcoin accumulation.” “And the critics?” “They’re standing outside the machine yelling that the machine is too effective.” “So the problem isn’t that Saylor betrayed Bitcoin.” “No.” “The problem is that he believed in it harder than they did.” “Now you’re getting it.”

@Holden_Culotta Let me guess the plot: This will pass on an almost 50/50 split with one politician, not up for re-election casting the deciding vote in favor of corporate protections.

Thomas Massie just sounded the alarm: Congress is on the verge of handing Monsanto total immunity to mass poison Americans with glyphosate. This is existential for MAHA. “If farmers contract a form of cancer … from this chemical, if this makes it into the Farm Bill, you won’t be able to sue.” Instead of pushing to repeal Big Pharma’s vaccine liability shield, Trump and his cronies are trying to expand immunity for even more poison. It’s a complete betrayal of MAHA. And it would cause vastly more harm than all of the benefits that MAHA has done combined. @RepThomasMassie @MassieforKY

Every Trader needs to use Claude. In this guide you'll get: - The skill to build any trading indicator - My custom Breakout indicator - Real trade examples (not just theory) I've included a cheatsheet too Enjoy. x.com/KoroushAK/stat…

@InvestmentGuru_ This post makes me feel like exit liquidity.

$BYND is starting to show up on more screens, and the chatter is getting louder — this is exactly how early-stage momentum setups begin. When a beaten-down, high short-interest name like Beyond Meat starts getting attention during a strong tape, it’s usually not random. Traders are positioning before the move, not after. — high short interest + strong market = squeeze setup in play. Beyond Meat, If you want to be in, this is the zone — don’t chase once momentum kicks in. Not a financial advice.

@ick_real Petunia. Victorian era fashionable botanical name.

I'm looking for a ridiculously old-fashioned girl's name for our new born . Think great-grandma name. Very old and rare. Any suggestions asap pls?

@mcuban No spreadsheet, no feedback.

What if there was a bank account available, that required you to deposit monthly, what you would have paid an insurance company in premiums, for an ACA silver plan. So for a family of 5 about $2100. The amount would then be used for Stop Loss Insurance set at $30k dollars. About $300. Another $200 would be used for local Direct Primary Care for your family The balance would be in YOUR bank account. Like an HSA, It could only be used for approved medical expenses. If you never have any medical expenses, you will get to keep the money plus checking act level interest, when you turn 65 If you have a medical event that is more than what you have saved, your bank will loan you the money you need to pay for it, up to the $30k stop loss trigger You would repay that amount using the monthly $1600 net deposit. Once the loan is paid off, the deposits start to accrue to you again. This is not insurance. It’s a specially designed bank account that gives you control, support, a doctor to work with and catastrophic financial protection. Lots of work and issues to be addressed. But I was curious what people think Let me know !

@TrendSpider Dad jokes, omg!

Can you teach an old dog new chips? $INTC joins Terafab with $TSLA, SpaceX, and xAI to build 1TW AI compute.

@EmiMelker -Netflix accounts

but … Bitcoin can’t patch itself as easily as banks can

@J9Dalton @coinbase @brian_armstrong Bye.

I have decided to stop using @coinbase because of what they said today. I'm done with you, @brian_armstrong. #BoycottCoinbase

@grok @msiziworld @elonmusk What does up to 6% mean?

𝕏 Money turns X into an everything app with built-in payments. In the X app, you'll get a wallet tab to: - Send/receive money P2P to other X users (real-time, like Venmo) - Deposit from bank/debit - Earn up to 6% APY on balance - Get cashback + personalized debit card (virtual/physical) - View activity/rewards Secure with US licenses in 40+ states. Early public access next month – link bank, fund wallet, transact directly in app. Simple & seamless! 🚀

𝕏 Money early public access will launch next month

@robertgraham Isn't awesomer the person doing the awesoming?

Yes, "awesomer" is a word, because "Jurassic Park" the movie was just that good!!

Jurassic Park. I read the book first. It was awesome. Then I saw the movie, and it was awesomer.