Crunchy

3.5K posts

Crunchy banner
Crunchy

Crunchy

@MrEldenThing

Katılım Nisan 2019
530 Takip Edilen355 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Crunchy
Crunchy@MrEldenThing·
The inverted world
Crunchy tweet media
English
5
2
39
10.7K
Crunchy
Crunchy@MrEldenThing·
@gfodor @plasmarob It’s a self-fulfilling prophecy. Inasmuch as you are like other humans, your decision reflects other people’s decisions. If you choose red, this is evidence that other people will choose red. By the same token, if you choose blue, this is evidence that others will choose blue.
English
1
1
7
74
gfodor.id
gfodor.id@gfodor·
@plasmarob in the thought experiment, you are teleported into a booth, nobody knew the vote was happening, and there was zero discussion. in that scenario, you can be basically certain your vote will not change the outcome: the outcome is pre-determined as far as you care. vote accordingly
English
2
0
16
503
plasma ۞
plasma ۞@plasmarob·
Can somebody who is still voting red explain their position to me without getting mad? (Preferably without saying I am mad, actually) I still don't get it
English
139
1
80
6.3K
Tom
Tom@BigTomGamerMan·
@MrEldenThing You're missing the part that Red could also be mental modelling that among everyone on Earth, there is no way that Blue is being pressed more than 50% of the time, and the sample in the poll is self-selected to be far more conscientious than the entirety of humanity.
English
3
0
4
2.2K
Crunchy
Crunchy@MrEldenThing·
Ok so clearly there is a failure to model the thinking from one side to the other, so here’s the full breakdown to explain both sides’ thinking.
Crunchy tweet media
English
25
16
173
34.7K
Crunchy
Crunchy@MrEldenThing·
I think one of the most interesting things about the Red vs Blue buttons is that the result is always closer to 50/50 than it is to 100/0 or 80/20.
English
0
0
0
37
Crunchy
Crunchy@MrEldenThing·
@nosilverv It’s cuz it’s a badly articulated scenario so everyone’s guessing what the question is
English
0
0
0
170
Crunchy
Crunchy@MrEldenThing·
Risk analysis: being a gullible mark is too high a price, therefore it’s safer to assume that everyone is trying to cheat me. The cynicism trap is painful and difficult to escape, because any altruistic behavior or attempt to free you is further proof of nefarious intentions.
Totori Screenshots@totoriscreens

@IXianVernius My favorite part of this is the group of people saying "I don't sympathize with others, I lie, I cheat, and I love risk" is NOT the virtue signalers, they're the ones telling the truth, and people who don't do those things are lying.

English
0
0
0
39
Crunchy
Crunchy@MrEldenThing·
Crunchy@MrEldenThing

@ZakMndebele @planetiquely There is a principle of anonymous coordination; if I act X way, others will do X. Therefore if I act Y, others will do Y. Reds do not believe this is possible, because as I correctly modeled, the fundamental difference between Red and Blue is ex ante vs ex post.

QAM
0
0
0
40
Aleph
Aleph@woke8yearold·
Since people are still arguing over the blue vs red button, the actual reason to pick red is that you are not deciding what sort of person should live or how humans should behave. Your vote is not going to decide the issue, all you can do is make urself safer
English
25
2
114
3K
Crunchy
Crunchy@MrEldenThing·
@ZakMndebele @planetiquely The fundamental Red case is extremely simple. Because this is a prediction game, any further analysis has to take place in Blue territory (ex post), so my imagined Red retort is in that context.
English
1
0
0
55
Zak Mndebele
Zak Mndebele@ZakMndebele·
Your last sentence is accurate, what is incorrect is the modifier you added later in the original thread (unless I am misinterpreting it, which is possible). The thread also models red arguments, but not the red case itself - yes, many reds have said that 100% red makes blue unnecessary and that in practice red will get a majority, but the red case doesn’t depend on either of those the way the blue case depends on the arguments you have given blue.
English
1
0
0
63
Crunchy
Crunchy@MrEldenThing·
@ZakMndebele @planetiquely There is a principle of anonymous coordination; if I act X way, others will do X. Therefore if I act Y, others will do Y. Reds do not believe this is possible, because as I correctly modeled, the fundamental difference between Red and Blue is ex ante vs ex post.
English
1
0
0
102
Zak Mndebele
Zak Mndebele@ZakMndebele·
The probability that an election featuring 8 billion people will be decided by a single vote is so absurdly minuscule it is nonexistent for all practical purposes. You might as well ask what happens if you win the lottery every day for the rest of your life. Choosing to risk death because of it is moronic and unjustifiable.
English
2
0
0
95
Crunchy
Crunchy@MrEldenThing·
You’re wrong, Glorp, says Zorp, his companion. This was never a morality test, it’s just an anonymous coordination game with asymmetric risk and reflexive expectations, like our children learn about in Zogorth grade. Elementary, really.
English
4
0
120
4K
Crunchy
Crunchy@MrEldenThing·
Ah but now we are just haggling over price, the Lovecraftian alien who created the game observes. If the threshold for blue victory is low enough to be considered achievable, Red will vote blue. And if it’s too high, Blue will vote red. Truly, human morality can be bought.
English
1
0
70
3.8K