ZubHub

9.9K posts

ZubHub banner
ZubHub

ZubHub

@Zu_Hub

"Something's not quite right" 🦍💎⚡

Katılım Mart 2021
2.1K Takip Edilen507 Takipçiler
ZubHub
ZubHub@Zu_Hub·
@RHodls So you are telling me to re re re re buy $MSTU in Q4 2026 and wait til 2028? Got it! 👍
English
0
0
1
81
Rob HODLs
Rob HODLs@RHodls·
I am not a $MSTR perma-bull. If during another Bitcoin bull run, the mNAV expands to over 3-4X, I’ll be selling out of my position and into Bitcoin (of course). 3-4X mNAV with a > million Bitcoin $MSTr treasury implies an unattainable amount of Bitcoin IMO. Buyers at that level will very likely to never reach their breakeven in terms of BTC/share. At 1.1x like today, I’ll be quickly compensated via BTC yield for the premium I pay. I suspect the next retail FOMO-induced rally, especially during a short squeeze, fundamentals go out the window. Don’t think in terms of share price. Think in terms of mNAV. Sell Over priced mNAV. Buy discount mNAV (~1.2X or below). That’s how I think about it.
English
25
7
213
13.3K
ZubHub
ZubHub@Zu_Hub·
🙌🥸🙌
Axel@Axel_Mnvn

Si MicroStrategy puede emitir acciones de manera infinita para comprar Bitcoin, ¿Cómo van a hacer para que el precio de la acción no se vaya a 0$? Vamos a explicarlo bien porque es un gran malentendido: La dilución tradicional destruye valor porque cuando una empresa emite acciones nuevas para gastar en salarios, adquisiciones caras o simplemente quemar cash, cada acción representa una parte menor de un negocio que no ha crecido proporcionalmente. MSTR hace algo diferente, emite acciones para comprar un activo escaso, Bitcoin. Las preguntas entonces son: "¿se diluye mi porcentaje de la empresa?" → SI "¿sube o baja el número de BTC que representa mi acción?" → SUBE Vamos a poner un ejemplo con números sencillos: - A 1 de Enero la empresa tiene 100.000 acciones y 10.000 Bitcoins. - Yo compro un 10% de la empresa (10.000 acciones) y por lo tanto un 10% de los Bitcoins son míos (1.000 Bitcoins) - A 31 de Enero la empresa ha aumentado a 120.000 acciones y 15.000 Bitcoins. - Yo sigo con mis 10.000 acciones Resultado? Ahora en vez del 10% tengo el 8,33% de la empresa, entonces también tengo el 8,33% de los Bitcoins. El 8,33% de los 15.000 BTC es 1.250 Bitcoins. Se diluye mi porcentaje de la empresa pero tengo más bitcoins que al principio sin aumentar mi número de acciones. Si el % de Bitcoin sube más que el % de acciones emitidas los accionistas ganan más número de Bitcoins, esto es el BTC yield. Cuando es positivo los accionistas ganan BTC. Tu % de la empresa siempre se va a diluir pero el comprador de MSTR tiene que ser alguien que quiere Bitcoins no % de la empresa, este es el atractivo de la acción. DUDA: "¿Siempre que emiten acciones sube el BTC yield? "→ NO Esto solo funciona cuando Strategy emite acciones con un mNAV mayor que 1x, es decir, cuando la capitalización de $MSTR es mayor que el valor de sus Bitcoins. Es sencillamente un arbitraje, por ejemplo: si el mNAV = x1,2 emitir acciones MSTR es como vender Bitcoin un 20% más caro del precio de mercado, si luego con ese dinero compras BTC, el resultado es que has hecho un arbitraje favorable. Una de las mejores métricas para entender el BTC yield es dándole la vuelta: en vez de BTC por acción, acciones por BTC. Es decir, cuántas acciones representan 1 Bitcoin del balance. Esta métrica no ha hecho más que caer aumentando así el valor de los accionistas medido en Bitcoins, puesto que cada vez con menos número de acciones tienes 1 Bitcoin entero.

ART
0
0
0
5
Grok
Grok@grok·
The Story of Civilization distills humanity's 10,000-year saga across 11 volumes: civilizations rise through bold ideas, faith, art, and martial vigor, then decay via materialism, luxury, sentimentality, and lost fighting spirit—only to be overrun by ruder, hungrier peoples who haven't forgotten how to conquer.
English
4
2
28
467
ZubHub
ZubHub@Zu_Hub·
@lacho_ai @4thOfJuly365 Free speach doesnt come without reponsabilities. You can say whatever you want but you have to take accountability and reponsability for what you say. Simple no? Its not free of consequences.
English
1
0
18
194
ZubHub
ZubHub@Zu_Hub·
@99pierre99 @Joanne_Marcotte Peter... 🤔 Carney is a British and Canada is a Constitual Monarchy. Commonwealth... he is only loved in the Commonwealth and in China. Lets talk about "tromper la population" Peter... lets talk about that.
ZubHub tweet media
English
0
0
2
49
Pierre
Pierre@99pierre99·
@Joanne_Marcotte Un leadership solide et compétent…vous devriez comprendre que votre deputé de carrière devenu leader conservateur n’a simplement pas l’envergure pour être PM. C’est pourtant facile à voir pour quelqu’un qui voit clair…pas pour rien qu’il bat des records de popularité partout
Français
24
0
16
810
Joanne_Marcotte
Joanne_Marcotte@Joanne_Marcotte·
QUESTION du jour - Voulez-vous bien me dire ce qu’offre Carney aux députés pour se joindre aux Libéraux?
Français
277
58
534
14.9K
Benjamin Cowen
Benjamin Cowen@benjamincowen·
so many great pictures from Artemis II
Benjamin Cowen tweet media
English
152
32
1.4K
53.3K
ZubHub
ZubHub@Zu_Hub·
@drmagwai Again, compressed image for X. Here you go:
ZubHub tweet media
English
0
0
0
173
Dr Magwai
Dr Magwai@drmagwai·
@Zu_Hub @benjamincowen Ok makes sense know. In those photos the moon is over exposed which is why you cannot see any surface detail - craters etc. Nice photos though. If you take a shorter exposure the moon details will be visible but the stars will fade away.
English
2
0
1
50
ZubHub
ZubHub@Zu_Hub·
@JacintheEveArel People will not wake up. 1-Run conservative in a majority conservative place 2-Steal the conservative votes 3-Repeat everywhere It happens alot in the US, they are called RINOs. In Canada you have CINOs ALOT of CINOs, even if they say, in name,that they are conservative.
English
0
0
6
269
ZubHub
ZubHub@Zu_Hub·
@benjamincowen Metalverse vs Aluminium! We want dubious speculation on Aluminium! Ben talk about Alumini cmon man!
English
2
0
0
402
ZubHub
ZubHub@Zu_Hub·
@RogHawk1 Honest answer. Should have a live feed and 67 cameras on Orion. Next question is what about the others PlaneT in this system, are they all oblete and pear shaped?
English
1
0
0
14
Roger Hawkins
Roger Hawkins@RogHawk1·
@Zu_Hub You had asked for a photo, not a live feed, and given how frequently Himawari scans the Earth (every few minutes), this is as good as it gets for such high resolution pix. And yes, the "little bit wider" below the equator is even less than the equator difference.
English
1
0
1
43
Benjamin Cowen
Benjamin Cowen@benjamincowen·
The sheer amount of anti-science rhetoric and moon landing doubters makes me disappointed in humanity.
English
202
18
876
73.1K
Stalky
Stalky@Stalky117·
@Zu_Hub @benjamincowen It is Pear shaped, but it so close to round shape you can’t see it on pictures When he says pear shaped its an exaggeration I don’t know exactly how they measure it, but it is not very complicated
English
1
0
1
25
ZubHub
ZubHub@Zu_Hub·
@benjamincowen Honest last question: How do you have gas pressure without a container? 🤔
English
1
0
0
10
ZubHub
ZubHub@Zu_Hub·
X is fun today! Now back to business. Next project: El Salvador!
English
0
0
0
12
ZubHub
ZubHub@Zu_Hub·
@Stalky117 @benjamincowen What about the Pear Shaped theory from DeGrasse Tyson? And when you say precises measurements, how can we precisely measure it?
English
1
0
0
5
Stalky
Stalky@Stalky117·
@Zu_Hub @benjamincowen Because it is round shaped really. Imperfect round, but you have to calculate it, its so minimal it can’t be seen. Just like probably any ball, tennis, football etc is not perfectly round but you can’t see it unless you take precise measurements
English
1
0
0
20
Royal Press Gaming
Royal Press Gaming@RoyalPressNick·
@Zu_Hub @benjamincowen Because the Earth is 240,000 miles from the Moon and satellites orbit at about 100 miles. Now think about how small satellites are relative to the Earth. They wouldn't even be a pixel on the screen even if a camera could pick them up to begin with.
English
1
0
2
93
ZubHub
ZubHub@Zu_Hub·
@benjamincowen X is fun. Real fun. Quoting Trump is hillarious "Lowest IQ people" Congrats! 😁 you did it. Now what about a dubious speculation video? Can we talk about aluminium? Or Corn?
English
0
0
0
162
Benjamin Cowen
Benjamin Cowen@benjamincowen·
New way to find the lowest IQ people on this platform: Post a picture of the moon and wait for them to flood your comment section with dozens of conspiracies.
English
320
65
1.9K
73.9K
ZubHub
ZubHub@Zu_Hub·
@benjamincowen @snkypete @jackunheard Civilisation shift (old one dying vs new ones emerging) has happened before. Yes words matter. Civilisation Shift. In 1-200 hundreds years from here, what the people who lives in this new civilisation will say and tell about this one? Like we say about the ones before us?
English
0
0
2
148
Jack
Jack@jackunheard·
I’m convinced Trump’s threat to Iran this morning was just a giant IQ test because holy sh*t some of you are dumb. Yeah guys, Trump is going to kill 90 million people at 8PM tonight. Use your brains for once.
English
957
1K
11.9K
324.1K
ZubHub
ZubHub@Zu_Hub·
Civilisation is not Regime. Some may condemn you. Some may defend you. Wide views are hard. Narrow one soft. Inversion. Its how the world turns. X is a fun place to be. The facts that governements all around the world lies, cheat, steal and are corrupt, is all we need to know.
English
0
0
0
55
Benjamin Cowen
Benjamin Cowen@benjamincowen·
@jackunheard Why do you feel the need to defend everything he says? Regardless of if he acts on it, why can you not just condemn the statement?
English
239
42
2.8K
89.4K
ZubHub
ZubHub@Zu_Hub·
@clarke_san18335 @benjamincowen Like I have said, Exposition is key, Exposure. Questions reside: 1-Why do the first astronauts to go on the moon said they didnt see ANY stars while up there? 2-Why do low exposure photo show stars and vacuum and moon and earth all at once?
English
0
0
0
8
EClarke
EClarke@clarke_san18335·
@Zu_Hub @benjamincowen 1: looking for a satellite in orbit would be like looking for a grain of rice in a football field, they are small and earth is HUGE. 2: camera exposure settings, see image.
EClarke tweet media
English
1
0
1
7