avery wayde🧘🏼‍♀️🇺🇸✌🏻💙🇺🇦

@therecount The irony of a room full of young girls and women around a sexual predator.

@JenniferJJacobs Curious. How many recent past Presidents have appointed their former personal attorney to the AG spot? Even in an acting capacity.

"We love Pam, and she will be transitioning to a much needed and important new job in the private sector, to be announced at a date in the near future," Trump says.

@TodayUpdates0 Now that is not a bad idea.

BREAKING 🅱️ RFK Jr is preparing to ban Pharmaceutical Ads on TV.. Thoughts?

@WUTangKids The guy who rakes in millions for mediocrity.

How does he keep getting these massive deals….this is insane….Commies, Vikings, Falcons and now Raiders….robbed them all! Gotta respect the hustle just don’t understand how it keeps happening 🤣

@_iamlougotti 🙌🏻

Tomatoes easily

@FBIDirectorKash What’s your next personal vacation planned using my tax dollars f_ckface?

How’s that private beach club of yours that doesn’t let people who look like me in? I’ll be the guy knocking on the front door, let’s see if you open… meanwhile this FBI crushing violent crime in Rhode Island for people of every color 👇🏾

@4Awesometweet @UziCryptoo Blah. Blah. Illegals voting. Find a new lie. That one is getting old.

@UziCryptoo They didn’t steal the money They used it to pay for their 22M illegals who will vote for them 😉

By the time I am 65, over $600,000 will be paid into Social Security on my behalf. That money would have been worth $1.9 million if I had gotten a 5% return. My annual interest would be $95k. The government promises me $3,075/month at age 67, which is $37k/year. HOW IS THIS NOT THEFT??

@UziCryptoo Are you from Texas or South Asia?

@DMichaelTripi @McFeely_Inforum Oh that will be a winning platform.

NEW: Trump to release 2027 budget plan with midterm election messaging centered on “massive defense buildup,” paid for by cutting domestic agencies and healthcare programs. -Bloomberg

@Evie_Magazine 🙄

Katherine Schwarzenegger celebrates marriage: “I do need my husband” ♥ She shared a video of Chris Pratt building a dollhouse for their daughters with a caption that playfully pushed back on the feminist notion of not needing a man. “I'll never understand when women say ‘I don't need my husband’ when I very much in fact do need my husband because who else would build our daughters a doll house?”

@j_fishback Bullshit. Are you going to give childless households $13 grand?

If you decide to pull your child from public school and homeschool your child You should get the full $13,000 for your child that would have been spent on your child in public school

@likelycause6 @AMikeBloomType Emily is a cold fish. I agree.

@AMikeBloomType This is the first vote out that I've hated this season. Colby was one of the people I was most excited to see. I wish Emily had gone instead.

Many of us were confused to see Colby was on #Survivor50. The last time we saw him, he was absolutely miserable at being back on the beach. But his time here has been one of the happiest surprises of 50. And hearing him get choked up about how much this show has defined half of his life is one of the highlights of the season

@McFeely_Inforum Boy were his voters conned.

Daycare, Medicaid and Medicare are scams in TrumpWorld.

@HalfwayPost @carolynfrances5 I knew he had to leave to change his diaper.

BREAKING: Over 50 audience members sitting around Donald Trump during his appearance at the Supreme Court today told reporters his smell was "unmistakable" and "distracting," and one elderly woman described it as "a mixture of soupy fecal matter and rotten roast beef."

@AHarVesco @SusieLeeNV He thought he’d use his fucking mob boss tactics to intimidate. This isn’t his corrupt family business.

Let's break it down calmly and factually. No Violation of Separation of Powers - Attendance is not interference. Oral arguments at the Supreme Court are public. Anyone can attend, including the President of the United States. There's literally a chair reserved for the President in the courtroom for such occasions. Trump isn't dictating rulings, threatening justices, or rewriting procedures, he's showing up to listen to arguments in a case directly involving his administration's executive order. That's engagement, not encroachment. - Presidents routinely interact with the judicial branch without "attacking" separation of powers: They nominate justices, their administrations argue cases, they comment publicly on decisions, and they enforce (or decline to enforce) rulings. Attending in person is unusual, historical records confirm no prior sitting president has done so for oral arguments but unusual ≠ unconstitutional. - If mere physical presence "threatens" the judiciary, then every senator, congressman, or citizen in the gallery does too. Lee's hysteria reveals more about her inability to handle a confident executive than any real breach. The Actual Issue: Birthright Citizenship and the 14th Amendment Trump's executive order seeks to limit automatic citizenship to children born in the U.S. only if at least one parent is a U.S. citizen or legal permanent resident. This challenges the modern blanket interpretation of the 14th Amendment ("All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof..."). - The phrase "subject to the jurisdiction thereof" was never intended as a blank check for children of illegal immigrants or temporary visitors. Historical context from the Amendment's ratification (post-Civil War) focused on freed slaves and those with full allegiance to the U.S., not diplomats, invaders, or those here unlawfully. Supreme Court precedent like United States v. Wong Kim Ark (1898) addressed a child of legal Chinese residents, not the open-border scenario we face today. - Unlimited birthright citizenship creates perverse incentives: "anchor babies," chain migration, and exploitation of U.S. resources. Trump is using executive action and now defending it in court, exactly how the system works. The judiciary gets the final say on constitutionality. Showing up demonstrates accountability and seriousness, not bullying. Lee's deleted meltdown and her sanitized follow-up ignore this. She weaponizes "oath to the Constitution" while many on her side spent years cheering lawfare, selective enforcement, and judicial activism against Trump. Where was the pearl-clutching when prior administrations stretched executive power on immigration, DACA, or mandates? A Congresswoman resorting to repeated vulgarity at 1 a.m., then deleting it when it backfired, isn't "defending the Constitution." It's unprofessional, emotional, and reveals the raw animus driving much anti-Trump rhetoric. She claims her "nerve was touched" by attacks on separation of powers. In reality, Trump's presence touched a nerve because it signals he's unafraid to confront entrenched interpretations that prioritize globalism over American sovereignty and rule of law. Trump's approach here, issuing the order, litigating it transparently, and observing the process, embodies energetic executive leadership. The Framers designed a vigorous presidency, not a timid one afraid of its own shadow or public scrutiny. The Supreme Court will decide the merits independently; justices aren't swayed by who sits in the gallery. Lee took an oath to represent her constituents and uphold the Constitution impartially. Selective outrage undermine that far more than a president attending a public hearing. This isn't principled constitutionalism; it's partisan derangement dressed up as duty. The people elected Trump to challenge failed policies like unchecked birthright citizenship. Watching the process unfold is leadership, not a threat to the republic.

Clearly my language touched a nerve — my nerve was touched by the attacks on our Constitution and its separation of powers. I took an oath to protect and defend it.

@SusieLeeNV @neeratanden All good Susie. I’m worse.

@BillMelugin_ I get it.

In a now deleted post, Rep. Susie Lee (D-NV) said of President Trump going to SCOTUS this morning: "So fucking fucked up. I'll pray they fuck him to his face."

@GovPritzker That mob boss shit doesn’t fly in that setting.

This is intimidation, plain and simple.

@ChrisMurphyCT @AngieFrost21 Mob boss tactics.

If he’s trying to intimidate the justices he appointed (and who MAGA world expects to follow Trump’s orders with a vitriolic, fringy fervor), it’s a recklessly dangerous tactic.

@PabloReports @seemva1 Diaper change time.

Update: Trump just left the Supreme Court, presumably because he got bored because no one was paying attention to him, but who knows.

@MeachamDr Mob boss intimidation tactic.

So why is Trump attending the SCOTUS hearing on birthright citizenship? It’s not like he’s going to understand any of the words being said.