Maximo

MMAT ⚖️Case: In re Meta Materials Inc. Case No.: 24-50792-gs (Chapter 7, U.S. Bankruptcy Court, District of Nevada) Filing Date: May 14, 2026 Docs: 2773, 2774, 2774-1, 2775, 2776, 2776-1 (Documents in comment section) ⚠️ Not Legal Advice Big Picture (Plain English) These filings look like the trustee broadening the financial investigation from market/trading discovery into the company’s banking records. Translation: The trustee isn’t just asking “What happened in the market?” anymore. She’s also asking “What happened to the company’s money?” 💸 ❓ ⸻ DOC 2773 — Ex Parte Motion re Silicon Valley Bank What it is: The trustee asks the court for permission to compel Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) to provide records and potentially have a records custodian examined under Bankruptcy Rule 2004. Layman’s version: “Judge, we need SVB’s records to trace Meta’s money.” What they want: Account ending 7741 Account ending 7011 Any linked/associated accounts Date range: Aug. 5, 2023 to present Including: monthly statements deposits withdrawals wires ACH transfers checks (front/back) internal transfers Why this matters: Trustee explicitly says she wants to understand: potential disbursement of debtor property how those disbursements affected Meta’s financial condition possible recovery for the estate Translation: This is classic money-tracing. ⸻ DOC 2774 — Notice of Subpoena to SVB What it is: Formal notice that the trustee intends to subpoena SVB. This isn’t arguing the merits—it’s procedural notice to interested parties. Plain English: “FYI everyone, the subpoena is being served.” ⸻ DOC 2774-1 — SVB Subpoena (image below) What it is: The actual subpoena paperwork sent to SVB. Notable points: SVB gets ~21 days from service unless otherwise arranged Standard subpoena protections apply: can object can seek to quash privilege protections exist Plain English: This is the enforceable “produce the records” document. ⸻ DOC 2775 — Ex Parte Motion re JPMorgan Chase Same concept as SVB—but bigger. 🗄️Trustee wants Chase records under Rule 2004. Accounts requested: ending 5780, 5970, 6175, 1145, 1946, 6174, plus linked accounts Date range: Aug. 5, 2023 to present Same requested records: statements, deposits, withdrawals, wires, ACH, checks, internal transfers Plain English: “Show us where the money went.” ⸻ DOC 2776 — Notice of Subpoena to JPMorgan Chase Procedural notice to parties that Chase will be subpoenaed. Nothing dramatic by itself. ⸻ DOC 2776-1 — JPMorgan Chase Subpoena (image below) Actual subpoena paperwork to Chase. Again: compliance required unless objection subpoena enforcement mechanisms, exist failure can lead to contempt under Rule 45 ⸻ Why This Matters (Strategic View) This appears to be a parallel investigative track: Track 1: Market conduct Already ongoing: FINRA Nasdaq Citadel Virtu Anson Funds DTCC Schwab TD Ameritrade TradeStation Focus: Was market activity harming Meta? ⸻ 🏦Track 2: Internal financial trail 👀 New here: 📑 JPMorgan 📑 SVB Focus: 💵What happened to Meta’s cash❓ ⸻ 🏦The trustee may be trying to answer questions like: Did cash leave the company in problematic ways? Were transfers ordinary business activity? Were there potentially avoidable transfers? Were there insiders/payees worth examining? Are there recoverable estate assets? Rule 2004 is intentionally broad, and this fits squarely inside a trustee’s investigative powers. 🔍 ⸻ ✅ Bottom Line This is not about naked shorting. This is about following the money inside Meta Materials itself. If the prior subpoena wave was: “What happened in the market?” This wave is: “What happened in Meta’s bank accounts?” 🕵️‍♀️💵

As a family law attorney who has represented numerous victims of domestic violence, I have been deeply troubled by the circulating “sworn statement” from Cynthia West alleging emotional abuse by Congressman Thomas Massie. After listening to the statement twice, I was struck by the complete absence of any specific, verifiable allegations. There were no claims of physical abuse, no harassing communications, no documented threats, and no evidence of any kind—only vague assertions without supporting facts. Out of professional duty, I examined the available record. Ms. West has a documented history of making false abuse allegations. Notably, during the very period she claims to have been involved with Congressman Massie, she filed sworn accusations of emotional and physical abuse against the father of her children. On October 1, 2024, she swore under oath in an affidavit to these claims. However, after the court reviewed all the evidence, the allegations were dismissed in full. I have sat with real victims—both men and women—who have endured genuine domestic violence and harassment. I have fought alongside them for protection and justice. It is precisely because of that experience that I find it so damaging when someone makes false accusations. It undermines the credibility of legitimate victims and erodes public trust in the system. Congressman Massie has earned my trust over many years—to the point that I would entrust him with my own children. These latest allegations appear to be nothing more than a desperate attempt to interfere in an election against a principled public servant who has consistently worked to protect women and families from real abuse and exploitation. False claims like these do real harm—not just to the accused, but to every legitimate victim seeking justice.

BREAKING 🚨 UNDER GARY GENSLER’S LEADERSHIP, THE SEC HAS BEEN CAUGHT COLLUDING WITH WALL STREET FOIA records reveal a broker trade group pushed the SEC to deny an S-1 due to unaccounted-for shares, known as naked shorts ⬇️ $MMTLP