Not James Bond

maybe 20-25% of the church gives 10% of their earnings, they use a huge chunk to build temples, meetinghouses, help members by paying for their rent, food, therapy, etc... they donate billions every year to helping with charity or disaster zones and they manage everything else so well that they have a fund that is multiplying and growing exponentially. Ever read the Parable of the Talents?

@_Not_JamesBond_ @FurkanGozukara The church gives less, waaaay less, than 10% of their for profit earnings to help others, but do go on...

Absolute insanity. An expert filmmaker exposes how the Mormon Church is hoarding a staggering 350 billion dollars and buying up massive amounts of American land while still demanding money from its followers. The religious corporate greed is terrifying.

Not sure I agree with your interpretation here. The people still have a tenth to the levites which in essence was them obeying God or giving it to Him. They were giving ten percent of all their stuff too, not just money, so in a way, giving 10% of just money is only a fraction of our true property

While it is true that tithe means tenth, it is equally true that Malachi 3:10 is calling for far less than 10%. Look ay Malachi 3:7-8… Malachi 3:7-8 (KJV) 7 Even from the days of your fathers ye are gone away from mine ordinances, and have not kept [them]. Return unto me, and I will return unto you, saith the LORD of hosts. But ye said, Wherein shall we return? 8 Will a man rob God? Yet ye have robbed me. But ye say, Wherein have we robbed thee? In tithes and offerings. God is calling for a return to His tithes and offerings ordinances. Now notice: Nehemiah 10:29 (KJV) They clave to their brethren, their nobles, and entered into a curse, and into an oath, to walk in God's law, which was given by Moses the servant of God, and to observe and do all the commandments of the LORD our Lord, and his judgments and his statutes; Nehemiah 10:37-38 (KJV) 37 And [that] we should bring the firstfruits of our dough, and our offerings, and the fruit of all manner of trees, of wine and of oil, unto the priests, to the chambers of the house of our God; and the tithes of our ground unto the Levites, that the same Levites might have the tithes in all the cities of our tillage. 38 And the priest the son of Aaron shall be with the Levites, when the Levites take tithes: and the Levites shall bring up the tithe of the tithes unto the house of our God, to the chambers, into the treasure house. The children of Israel aka, the congregation, enter into an oath to walk in God’s Law. Then, they say the will give their tithes to the Levite (for God’s Law said the tenth of all Israel was given to the Levite for their inheritance and for their work in the Tabernacle; Numbers 18:21) The congregation was not to take their tithes to the Tabernacle of the congregation (Numbers 18:21-23). They were to give them to the Levites. Upon receiving their inheritance (the tenth in all Israel) the Levites were to take a tithe of the tithes to the House of God (Nehemiah 10:38 above. God would not have called for a return to His Ordinances in Malachi 3:7 and then told people to transgress those ordinances just three verses later. Therefore Malachi 3:10 is not calling for everyone to bring tithes to God’s House…it is calling for biological descendants of the patriarch Levi to bring tithes…no one else. And the tithes they are to bring are 1% of Israel’s agricultural crops. Leviticus 27:30 (KJV) And all the tithe of the land, [whether] of the seed of the land, [or] of the fruit of the tree, [is] the LORD'S: [it is] holy unto the LORD.

@LovewinsGodwins @FurkanGozukara This could easily mean that no one can have a new marriage in heaven, which is the LDS interpretation. Food was money back then

@_Not_JamesBond_ @FurkanGozukara You give food not money and not to an organization that contradicts Jesus Christ words in the New Testament Jesus said to forsake your family and follow him Jesus said there’s no marriage in heaven meaning people are not married in heaven

Malachi 3:8–10 (KJV) “Will a man rob God? Yet ye have robbed me. But ye say, Wherein have we robbed thee? In tithes and offerings. Ye are cursed with a curse: for ye have robbed me, even this whole nation. Bring ye all the tithes into the storehouse, that there may be meat in mine house, and prove me now herewith, saith the LORD of hosts, if I will not open you the windows of heaven, and pour you out a blessing, that there shall not be room enough to receive it.” tithe means tenth.

@_Not_JamesBond_ @FurkanGozukara No the Bible does not

@AlfieJCarter COWORK

Claude just made cold email ops fully autonomous. And most people running Instantly or Smartlead have no idea this exists. Here is what cold email used to look like: - You wrote copy with AI - You logged into your sending tool manually - You checked metrics yourself - You made changes by hand Here is what it looks like now: - Claude logs in - Claude checks performance - Claude makes changes - You review the results With Computer Use, Claude can see your screen, move your mouse, click buttons, navigate dashboards, and update live campaigns. For cold email, that means Claude can: → Pause sequences under 1% reply rate after 500 sends → Increase daily send volume on sequences booking meetings → Edit subject lines and first lines on losing steps → Duplicate and spin winning variants → Clean lead lists → Pull reply and booking reports → Organize everything into spreadsheets Here is the system I built: 1) Desktop Setup → Mac with Claude desktop app → Claude Max plan or approved waitlist access → Computer Use enabled in settings 2) Ops Folder Structure → Create a "Cold Email Ops" folder on your desktop → Inside: Reports, Daily Summaries, Performance Exports → Tell Claude: "You have access only to this folder for saving files" 3) Dashboard Read Test → Before automating anything, prompt Claude to walk through your dashboard without making changes → Confirm it correctly reads reply rate, send volume, and sequence status → Fix any misreads before giving it control 4) Rules Playbook → Pause sequences under 1% reply rate after 500 sends → Increase volume only on sequences booking meetings → Never edit copy on campaigns under 200 sends → Always export reports before any changes 5) Sequence Pausing Automation → Prompt: "Review all active sequences. Pause any with reply rate under 1% and over 500 sends. Export a report first and ask for confirmation." → Saves 30 minutes of manual work per session 6) Volume Scaling Automation → Prompt: "Find sequences booking meetings in the last 7 days. Increase daily send volume by 20%. Cap at safe limits and confirm before applying." 7) Losing Step Rewrites → Identify steps with 300+ sends and under 0.3% reply rate → Claude rewrites only the subject line and first line → Creates a new variant and leaves the original untouched 8) New Sequence Drafting → Claude scans your highest reply rate campaigns for a given ICP → Mirrors subject line length, first line style, and CTA format → Saves as draft inside your ESP 9) Weekly Performance Report → Claude pulls last 7 days data, saves CSV to your ops folder → Writes a summary: reply rate changes, paused sequences, top performers → One document instead of five dashboard tabs This is the same system we use at Conigma to run cold email ops without manual micromanagement. If you want the full Claude Cowork Cold Email System: Follow me Reply "COWORK" I'll DM you the complete guide.

@MitcheIl Hit me up brother? I wanna see your thing and start building

@_Not_JamesBond_ i'll send it along in a bit-hope that helps!

@jmbrim3 No actually

Well the Bible is gone from the Gospel Library app 😅

@jonathanplumb Sounds quite dogmatic if you ask me. God is never wrong, true, but his servants are not infallible

This is sad. Of course, engaging with many of you makes it blatantly obvious there are too many members that probably shouldn’t be members. It is said, “There are many called⁠, but few are chosen.” I think this poll shows that divide clearly. Think about what those of you who have said YES are actually saying. You are saying, “GOD WAS WRONG.” If that’s the approach you want to take, may God have mercy on your soul. The better approach is to understand that the words of prophets apply to THEIR generation only — not earlier generations nor later — and that they are never wrong. Ever. Without exception. This, from a former apostate, who already learned how much more right God is than man.

@jkdavis89 Defending the freedom of religion and the right of others to practice what they believe is NOT the same as funding other religions or allowing others to perform their pagan rituals in our sacred buildings. We love the sinner, we don’t give them gold for their golden calf

Members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints are radical defenders of religious freedom. Having first hand experience of having our rights trampled by those who claim we are a "demonic cult" we know how important it is to defend the religious rights of all good people. "If it has been demonstrated that I have been willing to die for a "Mormon," I am bold to declare before Heaven that I am just as ready to die in defending the rights of a Presbyterian, a Baptist, or a good man of any denomination; for the same principle which would trample upon the rights of the Latter-day Saints would trample upon the rights of the Roman Catholics, or of any other denomination who may be unpopular and too weak to defend themselves. It is a love of liberty which inspires my soul — civil and religious liberty to the whole of the human race." —Joseph Smith, 1843

@escapefrommelos Pretty sure he’s been open about that from the start

wow…….. no way first the Liver King and now Huberman…………. who could have seen this coming

@ItIsHoeMath @GovPressOffice He’s now publicly implied that gays are bad and blacks are retarded. Maybe we should vote for him

@GovPressOffice So then would you say it's bad to be a homosexual?

We got a call from Grindr after this and said your team was their biggest users. Congrats!

@alexgroberman @Hoopss Son of a bitch, you got me again haha

So many people on X are delusional when it comes to Harry Potter. Some of you really need to log off for a while. The first Harry Potter book came out in 1997. The HBO series trailer just dropped today. That is 29 years of surviving every platform shift in entertainment and coming out bigger on the other side. Here is what the Harry Potter franchise has done across every major platform change since Sorcerer's Stone hit shelves: When it comes to books: 600 million copies sold in over 80 languages. $7.7 billion in book revenue alone. Still selling in 2026, 29 years after the first printing. When it comes to movies: Eight movies. $7.2 billion at the global box office. Another $2.6 billion in DVD and Blu-ray sales. The final film, Deathly Hallows Part 2, opened to $169 million domestically in 2011. When it comes to theme parks: Universal's Wizarding World became the most lucrative branch of the entire franchise. The parks drove a reported 50% increase in attendance at Universal Orlando when they opened. When it comes to Broadway: Harry Potter and the Cursed Child became the highest-grossing play in Broadway history, generating over $146 million in revenue in its first few years. When it comes to video games: $1.9 billion across 30+ titles since 2001. Hogwarts Legacy alone sold 34 million copies and crossed $1 billion in revenue, becoming the best-selling game of 2023. And now an HBO series with a reported $2 billion budget across seven seasons. Each season adapts one book. The first season premieres Christmas 2026. Every time the platform changed, the franchise showed up and dominated. Books to film. Film to theme parks. Theme parks to Broadway. Broadway to gaming. Gaming to streaming. Each new surface generated billions because the underlying work was genuinely deep enough to carry. That is not something budget can replicate. Other fantasy franchises launched with massive budgets in the same era. Eragon had $100 million. The Golden Compass had $180 million. The original Percy Jackson films had $185 million combined. None of them survived the first platform shift. The budgets were there but the depth was not. Harry Potter survived because the authority of the source material, the world-building, the characters, the storytelling, was real and deep enough that every new format could draw from it without running dry. Seven seasons of HBO content are viable because seven books worth of genuine depth exist to support them. This is exactly what is happening to businesses right now as search shifts from Google to AI. (If you want to see where your site stands across Google and AI search, start here: seo-stuff.com/free-audit) The platform is changing. ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overview, AI Mode, AI agents are increasingly where people start their research, get recommendations, and make buying decisions. The businesses that survive this shift are the ones that built something genuinely authoritative, not just something with a marketing budget behind it. Most businesses built their visibility the way those other fantasy franchises built their films. Real budget, real production value, but no depth underneath. Paid ads that run and expire. Social media posts that get 48 hours of reach. Email blasts with one open rate. PR placements that last one news cycle. Influencer deals that fade the moment the story expires. Those channels worked when Google was the only platform. But the platform is shifting, and content without genuine authority does not survive platform shifts. It never has. The businesses that AI cites, recommends and selects are the Harry Potter in this story. They built genuine depth over years. Content that actually answers the question better than anything else in the category. Backlinks from trusted sources that signal real expertise. Structure that AI systems can read, parse and confidently cite to a user. When ChatGPT cites a source, it cites the most authoritative, most structured, most useful content it can find. When Google's AI Overview selects a page to reference, it selects based on content depth, trust signals and extractability. When Perplexity assembles an answer, it pulls from the sources that actually answer the question best. No ad budget influences that. No social following affects it. No campaign calendar determines the outcome. The channel itself selects for the best answer. That is the gap SEO Stuff was built to close. seo-stuff.com J.K. Rowling wrote seven books. That one body of work has generated over $25 billion across every entertainment platform that has emerged in the last three decades, because the depth of what she built was real enough to survive every format change, every platform shift, every new technology that came along. The question is whether your business has built the kind of depth that survives what is coming next.

Don’t forget about what started the major wars in the Book of Mormon. It was entertaining different ideologies that were anti christian. We can and should befriend muslim individuals, we should not allow them to worship false gods within our sacred buildings. I promise you Jesus wouldn’t have brought Romans into the temple at Jerusalem so they could make offerings to Zeus

This may be my most controversial stance as of late: we should befriend the Muslim. I really think how people treat the Muslims--it's a similitude of how people are going to treat us in the future. Suspicion. Hate. To many, we are just as "other" as them. I've never had a Muslim tell me my family and I are going to Hell (even if that's what they believe). Plenty of "Christians" have.

@wrldclass51nn3r @cardamomkiss Dumb Bitch

@cardamomkiss Formula is just as good

One year of breastfeeding this week please clap

@alexgroberman @Hoopss lol, this made me laugh

Stephen Colbert just got hired to write the next Lord of the Rings movie. He is not a screenwriter, just a late-night host who used to be funny. Here's the real reason why Colbert got this job: He has been the most publicly recognized Tolkien authority in the world for over two decades. He reads and speaks Elvish. He has referenced Tolkien lore on his shows hundreds of times. He moderated a Hobbit panel at Comic-Con in full costume. Peter Jackson gave him a cameo in The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug, a cameo his wife and sons appeared in too. And when Jackson put Colbert head-to-head against Philippa Boyens, the franchise's own resident Tolkien expert, in a trivia contest on set, Colbert won. Jackson literally said it himself: "I have never met a bigger Tolkien geek in my life." So basically Colbert has two decades of genuine authority, built publicly, recognized by the people who control the biggest fantasy franchise in film history. A franchise that has grossed nearly $6 billion at the box office across six films. And it matters right now because of what happened when someone tried to do Lord of the Rings without that authority. Amazon spent over $1 billion producing two seasons of The Rings of Power. Another $250 million just for the rights. Biggest budget in television history. The production quality was undeniable. But the audience response was polarized. The most common criticism: it felt like it was made by people who had the budget but not the depth. Beautiful to look at, but missing the thing that made the original films resonate. Now the next major LOTR film is being co-written by a talk show host whose only qualification is that his authority on the source material is deeper than anyone else's in the room. Now here's why this story stuck out to me. This is exactly how AI decides which businesses to cite. (If you want to see where your site stands across Google and AI search, start here: seo-stuff.com/free-audit) When ChatGPT answers a question, it does not cite the source with the biggest ad budget. It does not cite the source with the most followers or the slickest website. It cites the most authoritative, most structured, most genuinely useful content it can find. When Google's AI Overview selects a page to reference, it selects based on content depth, trust signals and extractability. When Perplexity assembles an answer, it pulls from the sources that actually answer the question best. No ad budget influences that. No social following affects it. No campaign calendar determines the outcome. The channel itself selects for the best answer. Most businesses are doing the Rings of Power version of marketing. Massive budgets poured into paid ads, social media, email campaigns, influencer deals, PR placements. The production quality is fine. The spend is real. But the authority is not there. And the audience, whether it is a human searching Google or an AI assembling a recommendation, can tell the difference. The businesses that AI cites and recommends are the Colbert in this story. They built genuine authority over years. Content that actually answers the question better than anything else in the category. Backlinks from trusted sources that signal real expertise. Structure that AI systems can read, parse and confidently cite to a user. You cannot buy that with ad spend, the same way Amazon could not buy authentic Tolkien authority with $1 billion. That is the gap SEO Stuff was built to close. seo-stuff.com Stephen Colbert spent two decades building the deepest public expertise on Tolkien that anyone in entertainment has ever seen. He did not do it for a job. He did it because the subject genuinely mattered to him. And when the biggest franchise in fantasy needed someone to co-write its next chapter, the authority he built is what got him chosen. The question is whether your business has built the kind of authority that gets it chosen when AI is deciding who to recommend.

@MitcheIl alright, don't forget

@BakedTurboFlash @DrInsensitive You are actually saying that sharp knives are more dangerous?

@_Not_JamesBond_ @DrInsensitive If you've worked in a kitchen you'd understand

I Thought Sharper Was Better. I Was Wrong. Mrs. Jerk is not allowed to use this knife. It's too scary. I bought it on the recommendation of the Youtube knife-sharpening guy. Holy crap this thing is scary, and it's only $40. It's Damascus over a hard steel core, and it's thin. "Thin" means that the knife is only 10 mills thick at the edge of the bevel, so it need not shove the meat aside as it slides through. Most kitchen knives are twice as thick at the bevel, and the difference is obvious. I thought at this price, if I like it, I'll buy a couple more as gifts. Nope. This is not a knife you give as a gift. It's too sharp. As a boy scout, I was told sharp knives are safer. That was a lie, but I wanted to believe it because our culture was just starting to be suffocated by feminine safety rules, and I grasped at any excuse to prioritize function over safety. This knife is palpably dangerous. youtube.com/watch?v=d1EPsq…

@thechosenberg Dude said it himself. Sex is sacred and should be done with a committed partner you care deeply for, otherwise it’s being used out of context and will not deliver the emotional satiation it’s meant to

I got news for you

Your words are incoherent. Most people would save sharp knives are more dangerous. Your comment was agreeing either that sentiment but I have the feeling you meant to say that dull knives are actually more dangerous which would have been a counterintuitive point that is also true, hence the motivation to share it. As it stands your comment shared an obvious and widely shared opinion

@_Not_JamesBond_ @DrInsensitive Absolutely not. People used to dull knives overpower with a sharp. Gets em every time.