Arkadiy Belousov

8K posts

Arkadiy Belousov

Arkadiy Belousov

@arkadiybe

I do not represent my employer or anyone else. All opinions are my own or borrowed for a small fee.

Katılım Ekim 2012
181 Takip Edilen95 Takipçiler
Arkadiy Belousov
Arkadiy Belousov@arkadiybe·
@MorlockP Well, I am not a great writer, now did I serve. So maybe I should not have crossed swords with you. Your ability to misunderstand is clearly beyond my ability to argue. But here is a better man making a similar point. Maybe he'll get through to you. x.com/i/status/20407…
John Ʌ Konrad V@johnkonrad

This is why Americans are the deadliest fighters on earth. I met a priest yesterday who just got accepted to chaplain school in Newport. I asked him the obvious question: Marines or Navy? Navy, he said. His face fell a little. He told me he could never be a Marine because every Marine is a rifleman, and as a priest he can’t carry a weapon. He’s hoping to get assigned to a Marine unit anyway. All chaplains are Navy officers, so that’s the only door in. I laughed. I feel a little bad about that. Then I explained to him what “Devil Doc” means. The Marine Corps doesn’t have medics. They use Navy Corpsmen. I told him: when you get out to the fleet, find a Marine sergeant with a couple of Purple Hearts and tell him Devil Docs “aren’t real Marines.” Be prepared to duck. Marines are violently particular about who gets to wear their uniform. Navy Corpsmen and Navy chaplains who have eaten dirt alongside them in combat qualify. Full stop. My dad was Air Force. Not even Navy. I remember going to VFW halls with him as a kid. Someone would ask him what service, he’d say Air Force, and the room would chuckle a little. Then they’d find out he was a medic, and the air in the room changed. Something close to reverence. Dad hated being honored. He had one line he used to deflect it: “I didn’t do much. Save your praise for my cousin the PJ.” That always broke the ice. PJs are the Air Force special operators who go into hell to pull downed pilots out. They will take casualties and are prepared to die to rescue a single pilot or crewman. The math doesn’t math out. Why would any combat force take multiple casualties to rescue one air force jet jockey? What the padre is about to learn is that the military has a hierarchy that has nothing to do with rank, and nothing to do with the service stitched on your chest. Have you deployed? Have you seen combat? In every firefight there are men who move toward the guns and men who hang back. And when the guy at the tip of the spear is pinned down, bleeding, with rounds cracking past his head, there is exactly one word he screams into the radio. “Medic.” Here is the catch, and it is the whole reason America fights the way America fights. That Marine is willing to push forward into fire BECAUSE he knows the Corpsman is coming. He knows the medevac birds will land in the hot LZ. He knows the Devil Doc will drag him out by his plate carrier if it comes to that. And, if the medic can’t help, if he has what Dad called “injuries incompatible with life,” he knows that chaplain will crawl on his belly to administer last rights and deliver him to heaven. The F-15 pilot punching out over enemy territory knows the same thing. He knows the PJs will move heaven and earth to reach him, and turn whatever is shooting at him into a smoking crater of hell on earth on the way in. This is the quiet math underneath American violence. Our warriors are the fiercest on earth not because they are more aggressive, not just because they are better trained, or better equipped, though they are all of those things. They are the fiercest because they know, in their bones, that when they key the mic and call for help, help is coming in hot. Take that away, and you don’t have the U.S. military anymore. You have a security force.

English
0
0
1
9
ⓘ Dogs don't have thumbs
We risk hundreds of lives to save one life because Scots Irish enlisted people are disposable pawns whereas officer pilots who went to college and then got $30 million of training are real people of the elite class.
Lee (Greater)@shortmagsmle

I’m noticing a lot of foreigners who seem to not understand why we’d risk hundreds of lives, spend millions of dollars, and sacrifice several aircraft to rescue one guy. And the reason they don’t understand is also the reason people can’t be made American by a piece of paper.

English
21
5
87
10.3K
Arkadiy Belousov
Arkadiy Belousov@arkadiybe·
@EricLDaugh The entire budget is 320+ billion. More than half is fraud in one department? That sounds funny.
English
0
0
0
1
Eric Daugherty
Eric Daugherty@EricLDaugh·
🚨 HOLY CRAP. Gavin Newsom's California Medicaid program alone has reportedly lost $146 BILLION to FRAUD. Think about how much that is. Fraud raids are now RAMPING UP and arrests are happening The Trump White House anti-fraud task force has already suspended HUNDREDS of hospice fraudsters More raids are on the way. END GAVIN NEWSOM'S CAREER! 🔥
English
725
4.8K
14.4K
782.8K
Arkadiy Belousov
Arkadiy Belousov@arkadiybe·
What a disgusting nonsense. I hope you meant it sarcastically... If not... First, it's a tradition. Without that tradition, who would agree to fly over the enemy territory? The kind of enemy Iran is, you'd be crazy to risk it. And finally, from a purely monetary and prestige point of view... The actual rescue was done by Delta. Their training may be more expensive than a "mere" Weapons Officer. Their unit is certainly better known.
English
0
0
7
1.2K
Louis Michel
Louis Michel@LOUISEMICH74337·
@BFMTV La France doit le faire avec de vrais partenaires. Le partage de connaissances avec la Chine devrait être envisagé. Les chinois ont les moyens et la technologie, on pourrait être leurs alliés premiers en Europe. Ils respectent toujours leurs engagements
Français
19
0
3
4.1K
BFM
BFM@BFMTV·
C'est la France qui devra financer seule l'avion de combat du futur Rafale F5, les Émirats arabes unis ont été vexés et ne veulent plus participer au programme l.bfmtv.com/q0cw
Français
132
145
571
146.3K
P B D
P B D@redamon8·
@TKratman @GenericJes Sorry but you're either ignorant or a troll. Saying that the UK is worse than Russia means you dont know anything about Russia. The country that controls ALL the TVs, kills political adversaries, and has no functioning democracy and elections.
English
4
0
6
814
Tom Kratman
Tom Kratman@TKratman·
From Martin Iles, reposted: Having lived in the USA for nearly two years, I've realised something. The USA and the remainder of the Western world are no longer aligned. We all laugh and mock when the Americans say, "Freedom!" because we truly think we're as free as they are. Wrong. We're not. Not even close. The laws, the mindset, and the behaviour, is totally different in this regard. Most of all, the governments are totally different. The USA's convictions around core freedoms are on a scale we do not share. Meanwhile, Donald Trump wins the popular vote, the electoral college, the House, and the Senate... a man who, in every other Western country, is held in open derision, if not contempt. For these and other reasons, we are not the same. Yet the West, including Australia, fully expect to rely on the USA for our very survival. If the world turns bad (which will happen - only a question of time), then the whole West, without America, is toast. So, you may ask - if we're not very aligned ideologically, then it must be that we bring something to the party militarily? Well, no... actually... we don't matter that much militarily. The USA has about 470 ships in its navy, including 11 aircraft carriers, 69 submarines, 75 destroyers... plus 110 new ships in the pipeline. Australia has about 30, including 3 destroyers, 7 frigates and 7 outdated submarines. The UK does a little better, with about 60. Meanwhile, the US has over 14,000 military aircraft. A staggering number. Australia has 252 military aircraft. The UK has 556. The US army has just shy of 1,000,000 uniformed personnel in its military. Australia has about 45,000. The USA spends 3.4% ($968 billion) of its GDP on defence. Australia spends 2% ($36.4 billion). The US spends as much as the next 15 largest military-spending countries (including China) combined. The USA has a fighting culture. The men shoot things (a lot) and hunt things, the veterans get favoured in everything from parking spots to boarding planes. A uniformed young man is thanked in the street a dozen times a day. "Oh, the Americans and their guns!" we say, in our smug way. Yes, they have a warrior culture. We do not. We don't have to, because we're a leech on theirs. How many young British men are willing to fight for their country? Now ask the same regarding young American men. The difference is about as wide as it could be. Militarily, we don't offer squat. Meanwhile, look at the way Australia works against America's interests by loving on China. China made us rich and we stay close. This is a Marxist regime with expansionist aims. Again, you have to spend time in the USA to realise just how vast a gulf there is between us on China. Europe, too. They let China have their way everywhere from Germany to Greenland, all the while importing Islam and sending their own people to court for saying hurty words. Somehow, we have landed the deal of a lifetime with the USA that says, "when the baddies come, you'll save us ok?" Because we can't save ourselves. And we live in peace. But we keep gnawing away at freedoms, keep enabling China, and get flabby and disinterested about our military because Uncle Sam's got it. And, let's be honest, Americans are widely looked down on. To add insult to injury, we don't think that highly of our protectors. So, the USA is finally saying "enough." I am here, I can tell you what the vibe is, and that's it. Trump is doing what people want in this regard. They're over it. And we come across all shocked and hard done by. We behave like people with no self-insight at all. Yes, the global alliance system is all over the place now. From America's perspective, it's about time. And I must say, though I be a proud Australian, I am forced to agree. Something has to change.
English
819
3.8K
15.2K
503K
Tom Kratman
Tom Kratman@TKratman·
@GenericJes Free speech. The UK, for example, is worse than Russia while Germany is racing to become as bad as that.
English
28
21
1.2K
24.2K
Hannah Cox
Hannah Cox@HannahDCox·
Not naming names obviously, but shortly after Hegseth’s confirmation I was at the Fox News studios and a personality said to me, “It’s all true, every single thing written about him. We’re all shaking our heads but we can’t say anything.”
English
2.2K
2.5K
20.3K
1.6M
Brian Hannemann
Brian Hannemann@BrianHannemann·
Now THIS is an outlier. The NY Times broke this story, with receipts? There is a hidden story here, for sure. What is really going on? Who is the target of criminal activity, such that the NY Times has to throw Act Blue under the bus for the distraction? This is exactly like Fox News running that story 24/7 about some grandmother that disappeared, instead of running a single story on the Epstein documents that prove total depravity by the predator class. So, what is the real story that the NY Times is hiding?
English
1
1
7
570
Flopping Aces
Flopping Aces@FloppingAces·
NYT just detonated a 4,000-word thermonuclear bomb on ActBlue...and it’s not rumors, leaks, or partisan bullsh*t. It’s straight from ActBlue’s own terrified lawyers’ internal memos. Those memos warned their shady donation racket wasn’t “robust”...it was flat-out criminal. The phrase that buries them alive? “Knowing and willful.” They KNEW. They were WARNED in writing. And they kept the grift machine churning anyway. Then the glorious rats-fleeing-the-sinking-ship collapse: Senior officials bail, in-house lawyers bolt, one attorney blasts the memo to the board and gets his access nuked instantly. HR warns against whistleblower retaliation… then quits 30 fucking minutes later. That’s not turnover. That’s a pathetic, full-blown organizational meltdown. NYT just lit the fuse right before midterms. ActBlue is cooked. (article below)
English
64
564
2.8K
80.3K
Ozinzen
Ozinzen@ozinzen·
@kunley_drukpa In some western countries there is zero public transportation to "small" cities. The "wait until the bus is full" doesn't exist. So a slow process is kind of superior to zero solution provided, if we talk about small cities.
English
1
0
2
1.4K
ɖʀʊӄքǟ ӄʊռʟɛʏ 🇧🇹🇹🇩
‘AFRICAN TIME’ AND WAITING FOR AFRICAN BUSES 🇲🇼 Bus stations are probably best place in Africa to experience ‘African Time’ - or at least the version of it where there is a sort of endless waiting for something to happen. What is important here is that in Africa many buses won’t leave until they are completely full. If you ask a bus driver “what time is the bus due to leave?” the answer will be “when it is full” and often in a confused tone as if the question was conceptually difficult to understand. So a lot of the time when you go to take a longer distance bus you have to go off vague hearsay that “it normally leaves about 6am”. Then you have to go to the ‘bus station’ - usually less a bus station more a busy dirt yard with a few Coca Cola vendors and corrugated shacks - a bit before that alleged departure time and sit down on the bus and wait the hour or two for it to fill. Reason you don’t go later when it is probably more full is that even though 80% of the time it fills up slowly the other 20% of the time it fills up quickly and then it leaves and then you miss the only bus of the day. Very time consuming way to travel, wastes a lot of time Wanted to travel by bus with friend between two cities in Malawi once so went to the dirt yard where the buses were. There was one bushvan bus heading to where we wanted to go but it was mostly empty excepted two people. Just had to suck it up because that’s how buses in Africa work. Go and sit down - an hour passed, two hours, three. No AC and hot sun sat in the dirty shantytown station. Bus was filling up at a rate of about three people an hour. After eight or so people had gotten on the original two people who had been sitting inside the bus since the beginning suddenly just got up and left. An African woman said they worked for the bus drivers pretending to be customers so that when customers were deciding whether to invest several hours to sit and wait for a bus to fill up they could look inside and see their bus was ‘already’ half full. Then when the fake passengers did get up and leave the real customers would have wasted so much time in the bus already that, sunk cost, it would be better just to wait a little longer instead of leaving and investing the time in finding another. A uniquely African kind of scam Wasn’t even as simple as the bus seats being full here either. As soon as the main seats were occupied the driver started putting down stools and trying to cram extra customers onto the bench seats. He wouldn’t leave until the bus was completely full. Told the driver that we would pay him the cost of a couple of extra seats if he left without waiting for the bus to fill up completely since it was taking so fucking long. He seemed enthusiastic about the prospect of taking more money but the concept of leaving without a full bus seemed to confuse him - as in he genuinely did not understand what we were asking. Unsure what he thought we were going to pay him for but the promise “we will pay for extra seats so we don’t have to wait until the bus is full until you leave, you can just leave” and “being able to leave without every seat full” was like trying to square a circle in his mind As it turned out we spent so long explaining the concept of ‘leaving without a full bus but you make the same amount of money’ to him that more customers entered during the time it took and it ended up being redundant. Of course he was still expecting the money so we had to explain why we weren’t going to pay him anymore. But he didn’t understand that concept immediately either and it ended up being even more of a waste of time just to convey the point [1/2]
ɖʀʊӄքǟ ӄʊռʟɛʏ 🇧🇹🇹🇩 tweet media
🇬🇧 𝙔𝙊𝙊𝙆𝘼𝙔 𝘼𝙀𝙎𝙏𝙃𝙀𝙏𝙄𝘾𝙎 🇬🇧@MythoYookay

English
34
102
1.5K
164.2K
Eddie F
Eddie F@Iamdonewithtgis·
@arkadiybe @Handre $500 for someone who don’t have health insurance. With insurance yes it is $5k.
English
3
0
2
397
Handre
Handre@Handre·
Americans fly to Turkey for $3,000 dental implants that cost $40,000 in Manhattan. They drive to Tijuana for $800 MRIs priced at $12,000 in San Diego (literally 15 minutes north). Medical tourism revenue hit $100 billion globally in 2023 while US healthcare spending broke $4.5 trillion. The market speaks louder than any policy wonk ever could. When you can get the same cardiac surgery in Bangkok for $15,000 that costs $200,000 in Boston—using the same equipment, often better facilities, and surgeons trained at Johns Hopkins—the pricing isn't reflecting scarcity or quality. It's reflecting capture. Insurance companies created this beautiful racket where they negotiate "discounts" off artificially inflated prices, hospitals play along because the government backstops the whole charade through Medicare reimbursements, and pharmaceutical companies... well, they just price whatever the market will bear (which turns out to be everything you own plus your firstborn). Austrian school economists predicted this decades ago. When you remove price signals and direct payment, costs explode. When Americans rediscover actual market prices by flying to Mumbai for heart surgery, suddenly they remember what healthcare actually costs when providers compete for cash-paying customers instead of...
English
229
1.9K
8.1K
842.5K
Arkadiy Belousov
Arkadiy Belousov@arkadiybe·
@jh336405 @USronaldcarter If I remember correctly, Obama's deal was for Iran to stop for 10 years. So even with full compliance, they would be restarting the nuclear program about now. With way more resources than they had before the war, much less now.
English
0
0
2
44
💯1%_Better_Every_Day💯
@USronaldcarter Trump literally created his problem by ripping up the Iran Nuclear deal. Iran was in compliance and only stopped being in complaince when trump removed the incentives and ripped up the agreement. This whole situation is 100% on Trump.
💯1%_Better_Every_Day💯 tweet media
English
178
77
965
27.1K
🇺🇸 Ronald Carter
🇺🇸 Ronald Carter@USronaldcarter·
I just got off the phone with someone who works in defense policy in Washington. What they told me should end every "Trump is reckless" argument permanently. "Every single president since Clinton received the same intelligence briefing on Iran's nuclear timeline. Every single one was told the window was closing. Every single one chose to kick it down the road because the political cost of acting was higher than the political cost of waiting." Trump got the same briefing. 60kg of 90% enriched uranium. 4 weeks to breakout. Material for 2 bombs. He chose to act knowing it would tank his approval to 35%. He chose to act knowing his own base would split. He chose to act knowing NATO allies would refuse to help. He chose to act knowing gas prices would spike. A senior analyst I know at a major think tank put it this way: "The difference between Trump and every president before him isn't intelligence. They all had the same data. The difference is courage." Read that again. Every president had the same file on their desk. Only one opened it and did something. I'll keep you updated. Turn on notifications. 🚨
🇺🇸 Ronald Carter tweet media
English
7.2K
20.8K
72.8K
3.9M
KOKICH
KOKICH@Ceci24148170·
@arkadiybe @Actualidad_Pol We've heard this thousands of times in the last four years about Russia, now the narrative in Iran is the same, Iran runs out of missiles every day, but at night it strikes hard, something doesn't add up.
English
1
0
0
20
Actualidad Noticias
Actualidad Noticias@Actualidad_Pol·
🇲🇦🇺🇸 🇪🇸 Nerviosismo entre la cúpula militar española EEUU rearma a Marruecos con un arsenal de 8.500 millones: F-16, Apache, Chinook, misiles y radares
Actualidad Noticias tweet media
Español
567
1.4K
5K
439.4K
Arkadiy Belousov
Arkadiy Belousov@arkadiybe·
@Ceci24148170 @Actualidad_Pol Russia has nothing to sell. They emptied out their Cold War storage depots and all the new stuff they manage to produce is immediately burned in Ukraine.
English
1
0
0
21
KOKICH
KOKICH@Ceci24148170·
@Actualidad_Pol No se alarmen, no es para tanto, US busca a quien vender su chatarra militar ya que los países del golfo Persico al ver lo inservible que es cancelaron todos sus contratos con Washington. Lo que España debe hacer es comprar armamento ruso y pedir asistencia militar a Rusia...
Español
14
0
3
2.1K
Arkadiy Belousov
Arkadiy Belousov@arkadiybe·
Two things. 1. The drones are cheap because they are made from cheap Chinese parts. Cut the Chinese parts and the drones are gone. Those parts are not made in small workshops. They are made in huge factories. These factories are huge because that's required for the efficiency. Destroy the factories and the drones will disappear. (Oh, and are the parts that cheap? Or are they dumped and subsidized?) 2. If every kitchen is a munition factory, then every power plant, water tower and sewage processing station is a valid military target. Be very careful with that notion. You really don't want to go there.
English
1
0
2
62
Jim Bianco
Jim Bianco@biancoresearch·
I am not a military analyst. I'm a financial analyst focused on macroeconomic risk. That different lens might explain why I see something most military strategists and investors are missing. --- The New Rules of Warfare—And Why We Can't Opt Out For nearly a century, warfare belonged to whoever controlled the biggest defense budget. Aircraft carriers. Stealth bombers. Multibillion-dollar weapons systems. That model is changing in ways many aren't appreciating. Ukraine and Iran are showing the West what 21st-century conflict actually looks like: decentralized, highly iterative, fast-changing, unmanned, and cheap. Neither the US nor Russia—beginning in 2022—appears prepared. We might now have no choice but to show we can fight and win such a war. The Ukraine Approach Faced with a small defense budget, a much smaller population, and a vastly outnumbered army, Ukraine had to get creative. They couldn't match Russia's industrial capacity or spending. So they abandoned that playbook entirely. They developed an entirely new way to fight, highly decentralized, iterative, and most importantly, cheap. They also created Brave1—a completely new way to conduct war. Frontline commanders log into an iPad and bypass central command entirely. They spend digital points to purchase equipment directly from hundreds of (Ukrainian) manufacturers. When they encounter a new threat, they message the manufacturer directly and work with the engineers to find a solution, even if that means they visit to the front. The result is hardware or software upgrades that once took months now take days. Here's the crucial part: hundreds of manufacturers compete fiercely for these dollars by offering the best possible product as fast as possible. This isn't centralized procurement. It's a market. Competition drives innovation at scale. Weapons evolve as the enemy evolves in real time. Units are also awarded points for confirmed kills, uploaded from drone video—a powerfully eloquent way to grade effectiveness. But the real innovation might be how they decentralized manufacturing itself. Instead of building weapons in massive, centralized factories that make perfect targets for Russian bombing, Ukraine distributed production across hundreds of small manufacturers—workshops, machine shops, garages, and yes, kitchens. Each produces components or complete systems. This approach serves two purposes: speed and survival. You can bomb a tank factory. You destroy production for months. You cannot bomb ten thousand kitchens. If one workshop gets hit, ninety-nine others keep producing. The network regenerates faster than Russia can destroy it. This is why the manufacturing process includes actual kitchens—it's not a metaphor. It's a strategy. The Metric That Defines a New Era The result is staggering: at least 70% of battlefield casualties now come from drones. This is the first time in over a century that the primary cause of combat death is neither a bullet nor an artillery shell. Since World War I, industrial warfare meant industrial killing. Ukraine has broken that equation entirely. As a result, Russia is now controlling less territory than at any point since 2022 and going backward. In March, Ukraine made gains while Russia recorded no gains for the first time in two and a half years, and Drone-led offensives recaptured 470 square kilometers while paralyzing 40% of Russian oil exports. Ukraine has lowered the "cost per kill" to less than $1,000 per casualty—a 99.98% reduction from the millions of dollars that were common in the post-9/11 wars. This isn't an incremental improvement. This is a complete inversion of modern military economics. Yet the Western defense establishment is not learning from this. Rheinmetall CEO Armin Papperger mocked Ukraine's entire approach. In The Atlantic, he called Ukrainian manufacturers "housewives with 3D printers," dismissing their work as "playing with Legos." They are not studying this revolution. They are mocking it. And the "housewives with 3D printers" are beating the Russian army! Ukraine Is Now in the Middle East The US Military and Gulf states face an eerily similar problem. Iran's Shahed drones threaten shipping in the Strait of Hormuz—a chokepoint that funnels 21% of global oil. They cannot fend off Iran by firing a $4 million Patriot missiles at $20,000 drones. They need what Ukraine has discovered: a decentralized, rapidly adaptive defense network that doesn't require centralized industrial capacity. That's why Ukraine just signed historic 10-year defense deals with Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and the UAE. Over 220 Ukrainian specialists are now on the front lines of the Persian Gulf—exporting not just weapons, but a completely new doctrine of how to fight. The precedent is set. The model works. Everyone is watching. Mosaic On April 1st, Trump threatened to bomb Iran "back to the stone ages" if they don't reopen the Strait within weeks. It's the classic 20th-century playbook: overwhelming offense force, massive bombardment, industrial-scale destruction. The problem? That playbook doesn't work against distributed, cheap, rapid-iteration systems—especially when your enemy is organized under a mosaic structure. Iran's "Mosaic Defense" doctrine is a decentralized command system where authority and capability are distributed across multiple geographic and organizational nodes. Each region operates semi-autonomously with overlapping chains of command and pre-planned contingencies. It's designed so that when you destroy the center, the edges keep fighting. You cannot decapitate a system with no head. You cannot out-bomb your way to victory when your enemy is not centralized; this was the solution for 20th-century industrial warfare. Defense Wins Championships 21st-century asymmetrical threats require defensive shields, not aggressive offenses. Ukraine has built exactly that: rapid-iteration defenses, decentralized manufacturing, commanders empowered to buy solutions in real time and rewarded for success. That same defensive model may hold the key to opening the Strait of Hormuz. Not through massive offense, but through the ability to adapt and defend quickly. Why We're Stuck Whether you viewed this as a war of choice or not, it has now become a war to keep global trade open. And that makes it inescapable. This is precisely why the US cannot declare victory and walk away from the Strait of Hormuz— or TACO. Every adversary on the planet will interpret American withdrawal as confirmation that cheap asymmetric systems work against powerful centralized platforms. And these adversaries might have sent us a message last month. In mid-March 2026, an unauthorized drone swarm penetrated Barksdale Air Force Base in Louisiana, home to the U.S. Air Force's Global Strike Command. The fact that this happened not overseas but in the United States, and that these tests occurred just weeks ago, underscores how close this threat is now. They didn't attack. They announced their presence. Every adversary watching learned that cheap drone networks can reach into the US. The Global Supply Chain Risk If the US abandons the Gulf while Iran holds the Strait contested, markets will price this as validation that cheap systems can hold global trade hostage. The current market disruptions will become permanent. Supply chains will have to pivot from "just-in-time" efficiency back to "just-in-case" redundancy. Inflation returns as safety costs money. Trade routes diversify away from vulnerable chokepoints. The global friction tax becomes permanent. The Unavoidable Truth Once you prove that cheap, asymmetric systems can hold global trade hostage, that knowledge spreads globally and irreversibly. Every adversary learns the same lesson: you don't need a $2 trillion Navy—you need $20 million in drones and the will to use them. Withdrawing while the Strait remains contested would permanently validate this model. Supply chains shift to "just-in-case" redundancy. Insurance costs rise. The friction tax becomes structural—baked into every global transaction for decades. The cost of staying is measured in months. The cost of leaving is measured in decades of economic drag. We cannot leave unfinished business.
English
303
298
1.4K
554.5K
Ketil
Ketil@ktlmld·
@esrtweet @MUKIDEZA2 What's up with all the Japanese posts? I'm getting swamped with stuff I can't read. Do I have to unfollow accounts that are otherwise interesting to get rid of this?
English
1
0
0
39
ムキデザ│グラフィックデザイナー
日本には家紋と言う家ごとに紋章があるんです。(受け継がれなくて消えた家もあるけど)アメリカには何か、自分の家に代々伝わる物とかありますか?
ムキデザ│グラフィックデザイナー tweet media
日本語
612
122
2K
2.4M
Arkadiy Belousov
Arkadiy Belousov@arkadiybe·
@UziCryptoo @KurtSchlichter "you would receive $32,583 per month" Please define "receive". Are we talking about monthly interest on a safe investment? Accumulated savings divided by life expectancy? Something else?
English
0
0
1
42
Uzi
Uzi@UziCryptoo·
The max one can pay into social security per year is $10,453.20. If you did that every year from age 18 until retirement, the max you’ll get from SS is $4,873 /month. If you put it into an S&P index fund instead, you would receive $32,583 per month. Social Security is a scam.
English
818
5K
51.7K
2.4M
Arkadiy Belousov
Arkadiy Belousov@arkadiybe·
@ingelramdecoucy The one my Mom baked was about a quarter this high. And the one me and my lady manage at home now is about half of that. 8 layers... But it is indeed delicious and very, very hard to find around here. Good job for finding it in Armenia!
English
1
0
8
242
Enguerrand VII de Coucy
Enguerrand VII de Coucy@ingelramdecoucy·
Serving the Napoleon Cake at Lavash in Yerevan, Armenia. The cake was very good, it’s a big complex of puffed up puff pastry with a sort of whipped cream throughout. VERY crumbly to eat as it turns out, but delicious and the serving of it was quite a show
English
66
31
618
26.5K
Arkadiy Belousov
Arkadiy Belousov@arkadiybe·
@factpostnews "violence [done to people who don't fight back] only begets more violence and is never a lasting foundation for peace"
English
0
0
1
180
FactPost
FactPost@factpostnews·
The Dalai Lama has joined Pope Leo XIV in condemning the Trump administration's Iran war: "History has shown us time and again that violence only begets more violence and is never a lasting foundation for peace."
FactPost tweet mediaFactPost tweet media
English
40
609
2.3K
22.4K