
Zack Grant
225 posts

Zack Grant
@ZackG_Politics
Postdoctoral Researcher at the Nuffield Politics Research Centre (University of Oxford). I research public opinion and party competition in Europe.



When we talk about 'child poverty' what we are referring to is a child living in a family earning less than 60% of the current national median income. This is a relative measure. It means that 'child poverty' can never be abolished. Moreover it means that if one cohort becomes richer relative to another, we define greater poverty in the latter cohort, even if it is no worse off on an absolute basis. For example, as pensioner incomes rose relative to families with children, child poverty has risen. Many more pensioners now take home lots more money thanks to the triple lock. Pensioner poverty has fallen markedly. At the same time child benefit has risen less quickly, ergo more children are defined as living in poverty, even if on an absolute basis they are not.




And in our current voting intention the difference is stark - Reform is leading among Britons with no degree, but in fourth place for those with a degree


TLDR Culture wars not all-encompassing or irrelevant – they are additional issue group voters care about. BUT importance of culture war was asymmetric. Liberal-left voters don't prioritize it... But everyone else did (to varying extent & depend on specific issue) This works 👇




















