abhiieee

44 posts

abhiieee banner
abhiieee

abhiieee

@abhionpoly

Full-time orderbook clicker. Part-time bonder. Occasional proposer. Professional liquidity lurker, ambiguity survivor and part-time sports gambloor @ Polymarket

Katılım Mayıs 2026
46 Takip Edilen52 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
abhiieee
abhiieee@abhionpoly·
On May 9, I found a bug that allowed anyone to post clarifications on-chain on the @Polymarket contract. I knew it would work because I have been using Polymarket contracts for a long time. The catch? It is not really a bug, but a feature in Polymarket’s contracts. The contracts state that “anyone can post an update for any questionID, but users should only consider updates posted by the question creator.” It was intended and built into an immutable contract 2 years ago. These messages were not appearing on the Polymarket UI or in their Discord channels. However, they were visible on @betmoardotfun’s UI and to people who track clarifications from on-chain data through bots or third-party tools. Betmoar is one of the top platforms used by Polymarket traders. What actually happened on May 9? I posted a clarification on-chain that was not posted by the Polymarket team, but by me. I wrote “Test message” and posted it on the Russia x Ukraine ceasefire market. For context, this had nothing to do with any market-related action because the market had already been settled by the time I started testing it. My intention was to make everyone aware of this issue. It definitely created some chaos, but it was done in good faith to bring attention to it before someone else could use it in the wrong way and cause huge losses in the future. I reported it to the Betmoar team and they immediately fixed it. Huge thanks to them for acting quickly and making things better. Three days later, exactly what I was worried about happened. Someone else used the same on-chain clarification feature to post what appears to be a fake clarification on the Epstein suicide note market. Transaction: #eventlog" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">polygonscan.com/tx/0x8560fbf1c… The clarification stated: “At the time of this clarification, there is now a consensus of credible reporting that the note released on May 6 was written by Epstein, including sources such as AP News: apnews.com/article/jeffre…” This is exactly why I raised the issue earlier in good faith. My intention was not to create chaos, but to make people aware before someone could misuse it and potentially cause real losses. The later incident caused around $20K in losses, as some people panic-sold their No shares, while someone else fast-clicked around 75,000 shares after receiving the on-chain clarification. The losses could have been much higher if Betmoar had not removed/fixed the issue earlier, or if the chaos from three days before had not already made people aware of the risk. Hopefully, this serves as a lesson for vibe-coded clarification bots and fast-clickers that rely on on-chain updates without properly verifying transaction signatures.
abhiieee tweet mediaabhiieee tweet mediaabhiieee tweet mediaabhiieee tweet media
English
3
5
20
598
abhiieee
abhiieee@abhionpoly·
@0xSC_ Everyone takes hits in this space. At least he’s building and sharing. That’s still way better than snitching and posting slop for engagement who don’t even understand how the site works.
English
2
0
11
2.4K
Epsilon
Epsilon@EpsilonPM·
Today, I had one of my biggest wins yet and made over 15k being a peacetard ☮️ I'm officially over 100k PNL on poly, it has been a wild few months! 🤯 With enough time and effort, anyone can make it :)
Epsilon tweet media
English
32
6
98
5.1K
abhiieee
abhiieee@abhionpoly·
It would be much better if we get a proper post-mortem report on this exploit. The exploiter’s funder wallet has been resolving and settling markets for the last three months or more. If the team investigates this properly, they should be able to identify who the exploiter actually is.
English
0
0
1
373
Josh
Josh@devjoshstevens·
With @zachxbt leading the effort alongside @Bitcoin_Vietnam and @ChangeNOW_io, we managed to freeze $164,000 of the $573,200 in funds transferred from the compromised private key. Really was a team effort, and it was amazing how quickly everyone reacted. Thanks to everyone who helped on this.
Josh@devjoshstevens

No polymarket or UMA contracts have been exploited. All user funds are safe, and using Polymarket.com is safe, so business as usual. We had a 6-year-old private key that was compromised. This was in the internal top-up config, which is why funds were being sent to it. We have rotated this key, revoked all prod permissions and are moving all PKs to KMS keys from now on.

English
68
47
505
129.6K
abhiieee retweetledi
Josh
Josh@devjoshstevens·
No polymarket or UMA contracts have been exploited. All user funds are safe, and using Polymarket.com is safe, so business as usual. We had a 6-year-old private key that was compromised. This was in the internal top-up config, which is why funds were being sent to it. We have rotated this key, revoked all prod permissions and are moving all PKs to KMS keys from now on.
English
80
64
396
267K
abhiieee retweetledi
Mustafa
Mustafa@mustafap0ly·
The CTF contract is not exploited, it’s an internal address we use for ops. POL was being sent to that address because it was in an internal refiller service that checks and refills balances every couple of seconds. All user funds are safe and the address is being rotated.
English
114
55
484
55.9K
abhiieee retweetledi
Polymarket Traders
Polymarket Traders@PolymarketTrade·
We're excited to announce our Taker Rebate Program. Get rebated up to 50% of all trading fees on Polymarket, earn level-up cash bonuses, & become eligible for amplified future rewards. Goes live next week. Learn more: polymarket.com/r/taker-tier
Polymarket Traders tweet media
English
162
85
617
174.7K
abhiieee
abhiieee@abhionpoly·
@S30qwq Share the market link and the position you're holding please. Do not interact with anyone in DMs. All those are scammers.
English
0
0
0
17
S
S@S30qwq·
@abhionpoly Hi?I use an EOA wallet. Could you help me fix this issue?
English
4
0
1
35
abhiieee
abhiieee@abhionpoly·
Big move by Polymarket. > It is a serious step forward. > Access was limited > Opportunities were closed > Value creation mostly happened before public listing > Polymarket x Nasdaq Private Market can make this space more open and more liquid 🔥
abhiieee tweet media
Polymarket@Polymarket

We're excited to announce our exclusive partnership with Nasdaq Private Market. Retail traders can now get exposure to private companies, one of the historically most profitable asset classes, exclusively through Polymarket.

English
1
0
2
217
abhiieee
abhiieee@abhionpoly·
@0x3577 Hi, can you confirm that every single market is which was redeemable is now claimable without the need to manual push and has no redeem failure issues?
English
2
0
1
115
0X357
0X357@0x3577·
UPDATE: Reedems are already fixed and you can reedem your winning positions. Polymarket team still working on refunds. If you didnt received you full value, ill let you know when they finish the refund process.
English
8
0
14
989
abhiieee
abhiieee@abhionpoly·
@S30qwq @atteonthephone Shoot the market link with the position you're holding. Make sure the position is showing as "redeemable" and is failing like the screenshot below.
abhiieee tweet media
English
2
0
1
48
that phone guy
that phone guy@atteonthephone·
Now there's a random person on Discord who's unlocking stuck positions for people. It worked for me and several other people. Billion dollar corporation couldn't get it done in 4 days, but some random person can? I take back everything bad I said about blockchains.
that phone guy tweet media
English
9
0
26
2.1K
Tenx
Tenx@Tenx397796·
@abhionpoly @predictdigest Thank you so much. The market link refers to Dallas highest temperature on May 17. My bet was a "no" on temperature higher than 92°". The link of the market does not load properly
English
2
0
0
27
Digest Polymarket & UMA Discord
POLYMARKET DIGEST — 21 MAY 2026 🔥 News & Announcements Emergency maintenance completed at 12:10-12:25 UTC with additional fixes at 14:50 UTC. Weather markets back online but with severely impacted liquidity due to trust issues. ⚠️ Bugs & Issues CRITICAL SECURITY BREACH: Systematic wallet draining via Polymarket's own relay infrastructure. Attacker (0xd40cBF...e34b) compromised 11+ proxy wallets with victims' accounts marked "deleted" post-theft. Major System Failures: • Auto-logout bug hitting users every 30-40 minutes • Auto-redeem completely broken after maintenance • UMA oracle mapping errors preventing redemption of winning weather positions • CLOB API showing $0 balances when funds exist • Sports data/websockets not updating since maintenance • Website crashes on weather market browsing API/Builder Issues: • Builder Program quota limits not applying despite verification • Deposit wallet migration errors: "order signer address has to be address of API KEY" • Signature type confusion between old/new accounts • Taker latency spiked to 3000-5000ms in BTC markets 📋 Clarifications Weather Market Refunds: Partial processing underway with positions appearing but redemption UI broken. Team manually minting pUSD from null address as workaround. Most users receiving only 30-70% of owed amounts, with winning positions largely unredeemable. Other Resolutions: • Trump kiss market: Disputed interaction ruled qualifying, orderbook cleared • Target Q1 earnings: All resolving to "3%+" with losing share refunds • Multiple esports markets canceled due to incorrect team/date references ⚡ Disputes Multiple daily crypto markets (May 18-19) have incorrect UMA queries. Seoul May 17 and NYC May 17 temperature markets still lack clarification despite being on processed lists. How concerned should traders be about using Polymarket right now given the wallet security breach, or do you think this is just a rough patch for an otherwise solid platform?
English
3
3
8
1.4K
Bumblebee
Bumblebee@0xBumblebee·
BREAKING: Polymarket added two new markets with a crucial error in outcomes if Solstice launches at $150 FDV you will earn an easy 2x yeah, you heard it correctly - at $150 FDV not at $150M FDV seems that Polymarket forgot to add a letter “M” which means it’s not millions but hundreds it’s obvious that it’s a mistake but rules are rules and whoever buys shares of these 2 markets HAS to win regardless it’s mistake or not interesting how Polymarket will handle this error thoughts?
Bumblebee tweet media
English
61
1
129
78.7K
Gena
Gena@GenaTheCroco·
@abhionpoly Not the $ but the M. I am not a hacker I just check the UI
English
1
0
2
517
Gena
Gena@GenaTheCroco·
Each day that passes another Polymarket scam. How is this allowed? I've played in a lot of casinos in my life, this one is the WOOOOOOOORST. Bought Mcap will be over $250, got over $250M, UNFAIR 😡.
English
17
0
61
12.3K
abhiieee
abhiieee@abhionpoly·
@Tenx397796 @predictdigest If you are still facing issues with redemption and it is failing repeatedly, please share the market link along with the bracket details. I will fix it manually for you through contract.
English
1
0
0
25
Tenx
Tenx@Tenx397796·
@predictdigest Confirmed what you mentioned. All the money net of the winning is in the redeem basket. But once opted for "redeem" they stay there not becoming available for trade
English
1
0
0
89
Nik
Nik@Nik_Poly·
Update: Ended up with $4.7k profit on this one💰 > Southampton appealed⚖️ > Highly unlikely that it would be succesfull, as they admitted to everything📝 > Sports degens didn't know game was cancelled🤦‍♂️ > I was getting filled at 80c after my initial tweet🎯 > Was buying low selling high, and held most until resolution📈
Nik tweet media
Nik@Nik_Poly

I made more than $2.1k on Southampton being thrown out of the EFL playoffs final. Fastclicking is still so profitable

English
16
0
38
2.2K
abhiieee
abhiieee@abhionpoly·
@0x3577 Could you please share the market and bracket where you are facing this issue? I will help you to claim it.
English
0
0
0
29
0X357
0X357@0x3577·
UPDATE: Some Weather events are already live to reedem. If you tried to redeem and it didnt worked, this is an error who many people are having too. Polymarket team already knows about this issue and will fix it. Let them fix.
0X357 tweet media
English
13
0
23
1.6K
abhiieee
abhiieee@abhionpoly·
Are there any plans to reward UMA proposers/disputers, considering they are the backbone of market resolution at the moment? Just like how you said you are waiting on UMA resolutions. Without them, many markets would remain unresolved for a long time. I genuinely think they deserve to be rewarded.
English
0
7
7
68
LeGate
LeGate@williamlegate·
@EJechel @mustafap0ly @kakujain @PolymarketHelp @Polymarket Half of the markets - depending on which of those markets you traded you may’ve seen anywhere from 0-100% refunded already - any funds not already refunded are actively having refunds processed, some are waiting on UMA resolutions which we hope will be completed this morning
English
14
4
14
1.9K