
LP 🐡
2.3K posts




Doubling down on our $CARDS bags here on the liquid market. @Collector_Crypt consistently ranges between $25-35M in annual gross profit, while the token FDV is currently hovering around $60M, which I largely attribute to tough market conditions and a complete lack of interest in altcoins by exhausted investors. All of this doesn't even account for the fact that Collector holds a trading card treasury worth 8 figures, and is expanding both horizontally via @slabcash_, @renaissxyz and others, as well as vertically by integrating key parts of the supply chain. This is the kind of opportunity investors will look back on sooner or later and realize how painfully obvious it was - and hate themselves for having ignored it purely because of fear in the market.




Every CT influencer flexing their TCG ports like as if they have size. We are a way long away from euphoria. When you see irresponsible buying (unlikely because cash finance is less available vs crypto) then you start to worry










There's a persistent myth floating around that Strategy is one bad $BTC drawdown away from a forced liquidation. That their Bitcoin is pledged as collateral and margin calls are looming. Save this and remember: None of the above is true. $MSTR’s Bitcoin is not collateral. This is the single most important thing to understand. Strategy's debt is primarily unsecured. There are no margin calls tied to Bitcoin's price. If $BTC drops another 20%, 30%, or even 50%, no lender is showing up to demand they sell. That's not how their debt structure works. The maturity schedule is distant. Most of their debt doesn't come due until 2028-2030. Meaning there’s no near-term refinancing crunch, and no wall of debt maturing in the next 12 months that will force their hand. $MSTR’s total debt: roughly ~$8.24B. Current Bitcoin holdings: ~$53.26B at the time of this writing. That's a ratio of about 6.5x coverage. Even if Bitcoin dropped by 50% from here, they'd still have more than 3x their debt obligations in $BTC value. And they've taken it a step further. Strategy has set aside 2.5 years of cash runway. This covers interest payments and dividend obligations. So they do not need to sell a single satoshi to meet their financial commitments, even if $BTC trades below their cost basis for an extended period. They're not leveraged long with a liquidation price. They're a company holding an asset worth 6x their total debt, with years of runway, and no collateral agreements forcing sales. If you want to worry, come back in 2-4 years from now and re-assess.





January marked a strong start for @Collector_Crypt which posted a monthly ATH of $50m in Pokemon Gacha Packs opening (reversal from November lows of $33.6m) Growth was mainly driven by the launch of $1000 Grail Pokemon Packs which accounted for 55% of total Jan spending. Expanded distribution of these new machines through channels like MagicEden also contributed to user activity, with ME accounting for 13.4% of total Gacha spending for the month. January also saw record secondary marketplace activity where a PSA 7 1999 Base Set 1st Edition Charizard was sold for $21k , representing ATH for top Pokemon cards sales transacted through CC secondary marketplace.












