
.
80 posts




🚨 BREAKING: Active supply chain attack across npm, PyPI, and Crates.io. Socket detected TrapDoor, a crypto stealer campaign hitting 34 malicious packages and 384 versions and artifacts, with attackers repeatedly pushing new releases across ecosystems. TrapDoor targets #crypto, #DeFi, AI, and security developers, stealing wallets, SSH keys, cloud credentials, GitHub tokens, browser data, env vars, and API keys. Socket detected releases with a median detection time of 5 minutes, 27 seconds. The fastest detection occurred 58 seconds after publication.

🚨 THE ENTIRE AI BOOM MIGHT BE BUILT ON FAKE REVENUE. Latest corporate filings show that OpenAI and Anthropic alone make up over half of the entire $2 trillion future cloud backlog held by Microsoft, Oracle, Google, and Amazon. This massive pipeline is actually being created through a circular accounting trick called a round trip revenue loop. But how it works ? A tech giant gives billions of dollars to an AI startup as an "investment". But hidden in the contract is a strict rule forcing the startup to hand that exact same money straight back to the tech giant to rent their computer servers. Look at the documented case of Microsoft and OpenAI. When Microsoft invested $13 billion into OpenAI, it didn't just give them cash; it gave them "cloud credits" to use Microsoft servers. OpenAI used those exact credits to train its AI models, and Microsoft then turned around and recorded that server usage as brand new "cloud revenue" from a customer. The tech giant is literally paying itself with its own money and calling it a sale. This is why OpenAI’s annual cloud bill has ballooned to over $60 billion, double its actual revenue of $25 billion, kept alive solely by this recycled funding loop. Anthropic runs the exact same play, spending $2.66 billion on Amazon Web Services in just nine months, which was basically 100% of all the money it earned at the time. This manufactured demand triggers a second accounting trick where tech giants book massive paper profits. Every time a startup gets a higher value from a new funding round, the tech giant updates the value of its investment on its books and counts that unearned paper gain as direct profit. In Q1 2026, Alphabet reported a record $62.6 billion profit, but $28.7 billion nearly half, was just a paper markup on its Anthropic investment. In the same quarter, Amazon reported $30.3 billion in profit, but $16.8 billion of it was just an Anthropic paper gain. While Amazon reported record profits, its actual free cash flow collapsed 95% to just $1.2 billion because it had to spend $44.2 billion in real cash to build physical data centers. This has created a massive danger where these giant companies rely heavily on just one or two unstable startups. Microsoft has 49% of its $627 billion future backlog tied to OpenAI, while Oracle has an incredible 54% of its entire $553 billion pipeline relying on OpenAI alone. This perfectly mirrors the 2001 dot-com crash when Global Crossing and Qwest Communications swapped identical fiber-optic network capacity with each other just to book fake sales. Qwest had to erase $1.4 billion in fake income, and Global Crossing went completely bankrupt. The only difference is that the dot-com swaps were illegal, but today's AI loop is fully legal under current accounting rules. This legal loop inflates tech company stock prices, forcing automatic retirement accounts and index funds to buy even more of these tech stocks. It is a self feeding loop where investments, sales, and stock prices all go up on paper without the AI technology ever making real cash profits.





🦔Microsoft canceled its internal Claude Code licenses this week after token-based billing made the cost untenable, even for a company with effectively infinite cloud resources. Uber's CTO sent an internal memo warning the company burned through its entire 2026 AI budget in just four months. American AI software prices have jumped 20% to 37%, and GitHub (owned by Microsoft) is dropping flat-rate plans for usage-based billing across its products. My Take The AI subsidy era is ending in real time. The same company that put $13 billion into OpenAI and built the Azure infrastructure powering most of Anthropic's compute just looked at the bill from a competitor's coding tool and decided it was not worth paying. That is not a productivity failure on Anthropic's end. Token-based pricing is forcing every enterprise customer to confront the actual cost of running these models at scale, and the number turns out to be far higher than the flat-rate experiments suggested. This ties directly to my Gemini Flash post yesterday. Anthropic, OpenAI, and Google all raised effective prices in the last six months. Enterprises that built workflows assuming AI costs would keep falling are now watching annual budgets evaporate in months. Two outcomes look likely from here. Either enterprises scale back AI usage to fit budgets, which slows the revenue ramp the labs need to justify their valuations ahead of IPOs, or the labs cut prices and absorb the losses, which makes the unit economics worse at exactly the wrong moment. Both paths land in the same place, the numbers stop working, and somebody has to take the writedown. Hedgie🤗



Maui in Hawaii experienced some of the worst wildfires in US history in 2023. Amid concerns of a PTSD epidemic, floatation tanks are being deployed to the island to help restore people's mental health #Echobox=1779361384" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">newscientist.com/article/252691…

As the recently expanded partnership with @AnthropicAI demonstrates, @SpaceX is offering AI compute as a service at significant scale. We are in discussions with other companies to do the same. Over time, especially with orbital data centers, we expect to serve AI at extremely high scale.

Is Theta Network an Intentional Long-Term Rug Pull? TWO Lawsuits from previous executive level employees accusing Mitch Liu and Theta of fraud and other accusations, insider-sale allegations, and years of investor losses have fueled growing questions about whether Theta Network was designed to enrich insiders while retail investors carried the risk, and SUFFERED THE LOSS. For years, Theta Network promoted an ambitious vision: decentralized video delivery, blockchain infrastructure, NFTs, edge computing, AI workloads, decentralized storage, and a future where growing network adoption would supposedly support long-term ecosystem value. Multiple whitepapers described shifting narratives, enterprise participation, staking economics, edge-node growth, and future compute services. Today, many retail investors are asking a much darker question: Was Theta Network simply an ambitious project that failed to deliver expected value, or was it allegedly structured from the beginning in a way that disproportionately benefited insiders while public investors absorbed the losses? That question has gained additional attention because of legal disputes and allegations involving former insiders and company leadership. Public lawsuits and accusations have raised issues regarding token sales, internal conduct, business representations, and the handling of company affairs. The existence of litigation does not prove wrongdoing, but it does place claims that were once dismissed as internet speculation into a more serious arena where evidence, testimony, and records can / will be scrutinized. Critics point to what they view as a troubling pattern. The project repeatedly introduced new narratives: video delivery, enterprise adoption, NFTs, Metachain expansion, EdgeCloud infrastructure, AI computing, decentralized storage, and future ecosystem growth. None of these shifting narratives ever reach fruition to where it produced a price increase for Theta Token $THETA With YEARS of announcements and roadmap expansions, many investors remain deeply underwater compared with prior market-cycle highs. Meanwhile, critics allege that founders, executives, and insiders may have had opportunities to realize substantial profits through token holdings and token sales long before ordinary investors had any realistic chance of recovering their investments, to the tune of multiple millions of dollars of profit. Critics argue that the most overlooked flaw in Theta Network was not whether the technology could work—it was whether the Theta token would meaningfully benefit even if it did. The token's role was largely confined to staking, while the overwhelming majority of economic activity was designed to occur through TFUEL and off-chain business operations controlled by Theta Labs and its partners. This meant that even if decentralized video delivery, EdgeCloud services, AI computing, NFT platforms, and enterprise integrations had achieved widespread commercial success, there was no clear mechanism forcing a proportional increase in demand for the Theta Token $THETA itself. In other words, the technology could have succeeded while Theta Token $THETA holders still suffered severe LOSS. Critics contend that this represented a fundamental value-capture problem at the heart of the project: ecosystem growth did not necessarily translate into token-holder prosperity, making the investment thesis far weaker than many retail investors originally believed when they invested, EXPECTING A PROFIT. @SECgov The question critics continue to raise is whether any of those developments created sustainable demand capable of meaningfully benefiting Theta Token $THETA holders—or whether the primary economic beneficiaries were the individuals and entities that controlled large token positions from the outset. Critics respond that market downturns do not explain everything. They argue that if insiders allegedly extracted significant value while retail investors were encouraged to remain optimistic about future adoption, then the economic outcome begins to resemble what many investors describe as a long-duration extraction model rather than a conventional startup failure. After years of losses, allegations, lawsuits, and ongoing questions regarding insider incentives, many investors are no longer asking whether the project succeeded. They are asking who benefited most from its existence. #Theta #Network #token #crypto #cryptocurrency #digitalassets





🚨WOAH! RESEARCHERS SAY DOZENS OF CRASHED UFOS HAVE BEEN RECOVERED — WITH FOUR DIFFERENT ALIEN SPECIES ON BOARD 🛸👽 TWO ARMS, TWO LEGS… LONG TAILS LIKE A LIZARD! 7 FEET TALL! 👾 SOURCES ARE TOO SCARED TO TALK… SAYING AN INTERVIEW COULD “FORFEIT THEIR LIFE” 😳💀







