Asger Frøhlich

Mig i Borgerligt Tabloid: “men tror du ikke også, at det for dem handler om noget med blod?” Den godmodige JBO: *noget om muslimers accept af danske konvertitter* Mohamed Abdi Kahn: “Hold my khat!” (Se screenshot*) … Min grundlæggende bekymring er, at Danmark risikerer at blive kvast af et influks af mennesker, som har en langt stærkere kulturbevidsthed, ingroup-præference og et modus for kontinuitet, der udspringer af noget meget mere slagkraftigt end flyvske idéer om ånd og vestlig performativ epokebestemt moraliseren: ophav og arv. “Blod”. “Nasab” (نسب). “Ketsuen” (血縁). Ophav og arv trumfer næsten alt andet under en seriøs tryktest. Det bærer en indbygget resiliens i en demografisk konkurrence, der i sidste ende handler om, hvem der får allokeret ressourcerne til deres egne. Findes der undtagelser, hvor loyaliteten vender sig anderledes? Ja, absolut. Sihaam Mohamoud er et glimrende eksempel. Men hun er undtagelsen. Det er derfor, hun skal kæmpe så hårdt for sin frihed og bliver kaldt "kokosnød" og anset som forræder. Mohamed Abdi Kahn er bare ærlig om, at blod og etnicitet gælder i den virkelige verden. Denne resiliens, som er legitim i stort set alle andre gamle homogene kulturer, er den venstrefløjs-domesticerede borgerlighed i fuld gang med at delegitimere og opløse hos etniske danskere, så vi står svagere i mødet med resten af verden. Alt sammen fordi man ikke kan være intellektuelt ærlig om virkelighedens realiteter og hellere vil dydssignalere mod en stråmand med et bizart overskæg. Som jeg hele tiden har pointeret: “Blod” er ikke nødvendigvis afgørende for individets tilhørsforhold, sådan som samfundet er skruet sammen. Men man er voldsomt meget tabt bag en vogn, hvis man tror, det er fuldstændig ligegyldigt, når konflikten først rammer. Og risikoen for at konflikten rammer stiger, jo mere man ignorerer virkeligheden. Alligevel holder parnasset fast i deres indbyrdes konsensus. The inmates are running the asylum. Det bliver underholdende at se, når alle sandkassekommisærerne om 5-10 år begynder at lade som om, de altid har repræsenteret fornuftens stemme i den her diskussion, når den kollektive bevidsthed i Vesten har rykket sig tættere på virkeligheden, fordi information ikke længere kun filtreres gennem aktivistiske journalister. Ligesom da man pludselig opdagede, at kultur faktisk betyder noget, og at mennesker ikke bare er udskiftelige BNP-producerende enheder. Gisp, hvem kunne dog have forudset dét? Ja, altså udover Glistrup og alle de andre, der dengang ikke var stuerene. ... *For kontekst: Sihaam Mohamoud er eks-muslim, og ikke biologisk Mohamed Abdi Kahns datter. Han snakker om hendes etniske ophav.

@AlexVanopslagh "Danske statsborgerskaber gennem årtier er blevet uddelt alt for lemfældigt" og Liberal Alliance har stemt for at uddele dem lemfældigt lige siden partiet startede, op til december 2024. Så prøv at sige det, Alex: "Undskyld fordi LA har skabt problemet!" politikdata.dk/afstemnings-sa…

Hver somalier koster de danske skatteydere 8,9 mio. kr. fra vugge til grav. Selv om vi betalte hver somalier 745.000 kr. for at remigrere frivilligt, ville det stadig være en kæmpe overskudsforretning. #dkpol

I don't think the industry and games journalists understand how little gamers care about what is happening to the games industry right now. The 40-person studio that made "Expedition 33" is comprised of former Ubisoft developers. Ubisoft hasn't made a game as good as "Expedition 33" in at least ten years. Ubisoft employs 17,000 people. If all of them lose their jobs and some of those people manage to form even a single small studio that makes a game as good as "Expedition 33," then we one more great game to play than we would have had otherwise, because Ubisoft will never make a great game. Great games are not Ubisoft's business model and that is why Ubisoft is unsalvageable. What is happening in the games industry right now is not the destruction of anything that deserves to be preserved. We are seeing the inevitable collapse of giant corporate studios that make mediocre games that nobody wants to play.

@politiken Det kunne fx de journalister, der burde fyres fordi de skriver denne form for naiv, aktivistisk og dybt politisk "journalistik" altimens de bliver aflønnet med vores skattekroner i form af mediestøtte.

"It's only 2% inflation" sounds harmless until you realize it's really ~8% annual supply increase, which destroys savings, forcing everyone to use their home as a saving account, making houses too expensive for young people, destroying family and civilization.

Vi ved hvornår valget kommer. Det kommer ca. 3 mdr. efter checks sendes ud. For sidste gang Socialdemokratiet gjorde det i 2022, der lavede man en varmecheck, og valget kom 3 mdr. efter. Og det er åbenbart sådan S arbejder. Man kunne også sende valgkort og valgcheck ud sammen, og så sparer man portoen. #dkpol

Denne regering har det mest anstrengte og destruktive forhold til ytringsfrihed vi har set i Danmarks historie siden Grundloven blev underskrevet. Nej, det er ikke en overdrivelse.

People think the government takes 15-60% of their wealth, depending on where they live. That's because they only consider direct taxation. But if you include inflation and the loss of investment capital (+ associated compound interest), it's closer to 90-99% over your lifetime.

Why is independent reporter Nick Shirley the only one digging into the fraud in Minnesota? Where’s 60 Minutes? ABC News? NBC News? CBS? CNN? Fox News? MSNBC? The New York Times? Washington Post? Reuters? Associated Press? Time Magazine? The Atlantic? Politico? NPR? PBS? Don Lemon?

Regeringen vil forbyde VPN-forbindelser Under et døgn efter, at jeg blev sendt tilbage til min fængselscelle med ekstra otte måneder i afsoningsbanken for blandt andet at gøre modstand mod regeringens forsøg på at fremmane en dansk version af filmen Minority Rapport (konstant overvågning af danskernes facebookprofiler og sundhedsjournaler) lægger samme regering næste ligkistesøm til rette for den store overvågningshammer. Denne gang føres hammeren ikke af den smalskuldrede frihedshader Peter Hummelgaard, men af den skaldede narkobillist Jacob Engel-Schmidt, der pt betvinger posten som kulturminister. Han og regeringen ønsker nemlig at forbyde brugen af VPN-forbindelser med begrundelsen om, at de vil forhindre geoblokeret streamning, “tilgang til ulovlige hjemmesider” og generel lyst til at gøre det nemmere for myndighederne at følge med i danskernes internettrafik. En VPN fungerer i korte træk ved at etablere en krypteret forbindelse til internettet, således at trafikkens indhold ikke kan identificeres af ens internetudbyder eller andre, der lytter med på linjen. Lovforslaget bør naturligvis ikke overraske nogen. Det er ca. lige så forudsigeligt, som når en seriepyroman antænder ildebrand nummer 16, eller som når Henrik Sass downloader babypornofilm nummer 3437. Regeringens forhold til privatliv er velkendt. Når ens synderegister består af indførsel og kraftig udbygning af masseovervågning på landets veje (ANPG), tvangsmæssig adgang til alle danskernes sundhedsjournaler og et brændende ønske om at afskaffe den elektroniske brevhemmelighed (Chat Control), er et forbud mod VPN sp, at foretage en ekstrapolation af en ret linje, der går gennem punkterne (1,1); (2,2); (3,3) - gad vide, hvad næste punkt er? Ja, du gættede rigtigt: retten til at skjule sig for sin ISP. I skrivende stund har jeg ikke adgang til selve lovforslaget - fordi jeg som sagt sidder fængslet for at gøre modstand mod masseovervågning - men mit gæt er, at myndighederne ikke kommer til at gå rundt på gader og stræder og forlange at se folks telefoner - de vil nok nærmere forlange af de store app-stores, at de lukker for danskernes adgang til VPN-apps. Det er heller ikke utænkeligt, at de vil pålægge ISP’er i Danmark at foretage dataanalyse på folks trafik og lukke linjen, hvis der findes mistænkelig krypteret data - måske ved at banne alle kendte VPN-end points. Selvfølgelig kommer forbuddet kun til at være 98% effektivt, men det er også godt nok for masseovervågerne. Det egentlige mål er ikke kontrol med en lille gruppe avancerede brugere med hang til privatliv. Målet er kontrol med de brede masser. For de kriminelle (og folk med et principielt forhold til privatliv) skal selvfølgelig nok sno sig uskadt forbi benspændet. Folk som os bruger i forvejen TOR, Tails, VeraCrypt og lange passwords, og vil kun i ringe grad blive berørt. Det samme med narkohandlere, børnepornografer, hemmelige agenter og terrorister. Jeg glæder mig til at læse lovforslaget (på samme måde som at klø skorpen af et sår eller at se et færdselsuheld) og det er helt sikkert et emne, jeg vil skrive mere om her på profilen. Ligeledes ser jeg frem til at læse alle høringssvarene - hvor regeringen fuldstændig jordes af alle eksperter, der kan krybe og gå. For dette er udelukkende et tiltag, der skal øge statens adgang til danskernes privatliv - privatliv er nemlig uhyre mistankepådragende, hvis man er socialdemogratisk magthaver. Mange krypterede hilsner fra Celle A10. Dateret 13. december 2025 (altså et par dage inden forbuddet blev fjernet fra lovforslaget, -admin)

For at være mere inkluderende synes jeg, at vi skal omdøbe gruppevoldtægt til gruppekram.

Either Elon stole this wealth, in which case Bernie should be advocating some kind of criminal case against him, or Elon produced and traded for this wealth, in which case he should rightly be viewed as a hero of civilization for such achievement, and an inspiration to others to achieve the same. Crucially, Bernie's wealth comes to him after being taken by force from others, while Elon's does not. And if you care about the plight of the poor, which all good people should, consider studying the structure of the financial system in which they operate. Consider, as Bernie shows, that from the 1970's something seems to have happened, structurally, that has lead to increasing wealth disparity. This disparity has little to do with Elon's momentous achievements, and much to do with money being perverted into a fiat institution when it was severed from gold in 1971. Civilization is sick because money itself—that blood which courses through its productive veins—was perverted. And it was perverted by people very much like Bernie, who, being unable to produce themselves, advocate for the wholesale theft of what others produce. That overt theft is somewhat distasteful, many insidious methods have been devised... most notably, the debasement of currency, which not one citizen in a hundred even diagnoses as the problem.

Inflation is truly a monster. Nearly everybody underestimates how destructive it is across decades. They just see 'prices going up' and 'high cost of living' but they don't understand why. (keep in mind the British pound is one of the BEST performing fiat currencies)

This 'why do you care about a tiny fraction of the population?' line is, and always was, utterly ridiculous. Gender ideology has undermined freedom of speech, scientific truth, gay rights, and women's and girls' safety, privacy and dignity. It's also caused irreparable physical damage to vulnerable kids. Nobody voted for it, the vast majority of people disagree with it, yet it has been imposed, top down, by politicians, healthcare bodies, academia, sections of the media, celebrities and even the police. Its activists have threatened and enacted violence on those who've dared oppose it. People have been defamed and discriminated against for questioning it. Jobs have been lost and lives have been ruined, all for the crime of knowing that sex is real and matters. When the smoke clears, it will be only too evident that this was never about a so-called vulnerable minority, notwithstanding the fact that some very vulnerable people have been harmed. The power dynamics underpinning our society have been reinforced, not dismantled. The loudest voices throughout this entire fiasco have been people insulated from consequences by their wealth and/or status. They aren't likely to find themselves locked in a prison cell with a 6'4" rapist who's decided his name's now Dolores. They don't need state-funded rape crisis centres, nor do they ever frequent high street changing rooms. They simper from talk show sofas about those nasty far-right bigots who don't want penises swinging around the girls' showers, secure in the knowledge that their private pool remains the safe place it always was. Those who've benefited most from gender identity ideology are men, both trans-identified and not. Some have been rewarded for having a cross-dressing kink by access to all spaces previously reserved for women. Others have parlayed their delicious new victim status into an excuse to threaten, assault and harass women. Non-trans-identified leftybros have found a magnificent platform from which to display their own impeccably progressive credentials, by jeering and sneering at the needs of women and girls, all while patting themselves on the back for giving away rights that aren't theirs. The actual victims in this mess have been women and children, especially the most vulnerable, gay people who've resisted the movement and paid a horrible price, and regular people working in environments where one misplaced pronoun could see you vilified or constructively dismissed. Do not tell me this is about a tiny minority. This movement has impacted society in disastrous ways, and if you had any sense, you'd be quietly deleting every trace of activist mantras, ad hominem attacks, false equivalence and circular arguments from your X feeds, because the day is fast approaching when you'll want to pretend you always saw through the craziness and never believed it for a second.

Where Are the "Je Suis Salwan" Marches? When Charlie Hebdo was attacked, the world erupted in solidarity. Politicians, activists, and so-called defenders of free speech flooded the streets chanting Je suis Charlie. But now, after the assassination of Salwan Momika—executed in his own home, live-streamed for all to see—where is the outcry? Where are the marches? Where are the vigils? Where are the global headlines condemning this execution in the name of Islam? Nowhere. The silence from Sweden’s political and media class is deafening. They won’t honor Momika’s sacrifice—instead, they’ll use his death to fast-track blasphemy laws and outlaw criticism of Islam completely. They don’t mourn him—they’re relieved. Muslims aren’t marching for Momika’s right to live. They’re celebrating his murder on social media. Look at the comments on Twitter—laughter, congratulations, and justifications. That tells you everything. Sweden’s prime minister won’t even say his name. The same Swedish authorities that hound and prosecute critics of Islam under so-called hate speech laws can’t be bothered to condemn his execution. If criticizing Islam means you deserve to die, then Sweden is no longer a democracy—it is an Islamic-occupied territory! If Western politicians truly believed in freedom, they would be in the streets right now chanting ‘Je suis Momika.’ But they aren’t. Instead, they side with the executioners.

I feel physically sick. The fact that I even have to report on this is beyond infuriating and heartbreaking! How many more need to be slaughtered before the world stops lying to itself and admits the truth—we have an ISLAM problem. BREAKING: A Sharia-style execution has just unfolded in Sweden. Salwan Momika, an outspoken critic of Islam, was shot dead during a live broadcast. This was not just murder—it was a calculated silencing, a brutal enforcement of blasphemy laws on Western soil. RIP, My Friend - You will be so very missed! Read my report: rairfoundation.com/breaking-shari…

Look, I can't tell why the world isn't freaking out about this right now. We're witnessing something monumental - AI hitting the top 10% of all programmers across every language out there. This isn't just another tech milestone; this is the dawn of what I call "cognitive hyper abundance." Think about it - while these models are mastering coding, they're simultaneously crushing it in mathematics and really the entire spectrum of scientific disciplines. When I talk about cognitive hyper abundance, I'm talking about a world where human intelligence is no longer the bottleneck for any scientific or economic endeavor. Full stop. Now, before everyone gets too excited (though you should be), let me bring some reality into the mix. Raw brainpower isn't everything - we still live in a physical universe with rules. Thermodynamics doesn't care how smart you are. Building next-gen fusion reactors still requires massive resources, muscle, and time. Physical experiments still move at their own pace, and they're not cheap. But here's the kicker - right now, we've got about 8 million PhDs on this planet. That's one doctorate for every thousand humans. But what we're heading toward? Imagine having a thousand doctorate-level intellects for every single human being. That's not science fiction anymore - that's our immediate future. This is the barrel of the cannon we're staring down, and it's about to launch humanity across the cosmos in ways we've barely begun to imagine. The real question isn't if this changes everything - it's whether we're ready for just how much everything is about to change.

Good reply Dryden, and worthy of a good response. But first let me place your mind at ease, for this “mode of libertarian thought” has indeed already been put out to pasture! In America, the notion of private property as a sacred ideal has been all but extinguished, discarded readily by everyone on the left, and blindly by nearly everyone on the right. So fear not my sentiments, for almost nobody agrees with me. “If you take libertarian ideas seriously, you start to think about how you would build a libertarian society.” This betrays a difference in how we view the world. You see it as something centrally planned, and I as something emergent. You see an engineered structure like a watch or an engine, I see unplanned order, like a forest or a living cell. One of us appreciates the complexity of human society, being so much more rich and dynamic than any engineered thing, the other fancies himself the watchmaker. But a watch is a simple machine, whereas society is complex. A watch can be calculated… like clockwork. A society not so. My allegation against every planner is that they suffer a dangerous hubris, unable to comprehend complexity, and believing themselves wise enough, they seek to design that which they cannot comprehend. And so we get all the foibles of politicians, made worse to the degree of their scale. “As such, libertarian philosophy says nothing about immigration, drugs, etc. It is beyond the scope. “ Libertarian philosophy (aka classical American philosophy), at its best, is a consistent application of the principle of self-ownership and private property, nothing more. If you believe in private property, consistently, then immigration “policy” is simple: let each do what they will with their own property. Drugs are the same: let each do what they will with their own property. And would you care about any immigrant if they touched nothing but their own property and that of rightful owners? I doubt you would. I think your antagonism toward immigrants is that so often they are found violating private property… violating it in the welfare you perceive them taking (though citizens take more), and in the aggression/crime you perceive them committing (though again, citizens commit more, at least in the US). An immigrant that violates no property cannot be a burden, by definition. Similarly, a drug addict that violates no property cannot be a burden, either. The understandable complaints about either are due fundamentally to violations of property. The greatest, and perhaps only, champions of property are libertarians. Everyone else is some shade of socialist/collectivist, eager to violate property toward some socially engineered goal of their own. However would we have roads, if we can’t steal your money? And so it begins. You allege, Dryden, that in my private city I wouldn’t want fentanyl or Haitians. I don’t need to address this point, for a private city is private property, and thus the owner can do what he chooses. You own land and don’t want anyone born in Haiti to visit? That’s your right. You own land and don’t want anyone consuming/possessing fentanyl on it? That’s your right. But I don’t believe the US Government, that cabal of detestable pretenders of virtue and wisdom, are the rightful owners of American land. Fundamentally, you disagree with this point (whether you've acknowledged it to yourself or not). And what you may not have admitted to yourself either, sadly, is that you believe the government owns not just your physical property but your self as well. How lamentable I find this, and yet you must believe it, if you command that the individual sacrifice his preferences over his own body to that of the collective. But, Dryden, even if you believe you are the property of Washington DC, I do not. I believe you are your own man, and I hope some day, you too may see it.