Jeffrey (POP'S) Christensen

As once said “Torch the Shorts”!

Agreed, Ken Griffin, Doug Cifu, Moas Kassam, all 105 brokers in #MMTLP all capital banks, and take a hard look at BlackRock and Larry Fink. You don’t get that big without making a few shady or questionable decisions.

@MetaGuyMarduk @J09939765 @MikeAloe1973 @mmtlpwarrior1 Pardon me? Where did you come up with that idea? I have done neither. Because I think that toxic behavior is bad for our community- you draw a line to 100 and Trump! That is a gorge (assumption) larger than the Grand Canyon. I stand by my statement.

@J09939765 @MikeAloe1973 @lonepine45 @mmtlpwarrior1 Your first mistake is comparing 100 to Donald Trump. 👍😎👍

That you for the post @stephmase22 Let’s not overlook NASDAQ, which is also turning over data. @VirtuFinancial and @AnsonGroupFunds are also facing discovery. It’s too early to speculate about @JaneStreetGroup, but if the judge rules against one, it’s highly likely that ruling will serve as a benchmark for all future rulings. Time will tell, and even more crucial data will reveal the identities of the individuals involved, the duration of their involvement, and the share counts they held. These nefarious acts will eventually be exposed and recorded, and shareholders will undoubtedly sue them into oblivion. After enduring three and a half years of this oppressive situation, there’s no amount of restitution that can compensate for the losses, hardships, and trauma that shareholders have endured! #MMTLP shareholders have been through an unimaginable ordeal!

Can you Say MARGIN CALL!

@RalphNorman, from our Business Dealing, is not the man to lead the great state of South Carolina. As a MMTLP shareholder, he says what you want to hear out of one side of his mouth. And to your backs, he says, and does the opposite thing totally. That is a 100% lack of integrity. It's your vote, but you need to know the facts to make an educated decision.

@WatcherGuru Fake News!

JUST IN: 🇺🇸 FBI charges 30 people in global insider trading scheme that made tens of millions in illegal profits.

Good day, Chairman. As we observe a new day at the Securities and Exchange Commission, I kindly request an explanation as to why this transition appears not to be reflected in the circumstances of #MMTLP shareholders. It is noteworthy that your predecessor and departmental heads engaged in over 13,000 communications concerning MMTLP prior to, during, and following the U3 Halt. Is it not within the SEC's responsibilities to oversee FINRA? Furthermore, is it not the SEC's duty to enforce Regulation SHO? Given these considerations, I inquire why we do not perceive this as a new day. According to the FINRA FAQ regarding MMTLP, there are approximately 2.65 million short positions in MMTLP. Additionally, TradeStation has publicly stated that it is unable to deliver MMTLP shares due to over-commitment. Anson Funds requested 10 million shares from NBH, which they are unable to deliver. FIF, on behalf of its field of membership, has held discussions with SEC staff concerning oversized and undeliverable positions. Therefore, I respectfully ask again: where is the new day? Are you informing Americans that it is a new day, yet behind closed doors, requesting the deletion of CAT data older than three years? That is not a new day, sir; it merely involves putting lipstick on a pig and hoping Americans will be sufficiently deceived to believe it is a new beginning, while markets continue to decline and the dollar is devalued. People like myself have had enough of political theater and have lost faith in you and this supposed new day. If it's truly a new day, fix MMTLP. It has been 1241 days since the U3 halt was issued. If it is a new-day issue, Next Bridge Hydrocarbons S1 filling has been awaiting approval for over 3 years!

Today, the @SECGov proposed amendments to provide public companies with the option of filing one semiannual report, on a new Form 10-S, in lieu of three quarterly reports on Form 10-Q. Here's why it matters. ⬇️ Public companies have an obligation under the federal securities laws to provide information that is material to investors. Yet, the rigidity of the SEC’s rules has prevented companies and their investors from determining for themselves the interim reporting frequency that best serves their business needs and investors. Today’s proposed amendments, if ultimately adopted, would provide companies with increased regulatory flexibility in this regard. In determining a company’s reporting cadence, a company might consider factors such as the costs and management time of preparing quarterly reports versus semiannual reports, expectations of its investors, potential effects on its cost of capital, the stage of its business development, the nature of its business model, other avenues of disclosure including earnings calls[2] and current reports on Form 8-K, and prospects of increased research coverage, all without undermining fundamental investor protections. Ultimately, this flexibility might reduce some of the burdens of being a public company and potentially influence a company’s decision to become or remain public. The proposal seeks public input on the optional semiannual reporting framework, and I look forward to the public feedback. Of course, the frequency of regulatory reporting is only part of the equation for incentivizing companies to go and stay public. Another significant part is ensuring that the disclosure—both financial and non-financial—mandated in interim reports, whether filed quarterly or semiannually, is guided by materiality as the north star. At the SEC, the Commission staff is well underway in exploring potential amendments to Regulation S-K,[3] generally and including the parts implicated by interim reports.[4] With respect to the financial statements required in interim reports, I also encourage the Financial Accounting Standards Board to evaluate potential amendments to its accounting standards, with the same goal of eliciting disclosure of material information and avoid compelling the disclosure of immaterial information. Today’s proposal is just the first step of the larger, comprehensive effort to review and reshape the current SEC rules governing public companies with respect to their ongoing reporting obligations and their ability to raise capital in the public markets. Over the next few months, I expect that the Commission will be considering a series of proposals that, if adopted, will not only redefine what it means to be a public company, but will make being public attractive again.

Looks like a can of Whoop ASS has been granted on Jeff Davies. Cannot be more happier. This jackel of society has been a parasite of nefarious actions agains Next Brigde Hydrocarbons and shareholders for way to long. Next whoop him in a motion to dismiss and get discovery on his ties with others in the den of thieves!

🚨MOTION FOR SUBSTITUTE SERVICE GRANTED IN NEXT BRIDGE HYDROCARBONS V. JEFFREY DAVIES RE CLAIM OF TORTIOUS INTERFERENCE. Judge grants request to serve Defendant via X account @EnergyCredit1 or via text message. Judge's order in chat below. MMTLP MMAT TRCH

In regards to @thatgirltrader after watching her on @TheRobbCarter one thing rang clear to me. John chapter 8 verse 44 & 45 — 44-Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it. 45 And because I tell you the truth, ye believe me not. Some truths mingled with lies perpetuated with - “My opinion or I believe” does not make it so. John Brda on the other hand was there. First voice references with knowledge and truth as clearly her allowed Amy the have an opinion and state it. But then not only refuted her assertions but once again determinated the truth as he was there and like her comes from the financial sector prior to being the CEO of Torch. Where Amy is concerned I just reference the above scripture. And state just because you have an opinion or believe something doesn’t necessarily mean you’re an expert. Why assert yourself into a situation like #MMTLP not being a shareholder? You have no skin in the game! Maybe you’re possibly connected to Virtu Financial! John asked Robb about that to be explored and explained. God know the truth and when discovery is granted so will the rest of the world.

Thanks @TheRobbCarter and Amy @thatgirltrader for proving what I've been saying since Day 1 of the $MMTLP settlement halt. ALL parties are frozen in crime and Brokers (as proven in FIF Foias) are still waiting for updated settlement instructions to reconcile the over sold allocations. And the S1 delays is proof, since adding more shares to a unreconciled register will confuse ownership even more. Even after 3.5 years of all sides being halted. The solution still points to a market based reconciliation of oversold counterfeit shares that can't be cleaned up nor moved into a private company. Time to make it happen @FINRA @SECGov. #FUPayMe Unlimited Risk is a bitch and we are not going anywhere.

We are competent @TheRobbCarter. But after 1241 day of Gladiator fighting for justice is tiring. You of all people should know that. You think that one debate going to bring closure for shareholders? That’s one major pipe smoking dream. MMTLP shareholders have uncovered acts that the government regulators themselves were involved. Remember all the FOIA’S and clear lines exposing @SECGov, Financial Information Forums and brokers they represent and the undeliverable outstanding warrents and shares they connot deliver? Remember @TradeStations admission that They oversold their AST allotment, and remember @FINRA own FAQs admission of 2.65 million short positions in MMTLP exist? Remember @annvandersteel meeting on the @SECGov doorstep along with #MMTLP shareholders. What been the end result of all this exposure of liability. Not a penance of resolution or Restitution for #MMTLP shareholders! Proven facts.- zero accountability. So who really believes that a debate with Amy going to result going to be beneficial to #MMTLP shareholders. I for one do not. There is no indication Amy has the regulatory authority, government clout, nor charismatic star power, journalistic following like Tucker Carlson nor and business acumen of Elon Musk. Correct me if I’m wrong but clearly there is ulterior motives driving this debate. I will be the first to say do not like the contentious behavior you’re bringing out with the Amy types to#MMTLP community in shamelessly misleading and insulting.

Mmm, how many people have you approached. I have seen the @JunkSavvy interactions and the Amy comments. Are you really implying that this type or promotion would result in a resolution and restoration for # MMTLP Shareholders. That is ludicrously false and merit less. Amy is not the President nor SEC Chairman. What value and worth does Amy bring to this situation if she can’t officially deliver a resolution and to harmed shareholders a restitution l? What good can possibly can from a debate that will not result in a Resolution and restoration to the 65,000 MMTLP shareholders. Don’t you believe we deserve justice? Instead of a circus act?

@TheRobbCarter I appreciate your show and your steadfast commitment to high moral standards, Christian-based beliefs, the fight against injustices, and your conservative stance in political matters. However, it is concerning to observe your recent efforts to pressure MMTLP, a well-known activist, into engaging in debate with @thatgirltrader . For over 1241 days, we have been dedicated to exposing individuals like her, from leaders at @SECGov to anonymous, unidentified figures. Our endeavors have spanned from Congress and legislative bodies to brokers and market makers. The shareholders of MMTLP have consistently fought valiantly for transparency and truth. You are aware of your involvement in some aspects of this ongoing journey. It is troubling to see you now opposing the very individuals you claim to support, by generating conflict over matters that have been publicly and thoroughly examined for more than 1241 days. From an external perspective, this appears less about #MMTLP Shareholders and the injustices they face, and more about personal gain, monetization, and financial interests. We, the shareholders of MMTLP, recognize that your personal circumstances and platforms may have recently changed; however, this does not alter our own stance or objectives. We have committed no wrongdoing beyond purchasing a stock. To clarify, what is the current share count? The available data overwhelmingly suggests transparency and validity. Has @TheRobbCarter reviewed this data? Have you interviewed #MMTLP shareholders and promoted a path to uncovering the truth and rectifying the wrongs inflicted upon them and their families? My own life has been profoundly impacted by my dear wife's health battles with two forms of cancer: non-Hodgkin lymphoma and acute myeloid leukemia. Three years of our lives consumed by medical procedures, doctors' appointments, chemotherapy, and emergency procedures. The financial strain has been overwhelming. Add that to the money stolen from my investment in MMTLP, and let’s just say it's been catastrophic. Life is full of hard moments, and it is within these moments that we define our cha Shareholders and the injustices they face, and more about personal gain, monetization, and financial interests. We, the shareholders of MMTLP, recognize that your personal circumstances and platforms may have recently changed; however, this does not alter our own stance or objectives. We have committed no wrongdoing beyond purchasing a stock. To clarify, what is the current share count? The available data overwhelmingly suggest transparency and validity. Has @TheRobbCarter, and if you are not aligned with us, then you are opposed to us. This staged theatrical display must cease. If you are experiencing doubts about your convictions, that is your concern. We, on the other hand, are confident in the data we have obtained, which supports our position. @bleedblue18 @palikaras @johnbrda @jen_kapela @boondockerm600

@kimkep4796 So it just dawned on me, that the bad actors and the supporting cast of regulators are trying to run out the clock from the “Statue of Limitations” to avoid being prosecuted. Can you weight in @kimkep4796 or @palikaras

✅ Civil RICO

My father often states, "Integrity is not for sale." #Junksavvy is arguably among the top five individuals who maintain a keen awareness of the #MMTLP situation. Why would an individual with integrity resort to engaging with requesters to debate well-documented facts? She has dedicated over three and a half years to this cause and is highly respected within the community. Just because others perceive it as beneficial for ratings, clicks, or their personal image, does not justify compromising one's integrity. Such actions diminish one's moral standing to merely satisfying others' demands. Pass, hard pass!

Nonfiction has no place debating fiction. There’s no point arguing truth with something designed to redirect attention. The truth isn’t up for debate. MMTLP @JunkSavvy @FINRA @VirtuFinancial @Citadel

You do realize, @SECPaulSAtkins, that no one believes you. Right! #MMTLP shareholders have proof of the @SECGov collusion and cover-up #MMTLP, right? @SECPaulSAtkins, you do realize that upper management at the @SECGov has also simultaneously been harming Next Bridge Hydrocarbon for 3 years as well, with the S1 delays. Are you on drugs, sir? Fix the @SECGov for real, please restore clarity, integrity and trust because all the public sees is you being a different version of your predecessor with the same lack of action. 1235 days! #MMT,

When I returned to the @SECGov in 2025, my mandate was clear: restore clarity, integrity, and trust to an agency that had lost sight of its core mission. One year later, we are delivering on that mission, and the most important work still lies ahead. My latest in @dcexaminer ⬇️

Todays thought, To whom it may concern: @FINRA @SECGov @SECPaulSAtkins @HesterPeirce @VirtuFinancial @Citadel @AnsonGroupFunds @TradeStation @etrade @OTCMarkets @Fidelity Today's thought: The above-named individuals and entities. You have approximately the same likelihood of halting discovery in the Meta Materials Bankruptcy Case as the Egyptians had of preventing Moses from parting the Red Sea, providing Israel safe passage on DRY ground. Only for you to be drowned in the sea because of greed. God is MMTLP shareholders' witness to your abominations. Settle trades now.

So Amy and progressive do not believe in regulatory mistakes. You ever heard of Ripple and XRP. Second, my share of MMTLP are at by brokerage as they refused to transfer to the transfer agent. So there goes you hypothesized share count spewing. I like several other have not been transferred to the transfer agent as well as retirement accounts holding have not been transferred. So there is two counts of regulatory issues and share count information being highly inaccurate. That’s why the bankruptcy judge is seeking trading data on TRCH because of the merger with MMAT. MMAT as a parent company and MMTLP as in was a placeholder dividend owned by the parent company. But here is a third regulatory blunder letting it trade against issuers repetitive request to stop once discovered in a few short days of listing . OPS? Hell no! Regulatory agencies knew and let it trade -secondly 42 day on the fail to deliver list and who can forget Finras two corporate actions breaking rule 6490 and fraud radar and still they regulators let it trade, says it all. FOIAs just increase the liability of all the nefarious activities, trading data will triangulate to paint a Rembrandt of epic proportions and those that bear responsibility will incur civil and criminal consequences.

@Tiggersdad2 @thatgirltrader Appreciate your input, but I'm just trying to get Amy's take regarding the regulators making mistakes and if she feels that they're liable in anyway

This is false reporting. The judge directed both parties to work together on the TRF data, as to not be overly burdensome or too costly. He also directed that the Trustee/estate must bear the cost of any and all production.

Do you want the Senate to pass the SAVE AMERICA ACT?