Régis 🕊💙💛🙏

10.6K posts

Régis 🕊💙💛🙏 banner
Régis 🕊💙💛🙏

Régis 🕊💙💛🙏

@aymelis

Electronics Engineer, proud single dad of 3 amazing kids. Ukraine 🇺🇦 supporter. Love hiking, scuba diving, travels, flying a paramotor.

Chandler, AZ Katılım Ocak 2009
298 Takip Edilen340 Takipçiler
Régis 🕊💙💛🙏 retweetledi
(((Tendar)))
(((Tendar)))@Tendar·
Russians started this war in full confidence that it will be just a “TV-war”, somewhere far and without compromising their lives. Well, it is now their cities in TV, and their future just like this Wildberries facility in Saint Petersburg, Russia, is getting burned down.
English
63
586
3.5K
145.4K
Régis 🕊💙💛🙏 retweetledi
Igor Sushko
Igor Sushko@igorsushko·
Laura, it's time for President Trump to put the weight of the United States behind Ukraine. @LauraLoomer Ukraine has the initiative, we must not squander this opportunity of a generation to neuter Russia. files.igorsushko.com/putin_trump_ne…
English
16
59
373
9K
Régis 🕊💙💛🙏 retweetledi
Ёшкин Крот
Ёшкин Крот@yoshkinkrot·
«За эти деньги, которые Россия сегодня тратит, чтобы Украину разрушить, они могли этот Крым весь купить. И на эти деньги, которые они сейчас вбухали, чтобы убить, можно было всем людям сделать хорошую жизнь! Что, России мало земли?» — Лайма Вайкуле, певица Видео: DW на русском
Русский
73
274
1.6K
33.3K
Régis 🕊💙💛🙏 retweetledi
Black Spark
Black Spark@Black_Spark2·
Moscow doesn't care how the rest of Russia survives An interesting survey revealed the true attitude of residents of Moscow toward the rest of the Russian people. Most of the "capital's freeloaders" firmly believe that all fuel and resources should flow to Moscow. As for the other regions, according to the opinion of the "capital's elite", they'll just "have to put up with problems and a lack of resources and survive somehow". Actually, that's all there is to know about the true attitude of the spoiled capital toward its fellow countrymen outside the Moscow Ring Road. For them, the country is nothing more than a powerless colony and a resource base whose sole purpose is to ensure the comfort of Moscow's privileged youth. And this raises the key question: What can the regions really do? The answer is obvious: stop feeding the parasites who haughtily spit on the rest of the country. Cut off the flow of money and resources, keep the fuel for themselves, and force Moscow to remember who's paying for its lifestyle. The situation in Russia will not change in a way that benefits the regions without resistance. We know how to change the situation! Join us! chernayaiskra.com t.me/chernayaiskra2 x.com/BlckSpark (our backup page) x.com/Black_Spark2 @blcksprk" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">tiktok.com/@blcksprk @blckspark" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">youtube.com/@blckspark
English
27
208
766
43.1K
Régis 🕊💙💛🙏 retweetledi
Radu Hossu 🇹🇩🇺🇦
No, this isn’t a photo of the Wildberries warehouse in Moscow from last week. It’s a photo of the Wildberries warehouse in Krasnodar from today. To the question, “But why are the Ukrainians attacking civilian targets?” the answer is as follows: Wildberries is a kind of Amazon. It has massive warehouses where goods from China arrive and are resold by russian merchants. Those goods are also dual-use goods. “Dual-use” is the term for civilian products that can be used for military purposes. DJI drones, for example, are dual-use products because they can be used to film a wedding or to surveil enemy trench positions. Wildberries’ warehouses serve as the gateway for dual-use products worth billions of dollars used by the russian military. From thermal cameras to controllers, 3D printers, components, or entire drones, and much, much more. This is the main reason. The secondary reason, publicly stated by the operations coordinator Robert Magyar himself, is to send the message that the war has returned home to russia. “Well then, in Ukraine too, the Nova Poshta or Epicenter warehouses—or others—are legitimate targets for the russians, aren’t they?” No. Nothing in Ukraine is a legitimate target for the russians. Ukraine is attacking these warehouses, just as it attacks russia’s commercial ships in the Shadow Fleet, and just as it attacks military targets—because it has been attacked. Ukraine’s strikes are acts of self-defense. russia’s strikes are violations of all international norms, as this is an illegitimate, unprovoked, illegal, and immoral war. Slava Ukraini!
Radu Hossu 🇹🇩🇺🇦 tweet media
English
266
1.8K
12.3K
378.7K
Régis 🕊💙💛🙏 retweetledi
Aleksandr X
Aleksandr X@AleksandrX13·
Ukraine uses russia's own Air Defence... ...to shoot down an advanced russian jet fighter!!! Ukrainian hackers and intelligence experts intercepted control parameters and altered operational data for the 'BARS Moscow' air defense system. They then exploited severe software vulnerabilities to trick the Russian air defense crew - deployed to protect Moscow - into misidentifying their own high-tech fighter as a hostile threat, triggering the fatal launch. This unprecedented operation resulted in the complete destruction of a russian Su-57 stealth fighter jet valued at over $100 million. While the Russian Ministry of Defense publicly attributed the crash to a 'technical failure', Russian military channels and pro-war media quickly confirmed that the jet fell victim to friendly fire. (1/)
Aleksandr X tweet media
English
41
475
2.7K
108.3K
Régis 🕊💙💛🙏 retweetledi
Régis 🕊💙💛🙏 retweetledi
UAVoyager🇺🇦
UAVoyager🇺🇦@CrimeanVoyager·
The russian hypocrisy is breathtaking. Wildberries CEO Tatyana Kim calls Ukraine's strike on Wildberries "an act of international terrorism." Meanwhile, since the start of its full-scale invasion, russia has attacked or damaged more than 400 Nova Poshta facilities — Ukraine's largest postal and logistics network. That's just one Ukrainian delivery company. Dozens of Nova Poshta employees have been killed or injured in russian strikes while simply doing their jobs. For years, russia has deliberately targeted civilian infrastructure. The last people on Earth who get to lecture anyone about terrorism are russians.
UAVoyager🇺🇦 tweet mediaUAVoyager🇺🇦 tweet mediaUAVoyager🇺🇦 tweet mediaUAVoyager🇺🇦 tweet media
English
100
2K
8.7K
154.1K
Régis 🕊💙💛🙏 retweetledi
Le Zelenskyste 🇫🇷🇺🇦
Le Zelenskyste 🇫🇷🇺🇦@VolodimirZelen1·
🚨 Poutine INCAPABLE d’organiser sa grande parade navale de Saint-Petersbourg à cause des drones ukrainiens ! Depuis 1939, la Russie célèbre chaque dernier dimanche de juillet la « Journée de la Marine ». Depuis 2017, Poutine en a fait SON évènement : des dizaines de navires alignés sur la Neva, à Saint-Pétersbourg, pour montrer au monde entier la puissance retrouvée de sa flotte. 🤗En 2023, il y invitait même des chefs d’État africains pour impressionner la galerie. 🫠Cette année ? Silence radio. Pour la 2e année consécutive, le défilé naval n’aura pas lieu ce dimanche 26 juillet. Motif officiel avancé par le Kremlin : un simple « manque de temps ». 🤡 La VRAIE raison : la Russie est incapable de protéger son propre littoral contre les drones ukrainiens, à 1 000 km du front. Et on le voit depuis des mois : 🔥 Fin mars : le brise-glace Purga, tout neuf, touché EN PLEIN CHANTIER dans le port de Saint-Pétersbourg 🔥 3-4 juin : frappes simultanées sur la base navale de Kronstadt ET un terminal pétrolier — pendant que 20 000 invités de 130 pays étaient réunis pour le grand raout économique SPIEF. 🔥 4 juillet : nouvelle frappe sur ce même terminal pétrolier. Organiser une parade dans ces conditions, c’est prendre le risque de voir Kyiv humilier le Kremlin en direct devant les caméras du monde. Et pendant que Poutine repousse encore sa fête, sa flotte fait naufrage : ⚓️ Mer Noire : ~30% des navires perdus (dont le croiseur amiral Moskva), le reste planqué à Novorossisk ⚓️ Méditerranée : présence quasi-fantôme depuis la fermeture des détroits turcs et le repli de Tartous — il faut désormais 3 semaines pour ravitailler un navire ⚓️ Vétusté : 40% des bâtiments ont plus de 35 ans, certains ravitailleurs frôlent les 50 ans d’âge, et les chantiers navals soviétiques qui pourraient les remplacer… sont en Ukraine, à Mykolaïv ⚓️ Le porte-avion : abandonné après des années en chantier et 1 milliard investi en vain pour le moderniser. Une parade annulée, c’est un aveu. Deux parades annulées, c’est un naufrage. 🇷🇺⚓️💀 L’Ukraine a GAGNÉ la bataille de la mer Noire sans même avoir de flotte. Et désormais, c’est la Baltique qui trinque. Chapeau bas. 🇺🇦
Français
16
353
1.6K
33.4K
Régis 🕊💙💛🙏
@wholemars Another reason it is dangerous is that if FSD suddenly tries to turn the wheel to escape a road hazard, most likely the hands would limit its ability and result in a disengagement, in such a way that the system would not complete its maneuver, letting the driver cope with it...
Chandler, AZ 🇺🇸 English
0
0
0
17
Whole Mars Catalog
Whole Mars Catalog@wholemars·
It was shocking and appalling to hear french officials make the case to delay life saving self-driving technology. Their proposed changes, to require hands on the wheel and to not allow speeding, could, of course, be implemented but would actually make the software less safe. Millions of people are now using this software all over the world, including in Europe. The design has been honed over the years to be incredibly safe. Rather than demanding software changes for the French market, I recommend regulators try to understand why their suggestions would actually decrease safety. Requiring people to keep their hands on the wheel sounds like a great idea, until you realize that NHTSA cited accidental disengagement as a top reason for ADAS crashes. When people are required to touch / pull on the wheel to satisfy the torque sensor, they sometimes accidentally turn the system off and don't realize it. That can cause a crash. That's why Tesla and the rest of the industry have moved away from requiring users to pull on the wheels. Instead, they now use advanced camera-based driver monitoring systems that can check whether the user is looking at the road and whether their hands are free and ready to take over. This is much safer than requiring them to pull on the wheel every few seconds. Requiring hands on the wheel also dramatically decreases usage of the feature, which reduces the positive safety impact. Insisting that the system follow the speed limit also sounds reasonable at first, until you start to think about it. Cruise control and lane keeping system can already be set at a higher speed than the speed limit today. Why should a more advanced ADAS be held to a different standard than a primitive lane keeping assist? Will users actually turn off self-driving and use cruise control or lane keeping assist features that are less safe so that they can set the speed they choose? The problem is, these systems can sometimes pick up the speed limit incorrectly. The model will choose the speed by looking at the speed limit, the road conditions, and the speeds of other cars on the road, so it can maintain safe driving even if the speed limit is off much like a human. But if you force the system to never drive faster than the detected speed limit, a minor error could become a disaster. Let's say there is a highway with a speed limit of 70 mph. Earlier in the day there was construction and a temporary construction sign that said Slow speed limit 15 mph. If someone accidentally left that sign behind, for example, but construction had ended and traffic had cleared up, the car might incorrectly register the speed limit as 15 mph. If the system is forced by law to never exceed the speed limit, it would slow down to 15 mph on the highway abruptly and possibly cause a crash. It's important that the driver ultimately retains control and makes a decision about what speed a car should travel — not the legislature. This is a supervised ADAS system and the driver maintains legal liability for any speeding that happens. They still get to set the speed, and if they make an unsafe decision you can enforce that the same way you always have — through speed cameras, police officers, etc. But don't cripple the system in a way that will dramatically reduce usage, and increase crashes. Just look at the examples in the clip below. Are you seriously going to justify delaying this technology for your citizens when your neighboring European countries are using it safely? If a kid is about to get hit by a car, like in some of the examples below, does it matter if the driver had their hand on the steering wheel or not when the AI stopped the car and prevented the crash? The only explanation for such a backwards policy stance is protectionism. Simply put, the French are purposefully delaying life saving technology to protect their local industry and unions — even if it means letting their own citizens get injured and killed in the process. I hope there is still some sense left somewhere in the European Union. All you have to do is try the software for one hour to understand its potential to transform road safety. x.com/Tesla/status/2…
Tesla@Tesla

FSD Supervised helps save lives

English
80
105
757
56.1K
Régis 🕊💙💛🙏 retweetledi
Christophe Ginisty
Christophe Ginisty@ChristopheGini·
🔴🔴⚖️ En décembre dernier, Trump a poursuivi la BBC, lui réclamant 10 milliards de dollars. Pour préparer sa défense, la BBC a exigé la communication de nombreux documents. Trump a refusé mais une juge vient de lui donner tort en le contraignant à donner accès à ses finances personnelles sur plus de 400 entités et à son journal, ses relevés téléphoniques, et les témoignages de ses plus proches conseillers. 🗃️ Les faits Mardi, à l'issue d'une audience de trois heures à Miami, la juge fédérale Enjoliqué Lett a ordonné à Trump de communiquer des documents financiers détenus par le Donald J. Trump Revocable Trust, la structure créée pour gérer ses affaires pendant sa présidence. A l'origine de cette action en justice, Trump avait accusé la @BBC d'avoir présenté, dans un reportage, les faits de façon "intentionnellement, malicieusement et trompeusement" déformée, qualifiant le montage de "faux, diffamatoire, trompeur, dénigrant, incendiaire et malveillant". La BBC avait reconnu quelques erreurs de montage et avait publiquement présenté ses excuses. Trump n'avait pas retiré sa plainte, sûr de son fait. 🔥 Mais c'était sans compter sur les conséquences de cette attaque contre la BBC. 1⃣ Réclamer 10 milliards de dollars de préjudice économique à une entreprise, c'est accepter, en droit, de prouver ce préjudice et prouver un préjudice économique suppose de montrer ses comptes. 2⃣ Réclamer une atteinte à son image le jour du 6 janvier, c'est accepter que la justice interroge ce qu'il pensait réellement ce jour-là, et ce que ses plus proches conseillers en savaient. Pour mieux préparer sa défense, la BBC a donc demandé la communication de son journal personnel et ses relevés téléphoniques autour du 6 janvier 2021, des documents financiers concernant plus de 400 entités liées à sa famille, et a lancé des assignations visant son cercle le plus proche — Donald Trump Jr., Ivanka Trump, Jared Kushner, Steve Bannon, Stephen Miller et Michael Flynn — pour établir son état d'esprit réel ce jour-là. La BBC a aussi assigné des agences fédérales et d'anciens responsables. La juge a justifié sa décision en relevant que la plainte de Trump évoque des dommages à sa "marque, ses propriétés et ses affaires", et pas seulement à sa réputation personnelle. L'avocat de Trump a tenté d'amender la plainte pour ne réclamer que des dommages réputationnels, précisément pour éviter cette obligation de transparence financière. La juge n'a pas été convaincue et a maintenu son ordonnance. Pour étayer son accusation, les conseillers de Trump n'ont produit que 735 pages, décrites par l'avocat de la BBC comme de simples articles de presse glanés sur internet, une production qu'il a qualifié de "mascarade". ➡️ On en est là. Le procès censé faire plier un média public se retourne contre celui qui l'a intenté. Trump a passé sa carrière à protéger farouchement ses finances et son entourage. En poursuivant la BBC, il vient de leur ouvrir grand la porte sur les deux fronts à la fois. Comme à son habitude, Trump a voulu faire de ce procès une démonstration de force. Cela pourrait devenir la première occasion en des années d'examiner en détail à la fois ses finances et les coulisses du 6 janvier. La même stratégie contentieuse déployée contre la presse, celle qui a déjà échoué contre le Washington Post et le Guardian, se retourne ici avec une conséquence bien plus lourde que la simple perte du procès : l'exposition de tout ce que Trump a toujours voulu garder hors de portée des tribunaux.
Christophe Ginisty tweet media
Français
28
428
1.1K
63.4K
Régis 🕊💙💛🙏 retweetledi
Pepel Klaasa
Pepel Klaasa@pepel_klaasa·
Russia’s occupation authorities in Kherson Oblast are preparing to “nationalize” 1172 Ukrainian homes, according to Ukraine’s Ombudsman. The properties belong to owners who refused to or could not re-register them under Russian law. This is another large-scale illegal seizure of civilian property in occupied Ukraine and constitutes a war crime.
English
5
133
323
4.6K
Régis 🕊💙💛🙏 retweetledi
Tymofiy Mylovanov
Tymofiy Mylovanov@Mylovanov·
McFaul: People thought time was on Putin’s side: more soldiers, more money, the West losing interest. The Trump administration cut U.S. aid to Ukraine nearly to zero. But today, I don’t know anyone who still thinks time favors Putin. Momentum has shifted to Ukraine. 1/
English
20
284
1.4K
33K
Régis 🕊💙💛🙏 retweetledi
Anton Gerashchenko
Anton Gerashchenko@Gerashchenko_en·
President Zelenskyy: Putin is preparing new strikes against Ukraine, as well as an additional mobilization in Russia and an expansion of the war.
Anton Gerashchenko@Gerashchenko_en

Russian propagandist Dugin openly says that Russia needs a mobilization and that Putin must make the decision to go through with it. A new large-scale mobilization campaign in Russia in the fall of 2026 has not yet been announced. However, the likelihood that mobilization will be announced in late September or October is very high. It is clear that the Russian authorities will not announce this in advance so as not to trigger a mass exodus and a decline in loyalty on the eve of the parliamentary elections. If the campaign is being prepared, it will logically be concealed until the administrative system is ready and opportunities to leave the country are as limited as possible. Therefore, it's necessary to see whether Russia's individual actions are coming together into a unified mobilization configuration. ◾️ First, independent Russian media outlets with sources in regional administrations and the military recruitment system report that a new mobilization is being discussed at various levels of government. October (after the State Duma elections) is cited as a possible date. ◾️ Second, Russia is facing an increasingly severe shortage of manpower. Regions are increasing payments to contract soldiers and expanding recruitment among debtors, prisoners, the unemployed, foreigners, and socially vulnerable groups. At the same time, recruitment numbers are declining, while the need for monthly replenishment is estimated at tens of thousands of people. This means that the voluntary-monetary model is approaching its limits. ◾️ Third, military enlistment offices are not just updating their databases. Since the beginning of 2026, reports have been coming in from various regions that mobilization orders are being affixed to military ID cards during summonses, ostensibly for "data update." Such an order predetermines where a person must report on their own once mobilization measures are in effect. ◾️ Fourth, the state has established an e-infrastructure that it did not have in September 2022. A summons is considered served once it is entered into the registry, and a travel ban can take effect as soon as it is uploaded, regardless of whether the citizen has seen it. If a person fails to appear, the system allows for additional restrictions to be imposed. This means that the Kremlin no longer needs to publicly announce a general border closure: it is sufficient to simultaneously enter the required number of people into the registry and forward the data to the border service. ◾️ Fifth, one of the potential ways for circumventing Russian control has already been closed. Belarus has confirmed that Russians prohibited from leaving Russia due to a military summons will not be able to leave Belarusian territory either. Thus, the restriction effectively applies to both countries. ◾️ Sixth, the tightening of border control, consultations with neighboring countries on closing borders to Russians, changes to transport links, and growing interest among Russians in leaving Russia coincide with the worsening of military conscription. ◾️ Seventh, the calendar follows a political logic. Before the election, it is not in the government's interest to stir up widespread anxiety. After the vote, the political cost drops sharply. That is why September may be the final month of administrative preparations, and October - a convenient time for mobilization. The available indicators are sufficient to assess that the risk of a new mobilization this fall is high. It may not be called a mobilization. It could take the form of mass "data update," reservist assemblies, mobilization orders, forced enlistment, regional quotas, or phased travel restrictions. For someone who will ultimately be sent to war, the legal name of the mechanism will not matter. What should those who do not want to participate in the war do: 🔹 Don't wait for an official mobilization announcement. Once a draft notice is entered into the electronic registry, the travel ban may take effect automatically. The moment when mobilization is publicly acknowledged may come only after opportunities to leave the country have effectively been closed off. 🔹 Leave in advance and only via legal routes. Belarus should not be viewed as a way to circumvent Russian restrictions, as the Belarusian border system may enforce Russia's travel bans. 🔹 Don't consider Europe as the primary relocation destination. Russian citizens will face visa restrictions there, stricter checks on the source of funds, banks' refusal to open or maintain accounts, difficulties with money transfers from Russia, and restrictions on transactions with Russian banks, payment and cryptocurrency services. 🔹 Use Central Asia primarily as a quick transit zone. Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, or Uzbekistan may be options for an initial departure, temporary stay, and planning the next route. At the same time, these countries should not be considered guaranteed safe havens for deserters, anti-war activists, or people wanted by Russia, due to the cooperation between local law enforcement agencies and Moscow. After the initial departure, potential relocation destinations may include: ▪️ countries in Latin America, specifically Brazil, Argentina, Uruguay, Paraguay, Chile, Mexico, or countries in Central America; ▪️ countries in South and Southeast Asia; ▪️ Türkiye as a temporary transport and relocation hub; ▪️ certain countries in the Middle East, Africa, or the Caribbean; ▪️ other countries where legal entry, long-term stay, study, work, or a residence permit are available. A practical strategy should consist of two stages: first, a quick, legal departure through an accessible country in Central Asia, the Caucasus, Türkiye, or another open route; then, travel to a country in Asia, Latin America, the Middle East, Africa, or another region where long-term legalization is possible. Waiting for full documentary confirmation of mobilization in this situation means risking that the decision will be confirmed only after it will no longer be possible to cross the border.

English
15
208
466
19.6K
Régis 🕊💙💛🙏 retweetledi
Kaja Kallas
Kaja Kallas@kajakallas·
We have agreed on the 21st sanctions package against Russia. It delivers sweeping measures targeting Moscow’s financial system, its military-industrial complex and energy sector, that keep Russia's war economy running. We are hitting Putin where it hurts most: cutting off the financial lifelines he relies on to sustain his war. This is not the end of the road on sanctions. We are already working on the next steps. The EU must be ready to respond to any further Russian escalation.
English
1.3K
974
5.9K
180.5K
Régis 🕊💙💛🙏 retweetledi
Caolan
Caolan@CaolanReports·
Russian spent centuries acting like an untouchable bully. Now its refineries are burning, its gas pumps are dry, and the people who cheered the war are crying into their phones. That’s what happens when you power an ‘empire’ with bullshit
English
424
2.2K
9.9K
187.3K
Régis 🕊💙💛🙏 retweetledi
Gandalv
Gandalv@Microinteracti1·
For four years Kyiv has made the simplest request in modern diplomacy: help us stop the missiles that land on apartment blocks and children’s hospitals. And for four years Washington treated that plea like an unreasonable demand from a difficult tenant. Then Ukraine, under nightly bombardment, built the finest drone industry on Earth. And suddenly, miraculously, America found its way to Kyiv. Not to answer the plea. To do a deal. Item one on the agenda: acquiring Ukrainian drone technology. Item two: “progress” on the Patriots, which is diplomat-speak for “we’ll see.” That’s the tell. When Ukraine needed help saving lives, the superpower checked its watch. When Ukraine had something worth taking, it booked a flight.
U.S. Ambassador to NATO@USAmbNATO

Great post-NATO Summit meetings today in Kyiv with Ukrainian President Zelenkskyy and senior leaders. We discussed getting President Trump's drone deal done and how to progress on Patriot interceptor. We also talked about how the Prioritized Ukraine Requirements List (PURL) -- coupled with Ukraine's strength and innovation -- allows it to fight another day, as we continue to work toward a durable peace.

English
22
345
1.2K
28.9K
Régis 🕊💙💛🙏 retweetledi
Louis Duclos
Louis Duclos@ObsDelphi·
🇷🇺🇺🇦Nouvelle vidéo en haute qualité de l'incendie de l'entrepôt Wildberries à Krasnodar. Toute la fumée que vous voyez, c'est en réalité le pouvoir politique de Vladimir Poutine qui s'envole vers d'autres cieux. Ce qui est triste dans cette affaire, c'est qu'on sait tous que la Russie se vengera en tirant des missiles sur les civils ukrainiens. Mais il est normal que le commandement ukrainien ordonne ce type de frappes sur des infrastructures stratégiques de l'économie russe et de son appareil militaire. L'Ukraine continue de se défendre dans le cadre imposé par le droit international, alors que la Russie continue de multiplier les crimes de guerre et de cibler des civils. Face un à État terroriste, l'Ukraine essaie de se défendre comme elle peut, et elle le fait avec un grand professionnalisme. L'économie russe va rapidement subir le contrecoup de ce type d'attaques.
Louis Duclos@ObsDelphi

🇷🇺🇺🇦C'est une nouvelle catastrophe pour la Russie ! Un nouveau hub logistique de la compagnie Wildberries a été ciblé par les drones ukrainiens et complètement détruit par les flammes. Ces immenses hangars de stockage participent à la construction des armes qui frappent les civils ukrainiens en stockant des composants clés. Quand on voit l'ampleur des dégâts dans cette vidéo, le coût à payer est terrible pour les Russes. Ce sont des milliards de roubles de biens qui partent en fumée et, parce que c'est la Russie, les gens n'auront évidemment aucun remboursement ni dédommagement. Ce sont des milliers d'entreprises russes qui vont être durablement affectées. Reconstruire de tels hangars va prendre de longs mois, au mieux. En même temps que la pénurie d'essence, c'est un nouvel élément qui vient porter un coup à l'économie russe et qui vient asphyxier un peu plus le quotidien de la population. La Russie ne peut tout simplement pas défendre tous les hubs logistiques, raffineries et usines de composants de son territoire. Elle doit encaisser les coups et subir les initiatives ukrainiennes qui n'en finissent plus de porter leurs fruits. Les Russes ne doivent penser qu'à une chose : le tsar Poutine perd totalement le contrôle.

Français
60
210
896
18.9K
Régis 🕊💙💛🙏 retweetledi
Le Zelenskyste 🇫🇷🇺🇦
🫠 La Russie va dans le mur - et c’est les RUSSES ordinaires qui le disent. « Il n’y a pas d’internet, pas d’essence, pas de marques étrangères, pas d’investissements étrangers, pas de médias indépendants. Nos réserves de devises sont épuisées, la bourse s’est effondrée, les petites entreprises ferment, les grandes entreprises subissent des pertes, les visas sont difficiles à obtenir, et obtenir un passeport devient de plus en plus compliqué. Mais nous avons une censure sévère, des prisonniers politiques, des frappes quotidiennes sur le territoire russe, la peur du présent, la peur de l’avenir... » Poutine est en train de cramer son peuple pour en massacrer un autre.
Français
39
208
668
7.2K
Régis 🕊💙💛🙏 retweetledi
Kate from Kharkiv
Kate from Kharkiv@BohuslavskaKate·
APPLEBAUM: Putin could go for full mobilization, and my guess is that it would fail. It would be very unpopular. Russians would, for the first time, resist going into army, because it's death sentence. I also don't see a situation where Russia can win or turn the tide this year.
English
55
662
3.3K
80.9K