Amar Anand

3.1K posts

Amar Anand

Amar Anand

@amar

Product @Reforge

San Francisco Katılım Mayıs 2008
1.9K Takip Edilen2.6K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Amar Anand
Amar Anand@amar·
My first @Medium post! Priorities when building your product: Utilities vs. Networks @amar/priorities-when-building-your-product-utilities-vs-networks-16aeeb70e9a3" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">medium.com/@amar/prioriti…
English
8
8
38
0
Fundamental Investor
Fundamental Investor@fundiescapital·
i heard recently that this is nothing like 2000. if i said: tokens = internet data traffic and hyperscaler capex = fiber what are the big holes in that logic? internet traffic growth wild over time. providers didn’t make the money people thought.
English
4
2
21
2.7K
Amar Anand
Amar Anand@amar·
@cap_zay american foundry, supply bottlenecks, and vibes-based multiple expansion
English
0
0
0
70
Zay Capital
Zay Capital@cap_zay·
Haven't followed recently, but what's the bull case on $INTC. CPU and third tier stuff becoming valuable?
English
6
0
2
2.8K
Invert Man
Invert Man@lazereater·
@Divergent7651 Sure. This is derived from the scanner data. This does not capture sales in untracked channels which include online and many smaller independent convenience, grocery or drug stores. As of Q2 more than half of $tpb ‘s NP sales were online.
English
1
0
3
402
Invert Man
Invert Man@lazereater·
Here is a summary of the latest scanner data that covers Q3 for $TPB. Note that the capture rate below does not adjust for wholesale or retail margins but gives a picture of how much of sales are in tracked channels.
Invert Man tweet media
English
4
1
13
5.3K
Amar Anand
Amar Anand@amar·
@ramit Your friend is less wrong than you think. Professional photos that are obviously professionally taken in a single-day shoot comes across as extremely try-hard. Key is to have professional photos that look natural, which a very small percent of photographers do well
English
0
0
2
307
Ramit Sethi
Ramit Sethi@ramit·
I had single guy friends in the 2010s who wanted to meet someone but refused to do a professional photo shoot for their profile because it was “weird” Some people are more committed to their internal story than getting what they want
sona@swiftlydunphy

fun fact: one of my friends asked me to redo his profile for him because he wasn't getting matches. I went through his phone and picked pictures of him I liked, & I changed his prompts to reflect parts of his personality I personally liked. Matched with his now-wife the next day

English
6
3
110
27.9K
DaRazor
DaRazor@akramsrazor·
So what software name does the best from here to thanksgiving?
English
49
2
63
48.5K
Amar Anand
Amar Anand@amar·
@visakanv Funny —t he highest form of human intelligence combining empathy, theory of mind, and cleverness
English
0
0
2
61
Visa is doing marketing consults (see pinned!)
What are the emotional equivalents to “smart”, “sharp”, “clever”, “intelligent” etc? What adjectives would you use to describe someone who is emotionally savvy?
English
111
14
557
46.5K
Amar Anand
Amar Anand@amar·
@AggieCapitalist My understanding was True Wind owns 18% of sun corp because True Wind wants them to spin out their CLBT stake and sun corp doesn’t want to (not sure why though been a minute since I took a look). I wonder if they wouldn’t want to sell it for same reasons
English
1
0
0
209
LeftHandedOctopus
LeftHandedOctopus@AggieCapitalist·
@amar Hm, I think they would want it/welcome it. A PE firm True Wind owns 18% of Sun Corp and 6% of CLBT...
English
1
0
2
662
LeftHandedOctopus
LeftHandedOctopus@AggieCapitalist·
Top buyout candidates: $ECN CN (most likely by JV partner $SKY) $PHIN (most likely by $APO) $TTAM (most likely by $CRH) $FLYW (most likely by large strategic FinTech or a bank) $FIVN (most likely by partner $CRM) $POWL (by a larger strategic) $RTO (PE consortium) $CLBT (by $AXON)
English
20
6
120
24K
Amar Anand
Amar Anand@amar·
@ramit What’s your rational for city owned grocery stores?
English
0
0
0
125
Valerie Li
Valerie Li@ValerieLi88·
One thing I don’t see being addressed enough is how to combat loneliness in SF. Esp as a founder. I know it’s a slightly uncomfortable and vulnerable topic, but me and my close friends share the same sentimate. It’s very small, weirdly quiet, with horrendously homogogous population. Not much entertainment, not much excitement (the only ones come in the form of new GPT releases). 99% of people around me are tech founders/engineers. If you don’t mention AI, B2B, Manos, and shit on Gemini at least twice before noon—you’re irrelevant. You can’t sit with us. How I see people combat it is - flying back to new york (guilty🙋🏻‍♀️), getting a dog (my cofounder @JoelRitossa ), or trying to find a gf/bf at another AI agent demo night (have yet to see one success). But I want to go to a concert with friends and just vibe. I want late-night conversations where I can actually open up and share struggles and fears. I just want to enjoy being a real human and connect with other real humans.🥺
English
90
5
449
91.3K
CXCarroll
CXCarroll@CXCarroll·
This boggles my mind. Imagine being retirement age and having a chance to sell equities at all time highs and buy treasuries at 5%. How do you not do that trade?
NSX or 928 S4@Muggs00454738

@DonMiami3 @DntTaxes At Vanguard over 65s persons are at 60% of assets are equities.

English
150
43
1.1K
289.1K
Amar Anand
Amar Anand@amar·
@FintwitFella @compoundpapi Consider putting a covered collar on if valuation gets too crazy. Sell some oom calls to buy some oom puts. Pretty tax-efficient if you have a super low basis.
English
0
0
1
45
Jack Straw
Jack Straw@FintwitFella·
@compoundpapi I think this is the way. I’m coming at it from an ingrained mindset of active mgmt and relative performance. Can lead to over thinking
English
1
0
1
65
Shreyas Doshi
Shreyas Doshi@shreyas·
@amar Probably. FWIW, in one on one advising settings, I find it better to advise people based on a thorough understanding what they want to achieve in their career & life vs. giving 1 standard advice. The latter is available everywhere, the former is rare & priceless.
English
2
0
1
203
Shreyas Doshi
Shreyas Doshi@shreyas·
For highly ambitious, talented, entrepreneurial product people in their 30s: it is counterproductive to create your inner professional identity around things like “I create awesome OKRs” or “I send great status updates” or “I respond quickly on Slack” or “I know the Kano model (and all my peers don’t)” or “I talk to 5 customers/week”, etc. etc. All of these are mere proxies. They are not the main thing. Often they are very poor proxies. If you must create an identity, consider making it about building winning products & successful businesses. That is the main, non-negotiable thing. This is a powerful reframing because, once you internalize it, you will see that most of the activities, qualities, and labels incentivized by large groups do little to secure success for your product & your company. Of course, you will still have to do some of these nonsense, low leverage activities. But you will stop getting the dopamine rush you get today with these activities. And that is a great first step that many product people never take. After you take this first step, you will begin to get more excited & energized by activities that actually determine your product’s success. These activities are not always glamorous & cool. And most of the time, your peers will be confused about why you aren’t doing the things everyone else is doing. Some jealous & cutthroat peers might even complain vocally. But you won’t care because you know exactly what game you’re playing, and why. You are playing to win, while everyone else is busy chasing their next dopamine hit to just get through their workday.
English
22
58
661
58K
Amar Anand
Amar Anand@amar·
@karrisaarinen @pp3383 Overall depends if you’re a network (multi-player product) or a utility (single-player product). Networks win on size / network effects. Utilities win on quality Priorities when building your product: Utilities vs. Networks @amar/16aeeb70e9a3" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">medium.com/@amar/16aeeb70…
English
0
0
0
76
Amar Anand
Amar Anand@amar·
@karrisaarinen @pp3383 2) Lyft vs Uber Lyft launches true ride sharing ~9 months before Uber (uber was black car only). Uber raised a war chest and out spent Lyft to outgrow them. Dried up a lot of the growth capital in the space
English
1
0
0
79
Karri Saarinen
Karri Saarinen@karrisaarinen·
For decades, startups have been told to prioritize growth over everything else. Profitability was seen as a unambitious or even wrong. Profitably is something you worry about later. Why worry now when money and valuations are easy to come by? But that thinking was always flawed in my mind. Growth based on excessive spend is not sustainable by nature and profitability isn't a unambitious; it's about controlling your own destiny. It means you don’t have to rely on investors for survival. It means you can focus on your unaltered vision and mission without distraction. And once you experience it, it’s hard to imagine doing things any other way. With @linear I wouldn't want to go back to the existential threat you have relying on investors funding you. I believe the future will belong to the "The Profitable Startup", the founder mode led, small elite teams. You can still raise, be ambitious but it's going to be on your terms.
English
23
22
377
55.6K