Alex Cranberg

12.4K posts

Alex Cranberg banner
Alex Cranberg

Alex Cranberg

@acranberg

Chairman, Aspect Energy, Former Regent University of Texas System, Founder ACE Scholarships

Houston, Texas Katılım Aralık 2012
599 Takip Edilen1.3K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Alex Cranberg
Alex Cranberg@acranberg·
The case for affirmative action for faculty recruitment based on nonconformity of philosophical view is much stronger than that for affirmative action based on race. Provision of the latter is essential and not merely incidental to the University's mission.
English
15
4
99
12.5K
Alex Cranberg
Alex Cranberg@acranberg·
@shanaka86 More doomerism: America is very nearly self-sufficient in helium which is produced in major quantities in politically tricky places like Wyoming and Kansas Also: your pieces would read with more authenticity if you didn’t use so much AI
English
0
0
5
267
Shanaka Anslem Perera ⚡
BREAKING. Masayoshi Son just broke ground on a $33 billion natural gas power plant in Piketon, Ohio, on the site of a former uranium enrichment facility, to power the largest AI data centre complex in history. The plant will generate 9.2 gigawatts. The campus will consume 10 gigawatts. The first phase, an 800-megawatt data centre, is targeted for early 2028. The full build across 3,700 acres is projected at $500 billion by the end of the decade. Japan’s Prime Minister Takaichi sat across from Trump two nights ago at a dinner where Son was present and the $550 billion US investment framework was reaffirmed. The first shovel hit dirt on March 20. Day 21 of a war that is simultaneously creating the demand for AI infrastructure and destroying the supply chain that builds it. The site is the former Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant. It enriched uranium for decades. The centrifuges are gone. The gas turbines are coming. The land that processed nuclear material for the Cold War will now process tokens for artificial intelligence. Energy Secretary Chris Wright and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick attended. Son stood on remediated ground and announced the largest single-site investment in American history. This is what $550 billion looks like when the first cheque clears. Japan promised the investment under Trump’s trade framework. SoftBank is delivering the flagship. The Vision Fund holds an 11 percent stake in OpenAI with cumulative investment approaching $64.6 billion. The Piketon campus is where those models will run. The 9.2 gigawatts of natural gas generation is where the electricity will come from. The logic is vertical: invest in the AI company, build the infrastructure the AI company needs, generate the power the infrastructure requires. Son is not betting on AI. He is building the entire stack from turbine to token. The war makes this investment simultaneously more valuable and more vulnerable. Every NVIDIA GPU that trains the models Son wants to run is fabricated using helium that is 30 percent offline because Iran struck Qatar’s Ras Laffan. Every data centre chip uses silver for conductivity and packaging, and silver just crashed 43 percent from its January high because the same war spiked energy costs into stagflation. Jensen Huang said he is 100 percent committed to Israel, where BlueField-4 and ConnectX-9 are developed, but Huang’s chips cannot be manufactured without the helium that transits a strait the Houthis have threatened to close. Son is building a $500 billion campus that depends on chips that depend on a gas that depends on a strait that depends on a war that nobody can predict the end of. Trump told the world this week that America does not need the Strait of Hormuz. But Son’s data centre needs NVIDIA GPUs. NVIDIA GPUs need TSMC fabs. TSMC fabs need helium. Helium comes from Qatar. Qatar’s helium transited Hormuz. The president who says America is energy-independent just hosted the groundbreaking for a campus whose supply chain runs through the chokepoint he told other countries to police. Nine point two gigawatts. Three thousand seven hundred acres. Thirty-three billion dollars. A former uranium site. And a supply chain that passes through two threatened straits, a bombed LNG complex, and a semiconductor fabrication process that requires a noble gas no country can synthesise. The future just broke ground. The present is on fire. open.substack.com/pub/shanakaans…
English
29
155
589
104.3K
Alex Cranberg
Alex Cranberg@acranberg·
@MosabHasanYOSEF These are all the reasons why the Vietnam conflict was not justified by the danger represented a communist regime there compared to the enormous stakes involved in assuring destruction of the IRGC rule in Iran.
English
0
0
0
38
Mosab Hassan Yousef
Mosab Hassan Yousef@MosabHasanYOSEF·
Could This Iran War End Up Worse Than Vietnam? Vietnam was a quagmire, but it had boundaries: jungle, Ho Chi Minh Trail, North vs. South, a defined enemy. You could pull out, declare “peace with honor,” and the body count (58,000 US dead) was horrific but contained. The war stayed mostly in Southeast Asia, didn’t crash the global economy, and the US could eventually walk away without the world burning or being forced to accept defeat. This Iran situation? It’s shaping up to be a multi-dimensional nightmare: 1. Geographic & strategic scale
Iran is 3× the size of Vietnam, mountainous, with ballistic missiles that reach Israel, Gulf states, and potentially Europe. Proxies (Hezbollah, Houthis, Iraqi militias) are already active on four fronts. Vietnam didn’t have that kind of regional network. 2. Economic & energy impact
Vietnam didn’t control 20% of the world’s oil transit (Strait of Hormuz). We’re already seeing tankers blocked, $2 million extortion fees, Brent flirting with $150+, gas prices climbing toward $8–$10 in the US. That hits every American wallet directly. Vietnam never did that. 3. Nuclear wildcard
Vietnam had no nukes. Iran does (or is very close). Even if the program is damaged, loose material in a collapse scenario means dirty bombs, black-market sales, or warlord nukes. That’s apocalyptic-level escalation Vietnam never threatened. 4. Domestic US blowback
Vietnam polarized America, but today’s division is already at fever pitch. Add $10 gas, inflation rebound, dead soldiers on TikTok, and campuses erupting again? January 6-level unrest looks tame. Vietnam protests took years to boil over; this could ignite in months. 5. Civil war & the Islamic Republic emerging as superpower – bad and worse
 a. If the regime collapses, Iran could fracture into civil war along ethnic and ideological lines. Neighboring states (Iraq, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Gulf monarchies) risk their own internal implosions or spillover insurgencies. A fractured Iran means refugee waves, jihadist safe havens, and proxy wars spreading across the region, potentially dragging down fragile governments. b. A prolonged war could ironically strengthen a hardened, decentralized IRGC-led remnant. Surviving the storm, it could re-emerge as a more resilient, nuclear-capable, ideologically pure force, turning Iran into a Shia superpower with global reach through proxies. Unlike Vietnam, this war will reshape the world order forever in favor of China and Russia: China quietly buys discounted oil, Russia supplies drones and intel, North Korea sells missiles. A weakened, divided US loses credibility, energy security, and moral authority. The multipolar world tilts decisively toward Beijing and Moscow. The dollar weakens, alliances fracture, and the post-WWII order ends, not with a bang, but with $10 gas and empty promises. Vietnam cost ~$1 trillion (adjusted). This war is already burning billions weekly. Add prolonged chaos, refugee waves, jihadist blowback, regional collapses, and energy crisis? It could cost trillions and leave the US weaker, more divided, and less trusted globally. Vietnam was bad. This has the potential to be Vietnam × Iraq × Syria × 1973 oil crisis all at once, with nukes, civil war contagion, and a new world order permanently tilted toward China and Russia.
English
86
25
166
27.2K
Alex Cranberg
Alex Cranberg@acranberg·
@gboddicker @aeberman12 If Vietnam had been at the threshold of nukes, and sat aside the worlds oil lifeline while being run by a bunch of apocalyptic mullahs we would have looked at the Tet Offensive as the victory that it was.
English
0
0
0
10
Gary Boddicker
Gary Boddicker@gboddicker·
@acranberg @aeberman12 Please keep Ho Chi Minh's possible leverage and advantages quiet so Westmoreland can go on with his campaign until we fill the wall in Arlington
English
1
0
0
12
Alex Cranberg
Alex Cranberg@acranberg·
Art is a serious expert and writes what he thinks even if it turns out to be wrong or could be right. My point is different: that in wartime we should emphasize our support and assume the best interpretations vs the worst fears about what’s going on, since we really are unlikely to understand the half of it.
English
1
0
0
12
Dean Price
Dean Price@DeanPri42383873·
@acranberg @aeberman12 Absolutely 💯 and to think I use to take him seriously. 🤦 Most of his post are Un-American, Anti-Trump propaganda right out of the IRGC playbook. This self proclaimed energy "expert" should move his office to downtown Tehran He thinks the US Military doesn't have a plan 😂
English
1
0
0
27
Alex Cranberg
Alex Cranberg@acranberg·
@aeberman12 One of the downsides of X is that every event that occurs in the world gets viewed through a microscope as if it’s the only thing going on and then people take their positions according to their political preferences. Almost none of us have any idea what kind of deal making and quid pro quo is involved in releasing these sanctions. It’d be silly to think that it was completely valueless to us and only helps the Iranians. Perhaps this helps the Japanese and the Japanese in turn have made certain promises which obviously may never make it into the public arena. The poor guys running the show are faced with all these armchair quarterbacks amplified by their political opponents just trying to run a war. Let’s just cheer for USA success and IRGC failure and show the moral support that strengthens our hand and weakens theirs.
English
0
0
0
141
Jim Bianco
Jim Bianco@biancoresearch·
Iranian oil has been sanctioned for many years. The 140 million barrels he is referring to are part of the "dark fleet" that has been shipping Iranian oil to Asia (mainly China) for years. Iran gets money for oil, and China buys it at a discount. So, this oil already exists in the world market. It doesn't matter who buys it, or under what scheme (sanctioned through a dark fleet or legitimate open market sale), as a barrel sold anywhere, for whatever reason, adds to world supply. To emphasize, these barrels are already part of the world supply. These barrels are not randomly floating in a tanker on some ocean (for years?), waiting for sanctions to be lifted before they can be sold and offloaded. By allowing oil to be unsanctioned, all Bessent is doing is allowing Iranian oil to be sold to places like Japan or South Korea. In other words, all he did was raise the price of Iranian oil because they now have more bidders. He just made Iran wealthier and did nothing for the price of crude oil.
Maria Bartiromo@MariaBartiromo

Treasury Secretary Bessent unveils plan to flood market with oil amid Iran war | video.foxbusiness.com/v/6391174059112 @MorningsMaria @FoxBusiness

English
155
608
2.9K
362.1K
Alex Cranberg retweetledi
Elon Musk
Elon Musk@elonmusk·
Elon Musk tweet media
ZXX
7.9K
31.1K
286.3K
27.5M
Alex Cranberg
Alex Cranberg@acranberg·
@leadlagreport “Japan has 254 days of oil consumption in strategic storage”. That does not sound like a vulnerable country. In fact it is sitting on an incredibly valuable asset all of a sudden.
English
0
0
2
190
Alex Cranberg
Alex Cranberg@acranberg·
@Lacertko @aeberman12 Sowing fear for no good reason. Reminds me of when Oscar Wyatt predicted before the Gulf War that “our boys will be facing a meat grinder”… whoops
English
0
0
0
5
Alex is fine
Alex is fine@Lacertko·
@aeberman12 He says always opposite of what he intends. Suicide mission, I feel sorry for the young soldiers. Hormuz will remain closed.
English
1
0
0
50
Alex Cranberg
Alex Cranberg@acranberg·
@aeberman12 Meanwhile someone in Iran is saying that it’s clinically insane for Iran to undermine its own imposed oil embargo by selling oil in the world market.
English
0
0
0
10
Alex Cranberg
Alex Cranberg@acranberg·
@aeberman12 @annmarie It’s obviously not simple. But Iran would be less likely to attack if it sees more countries actively participate in securing the Straits
English
0
0
0
32
The Hormuz Ledger
The Hormuz Ledger@HormuzLedger·
"Simple military manoeuvre" assumes the problem is transit. The infrastructure damage has already made that framing obsolete. Ras Laffan: confirmed missile strikes, 30 years to build. South Pars Phase 14: still burning. Iraqi reservoir damage permanent at current shut-in timelines. You can't reopen a strait and restore production that no longer exists. The market is pricing a transit disruption. It hasn't finished pricing a destruction campaign.
English
1
0
0
157
Annmarie Hordern
Annmarie Hordern@annmarie·
“… they complain about the high oil prices they are forced to pay, but don’t want to help open the Strait of Hormuz, a simple military maneuver that is the single reason for the high oil prices”
Annmarie Hordern tweet media
English
26
7
65
9.8K
Alex Cranberg retweetledi
Roy K. Altman
Roy K. Altman@RoyKAltman·
In 1918, King Hussein of the Arabs—one of the great heroes of Arab history, the leader of the Arab revolt against the Ottomans along with the British—wrote an op-ed in the Al Qibla newspaper. He says that if the Arabs want the British and the rest of the world to care about their claim to their ancestral land, which they want back now that the Ottomans are gone, then they cannot deny the Zionists’ claim to their ancestral land in the Land of Israel. This isn't me. This is the leader of all the Arabs, King Hussein himself. And he says at the end of the op-ed, and I quote, "The Jews are the original sons of that land." If you don't care about King Hussein, nine months later, on December the 29th of 1918, King Hussein's son, Prince Faisal, who becomes King of Iraq, the first King of Iraq, has a banquet in his honor thrown by a bunch of British dignitaries, along with Lord Rothschild. And he stands up and gives a toast, and at the end of the toast he turns to Lord Rothschild and he says, "We Arabs cannot in good conscience deny the ancestral home of the Jewish people." And he turns to Lord Rothschild and he says, "To my Zionist friends, I say to you, welcome home."
English
44
606
1.7K
70.1K
blanche1977
blanche1977@picturepost444·
@Mylovanov lol If only it were that simple. Stop reliance on oil, and money dries up in the Middle East. No money, no arms...no conflicts.
English
1
0
0
555
Tymofiy Mylovanov
Tymofiy Mylovanov@Mylovanov·
Kellogg on Iran and regional operations: I’d be satisfied with kill them all. They should have taken out Hezbollah a long time ago, and instead everything was allowed to fester across multiple groups in the region. 1/
English
9
58
423
33.8K
Alex Cranberg
Alex Cranberg@acranberg·
@aeberman12 @citrinowicz You and I don’t really know what’s going on, so there’s really no point in cheering for the enemy. When there’s a lot more clarity maybe it makes sense to criticize but right now a major portion of what’s available in the press is just Cassandra.
English
0
0
0
17
Art Berman
Art Berman@aeberman12·
Iran is escalating on its own terms while the U.S.-Israel campaign drifts without a clear endgame, writes @citrinowicz Iran's regime is intact US allies are diverging. No strategy. No visible exit ramp. DISASTER #IranWar #Geopolitics #Strategy #OilMarkets #Hormuz #GlobalRisk
Danny (Dennis) Citrinowicz ,داني سيترينوفيتش@citrinowicz

A brief summary of last night’s events: A. Iran emerged with the upper hand. It demonstrated once again that it will not hesitate to raise the level of escalation to defend its strategic assets — without any retreat on the issue of the Strait of Hormuz. This was entirely predictable. B. Yet another indication that this war lacks a coherent, pre-planned strategy. Once the regime did not collapse early on, it is no longer clear what the overarching strategy actually is. C. Trump was aware of the strike, but chose to look the other way once tensions escalated. This reflects an ongoing gap between Washington which may still be interested in preserving a future-facing Iran and Israel, whose approach appears aimed at systematically degrading the country’s entire infrastructure. D. The strike itself seems to have been driven by frustration: Iran is not yielding, and there is a desire to force outcomes (such as opening the Strait of Hormuz) without committing ground forces — and before external pressure brings the campaign to a halt. E. The strategic failure so far leaves Trump facing a difficult choice: escalate dramatically, potentially including boots on the ground, or move to stop the campaign now. F. At this stage, the fundamental questions remain unanswered: What is the ultimate objective? What are the exit ramps? What does success even look like? G. Instead, the conflict is drifting into a war of attrition — with no clear signs of regime collapse in Iran. Meanwhile, the president, having committed to the idea that Iran has effectively capitulated, may find it difficult to disengage while facing a visible disadvantage in the maritime arena and no resolution to the nuclear issue. Bottom line, last night’s events underscored just how unstructured this campaign has become — lacking strategic clarity, long-term planning, and a defined end state. At the same time, they exposed growing gaps between Israel and the United States, gaps that may widen further if similar outcomes repeat. And as always..just because something is operationally feasible does not mean it is strategically wise. One more point that must be stated clearly — Iran is not close to capitulating. #IranWar

English
6
17
42
8K
Alex Cranberg
Alex Cranberg@acranberg·
@MichaelEWebber As I wrote, lots of problems. But also it would put pressure on the Europeans that depend on those imports. I’m not suggesting it’s a good idea.
English
0
0
1
8
Michael E. Webber
Michael E. Webber@MichaelEWebber·
@acranberg I mean, the gulf coast refineries will use the imported heavier oil, but where do we send the light sweet crude?
English
1
0
0
30