ale

4.9K posts

ale banner
ale

ale

@alejandrojsn

compu usb

Venezuela Katılım Ekim 2012
1.1K Takip Edilen396 Takipçiler
ale retweetledi
mads
mads@m4dder4ll·
I think the hottest non sexual thing someone can do is know what song was sampled
English
115
6.1K
35.9K
662.1K
ale retweetledi
marqix ☆
marqix ☆@fwmarqix·
Friend: Why is your bathroom light purple. Me: That's the shrimp setting. Friend: The WHAT. Me: The shrimp setting. Friend: There should never be a sentence like that in a normal apartment. Me: It calms them down. Friend: WHO IS "THEM." pause tiny bubbling sound from bathroom Friend: Why is your bathtub making aquarium noises. Me: Okay before you panic, Friend: THERE ARE LIVE SHRIMP IN YOUR TUB?! Me: They're temporary guests. Friend: You have CRUSTACEAN TENANTS. Me: Their tank filter broke. Friend: So your solution was "bathtub commune." Me: They're actually thriving. Friend: One of them just looked at me with intent. Me: That's Marcus. Friend: WHY DOES THE SHRIMP HAVE A NAME. Me: Because he survived The Incident. Friend: I'm scared to ask. Me: Costco parking lot. July 2024. We lost good men. Friend: THEY'RE SHRIMP. Me: You don't understand war.
English
29
502
5.2K
122.4K
ale retweetledi
adam
adam@theCTO·
serverless is amazing. you get: - cold starts - 14 dashboards - functions timing out because JSON was 3kb too large - logs delivered sometime between now and your retirement - a billing model based on quantum mechanics all to avoid managing a VPS that has had a working tutorial since 2009
English
105
135
3.2K
173.1K
ale retweetledi
Mason
Mason@CardinalMason·
The literal #1 most suicidal belief you can have is that you’re an introvert/socially anxious/don’t like people. I was this guy until around 22. Thought I was better than everyone else and actively chose not to be social. Life completely changed when I started interacting with random people and just trying to make them laugh. Opportunities opened up, made relationships with people I never thought possible. Everything was just less dull and boring. Every day was fun for no reason. You cannot be a lone wolf. It’s a mental illness. Life is meaningless without people.
Goldie@dezgoldie

I believe in socializing basically 24/7. This has made me more money than anything else. High energy levels and constant social interaction.

English
358
1.6K
24.5K
1.7M
ale retweetledi
luu ⋆。°✩
luu ⋆。°✩@luumbrera·
evita el falso golpe de dopamina que produce contarle tus metas a los demás
Español
49
6.5K
66.1K
751.5K
ale retweetledi
ein
ein@stylishdawg·
accidentally called this a “button” instead of a “CTA” and my PM took me aside and shot me in the head
ein tweet media
English
26
133
4.7K
179.2K
ale retweetledi
Reshad Rahman
Reshad Rahman@ReshadRahman·
❗️Gavi: “All I told Vinicius was to shut up, that’s all” #FCB 😭
English
203
2K
23.5K
392.9K
ale retweetledi
Chris Wood
Chris Wood@CWood_sdf·
i love how people are saying "if we write a sufficiently detailed specification, the agent can write all our code" do you know what writing a sufficiently detailed specification that deterministically maps to what a computer's actions is? it's coding
English
359
1.7K
21.2K
570K
ale retweetledi
Shimazu.S
Shimazu.S@ShimazuSystems·
You know at 20,487 (combined add/remove) We can assume an average and say per line this is 3-4 seconds to read, let's just boldly assume the same to understand. So what, 8 seconds per line? That's 163,896 seconds. Now let's divide that by 60, I'll round the decimal down for courtesy - that is 2,731 minutes. Now let's turn those minutes in to hours - so what, 2,731/60 again! Rounding to the nearest 1dp point that gives us 45.5 hours. Now I do work hard, so in my flow state I work for 14 hours straight. It's gunna take me 3.25 days in my state to even understand what you have produced. You do not understand, nor read your code. If this is markdown, there is zero way to verify that your AI hasn't hallucinated. This does not belong to you, it has nothing to do with you, you are a vessel. I like AI, I do not like people who pretend to be productive.
David Cramer@zeeg

im coming for you today @garrytan

English
36
51
1.6K
117.2K
ale
ale@alejandrojsn·
@Nemtastic1 @BreakfastQGame @cremieuxrecueil This is not a post facto rationalization. You can and should arrive to that conclusion if you think for more than 5 seconds before pressing any button
English
0
0
1
23
Nemesis 2026
Nemesis 2026@Nemtastic1·
That's a post facto rationalization though. The simple truth is that a *lot* of people would choose the blue button, and almost none of them would be suicidal or ironic. Some of your family members. Some of your friends. Some of your neighbors, and not just the bad ones. The solution is easy if you view this as a math puzzle. It is very much not easy if you view it as an actual choice placed before 8 billion actual humans.
English
5
0
6
370
Crémieux
Crémieux@cremieuxrecueil·
If this was how the buttons looked, what portion of humanity would press blue? It'd probably be a large enough number due to mistakes, the young, altruists, etc., such that it remains wise to press blue.
Crémieux tweet media
English
432
109
3.4K
230.6K
ale
ale@alejandrojsn·
@prerat @cremieuxrecueil If you see this, and see that if you press blue your life is on the whim of the red pressers, why would you press blue? This makes blue look even worse as an option. Also, in the end the red button does nothing if no one selects blue
English
0
0
0
50
ale retweetledi
Lyman Stone 石來民 🦬🦬🦬
When a philosophical hypothetical relies on this kind of sleight of hand its idiotic The question is in English.so should we assume non-English speakers don’t get a translation? Are color blind people told which is which? How many seconds do you have to choose? The hypothetical obviously includes unstated stipulations: “the choice is made by persons who have the ability to comprehend what the choice is and have it explained in a way they understand.” If your answer to the hypothetical rests on specific silly assumptions like “well some people don’t speak English” you’re not engaging the question at all.
Hunter📈🌈📊@StatisticUrban

The original question specified "everyone in the world." There's a critical mass of young children/babies who would not, under any circumstances, be able to understand the question, and would pick randomly. Voting blue is the only way to save them.

English
19
11
186
7.8K
ale
ale@alejandrojsn·
Which one would you press??? Red button: does nothing Blue button: kills you and everyone who presses it unless 50% of the people press it
English
0
0
0
17
ale
ale@alejandrojsn·
@MrEldenThing @32nds @jack_whitcomb_ But they shouldn't have pressed the blue button to start with. They can press the red button and nothing happens to them
English
1
0
1
22
ale retweetledi
Jack Whitcomb
Jack Whitcomb@jack_whitcomb_·
I'm convinced this is just a poorly phrased question. If you pose it as: - Anyone who presses the red button lives no matter what. - Anyone who presses the blue button dies, unless > 50% of people also press the blue button. then it's clear that pressing the blue button is dumb.
Tim Urban@waitbutwhy

Everyone in the world has to take a private vote by pressing a red or blue button. If more than 50% of people press the blue button, everyone survives. If less than 50% of people press the blue button, only people who pressed the red button survive. Which button would you press?

English
316
35
1.8K
127.1K
ale
ale@alejandrojsn·
@MrEldenThing @32nds @jack_whitcomb_ If they tell you that pressing the red button doesn't have any drawback but by pressing the blue button you are at the mercy of others, why would i press the blue button?
English
1
0
1
30
Crunchy
Crunchy@MrEldenThing·
@32nds @jack_whitcomb_ If you press the red button, anyone who pressed blue dies. If >50% pick blue, they don’t. Do you think anyone will pick blue?
English
1
0
1
83
ale retweetledi
Ariel
Ariel@redtachyon·
Remember - before their 3rd birthday, talk to your kids about the red/blue button test. Good parents don't let their kids press the blue button.
English
7
8
292
6.4K