Field Marshal Aalsi Indian

24.9K posts

Field Marshal Aalsi Indian

Field Marshal Aalsi Indian

@aalsidesi

here for the lulz. views are strictly unserious and not followed/preached in real life. RTs are not endorsements. why are you still reading this?

Katılım Temmuz 2012
1.6K Takip Edilen355 Takipçiler
Billa
Billa@caspergear·
@alpha_defense Lmao.... dude you guys cant even cope properly! All ya suffering from PTSD! Its really embarrassing! Its so clear PAF has made 1.4 billion ppl its bitch! Lmao
English
7
1
32
1.2K
Alpha Defense™🇮🇳
Alpha Defense™🇮🇳@alpha_defense·
Whatever stories Pakistanis may want to tell you, the physics of BVR combat does not change. With AWACS support and blind lobbying of multiple BVR missiles, you can absolutely push aircraft into defensive But at long ranges, especially with L-band/S-band tracking, angular error accumulation becomes so big that missile lands kilometres away. Detection ≠ fire-control quality track. And beyond a point, you are not scoring perfect kills shot after shot after shot. Missile seeker can correct only in certain limit (it is ku band and battery powered) Cheers.
Alpha Defense™🇮🇳 tweet media
English
19
80
809
24.4K
Army life
Army life@RimshaKhan21956·
While some countries are still stuck with 4th gen jets and begging for 5th gen scraps Pakistan is getting the J-35 Gyrfalcon a real stealth beast. Let Rafale&Tejas fans keep dreaming of 5th Gen jets. Pakistan’s Gyrfalcon era is loading soon 🦅🔥🚀
English
10
23
97
1.6K
gzswami
gzswami@jgops_venk·
@elmihiro @clary_co I don’t understand. 2019 made it abundantly clear that the PAF would throw everything, including the kitchen sink, at our assets. If we repeat the same ROE-driven mistake in 2026, then we’ve learned nothing.
English
1
0
7
239
Christopher Clary
Christopher Clary@clary_co·
The banal explanation may be the correct one: namely, the PL-15 had a somewhat longer operational range than the IAF anticipated. They pulled back somewhat in subsequent days of the crisis and that was sufficient. Nothing Rafale specific.
Mihir@elmihiro

The whitepill explanation is that Rafales performed pretty well in May 2025, and the loss on May 7 is more because of poor tactics/strategery/planning than any technical shortcoming with the platform itself.

English
17
5
61
20.4K
Field Marshal Aalsi Indian
@Qyvern @umbra2020paf @alpha_defense This must be true because missile models are impossible to recreate and Pakistani awam does not believe DGISPR propaganda blindly. Meanwhile doosra banda’s family crying somewhere in Rawalpindi after learning he got beaten to death by his own local countrymen! 😂
English
0
0
1
19
Umbra 🇵🇰
Umbra 🇵🇰@umbra2020paf·
As much as you want to cope kid I don’t even take you seriously. Go check your own posts and then check people’s replies before talking about who fools whom. Look at your own statements I don’t even take you seriously.
Umbra 🇵🇰 tweet media
Arihant_Ray@Ray70409890

@umbra2020paf Had there been a blast at Barnala, there would have been plenty of videos showing the blast. There are none. Stop fooling people.

English
8
2
51
2.4K
Santouryuu
Santouryuu@Deus_Ex_DeMo·
@elmihiro Let's be real, you can't allege technical shortcomings when no pilots are dead. That CHPM report outlines the possible reasons why that loss happened.
Santouryuu tweet media
English
2
0
10
937
Mihir
Mihir@elmihiro·
The whitepill explanation is that Rafales performed pretty well in May 2025, and the loss on May 7 is more because of poor tactics/strategery/planning than any technical shortcoming with the platform itself.
Snehesh Alex Philip@sneheshphilip

IAF finalises #Rafale RFP, sets stage for fighter production IAF chief ACM AP Singh to fly to France early next month PM Modi will also travel to France later next month 22 to come in fly away condition, 92 to be manufactured in India theprint.in/defence/iaf-fi…

English
16
17
214
30.6K
Field Marshal Aalsi Indian
@the_L_IronG As usual this tweet is also posted without proof. However brainded pakis will lap this up too. Classic madarsachhap behaviour! 😂
English
0
0
0
56
Field Marshal Aalsi Indian
@Paglu741463 @ArmedUpdat1947 What proofs? Some random images of scrap metal is proof for you? I forgot your government itself used Arma3 footage as proof as well. Logic is haram in Pakistan, that’s why you’re so gullible. No wonder you guys think you won last year! 😂
Field Marshal Aalsi Indian tweet media
English
0
0
0
10
Paglu
Paglu@Paglu741463·
@aalsidesi @ArmedUpdat1947 You lack education kiddo Filled with dumb delusion I gave proofs you are still unable to provide any such lol Keep coping keep crying
English
1
0
0
4
Armed Forces Update
Armed Forces Update@ArmedUpdat1947·
Indian Army Promotes Bhramos as their Triumph Card against Pakistan and They were also used during Op Sindoor to destroy Civilian Houses and Mosques, but do you know: Bhramos and Fatah-ll have similar CEP. It means Indian's Most Capable Missile "Bhramos" has the same Percision as Pakistan's Cheap "Fatah-ll" MLRS (Multiple Launch Rocket System). BTW, India did launched dozens of Bhramos Hypersonic Missiles towards Pakistan in Op Sindoor, but most of them were Successfully Neutralized via Soft or Hard Kill Methods and their Wrecks were Displayed as an Undeniable Proof of Pakistan's ADS (Air Defense Systems) Victory over Indian Missiles. Meanwhile, India failed to Intercept even a Single Fatah-l or Fatah-ll MLRS during Op Bunyan-um-Marsoos, Instead it's 2x S-400 Air Defense Systems were Partially Eliminated by Pakistan's JF-17 Thunder Fighter Jets.
Armed Forces Update tweet mediaArmed Forces Update tweet media
Armed Forces Update@ArmedUpdat1947

Pakistan Army carried out a Successful test of Fatah-ll MLRS (Multiple Launch Rocket System), which Provides a Quintessential Accuracy with a CEP of around 4-5m. Now, Indians are calling it a Failed test (as usual), because the Rocket fell outside the First Circle, but we can see it Striking within the Second One and still Destroying the main Target, which is enough for a Low-cost Rocket with 400 km Range. 🔥

English
15
52
281
55.1K