Dr. Ajit Anand

Hey, @grok, who was the most famous person to visit my profile? It doesn't need to be a mutual, don't tag them, just say who it was

Listen carefully, who are the #Sikhs? #Sikhhism

Haha

Journalist: Why didn’t you inform allies before attacking Iran? Trump: We wanted surprise, who knows better about surprise than Japan? Why didn’t you tell me about Pearl Harbor? Said that in front of Japanese PM 🤣🤣

An Open Letter To @RahulGandhi Dear Rahul ji, I write with candour, yet with due regard for the office you occupy as Leader of the Opposition in the #LokSabha. In any parliamentary democracy, this office is not meant merely to oppose, but to scrutinise rigorously, question the government of the day, fearlessly, and do so while safeguarding national interest. A mature democracy requires both - a strong government and a credible opposition. When either falters, democratic balance weakens. Unfortunately, I must say that the dignity of the office has declined since your takeover, due to your conduct and statements that appear impulsive, theatrical, and lacking a solid grounding in facts or historical knowledge. My concern is not limited to a single incident. The pattern predates 2014 and indicates a deeper intellectual attitude—one that is sometimes disconnected from historical realities and national sensitivities. In 2010, diplomatic cables released by #WikiLeaks recorded that you told the US Ambassador that radicalised “Hindu groups” posed a “bigger threat” to India than the Pakistani terror outfit Lashkar-e-Taiba— responsible for the horrific 2008 Mumbai 26/11. This disclosure came when India was still scarred by the Godhra train burning, where fifty-nine pilgrims were burnt alive by jihadist. Yet, instead of confronting Islamist extremism with clarity, a fake counter-narrative of “saffron terror” was constructed, even casting suspicion on organisations such as the @RSSorg. The 2007 affidavit questioning the historicity of Lord #Ram further reflected a disturbing intellectual drift. In a continuity of this disposition, you and your family chose to absent yourselves from the historic 2024 #RamTemple Pran-Pratishtha ceremony at Ram Mandir Ayodhya. In 2013, the country witnessed an extraordinary spectacle. During PM #ManmohanSingh’s tenure, you publicly dismissed your party-led Cabinet-approved ordinance as “complete nonsense” that should be “torn up and thrown away.” The ordinance had already been cleared by the Cabinet and the Congress leadership. Democracy welcomes dissent; it also demands institutional respect. Where do you get such arrogance? From a sense of entitlement owing to your dynastic roots? More recently, on 13 March last in Lucknow, while commemorating #KanshiRam’s birth anniversary, you suggested that had #JawaharlalNehru been alive, Kanshi Ram might have become Chief Minister through the @INCIndia. The claim surprised many observers — not just because it was speculative, but because it overlooked Kanshi Ram’s political journey and the historic disdain of Congress for dissenting Dalit voices outside its organisational structure. In 1994, I had the opportunity to meet Kanshi Ram several times. Each interaction lasted hours. These meetings were facilitated by a Dalit leader from South India who then served as a minister in the government of P. V. Narasimha Rao and remains associated with your party even today. Kanshi Ram impressed me as a man uniquely dedicated to Dalit empowerment. Unlike many politicians who see power as an end in itself, he viewed political office solely as a tool for social change. Personal ambition did not motivate him. He politely declined an offer to move to Rashtrapati Bhavan, made by Atal Behari Vajpayee. Ultimately, he trusted his movement to Mayawati, whom he believed could continue the struggle. The analogy you used in your speech—holding a pen vertically to symbolise hierarchy and horizontally to represent equality—was actually Kanshi Ram’s favourite metaphor. I remember him demonstrating it vividly during our conversations. Invoking Nehru in this context, however, appeared historically misplaced. Kanshi Ram built his politics precisely because he believed the Congress system had failed Dalits. The historical relationship between Congress leadership and Dr B. R. Ambedkar also deserves reflection. Kanshi Ram regarded #Ambedkar as his greatest inspiration. Yet Ambedkar’s political experience with #Congress leaders—particularly Nehru—was marked by sharp tensions. Nehru had no hesitation in awarding himself the Bharat Ratna in 1955. Ambedkar, the chief architect of India’s Constitution, received the same honour only in 1990—thirty-five years later—under the government of V. P. Singh, which was supported from outside, by the Bhartiya Janta Party and the left. Ambedkar’s entry into the first Cabinet of independent India occurred largely because Mahatma Gandhi insisted that the new government must include distinguished non-Congress figures. Thus, Ambedkar served alongside leaders such as Syama Prasad Mukherjee and Sardar Baldev Singh. The 1952 general election further highlights the relationship. After resigning from the Cabinet, Ambedkar contested from North Bombay. The Congress fielded Narayan Sadoba Kajrolkar against him. Ambedkar lost by around fourteen thousand votes, while over 75000 ballots were declared invalid. It was probably the first case of vote chori (theft), scandalising independent India in its very first election to Lok Sabha. Compounding the hostility, Congress and Communist leaders called Ambedkar a “traitor.” Yet such accusations were not entirely novel. Writing to Rajkumari Amrit Kaur on January 26, 1946, Nehru himself remarked that Ambedkar had “allied himself with the British Government against the Congress.” Savita Ambedkar records in her autobiography that Nehru was “keeping a sharp eye on the constituency” during the 1952 election. According to her account, Nehru, S.K. Patil and Dange were determined to ensure Ambedkar’s defeat. Nehru himself appeared jubilant with the outcome. In a letter to Lady #Edwina #Mountbatten dated January 16, 1952, he wrote: “In Bombay city and to a larger extent in Bombay province, our success has been far greater than expected. Ambedkar has been dropped out.” #RahulGandhi ji, please ask yourself: Why was Nehru celebrating Ambedkar’s electoral defeat? I am not implying anything, but I wonder why he was happily sharing the news of Ambedkar’s loss with a woman, who was the consort of a colonial ruler responsible for planning and executing India’s partition, and had then left Indian shores for her country. Hopefully, you know the answer. Ambedkar’s anguish is recorded by his biographer Dhananjay Keer in ‘Dr Babasaheb Ambedkar: Life and Mission’. Ambedkar lamented that Congress leaders routinely branded him a “traitor”. In contrast, Mahatma Gandhi once told him: “I know you are a patriot of sterling worth.” In this context, your recent demand for the Bharat Ratna for Kanshi Ram raises questions about consistency. When Mayawati made the same request in 2008, the Congress-led UPA government rejected it, arguing that such honours should not be subject to lobbying. Why were you silent then? Today, the same demand, raised by you on the eve of Uttar Pradesh elections, seemingly appears insincere and driven by political opportunism. Kanshi Ram himself had little faith in the Congress. In his 1982 book ‘Chamcha Yug’, he accused the party of cultivating “stooge” Dalit leaders who served its interests rather than empowering the community. Your rhetorical framework often echoes familiar ideological clichés about India’s civilisation. This has repeatedly led to judicial corrections. Your remarks linking the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh to Gandhi’s assassination required clarification in court. The “Chowkidar Chor Hai” episode led to an apology to the Supreme Court. Your statements on Vinayak Damodar Savarkar invited judicial caution. Criticism is legitimate, and indeed a vibrant democracy’s lifeline. However, undermining the nation while trying to criticise the government, echoing external prejudices, and making baseless accusations against political rivals and ideological opponents fall into a different category. It's an irresponsible behaviour unworthy of a credible leader. Your endorsement of foreign criticism describing India as a “dead economy” raised concerns about national disparagement. Your remarks abroad suggesting that “Sikhs may not freely practise their faith in India” were swiftly appropriated by hostile elements. Most alarming was your assertion that your party is fighting not merely the @BJP4India or #RSS, but the “Indian State”—a formulation historically invoked by insurgent movements. In 2018, you made an unsubstantiated claim in the Rafale matter, invoking the French President—swiftly contradicted by the French government. In 2017, during the Doklam standoff, you met the Chinese Ambassador, with your party first denying and then admitting the meeting. During foreign visits, Rahulji, you have expressed concern that Western powers no longer comment on India’s internal affairs and have repeatedly described India as merely a “union of states” — not as a nation. This is less a constitutional observation and more an intellectual stance that diminishes India’s civilisational continuity — a doctrine Gandhiji often emphasised and strived for. Even recent episodes— such as the conduct of Youth Congress activists at an international forum, followed by your approving remark—suggest a troubling preference for spectacle over seriousness. You have warned that India would “burn” if BJP return to power and questioned constitutional stability. After electoral defeats, you and your party have cast doubts on institutions such as the Election Commission. Opposition is legitimate; delegitimising institutions is not. Your parliamentary conduct has occasionally reinforced perceptions of theatricality—the 2018 embrace of the Prime Minister followed by a wink, or recent public gestures that prioritised superficial optics over substantive politics. Your renewed emphasis on redistribution slogans such as “jitni abaadi, utna haq” raises further concern. History offers a cautionary lesson. Under Indira Gandhi, excessive nationalisation weakened production, fuelled shortages, and culminated in the Indian Emergency. Redistribution without wealth creation destroys the very foundation it seeks to distribute. The test of leadership lies not in applause, but in arguments that withstand scrutiny—historical, judicial, and intellectual. India deserves an opposition that challenges the government with seriousness—not slogans; with evidence—not conjecture; with statesmanship—not theatrics. As Leader of the Opposition, you have a rare opportunity to elevate national discourse. That responsibility demands intellectual discipline, historical awareness, and an unwavering commitment to the dignity of the Republic. I hope you will reflect—not as a matter of partisan disagreement, but as an appeal to restore seriousness to India’s political conversation. Yours sincerely, @DattaHosabale @sgurumurthy @mediasurya @ARanganathan72 @jsaideepak @RajeevKSachan @yv_post @AMISHDEVGAN @sardesairajdeep @rajkamaljha @republic @anjanaomkashyap @sudhirchaudhary @Mayawati @bspindia @amitmalviya @KanchanGupta @nishikant_dubey @SudhanshuTrived @RatanSharda55 @ShashiTharoor @SupriyaShrinate @Pawankhera @himantabiswa @annamalai_k @CTRavi_BJP @Tejasvi_Surya @OpIndia_com @SwarajyaMag

@Pawankhera तू पाकिस्तान चले जा

Russia’s ambassador to Pakistan has said Moscow is ready to supply oil to Islamabad at concessional rates if approached. India, meanwhile, was already buying discounted Russian crude but squandered that advantage due to Modi’s eagerness to please Trump. Instead of discounts, Russian Urals crude is now trading at a premium to Brent in India, hitting record-high prices. Today, Pakistan stands to benefit, not India. Our energy security is in jeopardy – thanks to Modi’s nauseating sycophancy.

Before Modi. Before Pezeshkian. Before India. Before Iran. There were two peoples who called their land the same thing. Indians called their land Aryavarta. Iranians called theirs Airyanem Vaejah. Both meant the same thing. Land of the Aryans. Land of the Honourable. They were not neighbours. They were one people, not yet separated. The Sanskrit word for seven is Sapta. In Avestan, the Iranian tongue, it became Hapta. The Sanskrit word for river is Sindhu. In Persian it became Hindu. India is called Sapta-Sindhu in the Vedas. Hapta-Hindu in the Avesta. Hindustan is not an Indian name. Persians gave it to us. 3,000 years before Pakistan was a thought. Our gods were their gods. Varuna became Ahura Mazda. Agni became Atar. Yama became Yima. Sarasvati became Anahita. Soma became Haoma. Garuda became Faravahar. Not coincidence. One civilization. Two branches. And the gods were not just in texts. In Lorestan, Iran, a 3,200-year-old plaque was found. Ganesha. In Iran. 1200 BCE. Shiva's trident appeared on Persian royal coins. Minted by kings. Titled Lord of all the World. In Bandar Abbas, Iran, a Vishnu temple still stands. Krishna's murals are still on its walls. The regime turned it into a museum. They could not erase the paintings. The father of Darius the Great was Hystaspes. He studied under Brahmins in Bharat. He brought that knowledge back to Persia. He gave it to the Magi. Taxila, India's greatest ancient university, had Persian administrators. They debated. They traded. They borrowed. They never invaded each other. Two great civilizations. 3,000 years. Not one war between them. Then came 7th century CE. Islam swept through Persia like fire through dry grass. The Sassanian Empire collapsed in 651 CE. Zoroastrians were hunted. Their fire temples destroyed. Their scholars killed. They ran. They sailed across the Arabian Sea. They landed in Gujarat between 785 and 936 CE. They knocked on India's door. India opened it. No conditions. No conversion demands. Just shelter. They became the Parsis. They brought their sacred flame with them. That flame still burns today. In Udvada, Gujarat. Iranshah Atash Behram. Over 1,000 years. The oldest living fire of Zoroastrianism. Not in Tehran. Not in Shiraz. In Bharat. India saved Persian civilization when Persia could not save itself. That is why one call is enough. That is why the Strait stays open. Modern leaders don't build that kind of trust. Civilizations do. Over 3,000 years. What the Arabs couldn't erase, the British tried to finish. Sanskrit was suppressed. Taxila forgotten. The connection buried. But the flame survived. It always does.

प्रिय साथियों, प्रत्येक माह कम से कम एक बार परिवार और मित्रों के साथ बीआर चोपड़ा द्वारा बनाए गए महाभारत का एपिसोड 72-73 अवश्य देखिए जीवन को सार्थक बनाने के लिए नई दिशा मिलेगी

India was always a Hindu civilization. Other religions came later, converted many by the sword. The Muslims wanted a separate nation, India was partitioned as muslims used violence and killing to get partition. What remained was a Hindu nation where our forefathers decided that they wanted a modern republic which protected the freedom of religion for all faiths, not the hateful regime the Muslims created. The India of today is a Hindu civilizational nation, a modern republic with full freedom of religion guaranteed by a constitution which we the people, gave to ourselves out of a peaceful choice. People who say ‘We’ fought for freedom should know their history, their support and the violence of the Muslim league and Muslims who wanted a separate nation and partition. It is this India alone which protects and guarantees the freedom of religion because it is built on Hindu values and Hindus accept the right of all to practice a faith of their choice, not the Muslims of Pak and BD who support a theocracy, practice a religion which denies the right to others to freely practice a religion of their choice, say daily that their God is the only God. They have driven the Hindus and other faiths out and treat them as second class citizens and in Pak by law. People who say ‘We’ fought for freedom got their Pakistan which they wanted. Let us not have these bigots who support fundamentalists, who support those who kill Hindus propagate a fake history.

Read the Quran. There’s no such thing as secularism or coexistence in Islam. If there was secularism in Muslim countries, why are Muslim countries governed by Sharia? Do you want India to be a Muslim country? There are 207 million Muslims in India. Enough to conquer a country. Every freedom loving nation must wake up to the threat of Islam before it’s too late. Save yourselves.

There is no such thing as Islamophobia @sardesairajdeep. A phobia is an irrational fear. It is NOT irrational to fear Islam, an ideology that explicitly calls for the killing of all non-Muslims. How can you sit back and watch the Islamic massacre and raping of Hindus and defend the Pakistani invaders in your country who wish to make India a Muslim country? Don’t you have any sense of national pride and a desire to preserve your country as majority Hindu? You do not have a strong survival instinct.

@khanumarfa India was , is and will always be the land of the Hindus. Period.

No one wants to turn India into a Muslim country. And India was never a Hindu nation and never will be. We fought for freedom to build a secular, liberal, democratic republic. It’s shameful that India Today has invited such a vicious Islamophobe and brought disgrace upon itself.

“The only man that can now help (broker a ceasefire) is Prime Minister Narendra Modi. India has friendly relations with everyone in the region, with Israel, Iran, with the U.S. & Russia too. Nobody else does,” says Col @DougAMacgregor, former Advisor to the SecDef.

Things everyone should know: 1. Blood Pressure:.- 120/80 2. Pulse.:- 70-100 3. Temperature.:- 36.8-37 4. Breathing: 12-16 5. Hemoglogin: male (13-18), female (11.50-16) 6. Cholesterol.:- 130-200 7. Potassium: 3.50-5 8. Sodium: 135-145 9. Triglyceride.:- 220 10. The Amount of Blood in Body.:- 5-6Ltr 11. Sugar.:- children (70-130) Adult (70-115) 12. Iron.:- 8-15mg 13. White Blood Cell.:- 4000-11000 14. Platelets: 150,000-400,000 15. Red Blood Cells.:- 4.60-6 million 16. Calcium.:- 8.6-10.3 mg/in 17. Vitamin D3: 20-50 ng/ml 18. Vitamin B12.:- 200-900 pg/ml Understand your body and protect it daily.

Cricket trivia: Kirti Azad played 25 ODIs and scored 269 runs… Rohit Sharma in 1 ODI scored 264 runs… 😄😄

This guy shows how to digitalise a camera film

"No matter how bad you are, you are not useless. You can still be used as a bad example." Ultimate roast of Rahul Gandhi by @DrSEShinde 🔥🤣🤣🤣

Bihar’s first-ever Snow Park is coming to Aqua City, Purnea. This summer, people in Purnea will be able to enjoy snow, a water park and a game zone all in one place.

BIG NEWS 🚨 INDIA’S NEW RENTAL RULES 2026 😳🔥 • Landlords must provide at least 24 hours’ notice before entering the rented property. • Rent can be revised only once every 12 months, with a mandatory 90-day notice. • Landlords cannot demand a security deposit higher than two months’ rent. • Tenants cannot be forced to vacate without proper legal procedure. • Rental agreements must be digitally stamped and officially registered within 60 days. • If essential repairs are not completed within 30 days, tenants may carry them out and deduct the cost from the rent. • Harassing tenants by changing locks, cutting water or electricity, or issuing threats is punishable under the law.

India vs NZ : Narendra Modi Stadium Presidential Suite L5 : 12,10,000/person Instead of spending 12 Lakhs in the Stadium, watch it on TV. Put 12 Lakhs in FD for 5 Years, you will get 1.4 Crore in 5 Years!!

@laymans_profile may be..but shayed ye medical college hi banega kyunki parora me ab ye nhi bna rahe after controversy

@ajit_usp Mujhe laga MIT hi expand kar rhe hain.

Guess the place? What are they building? #Purnea