XcesBond

143 posts

XcesBond

XcesBond

@Xcesbond

Katılım Şubat 2025
37 Takip Edilen17 Takipçiler
XcesBond
XcesBond@Xcesbond·
@MultiversX67 I hope it goes back to 150-200$ and beyond to leave all haters behind. Same happened with Solana a while back, now everyone praise Sol.
English
1
0
1
17
Mark X
Mark X@MultiversX67·
Derek, let’s actually address your 3 points: 1. Dilution because of $MEX
$MEX was the old token from the Elrond days. The team transitioned the ecosystem properly. It wasn’t random dilution, it was cleaning up legacy structure. Calling that a scam is a stretch. 2. Inflation, we wanted $EGLD hard capped. 
There is a small tail inflation, yes. But every transaction on the network permanently burns EGLD. The more the chain is used, the more it burns. It’s a dynamic model, not “infinite printing”. 3. Hyped fake announcements. 
The team has been consistently delivering real upgrades (Supernova near complete, Open Rails live, xExchange 7x faster) while most other projects were busy hyping and raising money. That’s the opposite of fake announcements. You’re frustrated with price action. I get it. But blaming the only team that actually shipped through the bear market for “scamming” investors is just wrong.
Derek@travel_w_derek

I think @beniaminmincu should really think about how the actions taken by @MultiversX has scared off investors. 1. Dilution because of $MEX(Mex needs to be abolished) 2. Inflation we wanted $eGLD to be hard capped. 3. Hyped fake announcements You have changed the game on us.

English
6
2
28
1.6K
Josh Woodward
Josh Woodward@joshwoodward·
Want unreleased @GeminiApp features before anyone else? Love breaking, testing, and shaping new tech? We're opening a limited number of slots for power users to join the Gemini Trusted Tester program. Sign up here: goo.gle/4onCRHq
Josh Woodward tweet media
English
354
132
1.4K
293.4K
Lucian Mincu
Lucian Mincu@lucianmincu·
A clarification, because you deserve precision. Yesterday’s post drew fair challenges that I want to address directly. Removing a pair does not remove a correlation. That is correct. Delisting EGLD/BTC does not, on its own, break the link to Bitcoin. Correlation is broken by what an asset earns on its own merits, not by which pairs sit on an order book. So let me be exact about what this decision is, and what it is not. It is not us pretending we can command a market. It is not us hiding behind “the exchange decided.” Pairs do not stay alive on their own. They are sustained by liquidity, depth on the book, tight spreads, and that is a shared commitment between a project and an exchange. Maintaining a pair is an active cost and an active choice. We have a say in it. We are not passing blame. We made a call, and we will own it in full. And the call was this: in current conditions, holding up the EGLD/BTC book ties EGLD's price discovery to Bitcoin's volatility while returning nothing to holders. We would rather direct that effort toward where value is actually created. This is one deliberate step, not the whole strategy. The strategy is the network. The focus is the network. I will take a hard question in public before I give you a comfortable half-truth. That is the standard I hold myself to, and the one you should hold me to. ─── We move on our own terms: throughput, finality, adoption, utility. Still here. Still building.
Lucian Mincu@lucianmincu

Decouple, minimizing correlation, standing on our own terms For most of its history, this market has moved as one body. When Bitcoin rose, everything rose with it. When Bitcoin fell, even the strongest networks fell too, regardless of what their teams had built, shipped, or proven. That gravitational pull made it easy to forget a simple truth: not all crypto is the same, and not all of it should be priced as though it were. The last six to twelve months brought the cost of that into focus. Growth stalled. Headwinds settled across the ecosystems. And too often, the value of real work was decided by forces no builder could influence. We do not believe that is the future MultiversX is building toward, and we are no longer willing to leave EGLD's story to be written by Bitcoin. As we approach the Supernova genesis moment, we are taking deliberate steps to decouple EGLD from its direct correlation to BTC. We are clear-eyed about what this means: no team commands a market by decree. What we can do, and what we intend to do, is build, communicate, and position EGLD so that it is judged on its own terms, not on what Bitcoin happens to be doing on any given day. This means taking steps to delist some EGLD/BTC direct pairs, and give more proactive signal space to EGLD itself. We believe EGLD's value belongs where its contribution is greatest: in the throughput, the finality, the adoption, and the real-world utility of the network itself. Those are the things we control. Those are the things we are pouring ourselves into. And those are the things that, over time, earn an asset the right to stand on its own. Supernova is more than a launch. It is the moment we stop being treated as a passenger in someone else's story, and begin being weighted on our own merits. We are choosing decoupling, independence because we believe it is where MultiversX and EGLD have always belonged. To Supernova, and beyond.

English
56
68
346
18.2K
XcesBond
XcesBond@Xcesbond·
@lucianmincu Calling the removal of EGLD/BTC pair "decoupling" feels like a stretch. You don't decouple from Bitcoin by hiding the comparison, you decouple by building enough demand that the market stops caring about Bitcoin's moves. Correlation is solved by adoption, not by deleting it.
English
0
0
1
361
Lucian Mincu
Lucian Mincu@lucianmincu·
Decouple, minimizing correlation, standing on our own terms For most of its history, this market has moved as one body. When Bitcoin rose, everything rose with it. When Bitcoin fell, even the strongest networks fell too, regardless of what their teams had built, shipped, or proven. That gravitational pull made it easy to forget a simple truth: not all crypto is the same, and not all of it should be priced as though it were. The last six to twelve months brought the cost of that into focus. Growth stalled. Headwinds settled across the ecosystems. And too often, the value of real work was decided by forces no builder could influence. We do not believe that is the future MultiversX is building toward, and we are no longer willing to leave EGLD's story to be written by Bitcoin. As we approach the Supernova genesis moment, we are taking deliberate steps to decouple EGLD from its direct correlation to BTC. We are clear-eyed about what this means: no team commands a market by decree. What we can do, and what we intend to do, is build, communicate, and position EGLD so that it is judged on its own terms, not on what Bitcoin happens to be doing on any given day. This means taking steps to delist some EGLD/BTC direct pairs, and give more proactive signal space to EGLD itself. We believe EGLD's value belongs where its contribution is greatest: in the throughput, the finality, the adoption, and the real-world utility of the network itself. Those are the things we control. Those are the things we are pouring ourselves into. And those are the things that, over time, earn an asset the right to stand on its own. Supernova is more than a launch. It is the moment we stop being treated as a passenger in someone else's story, and begin being weighted on our own merits. We are choosing decoupling, independence because we believe it is where MultiversX and EGLD have always belonged. To Supernova, and beyond.
English
114
112
474
85.6K
XcesBond
XcesBond@Xcesbond·
@lucianmincu A liquidity issue dressed up as good news is still a liquidity issue. The Binance delisting of the EGLD/BTC pair reflects the reality of the current market. A little more honesty and transparency from the project's leadership wouldn't hurt. No FUD intended.
English
0
1
6
867
Nostalgic Hubb
Nostalgic Hubb@NostalgicHubb·
How many squares......??👀 99.9%will fail!!!!
Nostalgic Hubb tweet media
English
354
192
313
34K
XcesBond
XcesBond@Xcesbond·
@multiversxfndn The infrastructure is genuinely impressive. AI agent stack, MiCA compliance, 3,200+ validators, 150 commits/dev (#2 globally). But tech without adoption is just potential. $EGLD has the pieces. The question is execution in 2026
English
0
0
1
67
XcesBond
XcesBond@Xcesbond·
@multiversxfndn MultiversX 2026 State of Foundation report is out. Solid engineering, honest numbers. But some real challenges worth discussing 🧵
English
4
0
1
533
XcesBond retweetledi
MultiversX Foundation
MultiversX Foundation@multiversxfndn·
5 protocol upgrades, 6 successful governance proposals, and a 60% leaner footprint. Today we are releasing the State of the Foundation Report covering fiscal years 2024 and 2025. It provides $EGLD stakeholders with a detailed account of how the Foundation allocated funding, the initiatives and upgrades supported across the period, and the governance votes that shaped the network. files.multiversx.com/MultiversX-Sta…
English
41
117
381
110.3K
XcesBond
XcesBond@Xcesbond·
@multiversxfndn 🔴 The whole story rides on Supernova mainnet (Q2/Q3 2026). One major delay or post-launch bug and the entire 2-year narrative takes a hit. 🔴 No TVL. No DAU. No active app metrics anywhere in the report. We know what was built. We don't know what's being used.
English
0
0
0
39
XcesBond
XcesBond@Xcesbond·
@multiversxfndn 🔴 Marketing budget: $100K for 2026. That's it. Great tech, near-zero awareness spend. In crypto, narrative wins mindshare before fundamentals do.
English
0
0
0
39
XcesBond
XcesBond@Xcesbond·
@multiversxfndn 🔴 Team shrinking fast: 125→85→~50 people. Competing with Solana Labs (800+ employees) with 50 engineers requires flawless execution. Zero margin for error on Supernova launch.
English
0
0
0
38
Lunr
Lunr@scribblesvc·
@CraigOPodcast @MultiversX They should’ve united people first instead they’ve spent the last two years dividing. They don’t listen. Their communication is poor, and they lack both a real narrative and any serious marketing talent.
English
2
0
9
183
CraigO!🎙
CraigO!🎙@CraigOPodcast·
❓ $EGLD holders & $MVX community. What does it actually take for EGLD to finally wake the f*** up? We’ve got blazing tech, high TPS, solid fundamentals… yet we’re still sleeping at these levels. ♟️Bull market loading? ♟️New catalysts? ♟️Massive adoption push? ♟️Or just more time? Drop your hottest take below .What’s the missing piece? #EGLD #MultiversX #Crypto
CraigO!🎙 tweet media
English
16
7
81
2.7K
Oladoja
Oladoja@_onlyscott·
I see Samuel Eto, Ronaldinho and Lionel Messi. Guess the fourth player. Level: Extremely Hard
Oladoja tweet media
English
5K
318
2.7K
439K
XcesBond
XcesBond@Xcesbond·
@piperboywilliam After this fight, the opponent will start a career in checkers
English
0
0
0
4.1K