ImJustASoftwareEngineer

@XForceGlobal Where is the update @XForceGlobal ?

An altseason is imminent, but only select coins will survive. $XRP was the top performer in the top 10. Who wants to see an update for my mid-tier coin list?

@Ripple @okx @jasonklau I don’t see it on OKX

$RLUSD is now on @OKX, one of the world's leading exchanges. Starting today, users can trade across 280+ RLUSD pairs, use $RLUSD as collateral, and access full XRPL deposit and withdrawal support. We sat down with @jasonklau to discuss what this milestone means for stablecoin adoption, institutional-grade liquidity, and the future of finance.

@yeaookk @phil_uplc Maybe be more transparent about the workforce needed to get the work done. The work itself is clear, no questions about that. Asking the hard questions.

@phil_uplc It avoided the main point. x.com/i/status/20492…

Real builders know.

@Cryptofly777 No, we need enterprise partnerships led by real companies. No creator content that doesn’t reach the right target audience. Waste of money.

We’re working on a creator-led marketing initiative for Cardano to fund: > news, tutorials, project updates & campaigns over the next 12 months. Is this something the ecosystem needs and would you support it? Please share your feedback 🙏💙

@MerlijnTrader So we wait till 2028 when btc should top? Not this year?

BITCOIN JUST ACTIVATED THE 2026 DCA ZONE. 2019 DCA Zone: bought here. Then $69K. 2022 DCA Zone: bought here. Then $126K. 2026 DCA Zone: activated. Right now. Hold $65K: curve continues to $170K. Lose it: DCA zone extends lower. Every previous DCA zone was the last chance before the next ATH. This one is no different.

@CredibleCrypto @Waleedahmed234 Which one would you recommend more @CredibleCrypto $CRV or $CVX?

Do you bullieve $CVX

@PrecisionTrade3 A good time to keep accumulating

@YHS48587895 Yes, I am expecting cycle 2 to top this year or early 2027. When its ready, it will be very fast!

Hey guys! ☺️ Some have been asking for my projections for the next cycles on #XRP . Thought I would share it with all of you. Keep in mind that I measured for price only, NOT time. I used only the textbook/conservative targets and as the cycles develop, each of these targets will be adjusted with the actuals. (I deleted a lot of my work so that you're able to read the prices.) This is how many MACRO cycles it could take before #XRP breaks $100. Many waves, many corrections, many years. #Ripple Cycle 1 top: $3.65 ✅ Cycle 2 top: ~$8.68 Cycle 3 top: ~$22.50 Cycle 4 top: ~$59 Cycle 5 top: ~$153

@Cryptoinsightuk The liquidity all around 4 dollars expired or something?

$XRP hourly and daily liquidity

@RealAllinCrypto You believe he is correct and 2026 is going to be a bear market?? Why share this?

Canary Capital CEO Steven McClurg on whether the Bitcoin 4-year-cycle still exists:"I believe the 4-year cycle is still very much intact." $BTC $HBAR $ETH

@jaydee_757 @Belisarius2020 what you need his confirmation for? haha

@Belisarius2020 ok good hahah.I agree 100%. Most of these moonboy "influencers" are trash lol. You agree?

Hey Mr IQ 276 You say crypto may go into a Q1, 26 supercycle and you have also said: 1. you are buying $XRP from now on; 2. All the the capital in the world is going to flow into the XRP network. They are extremely bold and bullish statements about crypto and XRP which would make some of the most out there influencers blush. Do you want to share some reasoning for these bold conclusions with someone with a paltry IQ of exactly half your one.

@Belisarius2020 I don't think you even have half his lol

@virtualbacon Solana

What coin are you refusing to touch no matter what?

@vaneck_us When xrp etf?

see you at the top

@vincent_vancode its* salt. How do you not know the difference between it’s and its?

Only analysis worth it's salt. Volume! XRP global volume is still super low.

@Cryptoinsightuk Do you still believe it?

$XRP hourly and daily liquidity

@vincent_vancode Hence its* escrow

Don't forget the ETF fund managers cannot buy XRP directly from Ripple and hence it's escrow, due to court injunction, it must be blind sale/open market. That means market, so we will see a slight period where the prices may not move sharply, as Ripple sells it's monthly escrow on open market on par with demand volume from ETF. But Ripple will only sell what it needs, it too doesn't wan to pay capital gains tax on its XRP sales, and prefers to keep it in escrow. It's a balancing act, but rest assured fund managers are speaking to Ripple about timing.

@ChartingGuy So it extends till Q2 2026?

@iloveyatchan @takaichi_sanae Your story is not readable at all with all the short sentences.

I often notice that people who strongly support 🇨🇳the Chinese Communist Party freely use X to attack 🇯🇵Japan or other democracies — even though X is banned inside China. It is a striking contradiction. Freedom of speech exists because democratic societies protect it. Authoritarian systems do not. Some of these users also try to weaponize history. But history is a mirror. We must learn from it, not weaponize it. Its purpose is to help us prevent the next conflict — especially now, 80 years after the war. Most of us were born long after that tragedy. Our responsibility is not to refight the past, but to protect peace for the next generation. There is another fact largely unknown outside Japan: modern China was built, in no small part, with Japanese ODA. For nearly four decades, Japan supported China’s development sincerely and without political conditions. Japan funded or helped build Pudong International Airport, the Shanghai Metro, Tianjin’s waterworks, major port upgrades in Dalian and Qingdao, and even early optical-fibre networks in Shanghai and Tianjin. And one example is particularly symbolic: Beijing Capital International Airport — modernised with Japanese ODA — later created a listed company on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange. Japan financed much of the airport’s development, yet does not hold a single share in the listed company. Japan helped build the infrastructure, but took no equity. This fact speaks for itself. And yet today, some choose to use the freedom of democratic platforms to attack the very country that helped them rise. That contradiction deserves to be recognised. But beyond contradictions, one principle must remain absolutely clear: no country should ever be allowed to change the status quo by force. This is a shared value across responsible democracies — and a cornerstone of peace in the Indo-Pacific. Japan will never start a war. That has never changed, and never will. But we must be able to protect our people, our democracy, and the rules-based order that prevents coercion and preserves peace. Our generation’s duty is clear: to make sure that freedom, truth, and responsible leadership prevail over intimidation. And together with all nations that believe in a Free and Open Indo-Pacific, we must keep this region peaceful, stable, and open. 🇯🇵Yasuhide Nakayama 　　中山 泰秀

@Justin_Bons @dori_coin Bro u got 0 likes. Stop overreacting cause you know he has a point

That is straight-up false. It is a permissionless network; the foundation controls nothing It is a lie to say you cannot operate without the foundation's permission... There are, in fact, many independent validators, as high validation costs are not the same as permission! That is the equivalent of hating capitalism because Lambos cost too much. Well, you cannot have Lambos without capitalism, and you cannot have high capacity without high node requirements. That does not make Lambos or high-capacity bad! It is an intrinsic aspect of how crypto and capitalism work; there needs to be a high cost, as that means there is skin in the game, strengthening the incentive mechanisms You also completely failed to address my argument, which is the relationship between fees and decentralization & how scalability has to be a core aspect of that consideration Also, I will not respond to you again if you keep doing blatant ad hominem attacks: "has no real understanding of Solana at all" is not an argument & a bit silly considering I have been a full-time professional crypto researcher for over a decade...

SOL is best positioned to deliver on the promise of the cypherpunk revolution 🗽 BTC & ETH push users into centralized L2s due to a lack of L1 capacity Only a high-throughput chain like SOL can support privacy at scale! Making SOL a better money, SoV & platform for freedom! 🧵 The brain-dead response to that is: "SOL is centralized!" The truth is that SOL is one of the most decentralized cryptocurrencies out there & will only become more so on its current trajectory: SOL is decentralized With around 900 validators, a Nakamoto Coefficient of 20 & ZERO permissioned elements. The facts speak for themselves: SOL's decentralization is respectable Being more decentralized than BTC yet less decentralized than ETH currently. That is, if we ignore BTC & ETH governance... There is no "off-switch", it is not all fake & there is no secretive cabal controlling everything. Foundation subsidies are being phased out (explaining why validator counts have dropped recently) The amount of crazy propoganda leveraged against SOL is worthy of the important role it will likely play in the world. Much like the early days of BTC & ETH when they were still threats to the status quo As restricting the capacity of BTC & ETH has neutered their revolutionary impact: Scalability matters There is no point to crypto if the world cannot use the most empowering aspects of the tech at scale The real tragedy is that chains that restrict capacity in the name of decentralization only end up destroying both in the long run Pushing users into centralized alternatives, as the top L2s can now all steal user funds & censor. Or the fact that even mass self-custody becomes impossible with so little capacity. Ends up defeating all the first principles these chains once claimed to hold dear Without scale, crypto cannot be money or finance. Reducing it to only being a SoV, a purely speculative asset. Which, ironically, also makes it a bad SoV! Economics Props to ETH for adopting the ideal economic design: Low tail inflation + fee burn. That is why SOL also effectively adopted the same economic design! The difference is that SOL scales, while ETH does not This matters a lot, as ultimately decentralization, scarcity & security are derived from FEES! A high-throughput chain like SOL can support commerce & all of finance. Massively eclipsing the fees that a low-capacity network can charge We now have plenty of experiance with congested blockchain economics & can conclude that high individual TX fees are not sustainable. Because usage inevitably bleeds over to alternatives, such as centralized systems or competitors like SOL! That is how I see a path for a high-throughput chain, such as SOL, to become the most decentralized chain in existence by a massive margin in the long run. As fees are what PAY for decentralization, scarcity & security Fat protocol thesis The most powerful revelation in blockchain design is that combining all three aspects: Money, SoV & SC platform makes all three stronger. It becomes a virtuous cycle. As these attributes reinforce each other A strong foundation in money/utility (creates more scarcity & stability), strengthening the SoV aspects. While it is becoming a better SoV strengthens its use in finance (platform), which in turn strengthens security (SoV) & so it goes on in an endless self-reinforcing positive cycle That is why BTC is not the best SoV, ETH is not the best SC platform & "privacy coins" are not the best privacy solution The perfect blockchain design combines all three into a single chain. That was Bitcoin's & Ethereum's original vision & I am still here to make that cypherpunk dream become a reality Today, SOL is without a doubt best positioned to take on that role, as it is sufficiently decentralized & has high capacity, with the right economic design. While & this is very important: SOL is by far the leader in real usage right now Privacy We have to build robust privacy solutions where the users/usage is Tools like @theprivacycash built on SOL, in my view, offer the best balance of trade-offs. Similar to Tornado Cash & Railgun on ETH. Anonymizing users at the "application layer" still allows them to interact with transparent, pre-existing smart contracts on-chain Privacy is still computationally expensive, so it is not yet feasible to build a high-throughput chain where privacy is the default. It is one of the many reasons why I advocate for on-chain privacy as an option There are also plenty of cases where transparency is a good thing. So by anonymizing individual users, we can get the best of both worlds Conclusion There is narrative & there is reality. The truth breaks the popular narrative in this case We must push back, for the sake of the cypherpunk dream. As many people will ridicule these "out of sync" statements, but if you really stop to think about it, honestly. You will find that the code does not lie: Economics is a powerful force, & politics often only trails behind once it is set in motion. So it should not come as a surprise: That in a game-theoretical cryptographic network based on economic incentives, the chain with the best economics (based on usage) will also become the most decentralized, thereby "liberating" the most people in the process That is what it means to truly deliver on the original promises of the cypherpunk revolution & Satoshi's Bitcoin. To be P2P Electronic Cash! So help us spread this controversial message, if you care about crypto & its original vision. Then say it loud: SOL is cypherpunk! 🔥