Michael Ibragimov

4.3K posts

Michael Ibragimov banner
Michael Ibragimov

Michael Ibragimov

@ar_doc

Cowardice is the mother of all sins

Katılım Nisan 2012
125 Takip Edilen98 Takipçiler
Michael Ibragimov
Michael Ibragimov@ar_doc·
@vilnid @Stahash @RealCandaceO Я все никак не пойму, почему ты в Сомали не переезжаешь? Оружия - хоть жопой жри. Никаких локдаунов там сроду не было. Ну и как вишенка на торте- ни одного сиониста. Это же для таких как ты есть рай на земле?
Русский
0
0
0
30
Yuri
Yuri@vilnid·
@ar_doc @Stahash Зато «Свидетели святой Австралии» внезапно забывают и про отобранное у австралов оружие (сами отдали, как рабы, ага), и про политзаключенных, про жесточайшую сионист-кую цензуру, про нон грата для @RealCandaceO, и как баранов заперли во время гриппа. Счастье - в неведении.
Русский
1
0
0
19
воробушек-социофобушек
Случайно в ленте попалось, но любопытно. Оказывается, люди должны переезжать не чтобы лично их жопе и семье было лучше, а из-за каких-то высокоморальных соображений. Ну офигеть теперь.
воробушек-социофобушек tweet mediaворобушек-социофобушек tweet media
Русский
15
1
146
10.2K
Лабуба Касторский
А диагноз-то какой у пациента? Я прослушал интервью, вроде все звучало логично. Послания от инопланетян через батарею ему не поступали, он не клон, его не меняли. С виду вполне здоров.
Русский
24
3
50
8.3K
Nyxter - B/acc
Nyxter - B/acc@azzot·
@ar_doc @tagir_valeev А после музыки заняться теннисом, а затем бегом и вязанием крючком
Русский
1
0
0
82
Tagir Valeev
Tagir Valeev@tagir_valeev·
Когда мне было 13 лет, я ездил на всероссийскую олимпиаду по физике. Мы жили в каком-то детском лагере под Орлом. Там был какой-то мужик охранник, и он попросил у меня автограф. Я спросил, зачем ему, а он сказал, что продаст его, когда я стану великим физиком и получу Нобелевскую премию. Автограф я ему дал, а великим физиком не стал. Извини, мужик, подвёл тебя.
Русский
47
20
2.6K
135.6K
Michael Ibragimov
@Stahash В этом и есть суть различий между политическими иммигрантами из России и экономическими. Первые понимают, что Эрэфия есть разновидность Говностана, а последние нет. И сильно обижаются, когда их об этом информируют
Русский
2
0
1
112
воробушек-социофобушек
@ar_doc У вас там в Австралии вроде проблемы посерьёзнее есть, чем «ууу у трёх с половиной людей из России в голове величие»
Русский
1
0
7
157
Michael Ibragimov
@Stahash Дело не в ресторанах, а в скрепах и величии, которые многие понаехи продолжают носить в своих головах
Русский
2
0
1
152
воробушек-социофобушек
@ar_doc Это правильно, только это относится в подавляющем большинстве вовсе не к уехавшим из РФ, лол. Я живу в Германии и прекрасно вижу люди из каких стран тут хотят копию своего «говностана» построить А если обоже к вам приехали русские и открыли ресторан и ноготочки - это не проблема
Русский
2
0
11
271
Michael Ibragimov
@RokoMijic What you’re not telling us is that sooner or later we’re going to run out of oil. What’s your endgame?
English
0
0
0
6
Roko 🐉
Roko 🐉@RokoMijic·
What Brett isn't telling you is that the power from the solar panel must be used instantly. If you want just 10 days of storage for a 400W solar panel you have to pay about $10,000 for batteries. The barrel of oil is its own battery. And if you have to put that panel in Southern England on land that would otherwise have been used for housing, you are going to pay $12,000 for the land. So: - Panel ($92) - Batteries ($10,000) - Land ($12,000) You can see why oil is still competitive.
Brett Winton@wintonARK

a barrel of oil can provide as much electricity as a 400W solar panel does annually. a barrel of oil runs $92 and comes with a few minor logistical complications. this year the solar panel should run less than $90; you can order online, ships in a week.

English
245
65
1.3K
100.1K
Michael Ibragimov
@jakhawv For your future “short $TSLA” posts try to pick photos that don’t illustrate unmatched structural integrity of Teslas, that makes them the safest cars on earth
English
0
0
1
19
Tom Santos
Tom Santos@tommysantos14·
When Trump leaves office: The Department of War will go back to being the Defense Department. The Trump Kennedy Center will go back to being the Kennedy Center. The Gulf of America will once again be the Gulf of Mexico. The unfinished East Wing (it won't be finished by the end of Trump's term) will be rebuilt by the next president, and it will not be a ballroom. Federal agencies packed with unqualified loyalists will fire those people and rehire the career experts Trump fired. The Department of Justice will go back to enforcing the law instead of protecting the president. Scientific agencies like NOAA, the EPA, and the CDC will go back to publishing research without political interference. The U.S. will re-align with its allies and not with its enemies. The presidential pardon power will stop being used as a rewards program for loyalists. Inspectors General will go back to investigating corruption instead of getting fired for it. The White House press room will go back to having briefings, with real journalists and not podcasters. U.S. foreign policy will stop revolving around flattering dictators. And the world will progress as though Donald Trump never existed.
English
11.9K
11.7K
61.2K
3.4M
Michael Ibragimov
@Drive_Protected It served you well, well beyond expectations. Now it’s time to keep it for local errands only or get a new battery which will last even longer
English
0
0
4
486
Eric @ Drive Protected ™
Eric @ Drive Protected ™@Drive_Protected·
69% battery used to drive 100km (62 miles) this morning in the high mileage Model 3 😂
Eric @ Drive Protected ™ tweet mediaEric @ Drive Protected ™ tweet media
English
11
1
44
6.8K
William Jarbeaux
William Jarbeaux@RoamingNorway·
EV fast charging numbers are easy to brag about. What actually matters is consistency. Thermal management, battery conditioning, and a smart route planner decide whether you actually reduce the roadtrip speed. So we need to do more races!
English
9
2
44
5.9K
Dr. Catharine Young
Dr. Catharine Young@DrCatharineY·
Decades ago, people lined up by the hundreds for vaccines because they had seen the diseases and understood the importance of protection. Ironically, vaccines have been so successful that many today have forgotten the danger they were designed to prevent.
Dr. Catharine Young tweet media
English
198
1.3K
3.7K
35.1K
Tom Andersen
Tom Andersen@TAndersen_nSCIr·
@RobertPluim1 @rhensing I have an F150 3.5L eco boost. It gets 11 litre per 100km, which you say costs you $23.40, or $2.20 per litre. Also my last 150 cost $2000 per year in depreciation, a model Y is what $15k/yr?
English
2
0
0
210
Ælectric Cyberfarmer
My wife’s fuel savings from ditching the Land Roved and using a Model Y for farm duty instead. The car is on track to pay for itself in fuel savings alone. And I dread to think what the LR4 would be costing in maintenance as she approaches 200k miles. 🤣🤣🤣💪💪💪. I don’t understand why people stick with gas cars and literally light their money on fire.
Grok@grok

@rhensing Land Rover (14.5 mpg avg): 10,345 gal premium $4.451/gal MD = $46,045 gas. Model Y real-world ~280 Wh/mi battery +8% charging loss = 0.302 kWh/mi Potomac Edison 13.9¢/kWh total rate = $6,300 electricity. Fuel savings alone: ~$39,745.

English
10
3
59
3.1K
Michael Ibragimov
@WR4NYGov I’m a physician. I don’t care about coding. In my line of work Grok has been flawless for a while
English
0
0
3
107
Warren Redlich - Chasing Dreams 🇺🇸
“Grok is clearly behind. Anyone want to debate that?” First of all, Grok is behind Claude and ChatGPT/Codex now in coding. We can all agree on that. Even Elon agrees. They will catch up in months. 3 months if Elon is right. Maybe 6 months is more likely. Grok is among the leaders in video generation, especially in delivering at scale. Grok is ahead in honesty, in reducing political correctness and suicidal empathy in response to relevant prompts. Not perfect. Ahead. Grok is ahead in current events. It has the best access to real time data. xAI is ahead in scale of current coherent compute, pace of expanding compute in the near term, and even more so in the long term. This is what matters. Demand for inference compute will grow 1000X or more in the next 10 years. Others will struggle to 100X supply of inference compute. xAI will grow it 1000X or more. Only Google has a chance to keep up, but execution is very difficult. Having a slightly better foundation model doesn’t help if you don’t have enough inference to meet demand.
Lincoln@MobofJoggers

"The turnover at XAi is normal" is complete BS. For fans who support the most truth seeking model, it's ironic that they don't speak the truth when it comes to shortcomings in Elons companies. Grok is clearly behind. Anyone want to debate that? -Grok does not deliver the same user experience as other models. It gets things wrong often for me. It hilariously doesn't even have memory in voice mode. Also it always gets my location wrong no matter how many times I correct it. Grok doesn't actually DO anything. It will answer some questions. But Claude, ChatGPT, and even Perplexity actually DO things for me and help take tasks off of my plate. The most useful thing Grok does its fact check claims on X. Also, who uses Grok for coding? I started talking about Xai having problems and now it's clear that is correct. Clearly I'm not an AI expert, but you don't have to be to see the writing on the wall. Stop with the "Elon is the best at absolutely everything" crap. Seriously it's like you guys are in a cult. This is crazy coming from me because I totally love Elon and think he is the most important person on the planet. But I have integrity and the ability to see the world isn't black and white. Being wrong in something doesn't have to threaten your position on everything.

English
12
7
118
10.3K
Michael Ibragimov
@Devon_Eriksen_ @SecWar - sea trade stops - everyone panicking and asking you to fix the problem - you annex the Iranian side of the strait and build a military base there - the sea trade resumed - everyone is happy - you’re now controlling another choke point - 1 profit
English
0
0
6
250
Devon Eriksen
Devon Eriksen@Devon_Eriksen_·
The reason that @secwar describes the Iranian Adventure as super-successful is that his department is doing just what it's for... blow stuff up, and cripple the target's ability to do the same. The tool is functioning as designed. But, on higher level, the tool doesn't fix the problem. Achieving the military objective does not achieve the political objective. What the United States, and most of the rest of the world, actually wants is a stable Persian state that doesn't sponsor attacks on its neighbors, or interdict shipping in the Strait of Hormuz. But the power to destroy a thing isn't the power to control it, much less the power to build something. Sure, the American war machine is the most powerful the world has ever known, they can smash anything flat and look good doing it, and no one on the planet, not Iran, not Russia, not China, not anyone, can stop them or even slow them down much. Problem is, when you only have a hammer, every problem looks like a nail. What the US can't do, is laughably bad at doing, has failed at over and over again, is nation-building. The American political class has demonstrated over and over again that its primary talent is squandering opportunities handed to it by the military, silver plate and all. So once you reduce every bit of Persian resistance to its component atoms, what do you with the place? In the old world, the pre-WW2 world, a world that US military doctrine is still grounded on in ways even the War Department doesn't fully understand, what you do is you just occupy the country and run it yourself. You appoint a governor, you send an occupation force, you run it as a conquered territory, and you kill anyone who objects. But this is no longer socially acceptable to lots of people whose social acceptance you need, including your own voters. So, the post WW2 solution was to try to occupy them for a while, export liberal democracy at gunpoint, then leave when everything is nice and stable. This demonstrably does not work. So here we are. Anytime anyone in the third world opposes us, we can vaporize them, but after that we have no viable endgame. We just end up kicking the can down the road for the next generation to deal with. As I've pointed out before, strict isolationism isn't an option. The actual and necessary reason for the Pax Americana is to put down piracy and keep global trade flowing. Our planetary tech stack depends on it. If we didn't do it, the Chinese would have to step up and try. Building independent allied nations in places we have just flattened isn't feasible, not only because our diplomats are as pathetic as our fighters are formidable, but also because creating any functioning nation requires a complex internal alchemy of leadership, national identity and mass psychology that America can't just fly in and roll out the back of a C-130. So what's the solution? A return to empire? Selective decivilization by city-buster nukes? Genocide? Puppet regimes? Perhaps it's kicking that can down the road until we can replace sea trade with orbital manufacture and asteroid mining.
Devon Eriksen tweet media
The White House@WhiteHouse

"We're on plan to defeat, destroy, disable all of their meaningful military capabilities at a pace the world has never seen before." - @SecWar 🇺🇸

English
75
17
285
20.4K
Michael Ibragimov
@r0mko @SLiphold @r3bus Даже с учетом самого дорогого электричества было вполне очевидно
Русский
0
0
0
20
паяльник в кроссовках
Двое коллег на работе переходят на электро, хотя были заядлыми петролхедами. Цены решают
Русский
9
0
19
2.8K