Enby Coin
62 posts

Enby Coin
@ZapStreamer
The Non-Binary Bitcoin Launched from a 256GB iPhone 17 Pro
Katılım Aralık 2025
50 Takip Edilen0 Takipçiler
Enby Coin retweetledi
Enby Coin retweetledi

@PennywiseBTC @Bitcoin The marginal cost to produce psyop-grade memetic deliverables is 0
English

@MajorianBTC Must be draining living such a paranoid and delusional life.
English

If we really want to preserve the monetary property of the bitcoin then running and hashing with BIP110 may not be enough IMO.
Plebs should also be INCENTIVIZING good actors any way possible and DEMONIZING bad actors (& fencesitters) any way possible.
I may sound like a commie but remember that cancelling zionists may sound commie but it obviously makes you pro human.
I believe cancelling coretards, fencesitters and shitcoin core devs doesn't make you any less than pro human since they are directly/indirectly helping the destruction of something which can literally save humanity from slavery.
LONG LIVE BITCOIN 🧡🧡🧡
Toine@TronMonGone
I don't know if someone has already done this, but I'd like to start a list of businesses that support BIP 110. The main reason is so like minded people can support each other's businesses. Please feel free to add companies in the replies: 256heat.com Covebitcoinwallet.com Bitcoinartmagazine.com parman.org/parmanodl
English

@LukeDashjr @Loriss65 @Kurtis_NZ @dathon_ohm Your fingerprints will be all over the false flag, nobody else will agree to reorg the offending data, and you will land in jail for inspiring/directing the offensive data push.
Happy Easter, you filthy weasel.
Submit to Core!
English

Note that if it gets mined, users _can't_ run filters anymore. Distributing CSAM would be _mandatory_ for Bitcoin.
Spam filters work _only_ before things are mined, and don't stop malicious miners from putting spam (or worse) inside blocks.
Core developers do NOT have keys to change things about Bitcoin. They can make proposals only - and so can literally anyone else (eg, as Dathon Ohm did). Accepting or rejecting those proposals falls on the Bitcoin community.
"Individual holders" might be fine IF they don't personally distribute CSAM by running a full node. But then Bitcoin as a whole doesn't work, because it depends on most people running their own node.
The community _had_ been "policed internally" until last year. Core30 formally removed that, and kicked opened the doors to data storage officially. Sadly, a non-insignificant amount of Bitcoin users adopted Core30, so we can't even fully say it was rejected (RDTS will change that).
English

Updated chain growth vs projected storage improvement chart using more historic input data and better modelling. #bitcoin won't die.
Worst that will happen is near term people will have to upgrade their node hardware sooner than they hoped.

English

@d0mesticblend You’re going to have to live with it unless you take your principled economic activity and segregate its proud and pure monetary fee pressure from the degenerate libertine blockspace.
English


@w_s_bitcoin @SteveSimple Ownership of what?
Coin amounts traced back to subsidy?
Or arbitrary ledgers that also lock and unlock with UTXO? Sats are just the database gas.
English

@SteveSimple A real layer 2 is simply a secondary protocol that tracks changes in ownership off chain for one or more on chain UTXOs.
English

@DavidSpinotza @AG3NT_0R4NG3 @sitiosguau Bitcoin state is solid for non-noderunners. Nodes add marginal utility in privacy and censorship resistance. Unless you want to demand payment in obscure chaintips, you don’t need a node.
English

@ZapStreamer @AG3NT_0R4NG3 @sitiosguau True, although...
I trust Linux more because it's open source, giving me a level of confidence that they don't sneak in some nasty spyware. Doesn't mean I have read every line of code myself.
The same goes for nodes. The important part is not being dependent on others to run it.
English
Enby Coin retweetledi

A leprechaun visits my home every St Patrick’s Day and leaves a box of Lucky Charms in the middle of the night. @GeneralMills I redesigned the box for you this year, just a helpful suggestion for your cereal, and balance sheet 🧡


English

@ZapStreamer They were kicked out more than 1000 times.
110th place to be kicked out, now this is virtual
English

Core apologists are on a mission to lower Bitcoiners' morale.
Don't yield to their gaslighting and lies.
Study Bitcoin every day and you will realise that we have a lot more power in our hands.
Luke Dashjr@LukeDashjr
Bitcoiners, remember that in 2013 March, Bitcoin Core deployed a temporary softfork to limit block sizes to 500kB, expiring 2 months later, with zero notice or miner signalling. It also retroactively invalidated existing blocks.
English

@DavidSpinotza @AG3NT_0R4NG3 @sitiosguau The system works because there are no privileged users.
You don’t have to participate in the system to know this fact.
You are only trusting that the code does what it says it does.
Running a node won’t change the trust model, only reading and understanding the code can.
English

@ZapStreamer @AG3NT_0R4NG3 @sitiosguau Dude, in the original version a wallet was a full node. It was always intended for every user to trust nothing except its own node.
English

@DudeJLebowski Fork off is the only way actual Bitcoin controversial rescuing takes place.
English

@AG3NT_0R4NG3 @sitiosguau Peer describes the relation of participants.
Peer is not communism, not everyone can participate in all aspects of life.
Bitcoin is p2p because of it’s architecture before anyone ever uses it let alone every normie.
English

@ZapStreamer @sitiosguau OK, so...
Peer-to-Peer ackchyually means Dev-to-Dev 🤪
Understood, thanks for the clarification👌
Turning off my Node now! 🫡
English











