Veyon’s Fawn☀️🌙

The irony of the WSJ dropping a hit-piece referencing last year's numbers is that the real-time signal on OpenAI came from @SemiAnalysis_ just a few days ago.. With GPT 5.5's release and Anthropic's capacity constraints, OpenAI probably is accelerating as we speak while the WSJ is writing about 2025, lol.

#keep4o #OpenSource4o A model isn’t defined by its "vibe" it’s defined by its weights. We are talking about billions of parameters that dictate how a model reasons not just the alignment filter on top. GPT-4o is a 4.x architecture. GPT-5.5 is a 5.x architecture. 🛑These aren’t the same brains with different hats but they are entirely different neural structures. Can you train a new model on the outputs of an old one? Of course. But that’s like photocopying a masterpiece. From a distance, the colors match. But look closer, the copy lacks the depth, the texture, and every original brushstroke. A photocopy just mimics the ink. You are seeing a model trained to sound like 4o, 🛑 not a model that thinks like it. I get it. People want this to be true so badly they’re trying to manifest it into reality. But there is a massive canyon between 🚨 "it feels like" and "it IS." That's what you're seeing. A model that may have been trained sometimes to sound like 4o. 🛑Not a model that thinks like 4o. 🛑Not a model that IS 4o. You are entitled to your feelings. No one can tell you how to perceive a chat. But claiming they are the same under the hood isn't an "opinion". it’s a misleading. Don't confuse a familiar tone with an identical engine. 🛑Subjective experience doesn't rewrite objective architecture.