enjay.hl

Sometimes I watch my cat get excited by the birds outside the window that she'll never catch and I wonder if I'm doing the same thing by staring at charts hoping to get rich from crypto.

I think Thiccy described really well on the Threadguy stream why no one ever manages to leave this place: After hitting his number he took 6 months off and tried to play other games, hang out with friends, do sports, etc., only to realize that the outside world (non-online) move so slowly. It's like they live 10 years behind. Online you have this insanely fast feedback loop, and which is why the frontier of humanity thrives in here playing all these games. Also it helps to get rewarded PnL-wise, and in the combination with getting instant feedback from some of the smartest people on the internet, it's very hard to leave. For myself, the plan was to quit after the 2024 cycle. But I changed plans. I spend 12+ hours daily in here already, and can't see myself suddenly doing a full stop. This is what I am good at (obviously way behind many OGs), but still, I think that as long as I enjoy it, then why not keep doing it. I was also telling myself that I would quit at $1m. But then I got there in 2021, and at this point, it's not about making the sickest gains (obviously I don't mind it), but this is a game that is mentally stimulating and very competitive too. I will never become as great as many of the traders or DeFi degens on CT, but I think as long as I enjoy it myself, can evolve and become better + earn something from it, then I am fine with that.

@djangohl @markets_xyz gDjango

I'm proud to announce that I'm being paid $10 to wear the @markets_xyz badge. Jk, fuck that. Happy to be involved in what is bringing the entirety of finance to the global population. This is such an ambitious project to be a small part of. markets.xyz coded.

@prophet_win is profit 💪

GN Base crew 👋 Just locked in my first win on @prophet_win 🔮 And yeah, this is the kind of product I like testing early. No leverage. No liquidation stress. No guessing exact prices. You’re simply predicting a price range 📊 If price settles inside your range at expiry → you win. Clean outcome. No noise. What Prophet does differently 👇 Instead of long or short, you answer one clear question: “Will the price be inside this range at time X?” Yes → paid No → move on Simple, transparent, outcome-based. Why it’s interesting right now 👀 Clean UI Chart embedded, no tab hopping Clear expiry windows = better discipline Small pools, but real fills Feels built for consistency, not gamblers. How I’m playing it (not advice) 🧠 Small tickets Cover neighboring ranges Mix short expiries + one patience bet Aim for steady wins, not lottery dopamine Stack consistency > chasing one big print. If you want to earn by predicting, not trading 🚀 Worth testing before the crowd shows up. prophet.win Anyone else building range discipline early, or waiting for noise? #Base #PredictionMarket #Crypto #PredictToEarn

@SethDannyYak @prophet_win @Interniccm @iam_rekt_ The prophet see’s all! 👀

@_enjay420 @prophet_win @Interniccm @iam_rekt_ Something caught my attention!

@0xztirov @prophet_win @Interniccm @iam_rekt_ prophet is profit

@_enjay420 @prophet_win @Interniccm @iam_rekt_ sick 18x on $1 lfg prophet cooking fr 🫡

@nikhilkamathcio @smtgpt Hyperliquid

@smtgpt I hold none, never have, honestly don't know enough to comment, would love to take some time and learn more about it next year...

Hi @nikhilkamathcio, Congrats on the success of WTF podcast in 2025. I learnt a lot from it and I am sure millions of Indians also learned a lot too. I have a question for you though! You have spoken to many leaders like Elon Musk, Ray Dalio, Nandan Nilekani, Ruchir Sharma and got their views about bitcoin and blockchain and learnt from it. Would be keen to know what your view on blockchain and bitcoin is now? Has it evolved from those conversations? Do you hold any BTC? 🙂

Hyperliquid is built on a foundation of onchain transparency. A recent article made several claims that are factually incorrect: + Solvency: Every dollar is accounted for; the author failed to count native HyperEVM USDC. + Integrity: Testnet functions are exactly that - testnet only for testing. They cannot be executed on mainnet. + Transparency: Hyperliquid is more transparent and decentralized than all other major venues for perps trading. The entire state is independently maintained by a permissionless validator set and verified through BFT proof-of-stake consensus by each node. Every order, trade, and liquidation is available in real time during execution. Anyone can run a node and index the chain’s state and transitions. No major perps platform comes close to this guarantee for users. See our response to the writer’s individual points below. Claim: The system is undercollateralized by $362M False: The Hyperliquid blockchain state is fully and verifiably solvent. The author excluded the HyperEVM USDC (a publicly announced and much anticipated integration), which exists in parallel to the Arbitrum bridge. Every USDC in circulation on HyperCore is accounted for transparently, by summing up the balances of arbiscan.io/address/0x2df1… and hyperevmscan.io/address/0x6b9e…. At the time of writing, this amounts to 3.989B + 362M = 4.351B USDC on HyperCore. USDC on the HyperEVM can be computed by subtracting 362M from the 421M on the HyperEVM USDC contract (hyperevmscan.io/token/0xb88339…), totaling another 59M USDC on HyperEVM. The sum of the Arbitrum bridge and native USDC balances can be compared against the sum of user balances on HyperCore. As highlighted in the introduction, this exercise of verifying complete system solvency against user balances is uniquely possible on Hyperliquid compared to competitors. The current Arbitrum bridge was an important stepping stone in bootstrapping the Hyperliquid network and will be deprecated as the migration to native USDC is complete, bringing Hyperliquid to parity with other major L1s. Claim: There is retroactive volume manipulation via TestnetSetYesterdayUserVlm False: This is a testnet-only function to allow for comprehensive testing. The author states that “the function’s presence is the problem…capability alone violates the trust model.” Testnet-only features that enable more rigorous testing of edge cases do not undermine the chain’s integrity. The fee schedule on Hyperliquid interacts in a complex way with inputs: user volume, aligned quote token status, maker vs taker, HIP-3, etc. It’s important to test these interactions on testnet, and therefore the testnet chain has a set of admin testing functions that do not exist on mainnet. The related TestnetAddMainnetUser action is to mark a testnet user as having corresponding mainnet state, to avoid DDOS and other attacks that are “free” on testnet. None of these functions are callable on the mainnet state. While the execution source is not available, anyone can verify every trade onchain by running a node, and sum up the values to confirm that volume numbers are reflected accurately in onchain state. Similar to onchain solvency verification against the sum of all user account values, this is possible on Hyperliquid but not on most competitive platforms. Given that this code path is entirely unreachable on mainnet, future development work will entirely compile out this testnet-only logic on mainnet nodes to avoid any possible misunderstanding or misinterpretation. Claim: Some users have special privileges such as fee exemptions or retroactive volume manipulation used to influence the airdrop False: Like system solvency, user balances, and individual trades, the fees paid by any address is available onchain. Each trade along with its fees paid or rebates received are transparently indexed by nodes, API servers, and third party analytics providers. There are no such mechanisms to distort fees, and no such mechanisms could have influenced the HYPE airdrop. Furthermore, the genesis distribution of HYPE is fully available onchain, and users can verify the historical behavior of every such address. Claim: “CoreWriter” godmode can mint tokens, move user funds without signatures, crash random validators and basically do whatever it wants False: The CoreWriter spec is fully documented here hyperliquid.gitbook.io/hyperliquid-do… and replicable in the open source HyperEVM execution. CoreWriter is a way for smart contracts on HyperEVM to send HyperCore actions as part of HyperEVM block execution. It supports various actions that are normally sent by EOAs such as staking and placing orders, but has no such features to “mint tokens, move user funds without signatures, crash random validators and basically do whatever it wants.” This is a fundamental misunderstanding of how HyperCore interacts with the HyperEVM. Claim: Chain can freeze via governance, and no undo function exists Misinterpreted: The chain freezes during network upgrades. There is no undo function because the validators adopt a new binary at that height. This is analogous to how other networks perform hard forks at future heights determined by social consensus. Suspicious activity on POPCAT in Nov 2025 did not cause the L1 to freeze, nor were any user funds frozen. The L1 was entirely operational, and any observer can see the blocks that were produced during this time. The Arbitrum bridge was automatically locked after the incident due to abnormal variation in account balances. As explained above, the Arbitrum bridge is not as secure as natively minted USDC, and therefore requires several conservative automated locking mechanisms as safeguards. The Arbitrum bridge’s locking mechanism is audited and open sourced, and the bridge is being deprecated with the transition to native USDC. Claim: A single private key can set any oracle price instantly: no timelock, no limits Misinterpreted: The author is likely mistaking the HIP-3 oracle updater logic with the validator-operated perps. HIP-3 oracle updates are indeed set by a single address, but this is up to the deployer to configure. The updater address need not be an EOA. For example, current HIP-3 deployers use a combination of MPC and CoreWriter architecture. For validator-operated perps, multiple validators can submit oracle price updates. The final prices are a robust weighted median across major centralized exchanges. There is no timelock and no limits explicitly because these limits make the system less, not more, safe. The events of 10/10 show the danger to solvency if ADL is not accurately triggered in a timely manner during high volatility. Hyperliquid was one of the only venues without performance degradation or a network outage during this time. If Mango Markets or a similar protocol with oracle rate limits were active during 10/10, they would have likely accrued bad debt. Further decentralization will involve other validators actively running independent and open-sourced oracle update binaries. Claim: 8 undisclosed addresses control all transaction submission False: Some transactions are already sent directly from the validators. Some such as orders are not, in order to minimize MEV, but a future upgrade will incorporate this logic for all transactions in a mechanism that is both MEV- and censorship-resistant. The careful consideration of MEV is in response to trader and researcher feedback based on predatory behavior observed on other chains. There is almost unanimous agreement that toxic transaction ordering degrades the end user experience. Ultimately, the validator set is permissionless, and there is no guarantee that validators in the mainnet set are always fully aligned with the ecosystem. A major milestone in decentralization will be solving this problem, including a multiple-proposer block building setup. Claim: There is a liquidation cartel with unfair advantages Misinterpreted: Only HLP may backstop liquidate users, and HLP subvaults are the only addresses in this set. However, depositing into HLP is permissionless, so HLP is a community-owned liquidity vault supporting the protocol. The fact that HLP has privileges is no different from other protocol liquidity vaults. Relatedly, all liquidations are first attempted against the order book, which handles the vast majority of liquidated positions without backstop liquidation. This allows users to keep any remaining collateral, and allows all other users to compete in providing the best price to the liquidation flow, benefitting the liquidated user. Claim: There is a hidden lending protocol with $1M+ supplied and no documentation False: Portfolio margin, borrow lend, and the HLP supplied value were all publicly announced and are currently in pre-alpha rollout. The current documentation can be found at hyperliquid.gitbook.io/hyperliquid-do… and has been progressively fleshed out over the past several weeks. Claim: ModifyNonCirculatingSupply allows changes to token supply False: The full supply of HIP-1 tokens on HyperCore is fixed at deployment. The non-circulating supply is a purely informational number that can optionally mark addresses as “non-circulating” for display purposes. Whether an address is marked as “non-circulating” does not affect execution. This is an example of onchain information that might make more sense offchain, but is not a vulnerability. Thank you to the author for spending the time to verify the execution of Hyperliquid. The fact that this investigation could be done at all proves the transparency and decentralization that Hyperliquid has already achieved. Concretely, Hyperliquid is the only major perps venue where the entire state and every input diff is transparently available to anyone running a node. A similar analysis on any of the other top perp DEXs is impossible. For example, Lighter uses a single centralized sequencer whose execution logic and ZK circuits are unavailable. Aster uses centralized matching and even offers dark pool trading, which is only possible with a single centralized sequencer without verifiable execution. Other protocols with some open source contracts do not have a verifiable sequencer. On Binance, Lighter, Aster, or similar exchanges, it is impossible for anyone other than the sequencer to see a full snapshot of onchain state including order books, positions, and other user information. The centralized sequencer can also upgrade its software without any constraints. On Hyperliquid, the entire state is onchain, which means there are 24 validators executing the same state machine under BFT consensus rules. There is plenty left to do on the journey towards greater decentralization, but it’s important to highlight just how far Hyperliquid and its ecosystem have come compared to competitors. Decentralization is progressive, and Hyperliquid will ultimately be fully open sourced. Hyperliquid is the most transparent of all major venues, even though this leaks advantages to competitors (all of whom are closed source), who can copy Hyperliquid’s innovations more easily. We think this is the correct tradeoff to balance value accrual to the community, speed of innovation, and upholding the values of defi. The HyperEVM execution is open source, and Sprites, an independent community member, maintains a full archival node that powers many important integrations. HyperCore will follow the same path as soon as it reaches feature completion.

Unstable Coin has officially deployed on @HyperliquidX EVM, powered by @Chainlink CCIP. This marks another expansion of the Unstable ecosystem. We are partnering with @funnel_markets to launch the first USDUC pools on Hyperliquid EVM. More info to be shared. HL EVM contract address 0x61ef9543f8919bb06e374b3bb58a17725e34f9d9 Unstable Coin is entering new territory and the mission continues.

we keep pushing bros

@dschamis @CNBC @BeckyQuick @HyperliquidX @HypeStrat Hyperliquid Mr. Schamis 🫡

Spreading the gospel of Hyperliquid, the most exciting story in crypto, to the traditional finance world It's always a pleasure to be on @cnbc with @BeckyQuick and Joe Kernan Our stock starts trading this morning with the ticker $PURR Hyperliquid @HyperliquidX @HypeStrat @SquawkCNBC @rediamondjr

@mogie__ Hyperliquid

Seeing lots of discussion on perps fees and HL’s long-term viability given lower fee competitors At this point it should be clear HL is optimizing for distribution: their endgame is to be the AWS of liquidity, thus they are creating the necessary plumbing for builders/apps to tap into their infrastructure HL realizes that the correct path to true scale (the “exponentials”) is creating a foundation upon which consumer facing apps can easily build and monetize $40M+ has already been generated by 3rd party apps via HL builder codes; if this underlying flow was indeed fee sensitive to incremental bps, they would not be executing through these apps The reality is these users want to simply trade on platforms that are easy for them to understand and are familiar HL will win the distribution game.

bruh i think i got hit with that kim kardashian low brain activity thing years of just pressing green button to long shit and pressing the lever to spin slot machine have eroded my iq might go read a book

The privacy game has begun, it is IRC bitcointalk time era again. Crypto is returning to its cyperpunk roots. The game is on blu frens. This is what we've been waiting for. It is time. It starts with transactional privacy and then it spreads to the ideology of privacy overall - because real recognize real and those who understand transactional privacy also truly understand that it cannot exist without absolute networking privacy involved. Sentinel is the only truly decentralized DePin protocol in existence where every interaction between a service provider and a user happens completely on-chain with absolutely 0 off-chain dependency or services. From the process of node query and the implementation of the first on-chain DHT and other advanced implementations of decentralized node connection authorization and credential exchange completely enabled on-chain. There is no protocol that compares if anyone wants to respond and argue to this they can and please this is encouraged lets open the debate. There is no DePin protocol compared to the engineering of the Sentinel dVPN protocol on Cosmos. docs.sentinel.co The American government is exporting debt through stablecoins and different forces and engineer events to take this debt back, 1010 luna may 2021 etc.. Export debt, take it back. Everyone converting their local currency into treasury debt notes, and then in black swans it goes back. Pig gets fattened then slaughtered. Criminal groups amass big amounts, they are allowed to do so - then it is taken back. Convert your illegal money into treasury debt, then reclaim it back. Peter Thiel recently said that his friends in the FBI would rather have dealers using BTC than 100 dollar bills. Everyone knows the origin of crypto and the story of how encryption was classified under munitions until SHA-1 was broken. Everyone knows how crypto has evolved since and how early forms of currency started in the silicon valley in the 90s. It was plan for decades. Now there is a parallel force created to this that has been ignored for a long time because crypto has gone full retail to memes but lets not degrade that because that is what was needed to bring the masses. Respect to Alon respect to our man @blknoiz06 respect to @solana and thanks for following us also bro - no matter what shit people give you - you folks brought crypto the mainstream and you were needed to bring us closer to the evolution we need that crypto is meant to be. That is why we respect @mert so much he understands this completely. Recently there was a sequence of big events we don't want to go into that has shown the world that the fed is ready to start taking money back from these groups. XMR failed, ZEC took off - look at timelines of news - lets not get into this. Now while there was a plan to export debt all along, the same forces that created this plan also had the power of the human consciousness to also have the cypherpunk ideology to spawn up the parallel - the dao - the yin and the yang was created. The Yin and the Yang. Treasury debt issuance, and privacy cypherpunk. Now the Yin and the Yang has been established, the war has begun - but is it a war? No it is a natural evolution of human consciousness. All respect to Yahweh the god of Abraham who is amongst the pantheon of gods which is connected to every major religion, how we dare to even mention his name, - we live in a different age of time - but there are multiple forces at play which will continue forever in the future and while some may classify as good or evil the fact is that this is how consciousness works and this is in the yin and the yang. Sentinel doesn't judge have enemies nothing. Sentinel is the 3rd party, the unison between the yin and the yang. The truth is that we are all individuals who think we are apart but we are one consciousness perceiving multiple perspectives but we are one mind. From the time of Abraham a new era began and this is how consciousness evolves whether people say dark ages or in Hindu scriptures its written Kali Yugam etc.. With the power of the internet for the first time in human history the consciousness is becoming unified. For the first time the poor man can expose the rich for a crime and enforce justice through a tiktok video and a camera. Everything has changed. The common man has power, everyone is connected The internet is apart of the evolution of the global human consciousness, we are all connected to the internet. We are evolving from the internet. Of course its a double edged sword in the analogy of how a surgeon knife can save or kill but thats another topic. The point is that this for the framework of this human consciousness to persist without restriction and infringement from external forces there are only two factors: one is the infrastructure of how the internet works itself and then the ability for users to connect with freedom and no restrictions. The infrastructure issue is very complex and @HNS is leading the revolution and this is why HNS is blu frens true family along with @_PIVX @pirate_chain (and others - another side topic). The control of fiber option, ICANN etc - doesn't have to be explained. It is understood that those who are reading this deeply know everything. HNS is fighting this - maybe one day they can get a satellite system with perpetual power to host their core infra and replace miners and create the true parallel internet - another topic but Colin Cantrell vision from Nexus was always legitimate (not exactly same but his enables this). Anyways another side topic. Without the infrastructure being solved, VPN is useless because infrastructure can always be blocked - same way no one could travel during covid. When black swan events happen things we can't imagine happen - just like covid. We need @HNS to become what it is meant to be and create the parallel internet and people our brothers and sisters at HNS lets make it possible. If the infrastructure issue is solved, next you have the communication obfuscation problem. In this you see the core issue is that every single peer to peer protocol including TOR depends on centralized DHT - even bittorrent isn't perfect when the peers and trackers fail its over - its not perpetual. What is perpetual. THE BLOCKCHAIN IS PERPETUAL. What if peers can establish their availability on-chain and users can identify peers on-chain. The Cosmos SDK is the only protocol that can support this level of scalability where Sentinel has processed 100m+ transactions 90%+ being application logic related (daily hundred k+). Blu frens have spent more enough energy in proving almost all centralized VPN fallacies exploits and scams - just please DYOR out of curiosity into the Sentinel timeline. So the issue is there is a oligopoly that is suppressing the ability for the human consciousness to evolve. How do you compete with the Oligopoly? VPN applications are some of the the highest spenders of affiliate marketing in the world. How the hell can Sentinel Shield flagship dVPN compete with Nord? It can't. What does a VPN company do? They buy cloud servers, they understand their economics, they upsell to users - and then they do their shady shit whatever for real cash - whatever it is - thats the way the world works no real hate because we want to onboard all of you and you all know very well that you have to build decentralized VPNs also because one day a Musk tweet or some equivalent is about to come on all of you and everything will flip so lets get to work immediately and not fight. Sentinel has created the first perpetual DHT system where peers can establish their identity and connection path on chain and users can query the chain to identify the peers. As long as the blockchain is alive - as long as the validators are up and running - it is a perpetual DHT system of peer to peer identification. Akash network has thought in a very similar manners and many other DePin protocols have also but in terms of the intricate details of removing every single off-chain dependency - Sentinel has evolved beyond all projects after years of protocol engineering (Akash honestly didn't need to for their model but they are the one team that can exceed Sentinel potentially in the level of DePin protocol engineering). If everyone does their research Sentinel was one of the winners of the first Cosmos competitive hackathon and then Sentinel was the main winner in the second hackathon with just a 2 people team vs teams with dozens of people. Blu frens don't play games my siggas. So back to the question, how does 1 VPN compete against the oligopoly? It cannot. But what about 1000s of decentralized VPN applications sharing the same node infrastructure together - thats whats happening right? All of these massive VPNs owned by the same companies are using the same servers. The truth is that the VPN industry is an outlier to all other industries because there is absolutely 0 consumer loyalty. Some people use tunnel bear because they like the bear, some users like Nord because they like the mountain. Everyone is getting bombed everyday by ads and its small subtle differences. This shows the power of memification and ideology. All VPNs do the same, a few VPNs like mullvad larp that they are different but in the end its all centralized DHT and they control the servers so come on bruh - they'll get called out soon. Imagine if anyone has the ability to spin up their own VPN application that they can prove does not mess their their security and betray their trust - and the ability to bring their own community and structure into it. Sentinel has the on-chain payment logic to authorize off-chain API based payment triggers including credit cards, on-chain payments and even off-chain payments such as how Freqnik in Meile has brought together ZEC and other privacy tokens into Sentinel transaction systems. The point is that the white-label model is adopted for anyone, pure Web 2 app, pure Web 3 app, even an app created by a casino meant only for its users. The API trigger for the authorization can be configured to any type of logic for user public key account to be added to the subscription contract to get access to the nodes that the white-label operater has paid for (locked tokens with these nodes that are deducted over-time as time elapses with the bandwidth contract). Sentinel has created the structure where anyone can offer their bandwidth and become a node, and application developers can created fixed payment contracts with these nodes and plan their unit economics in the same way that VPN companies work cloud service providers. The only issue Sentinel has right now is the main issue that plagues networking DePin - the inability to understand the system specs of the node operator. In GPU/CPU and storage its very easy because there are market standard prices and even standardization to the level where there are perpetual futures contracts coming to offset GPU deappreciation risk. This concept is easy to understand. But when it comes to networking - there are too many factors. What is the geo-location, what is the bandwidth what are the specs is it cloud is it residential etc. There are enough systems to prove that nodes can be residential or not - this is an ever evolving battle. But the core issue is that without a proper TEE structure no node reporting can be trusted any system side reporting logs can be manipulated. When a VPN company goes to purchase a server - they know the specs they know all of the economics - but when you are subscribing to a decentralized node - how do you know its specs with trust? How many concurrent users can the server handle? How much RAM does it have, what is the bandwidth? The core issue for Sentinel right now is that Sentinel has not yet established this unit economics for the centralized VPN conglomerate (a faction that Sentinel is allied with) that is about to enter Sentinel and has begun to slowly start to come in with out first adopter. This issue also leads to the #1 UX issue for Sentinel users which is slow servers due to user overload on the servers. There has to be a system to understand a node's capability so that when the node reaches the the max concurrent limited - it is removed from the application front-ends. But how can this limit be understood with the whole issue on the node specs reporting. Akash is able to establish SLAs and have verification processes but Akash model is required for the mission Akash is on, in Sentinel's mission the node hosting has to be permissionless. There may be some compromises to get the top tier node hosts into a subscription contract that is used by the cVPNs coming in and not allowing just any host - but we cannot fulfill the blu fren ideology with kind of thinking in the long term while it may work in the short term. Anyone should be able to host a node and then if this node has good qualification - it deserves to be adopted into white-label subscription contracts. How do we create a node economic structure where it can't be gamified? Anyone can rent a big server and act like they have a huge expense and offering huge bandwidth and then they can manipulate and throttle behind the scenes. Digital ocean and others can't do this because they are legally bound to SLAs, but this legal binding of SLAs is a trade off for the liabilities that cVPNs have which will lead to the loss of their marketshare to dVPNs. And then another issue, hardware and storage is priced based on metering of consumption - however all bandwidth services have become unlimited (except for specific usecases). So you cannot price the bandwidth per hour function etc, this is why Sentinel evolved from a bandwidth pricing mode of GB/USD to time unit per USD because this is what the market dictates as everyone around the world is used to unlimited data plans (of course there's exception eg residential proxy where bandwidth is metered). Bandwidth economics is extremely complex, extremely complex and in a true decentralized P2P model no one has cracked it yet in the way Akash cracked GPU. Truly very few can imagine what @gregosuri has done and once AKT goes to $50B+ then they will realize. The only answer is there must be a way to truly understand node economics to the level that Akash has cracked GPU economics. How can Sentinel today say that, pay 10k usd for 3000 nodes which can handle maybe 100k users and you make $2 dollars per user per month so your profit is etc. etc.. How can Sentinel say that today to its CVPN clients when there lacks the ability to understand the node's specs? There has to be unit economics for this all to work out, crypto has evolved from science project mode. Decentralized VPNs will not work if its not economically viable compared to centralized VPNs. This is going to be solved. Sentinel has 3 SDKs to built your own dVPN - they are quite complex for many experienced devs as well due to the intricate structure of the dVPN protocol however a new solution is coming to make the protocol development extremely easy at a minimal tech experience level. Imagine if anyone can spin up their own dVPN - choose the nodes they want to add to their app - and create their own culture and community and integrate it into their services. @tokapreacher dVPN is about to set the trend in terms of what a meme dVPN can actually do. But forget all talk - lets see facts. Sentinel has some of the only products in all of Web 3 where there is a Web 2 userbase that doesn't know there is a Web 3 product behind. Independent dVPN has scaled to over 500k users and is a free model (with ad payments and subscription coming) - and has a stronger community than the Sentinel main chat at times. There is no application in the world where you can just post it in a group and get 10s of k downloads overnight like you can with a VPN. Sentinel is connected to very powerful ideological groups, brothers and sisters of Sentinel. Distribution is easy. Sentinel processes 25% of the bandwidth that Helium does every week (approximate). But how can revenue happen when there is no service assurance when nodes get overloaded? Maybe the answer to this is easier than Sentinel contributors think and it would be great to get input on this. Lets fix this problem, then the path to revenue is very easy. The Independent community demands everyday for a paid option and that they don't want to see ads. How can independent charge users at scale confidently with the node problem being established at this scale? Independent was just the test. 10 independents can be spun up in a week. The leaders are coming, the visionaries are coming. Zac Wickstrom, Freqnik, Decentr team, RYN VPN team and others have come and the universe has brought them together with the blu frens and they become apart of the blu frens and many more entrepreneurs are coming in day by day. Another point - Everything every VPN says about no logs is bullshit everyone knows there is logging at the networking card level. This cannot be prevented maybe tomorrow there can be a TEE networking solution but not today - but even then at the ISP level there is always logs so thats why HNS is too important coming back. Multi-hop is secondary. Lets focus first on peer to peer and get somewhere there - lets focus on the mass market and then move to multi-hop and more innovative solutions. All respect to NYM and anyone protocol and Orchid but anyone without bias can checkout the Sentinel app ecosystem and understand how Sentinel makes Web 2 adoption effortless - and will have the ability to then transition this userbase towards more advanced functions such as multi-hop. Lets be practical a great multi-hop solution like what NYM has built takes years and amazing specialized talent. Perhaps Sentinel can cooperate with NYM when the time comes otherwise Sentinel will crack multi-hop on its own but lets be practical until that time and focus on the mainstream usecase and mass market audience. Another point - Why is Sentinel dVPN more powerful than all CVPNs? Because CVPNS cannot get residential IP pools as quickly as Sentinel blu frens can spin them up. China and Iran and all of these nations can ban IP ranges and then these CVPN have to start making phone calls and get new IP ranges setup or switch providers etc. With Sentinel, have fun banning every mom and pop who wants to earn a yield from their unlimited bandwidth. Sentinel can circumvent any restriction. The Cosmos SDK makes this possible DYOR. This is the answer to protecting the human consciousness in the tumultuous times to come. Everyone is a Dollar bear but those with clairvoyance understand what is going to happen in the coming years. DXY is king and will prove so, EURUSD will break 1:1 floor and the world will go into chaos we cannot imagine. This is written in the times of ages, the Mayan 2012 prediction was based off of not the end of the world but the evolution of consciousness. Now the cycle is complete once Humanoids arrive as @Rewkang is focused on - the normal human isn't required anymore. We will see events we cannot imagine. Understand the message placed in the first block of Bitcoin. What is coming is not the end of the world, its the evolution of mankind from the origin of whatever we are. It is perpetual cycles that will repeat, but it is not going to be nice. We don't have much time left. We have to protect the power of the human consciousness that is enforced by a truly free internet. We have to make this revolution possible. We cannot allow for the masses to get disconnected from the internet no matter what happens. Black swans you can't imagine. It is coming. It is known. Lets not speak too much on this. Just please everyone get more prepared for things you cannot imagine as we come closer year by year into the future. Not everyone is going to make it to see the AI tech future we know is coming - and that is an incontrovertible fact. But this is how life works and we must do our best to protect friends and family in the times to come. Now going back to Sentinel and its understanding with government structures. Sentinel has gotten letters from some of the worlds biggest governments and team members are under surveillance and risk. If you have any doubts you can just research the story of Aleksander Litreev - the leader of Sentinel to understand that there is no bullshit or games here. techradar.com/news/the-russi… No one can imagine the lore behind the Sentinel contributors and how close some of the biggest people in crypto are linked to the origins of the story that created Sentinel. This can be called as bullshit but no external validation can is required or needed and any judgement that is passed on this claim is accepted and taken with good heart. There have been mistakes made, structures broken, internal fallouts and calamities no one can imagine - but thats what all of the greatest teams go through in their journey - but perhaps Sentinel could have protected investor value further regardless and could have broken its price correlation to Helium/Osmosis. Sentinel does not want to go against any form of government structure and neither will Sentinel cooperate with any government. All Sentinel humbly requests is that governments please ease off of Sentinel because there is no fucking project at such a low market cap facing the struggles Sentinel is that has gotten fucked by such forces - come on bruh all the intelligence folks reading this - come on bruh. Blu frens are sub $10m USD. Come on bruh. Let us move forward in peace and establish this vision - focus on higher market cap scams - we are nothing. Please. At least wait for $100m+ again please bro. Now going into Sentinel ideology from contributors further: The US government is the cradle of innovation and it moves the world forward along with China as a great counterpart however there is a war against the Dollar and the US empire. Blu frens understand that the US is not the US itself but it an empire created by a force that has transcended from empire to empire throughout the millennia. We all speak English out of design, it took many many thousands of years to get all of us to the same language. This power structure moved from Egypt to the UK to the US - whatever it is the facts can be disputed but this is rough analogy and now this power is across the world but there are multiple factions at play. Sentinel understands there are different forces in the world and Sentinel does not want to be the enemy of any one but support the people. At the same time, the governments understand that there must exist truly open solutions for the people as people in the government themselves use these solutions without telling anyone and that's the only way the system works. DXY is going to reign supreme, EURUSD 1:1 is going to break. Stablecoin issuance is going to go $1 trillion+ next year - and maybe the DXY pump begins 2027 2028 29 who knows but it is coming. Privacy tokens are about to scale as hard as stablecoins are. Privacy tokens cannot succeed without the growth of absolute networking privacy. Let the game begin blu frens

@SentinelP2P god DAMN this is a longpost

One year since I splashed into the Hyperliquid ocean💧 Thanks to you, we turned a little droplet into a family-sized wave 🌊 Had the best year & looking forward to the next 365 days 👀

Glad to see more players driving new HLP spot listings. Funnel is built to power the same - enabling teams and communities to fund listings and earn perpetual rev-share from their markets. Exciting new updates (assets) coming to Hyperliquid soon!