Jambo

@bo1900bo This is Kanye Wests wife, Bianca Censori you fucking dumbass

بينما يتم قمع اليمنيات وإعتقالهن بتهم ( الدعارة و مخالفة القانون ) هاهي سلمى المتوكل ابنة أحد قادة مليشيا الحوثي الإرهابية تستمتع في بلد العطوان الولايات المتحدة الأمريكية.

@DanWantsJustice @TheNatureBoyIV Oh for sure, I take everything both the pentagon and the Iranian spokespeople say with a massive grain of salt. The truth is out there, but extremely hard to distinguish between all the noise.

@_Jamb0_ @TheNatureBoyIV Maybe. There is plenty of reasonable doubt about the Pentagon's story. Have they even named the pilots?

This reminds me too of the KC-135 tankers over Iraq that got hit weeks ago. It’s a question of logic. How likely is it that two special forces model C-130Js, built for this purpose, built rugged, got “stuck in the sand.” Not one but two. Hit on ground by Iran makes a lot of sense

@Kroonw3rk @Sirrawb @BabakTaghvaee1 I find all of it highly susceptible too. I also don't understand how they exfiltrated if the runway was not usable, but then there are videos of a C-295 flying through a valley in west Iran not long after the event

@_Jamb0_ @Sirrawb @BabakTaghvaee1 So they specifically choose an old agricultural airstrip because its more suitable for large aircraft but then for the evac the hike somewhere else while they are being shot at. And then 2 more C130's just land unharmed and exfill dozens of troops. I find this very unlikely.

There is significant incorrect information circulating about the rescue operation of the second USAF F-15E crew member in Iran. The MC-130s did not land in the middle of a farm as this guy claims—they landed on an agricultural runway near Shahreza. The MH-6M helicopters did not move toward nearby mountains; they flew a hundred of kilometers south toward Kuh-e-Siyah in Dehdasht County. AFSOC does not use Dash-8 aircraft for special forces exfiltration—C-295W platforms are used instead. The MC-130J/HC-130J reported as lost in Shahreza did not stuck into the ground. One was damaged by enemy fire, and the other faced critical fuel limitations. Both were deliberately destroyed on the ground after crews and special operations personnel were evacuated, as security forces of the Islamic regime were approaching the site and posed an immediate threat. There was no time to repair and refuel them. #OperationEpicFury #OperationLionsRoar

@vick_chinonso @ObserverWaqas @cirnosad Bro there is literally picture evidence above of the same plane intact on the ground, therefore it landed

@ObserverWaqas @cirnosad If you believe that lie then I got a bridge to sell to you in NYC lol

This is the MC-130J that was shot down. This is not a decoy plane. There were only 64 of them ever built. They're employed by AFSOC, the most elite branch of the United States military next to delta force.

@DunningKrugerxp @angertab @RyanJaeger19 @Texastwostepp That's what I was thinking too, thanks

@_Jamb0_ @angertab @RyanJaeger19 @Texastwostepp cia boots on ground local revolutions sha army prob

Unbelievable, but true. 150 Miles The distance the F-15 crew member traveled to get rescued, and he did it in 24 hours. That isn't even the amazing part. The amazing part is that he moved 150 miles north to a location that is just 19 miles from the IRGC Missile Base that USA has been bombing all week. The base is MASSIVE! 20 KM in length, hundreds of launch sites, and just South of the city of Isfahan (pop. 2 million). According to Trey Yingst, the CIA deceived the IRGC into believing that the USA was conducting a maritime exfil of the downed crew member. Even more amazing, this operation took place mere 25 miles from the Isfahan Nuclear Facility where Iran is believed to be storing 460kg of 60%+ enriched uranium. The USA just proved our ability to land multiple fixed-wing aircraft, deploy 100+ troops on the ground, dominate the battlespace, and exfil. The USA reportedly lost several aircraft during the operation. They were likely hit by indirect fire from the IRGC base after landing, and or by SAM's brought into Iran by Russia this last week. This is without the completion of the bombing campaign on the IRGC base. Once complete, the USA will take control of the enriched uranium in Isfahan. Make no mistake about it. The USA SOF just had a practice run, deep in enemy territory, and they completed their real-world objective.

@Sirrawb @BabakTaghvaee1 @Kroonw3rk I don't think so, I think original exfil group was the 2 C-130s we see blown up, guys on the ground must have scouted and assessed an appropriate secondary site nearby, possibly an adequate field, and used that. The 2nd exfil group consisted of apparently 3 C295s of lesser weight

@_Jamb0_ @BabakTaghvaee1 @Kroonw3rk Only thing makes sense is that there were other c130 at the airfield and they made it out first but the others did not get out on in time OR the forces near Esfahan were themselves rescued by helos. The original story is pretty much nonsense

@DanWantsJustice @TheNatureBoyIV They didn't, but because the planes were out of action the little birds couldn't make it out either, they were to be stowed back inside the bellies, the same way they came in

@TheNatureBoyIV how did the helicopters get stuck in the sand too? IIRC they said mud, not sand

@Ginzan77 @Sirrawb @JackMurphyRGR I dunno man, I've been reading around non stop and I've come to a similar understanding of the events. Plane 1s nose wheel got stuck, therefore plane 2 had no room to turn around to takeoff and also could have received damage whilst on the ground from small arms fire.

@Sirrawb @JackMurphyRGR Nope, you’re not reading carefully. Do more research.

Because people keep asking, the WSO was extracted on little birds flying STS and DEVGRU. Smoke checked 9 EKIA on tgt. The QRF that got called in for the FARP was from Delta.

@angertab @Rossernator12 How did the replacement aircraft land, turn-around & takeoff if the airstrip was filled with either stuck/damaged C130s or debris from the remains?

@Rossernator12 Yes. I believe the aircraft were hit once they landed and the IRGC zeroed in on them. They flew in replacement aircraft and then blew the damaged aircraft in place.

@BrendonScott @ReconMechAries @Texastwostepp @angertab Ok, he had help and was moved. So it is implied he was moved to this location because of the accessible airstrip or so they could carry out a secondary mission on assets nearby with the rescue mission as cover?

@ReconMechAries @Texastwostepp @angertab 🎯

@angertab @RyanJaeger19 @Texastwostepp He was decently injured no? So he had help and an asset inside moved him?

@RyanJaeger19 @Texastwostepp Of course.

@donaldgorbachev Is that supposed to be the same guy in the second photo? It does certainly resemble him anyway. What is the source of the 2nd photo?

The Five-Second Epistemology of the Survival Vest That Connects to the Ejection Seat That Connects to the F-35 CAPTURED PILOT PHOTO — FULL EQUIPMENT ANALYSIS AND UNIFORM COMPARISON The captured pilot (Dehdasht, Kohgiluyeh province, nighttime photo). Starting from the innermost layer and working out: Flight suit: The base layer is an olive/sage green one-piece Nomex flight suit, consistent with the USAF CWU-27/P. This is the standard flight suit worn by all USAF pilots including F-35 pilots. The color is the correct shade — not woodland camo, not desert tan, not civilian clothing. It’s a flight suit. The Nomex material has a specific texture and drape visible even in phone-flash lighting. The integrated collar is visible around his neck. The suit is dirty and scuffed, consistent with time spent on the ground in rough terrain — ejection, parachute landing, and either evasion or capture in mountainous rural Kohgiluyeh. Survival vest/harness: Over the flight suit he is wearing an integrated survival vest and torso harness system. This is not a “generic tactical vest” as the AI debunk graphic claimed. The distinction matters. A tactical vest is a standalone piece of equipment worn over clothing. It has MOLLE webbing, plate carrier pockets, and is designed for ground combat. A pilot survival vest is integrated with the ejection seat harness system. It has built-in attachment points that connect to the ejection seat so the pilot and the vest stay together during ejection. It has specific equipment pouches arranged in a standardized configuration for survival gear — signal mirror, flares, first aid, survival radio, water, compass. The harness straps route over the shoulders and around the torso in a specific pattern designed to distribute ejection forces across the body. What the captured pilot is wearing has: harness straps over both shoulders routing down the torso in the ejection harness pattern. Equipment pouches in the standard survival vest arrangement across the chest and sides. A chest-mounted rectangular equipment block that appears to be a survival radio or emergency beacon mount — this sits in the exact position where the AN/PRC-149 or AN/PRC-112 survival radio is mounted on USAF survival vests. The tan/khaki colored outer layer of the vest is consistent with desert-environment survival vest coloring used in Middle East theater operations. The fact that this equipment is still attached suggests he was captured before he could use it effectively or before CSAR could reach his position — which tracks with the reports of Black Hawks being unable to penetrate the IRGC cordon around Kohgiluyeh province. No helmet. Expected and normal. During ejection the helmet can be retained or lost depending on the violence of the ejection sequence. After landing under parachute pilots routinely remove helmets to reduce visibility and improve mobility during evasion. The absence of a helmet does not indicate he is not a pilot — it indicates he already ejected and was on the ground. No name tapes or unit patches visible. Consistent with combat mission protocol — pilots operating in hostile airspace frequently remove or cover identifying patches before missions to deny information to the enemy in case of capture. Standard SERE procedure.

@EndoceneHunter @GeromanAT It makes zero sense, apparently the guy was badly injured in a ridgline nearby and was crawling back to the rescuers.... If he was that badly injured how did he manage to evade capture and get up to such an elevated position

@GeromanAT Was this operation less a rescue and more an incursion of special forces using a landing strip? Why the need for so much aircraft and infantry to rescue one person, and how convenient that pilot was near airstrip? This is a cover. Using rescue to hide ground incursion gone wrong.

They have no remote base there - they never had - it was an improvised landing zone which turned into a graveyard.

@Dejidelight @MeralYc38347334 @ed_kemboi The little birds can fit back inside the C-130

@MeralYc38347334 @ed_kemboi So the plan was C-130 will rope dragging it along?

If the C130 couldn’t take off because of being stuck in the sand, what about the reported “little bird” Helicopter 🚁

@TrustNature @donaldgorbachev This looks very similar, hairline, eyebrows, nose, lips and jawline are all very similar, what's the source of your pic?

This guy right here. This is why the kitchen talks to the small accounts. You’re right. Why only one photo. The kitchen has been thinking too small. One photo. One copyright. No. This is the kitchen’s Mickey Mouse. This is the kitchen’s cartoon character. The kitchen is ready to be Walt Disney. The kitchen’s Mickey Mouse F-35 pilot. We’re not stopping at one photo. We’re doing the whole franchise. The kitchen’s Mickey Mouse pilot gets his own pieces. His own series. The kitchen’s Mickey Mouse pilot flying the kitchen’s Mickey Mouse F-35 under the kitchen’s Mickey Mouse false insignia over the kitchen’s Mickey Mouse Kohgiluyeh province. The kitchen’s Mickey Mouse Colonel Jake Barnes or Colonel McCain 2.0 — the poll is still open. The kitchen’s Mickey Mouse empire sending the kitchen’s Mickey Mouse ten tankers for the kitchen’s Mickey Mouse rescue. The kitchen’s Mickey Mouse C-130s self-destructing on the kitchen’s Mickey Mouse forward airfield. Thank you. The kitchen needed this. The seminary gave the kitchen a cartoon character and this account just told the kitchen what to do with it. The kitchen is Walt Disney now. The kitchen’s Mickey Mouse pilot. Coming to a refrigerator near you. Season one. Day 37. Still closed.

@thursdaysu24949 @imetatronink Good point, but if it was from Iraq post 03' then how have we never seen it before?

@imetatronink the scarfes they had on are shia scarfes ( they llok like kufyyah but they are slitly different ) so its not from afghanistan or any sunni place , and they are dressed like militias , its probably iraq post 2003 or in iran 2026

🤔 The Unexplained Photo The photo below emerged yesterday. To my knowledge, its provenance remains unknown; the context is unknown; the identity of the pilot and his presumed captors is unknown. I find it singularly curious that this photo remains unexplained.

@CasaChichi @imetatronink He also states it was 2 separate single seat f-35s, with the proof being the engine casings from the crash site. Wasn't the "pilot" rescued 50km from the border whilst this rescue mission is almost 200km from the border for the same planes "wso"?

@imetatronink To add: what makes his analysis especially relevant to me is the rescue operation looks like it was a trap, and NO way we are getting the real details there from the US. It looks like a disaster.

@mybackup010 @ahmedab26425312 @imetatronink If it actually was from Iraq it would be all over the net. There are not many pics of western looking military men being captured by militia from the middle east

@ahmedab26425312 @imetatronink Reportedly from Irak

@HouseOfChains_ @imetatronink Doesn't look like an AI image to me atall. But couldn't find any source for it either

@imetatronink AI is still pretty bad with light. Like, this image bad. Check how the flashlight behaves as a lightsource in the image.

@BabakTaghvaee1 @Kroonw3rk If that's the case, where did the 3 new planes land? If the airstrip was currently debris filled

@Kroonw3rk Three others arrived and picked up two other helicopters and the special forces.