ALT 🗡️

@majinsayan @mb_ghalibaf @Ougi_stare You’re a delusional sand dweller

@mb_ghalibaf @Ougi_stare Hey azizam Its time to start begging zagros for mercy They are coming to take their dignity back

After defeating Iran 37 times in a row, this brilliant no-strategy war they started has now been downgraded from “regime change” to “Hey! Can anyone find our pilots? Please?🥺” Wow. What incredible progress. Absolute geniuses.

Heads-up: Pre-market so-called “news” or “Truth” is often just a setup for profit-taking. Basically, it’s a reverse indicator. Do the opposite: If they pump it, short it. If they dump it, go long. See something tomorrow? You know the drill.

@artikokus @DonAlt Don’t be a retard and cite an Israeli source

Shocking claims from Tucker & Kent :) heres a good text about this, translated from Hebrew (x.com/TomerPersico/s…) A claim that’s occasionally heard these days (mainly from the left), including from Iran experts, is that Iran never wanted to develop a nuclear bomb. True, they’ll say, there’s no need for uranium enriched to 60% for scientific research (less than 20% would suffice), and 60% does indeed enable a leap to bomb-level enrichment in a matter of mere weeks, but maybe they just wanted to go right up to the threshold without crossing it. Maybe they only wanted to deter. We also know there’s that same fatwa that rules that, according to Islam, developing nuclear weapons is forbidden. So they never intended to develop nuclear weapons, and this whole war is for nothing. This claim is strange mainly because of that well-known agreement between the U.S. under Obama and European countries with Iran, since the agreement was signed, as is known, in order to prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons. Obama wouldn’t have signed a broad international agreement, one that was very hard to pass in Congress, and which lifts harsh sanctions from Iran, without something in return—and the return was that Iran wouldn’t develop nuclear weapons. Obama himself said about the agreement (in a speech where he presented it to Congress) that “there’s no disagreement between Democrats and Republicans that an Iranian nuclear bomb is a tremendous danger” and that the agreement “cuts off all of Iran’s pathways to a bomb.”|| In other words: He believed there was a reasonable chance that without the agreement, Iran would advance to a bomb, and that this was a tremendous danger. Anyone who supported Obama’s nuclear deal, probably agreed with him. One could of course say that the Iranians, brilliant chess players that they are, amplified a threat they never intended to carry out in order to win sanctions relief. The problem with this argument is twofold: First, why would they amplify a threat that brings sanctions down on them just to remove those same sanctions? After all, most of the sanctions on Iran, those imposed since 2006, came in the wake of the discovery of its nuclear program, which it had concealed. Iran hid Natanz and Fordow for years. If the program was purely civilian, there’d have been no need to hide it, and the concealment itself doesn’t fit the tactic of walking right up to the threshold. And in general, why develop nuclear capabilities if you only want to walk up to the threshold in order to lift the sanctions that were imposed because of that very threshold-walking? Second, even if we ignore that, if the American intelligence agencies, and the top Iran experts, hadn’t believed there was a reasonable chance they weren’t bluffing and that they really would go for the bomb—if they hadn’t been very worried that the Iranians would indeed go all the way (with all due respect to the celebrated fatwa, and we see in Israel how flexible the halakha really is when you want it to be)—the U.S. wouldn’t have signed the deal. It’s clear from this that there was a genuine fear that without the agreement, Iran would proceed to a bomb. One can criticize this war from all sorts of angles. Personally, I don’t trust Netanyahu, and even less so Trump, to act correctly—and that’s putting it mildly. But in Iran, one of the most brutal, repressive, and religiously extremist regimes on the face of the earth holds sway. The claim that it never intended to develop nuclear weapons contradicts Iran’s own policy, the intelligence assessments of the U.S. and European countries, and the very logic that underpinned the nuclear deal signed in 2015.

So just another war in the middle east started for shits and giggles Fuck everyone that is/was involved in this I wish for freedom for the Iranian people but it' pretty clear that that's not the goal either

@0xMentalIllness Thanks for sharing

finished 1 cycle of pinealon + epitalon back to back. did about 30 days for each. regimen: -2mg pinealon AM upon waking -3mg epitalon AM upon waking (10 days), 6mg (20 days) results: -sleep efficiency +3% - 89% vs 86% -% restorative sleep (rem+deep/total) + 5% - 59% vs 54% my overall time asleep was down, but total rem/deep still went up. I've been in a caloric deficit for about 10 weeks during the full experiment + taking reta, +holiday season with lots of boozing, so I know that had some effect on the sleep vs baseline. overall i'd say my main takeaway is this stuff is pretty powerful for preserving energy when you need to run a bit of a sleep deficit, i definitely felt similar energy levels on 6hr vs my 7hr avg.

@PPLSOPTIMISMCEO Have u seen @anyspend, they seem to be building something similar

This is not the case with Meridian's x402 implementation.

Nvm fdv is ridiculous ffs

Aped $LITKEY finally an aero launch that has fundamentals and no ridiculous fdv

@phypto_logic Added a bit good confluence 🤝

Looking at roba atm .. will it turn? Seems undervalued imo

Aped some $Native @nativeonbase as a clanker beta, 5% burned in the recent acquisition of clanker. Markets are moving quick so this is just a short term trade.

@NeerajT4 @base @a16z @ironfishcrypto Real mc is not 1mil fdv is close to 10

So, wrapped $iron is sitting at $1Mn Market Cap on Base chain. $wiron is a Privacy Blockchain acquired by @base and backed by @a16z ✅ CA: 0x166e70941262ae7cbf9df5c8897a6242c546457d DYOR.

@pitlaneops Will you disclose the seed round purchase price ?

@Shawred0 $MRDN?

comeback szn. looking for next 10x-100x plays. time to lock in, do some research and start sharing new ponzis. Q4 base ponzis ( x402 ) prediction meta robotics icm

@iruletrenches Still in $MRDN ?

my balls are tingling

@Davosystems @base @clankeronbase Appreciate the response

@Davosystems @base @clankeronbase None of your team have socials? Also why haven’t you launched a tg or discord yet ?

Jesse Pollak says at BaseCamp they are exploring launching a token

@0x_Rorschach PA has been annoying af, hope team can improve the marketing as it’s the only thing holding this project back. Team and tech is as solid as it can be.

The ThinkOS Browser: -3D view of agentic systems -Real-time interface creation (Just-in-Time UX) -Semantic data to map and cluster thoughts $THINK offers an asymmetric RR in these prices

@ethimedes Agreed, send it

Comps: $PEAS more established platform trading at 53m $DVD trading at 900k

@swissborglife @thinkagents @coinbase In the pictures I posted which is from their website

@althunter10 @thinkagents @coinbase Where did you see backed by coinbase?

I'm starting to accumulate $THINK @thinkagents formally known as 6079ai Main Ip is on KuCoin which is not ideal, however it can still be bought on dex with poor Ip, which I'm hoping the team resolves soon. Circ mc is 20-30% so about its 6-7 mil mc right now. Backed by @coinbase

@wpcmz @thinkagents @coinbase It’s a different project to Asto and you know it. They acquired patents/tech from them in return for an allocation for tokens. Teams are different

@althunter10 @thinkagents @coinbase It’s not backed by coinbase ❌ They renamed existing coin $ASTO, check the chart 📉 Previous team has dodgy history of coins, see $ROOT $ASTO, $SYLO, $CENNZ 💩 THINK HAS NOT EVEN DISCLOSED UNLOCK DETAILS 💀