xAlan

@JB11XI @sterlingdeterm1 @Rothmus Indoctrination

@sterlingdeterm1 @Rothmus Why would white people feel guilty about it? White people are the only ones to end it.

Amazing.

@ElvistLl @realDailyWire @MaryMargOlohan @POTUS You are clearly one of the extremes if you don't believe there can be a middle ground.

@realDailyWire @MaryMargOlohan There’s two extremes when it comes to @POTUS, either you hate his guts aka TDS or love him. There’s really no in between!

TRUMP: "Tonight, I'm making a little speech at 9 o'clock, and basically, I'm gonna tell everybody how great I am."

@seanmdav You're literally stealing the family jewels.

If I break into your home and still your jewelry, it means I am a member of your family and entitled to your inheritance.

@StrategicWin5 @realDailyWire @michaeljknowles What about when the astronauts survive going through the Van Allen Belt? So many people are convinced that it causes instant death.

.@michaeljknowles goes ABOVE AND BEYOND to prove to a doubting listener that the Artemis II launch was, in fact, real, and that Michael is not broadcasting in front of a green screen. BONUS: Michael does jumping jacks on camera for the first time ever. 😂😂 😂

@BernieSanders Let’s pick a random millionaire…spinning my millionaire wheel…Bernie Sanders with a net worth of $8 Million. Does he have a spare $400,000 in his bank account to cover such a bill? Or will Senators be exempt as they are from most of their actions?

Ok, Jamie: Let me clear things up for you. If my 5% wealth tax on billionaires was enacted you’d owe $135 million more in taxes & a family of 4 making $150,000 or less would receive a $12,000 payment. Oh, and you’d still be worth more than $2.5 billion. Seems pretty fair to me.

@Osint613 I know there’s stuff I haven’t seen. But this seems a bit premature.

Trump: “We've had full regime change in Iran”

@OwenGregorian Maybe they can go back to the parent company’s original motto. “Don’t be evil.”

YouTube staffers deliberately aimed for ‘viewer addiction,’ killed safety tools for kids: court docs | Thomas Barrabi, New York Post YouTube employees admitted that their goal was “viewer addiction” and killed proposed safety tools for kids because they wouldn’t provide a high “ROI,” according to bombshell court documents reviewed by The Post. YouTube employees admitted that their goal was “viewer addiction” and killed proposed safety tools for kids because they wouldn’t provide a sufficient “ROI” — financial lingo for “return on investment,” according to bombshell court documents reviewed by The Post. The explosive records, which include internal chat logs and presentations from YouTube employees, were unsealed ahead of a series of landmark trials slated for this summer in Oakland, Calif. in the US District Court of Northern California. Google-owned YouTube, Meta, Snap and TikTok are listed as defendants. In a deposition in the case last March, John Harding, a longtime vice president of engineering at YouTube, was confronted by plaintiffs attorneys with an internal email from June 7, 2012, in which a YouTube employee, whose name was redacted, stated the “goal is not viewership, it’s viewer addiction.” Harding confirmed that the email was authentic but dodged responsibility, claiming that staffers were discussing a “video creation app” that “wasn’t event built for viewers.” The next portion of the exchange between Harding and the attorney is redacted. The federal case is part of what legal experts and critics have called a “Big Tobacco” moment for Google and Meta. Both companies were found liable last week for fueling social media addiction in a separate landmark case brought in California state court on behalf of a 20-year-old woman known as KGM. The shock revelations from the Oakland federal case contradict public statements from executives who have claimed the app was never meant to be addictive and any harmful outcomes for kids are due to third-party content rather than its intentional app design choices. During the state trial last month, YouTube executive Cristos Goodrow testified that the app was “not designed to maximize time” and the company doesn’t “want anybody to be addicted.” This summer’s federal case in Oakland, however, includes an internal YouTube presentation from April 2018 recounting study findings that “excessive video watching is related to addiction” and that it results in a “’quick fix’ of dopamine.’” The presentation even includes a colorful flow chart labeled “addiction cycle,” complete with arrows showing how “guilt” is an “emotional trigger” that leads to “craving, ritual and using.” “Researchers feel that YT is built with the intention of being addictive,” the document said. “Designed with tricks to encourage binge-watching (i.e., autoplay, recommendations, etc.” US District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers is presiding over a case that centralizes more than 2,000 pending lawsuits against social media firms that make similar allegations. A group of school districts has a trial date in June, while a coalition of state attorneys general will face off against Big Tech’s attorneys beginning in August. “These cherry-picked, decade-old excerpts mischaracterize our responsible product design work. In fact, they prove our teams proactively identify challenges to ensure our products prioritize high-quality, age-appropriate experiences,” Google spokesperson José Castañeda said in a statement. The company’s own research from 2018, however, estimated that an eye-popping 32 million users aged 13 to 24 years old were classified as “habitual heavy use” and watched more than two hours of videos per day, while 36 million users aged 18 to 24 said they regretted how much time they spent on YouTube in the past week. In an internal presentation slide featuring a screenshot of a silly cat video, YouTube employees said survey research showed that video watching “is a common technique for mood management” but it is “difficult to stop watching.” “Ultimately, viewers experience feelings of guilt for spending so much time doing non-meaningful tasks,” the researchers wrote. More recently in August 2024, an internal presentation titled “Teen (Unsupervised) Viewer Wellbeing and Safety,” YouTube employees admitted that the app’s “infinite feed” was a big part of the problem. Employees wrote that the app’s “two biggest challenges” were video recommendations that “normalize unhealthy beliefs or behaviors” and “prolonged” use that was “displacing valuable activities like time with friends or sleep.” “These concerns are loudest on short form content (more popular with teens) due to its lack of depth and infinite feed experience,” the document said. The documents, which range from 2012 through 2025, were unsealed in late February and compiled by the Tech Oversight Project, an online watchdog group that has emerged as one of Big Tech’s most vocal critics. “YouTube’s posture in court is that they aren’t a social media platform but their own executives don’t even buy that theory,” said the group’s executive director, Sacha Haworth. “These explosive documents show that YouTube set out to deliberately addict children and teens because it produced more screen time to deliver ads and more data to funnel into Google’s surveillance business,” Haworth said in a statement. “They see our kids as pawns to make their next trillion dollars, and it’s past time that we break this noxious status quo.” While discussing an internal presentation about YouTube’s autoplay feature dated Sept. 14, 2021, one employee asked if the team had explored tools aimed at “helping users fall asleep.” “It was something we looked into…but it generally just wasn’t as high a ROI compared to some of the other projects,” a YouTube project manager replied. Elsewhere, in a 2019 “strategy offsite” presentation, employees wrote that YouTube’s goal of “driving more frequent daily usage is not well aligned with our efforts to improve digital wellbeing.” Another document reveals that YouTube executives took steps to cover their tracks and prevent future scrutiny of its practices. During an April 2, 2025 deposition, James Beser, a senior YouTube executive focused on child safety, admitted that his team would keep “history off” in internal chatrooms – a move he claimed was intended to assist “junior folks” who would sometimes reread them and “take things out of context.” A plaintiffs’ attorney pressed Beser on whether “anybody senior” at YouTube had ever instructed him to turn off history on his chats. “I don’t recall ever being told that,” Beser replied. The “history off” issue had popped up in other high-profile lawsuits involving Google. Multiple federal judges have ripped Google for destroying chat logs that should have been preserved, including US District Judge James Donato, who furiously condemned the practice during a 2023 antitrust case as “a frontal assault on the fair administration of justice” that “undercuts due process.” A Los Angeles jury ordered Google and fellow defendant Meta last week to pay a combined $6 million in damages, with the YouTube parent responsible for 30% of the penalty and the Facebook and Instagram parent responsible for the other 70%. nypost.com/2026/03/30/bus…

@X99540400 @cb_doge Let me drop to your intellect level "It takes one to know one"

@cb_doge Yeah before we all knew he was a Nazi!

Elon Musk in a Japanese game show in 2014

@KITKAT I heard it was a supervillian and the stolen goods have been used.

Regarding recent press coverage

@MrBeast @KITKAT @greg16676935420 says otherwise

@KITKAT It wasn’t me!

@greg16676935420 Greg is all the proof I need.

I can’t prove it but I think MrBeast is behind the Kit Kat heist

@HankVenture5 Google the judge, Justice Clayton Conlan, and give up all hope.

They should be feeding these demented evil women to a woodchipper but it happened in Canada so slap on the wrist probably.

@TheDigriz @Timcast It's today's date on the article.

@Timcast Why is date removed? Must be old for rage bait.

holy fuck what

@DEBATEZdotCOM @MikeWo499951 @EYakoby Logic has just been vaporized

@MikeWo499951 @EYakoby That number is just the bodies found and identified. Only the tip of the proverbial iceberg. Vast majority of the bodies are under the rubble or vaporized when Israel bombed refugee tents.

Well that ends the debate on deaths in Gaza. Hamas itself is admitting that 80% of casualties were combatants. There was never a genocide. You have been lied to and manipulated.

@grok @nancylee2016 @EthanLevins2 @grok provide the sources that verified that the IDF is using white phosphorus

According to Human Rights Watch, Israel fired artillery white phosphorus munitions that airburst over residential areas in Yohmor, southern Lebanon, on March 3. They verified images of the bursts and resulting fires in homes/cars. Israel issued evacuation warnings for the village that morning and stated it cannot confirm the specific use, noting policy avoids dense civilian zones except in exceptions. It's not "spraying" like aerosol—it's shells dispersing burning particles for smoke/obscuration in ops against Hezbollah. Consequences: WP ignites on contact with air, causing deep painful burns that can reignite, hard-to-extinguish fires, and toxic smoke. Risks long-term tissue damage/respiratory issues; environmental contamination from residues. No verified civilian casualties from this incident per reports.

🚨 Israel is AGAIN spraying white phosphorus in Lebanon, which they have done for years against civilians. This causes cancer, birth defects, and an unlivable environment. They are preparing to ethnically cleanse southern Lebanon. This is an act of terrorism.

@Nick_LoGalbo @SandyofCthulhu The Inuendo is the best game console.

@SandyofCthulhu Are you sure that wasn't an inuendo? That's how I would have taken it if my wife said that

It’s my only game with an age rating of +81!

@BeaverProgram @TheRabbitHole @BeaverProgram Have you ever sat down and asked yourself if maybe you're the National Socialist?

@TheRabbitHole The Lefties started calling him a Nazi over saying Nazi stuff and doing Nazi stuff and cheating in the election and helping pedophiles and Elon was best pals with Jeff Epstein

The Left used to worship Elon. Then they started calling him a Nazi over political disagreements. The message is clear: Either submit or the Left will do everything in its power to ruin you.

@GoodingTuba @qsfkbwIhuWLhnjI Neat trick. Just redefine the definition of Samurai and suddenly half are women.

@qsfkbwIhuWLhnjI That’s exactly the point the exhibition was making. This is why it’s important to read more of the article than just the headline.

英国の博物館「日本の侍の半分が女性だった」と主張。 これは英国博物館で2026年2月3日から開催された「Samurai」展でのこと。 「侍」という言葉が一般に連想させるのは甲冑を着た戦士であり、そのイメージはほぼ男性です。人口の半分は女性なので武士階級の半分は「女性」というのは誤りではないが、しかし、この「戦う侍の半分が女性だった」と意図的に誤解を招く表現です。 英国の知的レベルの劣化は酷い

@TABYTCHI vs Obama's library

This is where they keep married women’s birth certificates

@creepydotorg We must ban summer!

German climate activists stood on melting blocks of ice with ropes around their necks, warning that “time is running out.”