@wthisjellyfish Thank you for sending the details over. It appears that the preorders are sold out and states to check back on the release date. However, the only date I see is the street date of 11/9/25. Hopefully, you will be able to place an order for them tomorrow. Have a great day.
Doctors are AMAZED at these 10 ways to BOOST your immune system:
The Tetanus vaccine
The Measles vaccine
The Polio vaccine
The Mumps vaccine
The HPV vaccine
The Pneumonia vaccine
The Hepatitis B vaccine
The Rubella vaccine
The Diphtheria vaccine
The Covid-19 vaccine
- @HislopMD
AMERICA: TODAY IS ELECTION DAY
IF YOU HAVEN'T YET -- MAKE SURE YOU VOTE TO MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN.
BRING YOUR FRIENDS AND FAMILY TOO!
#VotedforTrump#ElectionDay
Below are the R minus D early vote deltas in swing states before tomorrow.
Republican turnout on election day is usually much higher than Democrat, so any state currently leaning R in early voting is very likely to side with Trump.
Pennsylvania, while still leaning D, has a massive turnout on Election Day. If the same number vote in person for Trump this time vs last, he will win by ~500k votes (landslide).
@johnfgately I dont think you should have stopped the fundraising. I see them targeting him in many other ways. He should not have backed down or stopped and he should hire his own attorney to fight any charges, fines, harassment, or targeting he receives going forward. Keep fundraising
🚨 NEW: A Massachusetts man is being fined $100 PER DAY for projecting a Trump 2024 logo on the side of a water tower in Hanson, according to NY Post
What a LEGEND 😂
Someone launch a GiveSendGo for this man and I’ll help cover the costs 🤣🔥
Since I've been covering #KarenRead, I've maintained respectful dialog with those on both sides, as long as they are respectful to me. And along the way, hundreds of them eventually flip. It takes months of persistently showing them the rock-solid evidence.
But many just won't budge. Again, I'm talking about the ones who are decent people and respectful, since they're the only ones I maintain an ongoing dialogue.
A recent example went essentially like this:
me: The vehicle data, which comes from Lexus, shows that Karen went in reverse at high speed and struck a smaller object precisely seconds before John's phone moved for the last time.
FKR'er: Proctor hated Karen!
me: OK, but how could Proctor have rigged data from Lexus and from John's phone?
FKR'er: Are you saying I'm dumb?
me: Of course not, I just want to make sure you know about this data, and if you think it could be false or manufactured, please make an argument as to how.
FKR'er: you know, I've always treated you nice and wished you well, we should be able to disagree.
me: I agree 100% on both accounts, you're a very nice person and I respect you, and good people should be able to disagree. But can you please just tell me why you are rejecting data that the defense itself did not try to disagree with?
FKR'er: Data can be unreliable. The other day, the GPS on my app said I was in the neighbor's yard.
me: yes, but the defense did not challenge the accuracy of GPS signals. They did not challenge the accuracy of the vehicle data either, they instead tried to implausibly suggest Proctor created that data by driving the car at the police station. But there would be no way to recreate all of it...the three point turn 8 minutes before, the signature of striking a smaller object, the mileage of the trip.
FKR'er: But Proctor...
And on and on the conversation goes. Impenetrable.
Another issue with this person, who I've had a long, respectful dialogue with is that he's confronted me with MANY claims over these months that have now been completely debunked: "nonhuman" hairs, "gaps" in library surveillance, the feds putting a stop to things, geofence showing John in the house, missing belt, missing hat, Higgins flipping, CPD officer Wanless being forced to help the conspiracy...I mean an endless number of claims, all of them now known to be false. But none of this affects his thinking. None of it causes him to reflect on whether he should reconsider his beliefs or his sources. Not a moment of self-reflection. He's completely retreated to Proctor Island, and there he defiantly makes his last stand.
I believe this is how it felt to be sane within the maelstrom of a witch hunt or a pogrom or a red scare, or any other time where some irrational hysteria whips up the public. Fighting back with reason and logic is almost...almost...useless. The power of belief is just too strong.
Focusing on logic and evidence is not completely hopeless, and hopefully not useless. It's unlikely, of course, to have a massive effect...logic and evidence are impotent next to belief during a time of hysteria. But hysteria tends to run its course. Innocent lives will be destroyed before it does, that's always the case, but the irrational fever does burn out eventually, and recovery comes.
A final point. Most of the Believers think that they too are grounded in logic and reason. It's delusion. Remember, the Salem witches were prosecuted by men trained at Harvard. One of the judges, Stoughton, was from the class of 1650, and he argued, with legal reasoning, that spectral evidence was admissible in court.
However, there's a difference between arguing logically FROM evidence and using cherrypicked evidence to support a presupposed conclusion. I'm reminded of the legions of FKR'ers who believe that Jen McCabe telling the 911 dispatcher that a "man" was unconscious is somehow evidence of wrongdoing. This still amazes and stuns me. How Jen handled that 911 call is typical of the way 90% of them come in, and how 100% of the sane people make them. You don't tell a dispatcher it's your friend. You give them the barest minimum of details they need so they can dispatch the first responders. Yet these FKR people find this to be powerful evidence.
Are they dumb? Well, to be perfectly honest, in some cases, yes. There's no point in denying that. Not all sprinters can run a mile in 6 minutes.
But probably more often than not, it's not so much a matter of intelligence, but rather a situation where people are grasping at pieces of evidence in order to support a strong belief.
I like to entertain certain beliefs myself, and one of them is that most of these people, under circumstances that don't involve hysteria, would be capable of understanding that Jen's call was completely normal. I like to believe that these people are merely in the grips of something they aren't emotionally equipped to fight, so when the hysteria passes, their minds will return to normal functioning. That's my belief, and I am trying desperately to cling to it.
When combined with mail-in ballots, the system is *designed* to make it impossible to prove fraud.
Mail-in and drop box ballots should not be allowed, as cameras on the in-person voting stations would at least prevent large-scale fraud by counting how many people showed up vs ballots cast.
x.com/wallstreetapes…