Anton 🇺🇦

New version of anron.pro is out. 5000+ icons / 6 styles organized with @figma variants, along with some massive updates on the website. Feel free to share you thoughts on this and stay tuned for more details.

You can now use your ChatGPT subscription to dictate anywhere on your desktop now! Have fun!

@andrewtanchuk Thaaanks 🙏

@anronkai These tabs!!! 😱🤤

One more shot from my latest work.

@andrewtanchuk Bro 😌

@anronkai these subtle shadows 🤤

A couple of chat widgets from our latest launch.

Here’s one of our files, ~400K+ layers. You can imagine how many variations, explorations, and iterations live inside. Figma handles this load like it’s nothing.

non-designers who have never designed anything: "designers are cooked!" people who have worked in code, want to work in code, always will work in code: "future of design is code!" companies selling tokens: "move that button 4px with a prompt!" designers:

Such an elegant implementation of the browser view 👏

Recently crafted pixels for Superblocks.

@rubenhume Very accurate explanation, well done 👏

Apple shipped macOS Tahoe with an icon next to every single menu item. And in doing so, destroyed the entire point of icons. An icon is a signal, and signals only work through contrast. The moment everything has one, none of them mean anything, you've just added noise that looks like clarity. Apple even reuses the same icon for completely different actions. The right menu is my take: icons only on the actions you actually reach for daily: New Window, New Tab, Close. Everything else stays clean. Your eye knows exactly where to go. The left is Tahoe. Every item screaming at the same volume. Apple's own 1992 design guidelines called out every single one of these mistakes. Thirty years later, they made all of them. Adding more is not the same as adding value. What's your take?

Finally, someone describe this issue clearly. Using icons across so many menu items in such a dense layout just doesn’t make sense. It destroy the core idea of an icon as a visual anchor that helps you avoid reading the label. The old-school blur / drunk test makes this very clear – when there are so many icons and they’re that small, it just turns into visual noise.

Making something people love is mostly making something you love and hoping the overlap is real

@dmitriychuta I’ve been following you for a while, very very quality work, well done! 👏

✨I built a subscription tracker with the best import on the market, so users don’t have to enter everything manually. It’s fast and works really well, so I plan to let users try it before buying PRO in upcoming updates.

@FonsMans Original Fons Mans vs Fons Mans from Temu

Our team’s monumental work just came to life 👀

Introducing Superblocks 2.0: AI-generated enterprise apps – finally under IT control. Vibe-coded apps just became the #1 attack vector in the enterprise. Business teams are building on production data, while IT has zero visibility. No reviews. No audits. No permissions. No control. AI hackers are about to get 100x better. Anthropic proved it with Mythos. Superblocks 2.0 is the only platform to take back control: > Business teams build AI-powered apps with permissions baked in. > IT and Security can audit everything and lock down anything, instantly. > Engineering sets the standards. Every app follows them. Instacart, SoFi, and LinkedIn run Superblocks in production today. And larger organizations we can't yet name are too: A Fortune 500 just shut down 2,500 Replit users to standardize on Superblocks, running the platform air-gapped in their AWS environment. A 150,000-employee global services firm replaced Lovable with Superblocks to unlock AI-built apps on restricted internal systems. Every IT leader we’ve demoed to using Replit, Lovable or v0 asked for early access. Today we open access to the world. The genie is out of the bottle on employee vibe coding. Let it run wild, or take back control – superblocks.com

@Wellgraf Heh, sad but true. Those vibes are gone forever, I think. We were probably the last generation that got *invited* to Dribbble and remember when the platform actually felt special. I canceled my subscription around 4 years ago

End of an era Been paying for Dribbble for 10+ years but today I canceled it Not because I stopped caring about design but because Dribbble stopped caring about designers This wasn’t an accident or happening over night either, these were clear business decisions, and they backfired hard towards their death From community → Marketplace From exposure → Extraction At some point, they decided that every connection should go through them and every deal should pay them "You’re not allowed to send clients your email" "You’re not allowed to link out freely" You’re not allowed to... do much anymore And if you don’t comply? It’s simple. They delete you. Even if you’re one of the biggest designers on the platform like Gleb Kuznetsov with 20+ years of work, millions of views, hundreds of thousands of followers gone overnight because Dribbble rather have some extra cash rather than your craft. Let that sink in A platform built for designers, wiping out one of its most important contributors to enforce a revenue rule They’ll say “because of terms of service” but everyone knows what this really is. It's about control and revenue greed. This is where it all went downhill because the value of Dribbble was never the platform, it was the people on it The early 2010s was the peak with chaos, taste, exploration. You wanted to check Dribbble EVERY DAY to see something new and inspiring. The second you start treating designers like inventory, you lose us

@imuratalpay Amazing! I know how great is this feeling. Keep it up! ✌️

I launched my app last night. Went to sleep. Woke up to 4 sales. 4 countries. Zero ads. The best distribution channel is still just: ship something people want 👌🏻

@imuratalpay Congrats, let’s gooo ☄️

OMG!! No way!! I just made a SALE! 🥳 That’s a vibe 😏