Ben Sim

21.8K posts

Ben Sim

Ben Sim

@ben_sim

Proverbs 18:17

Swissland Katılım Ocak 2009
833 Takip Edilen354 Takipçiler
Ben Sim
Ben Sim@ben_sim·
@QXsToo @X I don't know if it's already the case, but have you considered not basing any metrics at all on unpaid accounts? Also, how about only monetising likes, and not interactions? Otherwise you're feeding the trolls.
English
0
0
0
2
Q
Q@QXsToo·
As a user, it's simple. I open the @X app. Here's what I hope to see — and I suspect many of you do too: 1. Great, informative, useful, or entertaining content (by humans, machines, or companies) 2. Real, authentic — even “boring” — posts from the people and networks I actually care about 3. No spam, bad bots, or reply farming As an X employee who uses it every day, I believe we’re actively building toward exactly this. Does this match what you want when you open X?
English
574
390
2.3K
452.6K
Ben Sim retweetledi
Wide Awake Media
Wide Awake Media@wideawake_media·
English football legend Matt Le Tissier thinks the UK government is under orders to deliberately destroy the UK. "If they destroy the country enough, there'll be people begging for help from their government... That's probably when you'll see initiatives like the central bank digital currencies being thrust upon the population as the way to save us." "People won't accept those kinds of things under normal circumstances. Yet in times of emergencies, people will accept all sorts of nonsense. As we saw in 2020." Credit: @mattletiss7 @robprogressive
English
161
1.1K
4.2K
171.2K
Ben Sim retweetledi
Aldo Sterone
Aldo Sterone@AldoSterone111·
Dear Sammy, I am sorry for your grandad. As an African and pro-life, I can respectfuly share my position on this question. Western countries are ruled by child rapists and criminals. This is no longer a divisive topic. Many years ago, when they were promoting acceptance of abortion, they were presenting extreme cases such as the 15 years old pregnant from her rapist. Fast forward, recently doctors put a full term baby in the freezer until death followed because his mother would rather be back to her pre-pregnancy life. Entire generations are being aborted. They can abort until full term for whatever reason or no reason at all. There are even abortion parties. When they were banning death penalty in Europe, they were telling the people: "Criminals will be locked for life". Fast forward, today, in many European countries, criminals kill, get locked up for a few years then are released just to kill again. Death penalty was transfered to the public and innocent people have to be murdered to give another chance to murderers. When the LGBT lobby started, it was about "tolerance" and "between consenting adults, it's none of your business". Fast forward today, an Irish teacher is in prison because he refuses to submit to a compulsory role play with a student who demands some pronouns being used when addressing him. Kids are being mutilated and public insurance paying for it while the West sees FGM in Africa as a barbaric practice (which it is). Female Genital Mutilation is a crime in most African countries. There is no place where insurance covers the "procedures". It's slowly fading away while it's back to your country under the guise of progressism. You see the pattern? Same for euthanasia. Yes, they will use extreme cases to get the laws they want. This is their usual pattern. Then, they will end up killing healthy teenagers who are feeling depressed, or people who couldn't find a job. Your rulers belongs to a death cult. They are easy to predict. They like wars, blood, suffering, killing, abortion, sterility... You have to place the bar really low, otherwise they eat you alive. Sorry for any typos. I don't use AI to write.
English
0
12
40
1.7K
Ben Sim
Ben Sim@ben_sim·
Dan Burmawi@DanBurmawy

Islam in the West is the ring of power in The Lord of the Rings. Everyone thinks they can handle it. They think they can use it, moderate it, integrate it, tame it, or negotiate with it. The Ring serves only one master, and it is not the one wearing it. As long as the West thinks it can use Islam, Islam ends up using the West. Just like the Ring amplifies the worst impulses of the one who carries it, Islam reshapes whatever institution allows it inside: Human-rights language becomes a shield for illiberal politics. Free-speech norms become a platform for anti-free-speech doctrines. Religious liberty becomes legal cover for parallel legal systems. Democracy becomes a staircase to end democracy. This is the rule of the Ring: Whoever tries to wield it eventually becomes its servant. Even the well-intentioned fall. Especially the well-intentioned. The West keeps trying different strategies: "Support moderates, integrate communities, counter the extremists, not the ideology, dialogue will soften them, maybe they don’t really mean what they say, economic uplift will change their worldview, second and third generations will modernize." Every one of these is the Council of Elrond arguing that maybe someone, somewhere, might use the Ring differently. But Tolkien’s world and Islam world share the same truth: You can't reform an object built for domination. You can't tame an ideology constructed for supremacy. The Ring can't be debated, reasoned with, or negotiated into moderation. It was forged for one purpose, and it retains that purpose regardless of who wears it. Islam is the same. The only way to destroy the Ring is to take it back to the place where it was forged, the fires of Mount Doom, and burn it in its original source. The same is true for Islam: You can't defeat it with counterterrorism alone. You can't defeat it with border policy alone. You can't defeat it with intelligence operations alone. You can't defeat it through elections, speeches, or interfaith dinners. You must go to its Mordor, its theology, its texts, its jurisprudence, its political creed, its doctrinal foundations, and you must burn it there. Confront the doctrine of jihad. Expose the political blueprint. Discredit the historical narrative. Challenge the legal theory that divides humanity. Break the ideological architecture. Expose it's master. Only then does the Ring lose its power. Everything else is delay. The danger is not in extremism. The danger is in believing you can harness extremism for your benefit. Like the Ring, Islam corrupts even those who oppose it. It drags the center toward its worldview. It forces institutions to accommodate its demands. It shapes the political discourse through intimidation, guilt, or demographic leverage. The Ring does not want to be hidden. It wants to be worn. Islam does not want to coexist. It wants to rule. There is no path to victory that avoids the mountain. There is no shortcut around theology. There is no peace purchased through appeasement. There is no safety in pretending the ideology is harmless. There is no future if you refuse to confront the source of the problem. The West keeps walking in circles around Mount Doom, hoping for an easier route. But there isn’t one. If you want to destroy the Ring, you must go to Mordor. If you want to combat Islam, you must confront its theology. That is the fire in which the ideology was forged. And that is the only fire in which it can be destroyed.

QME
0
0
0
1
Jamais Vu 🏉
Jamais Vu 🏉@boot15_vu·
For the virtue signalling morons at the back let me be clear: Nick Timothy nailed it—mass public prayer + adhan in Trafalgar Square is straight-up domination, not "celebrating faith." The adhan literally declares "no god but Allah" over a national landmark next to a church. That's not equality; it's assertion of supremacy. Starmer, Creasy, and the other imbeciles piling on with "Islamophobia" hysteria and sack demands? That's not protecting minorities—it's dangerous cowardice. It lets radicals hide behind religion, exactly like ignoring Salman Abedi (Manchester Arena bomber) because "racism" fears stopped proper scrutiny. We tiptoed around his extremism, and 22 people died. Islam isn't just another "religion of peace"—it's a totalitarian ideology masquerading as one, with built-in political conquest doctrines that demand submission. Calling it a pseudo-religion or death cult isn't hate; it's pattern recognition after grooming gangs, terror attacks, no-go pressures, and endless one-way accommodation. Virtue signalling from Labour doesn't help integration or safety—it enables the problem. Nick spoke uncomfortable truth. The appeasers are the real danger to Britain. Time to stop pretending and start enforcing reciprocity. Britain first. 🇬🇧 Bravo @NJ_Timothy 👏🏽 - the UK would be a safer place if other public figures had your courage. Well done Sir. 🫡
stellacreasy@stellacreasy

No one instructed me to do anything nick. My conscience sees a man seeking to foster division and hatred against a religious minority and calls it out because it’s wrong and dangerous. If you think Islam is unique in demanding one god alone be worshipped, the Ten Commandments will blow your mind….

English
15
167
637
7.8K
Ben Sim retweetledi
Massimo
Massimo@Rainmaker1973·
Who said you needed a console to play video games
English
17
16
113
11.2K
Ben Sim
Ben Sim@ben_sim·
Dan Burmawi@DanBurmawy

Islam in the West is the ring of power in The Lord of the Rings. Everyone thinks they can handle it. They think they can use it, moderate it, integrate it, tame it, or negotiate with it. The Ring serves only one master, and it is not the one wearing it. As long as the West thinks it can use Islam, Islam ends up using the West. Just like the Ring amplifies the worst impulses of the one who carries it, Islam reshapes whatever institution allows it inside: Human-rights language becomes a shield for illiberal politics. Free-speech norms become a platform for anti-free-speech doctrines. Religious liberty becomes legal cover for parallel legal systems. Democracy becomes a staircase to end democracy. This is the rule of the Ring: Whoever tries to wield it eventually becomes its servant. Even the well-intentioned fall. Especially the well-intentioned. The West keeps trying different strategies: "Support moderates, integrate communities, counter the extremists, not the ideology, dialogue will soften them, maybe they don’t really mean what they say, economic uplift will change their worldview, second and third generations will modernize." Every one of these is the Council of Elrond arguing that maybe someone, somewhere, might use the Ring differently. But Tolkien’s world and Islam world share the same truth: You can't reform an object built for domination. You can't tame an ideology constructed for supremacy. The Ring can't be debated, reasoned with, or negotiated into moderation. It was forged for one purpose, and it retains that purpose regardless of who wears it. Islam is the same. The only way to destroy the Ring is to take it back to the place where it was forged, the fires of Mount Doom, and burn it in its original source. The same is true for Islam: You can't defeat it with counterterrorism alone. You can't defeat it with border policy alone. You can't defeat it with intelligence operations alone. You can't defeat it through elections, speeches, or interfaith dinners. You must go to its Mordor, its theology, its texts, its jurisprudence, its political creed, its doctrinal foundations, and you must burn it there. Confront the doctrine of jihad. Expose the political blueprint. Discredit the historical narrative. Challenge the legal theory that divides humanity. Break the ideological architecture. Expose it's master. Only then does the Ring lose its power. Everything else is delay. The danger is not in extremism. The danger is in believing you can harness extremism for your benefit. Like the Ring, Islam corrupts even those who oppose it. It drags the center toward its worldview. It forces institutions to accommodate its demands. It shapes the political discourse through intimidation, guilt, or demographic leverage. The Ring does not want to be hidden. It wants to be worn. Islam does not want to coexist. It wants to rule. There is no path to victory that avoids the mountain. There is no shortcut around theology. There is no peace purchased through appeasement. There is no safety in pretending the ideology is harmless. There is no future if you refuse to confront the source of the problem. The West keeps walking in circles around Mount Doom, hoping for an easier route. But there isn’t one. If you want to destroy the Ring, you must go to Mordor. If you want to combat Islam, you must confront its theology. That is the fire in which the ideology was forged. And that is the only fire in which it can be destroyed.

QME
0
0
0
2
Jonathan Sacerdoti
An important conversation has been started by @NJ_Timothy. Let's not shy away from it. Behind this debate lies the idea that Islam is a religion of dominance, which seeks to confer the rest of us into adherents. It’s a proselytising religion. The Islamic concept of Dawah, coupled with the regular manifestations of violent Jihad the UK and the West have had to become accustomed to over recent decades, is one reason why many people feel a genuine and legitimate sense of unease when they hear the same words terrorists shout as they slaughter us, echoing across our nation’s primary public square. It is unsettling. My article in the @spectator spectator.com/article/feelin…
English
134
587
2.1K
84.6K
Ben Sim retweetledi
Diana Alastair💚🤍💜 ⚢ ❌❌
He’s the only man in the Bible who seems to understand that women are human beings too. If Christianity and Islam demonstrate nothing else, they demonstrate that Jesus and Mohammad saw the world through very different eyes. Islam is about submission. Christianity is about redemption. By Christ’s sacrifice, Christians believe, they are made worthy to enter God’s presence. There is emphasis on living a decent life, but the baseline message is that works alone are not sufficient; to a true Christian, no standard of behavior is ever “good enough.” Righteousness stems from Christ’s grace, not from one’s own behavior, and they believe there is no sinner so sunk in depravity that Christ’s grace cannot reach him. Christians may fail to truly live up to it, but the general idea is supposed to be to end self-righteousness, which is something Jesus clearly felt some kind of way about. In Islam, one’s behavior — but more specifically one’s obedience - is what gets you into Paradise. Unquestioning belief and obedience are what make one righteous, and that is a dangerous slope to start down. Not only does it encourage adherence to an outdated and brutal worldview, but it creates a culture in which disobedience and theological nonconformity are is seen as the ultimate sin. It creates a society that cannot evolve, and that stage lasts until that society manages to move past religion as an externally imposed structure, and see it as having pa personal relationship with God - or not - that is entirely one’s own choice.
Diana Alastair💚🤍💜 ⚢ ❌❌ tweet media
English
15
72
375
5.3K
Ben Sim retweetledi
Liz Churchill
Liz Churchill@liz_churchill10·
“I published a study proving that vaccinated children were 500% more ill…and then I got a call from my attorney saying that my licence was suspended” Dr. Paul Thomas studied more than 3,000 children and proved that unvaccinated children were healthier than vaccinated children.
English
149
7.5K
18.5K
179.3K
Ben Sim
Ben Sim@ben_sim·
Dan Burmawi@DanBurmawy

Islam in the West is the ring of power in The Lord of the Rings. Everyone thinks they can handle it. They think they can use it, moderate it, integrate it, tame it, or negotiate with it. The Ring serves only one master, and it is not the one wearing it. As long as the West thinks it can use Islam, Islam ends up using the West. Just like the Ring amplifies the worst impulses of the one who carries it, Islam reshapes whatever institution allows it inside: Human-rights language becomes a shield for illiberal politics. Free-speech norms become a platform for anti-free-speech doctrines. Religious liberty becomes legal cover for parallel legal systems. Democracy becomes a staircase to end democracy. This is the rule of the Ring: Whoever tries to wield it eventually becomes its servant. Even the well-intentioned fall. Especially the well-intentioned. The West keeps trying different strategies: "Support moderates, integrate communities, counter the extremists, not the ideology, dialogue will soften them, maybe they don’t really mean what they say, economic uplift will change their worldview, second and third generations will modernize." Every one of these is the Council of Elrond arguing that maybe someone, somewhere, might use the Ring differently. But Tolkien’s world and Islam world share the same truth: You can't reform an object built for domination. You can't tame an ideology constructed for supremacy. The Ring can't be debated, reasoned with, or negotiated into moderation. It was forged for one purpose, and it retains that purpose regardless of who wears it. Islam is the same. The only way to destroy the Ring is to take it back to the place where it was forged, the fires of Mount Doom, and burn it in its original source. The same is true for Islam: You can't defeat it with counterterrorism alone. You can't defeat it with border policy alone. You can't defeat it with intelligence operations alone. You can't defeat it through elections, speeches, or interfaith dinners. You must go to its Mordor, its theology, its texts, its jurisprudence, its political creed, its doctrinal foundations, and you must burn it there. Confront the doctrine of jihad. Expose the political blueprint. Discredit the historical narrative. Challenge the legal theory that divides humanity. Break the ideological architecture. Expose it's master. Only then does the Ring lose its power. Everything else is delay. The danger is not in extremism. The danger is in believing you can harness extremism for your benefit. Like the Ring, Islam corrupts even those who oppose it. It drags the center toward its worldview. It forces institutions to accommodate its demands. It shapes the political discourse through intimidation, guilt, or demographic leverage. The Ring does not want to be hidden. It wants to be worn. Islam does not want to coexist. It wants to rule. There is no path to victory that avoids the mountain. There is no shortcut around theology. There is no peace purchased through appeasement. There is no safety in pretending the ideology is harmless. There is no future if you refuse to confront the source of the problem. The West keeps walking in circles around Mount Doom, hoping for an easier route. But there isn’t one. If you want to destroy the Ring, you must go to Mordor. If you want to combat Islam, you must confront its theology. That is the fire in which the ideology was forged. And that is the only fire in which it can be destroyed.

QME
0
0
0
2
Adam The Apostate
Adam The Apostate@The1Apostate·
What are your thoughts on Islam. Leave your honest opinion below ⤵️
English
105
2
21
5.4K
Ben Sim retweetledi
James McMurdock MP
James McMurdock MP@JMcMurdockMP·
I dont think being overly emotional is particularly helpful when it comes to matters of the law but for the first time since becoming an MP I am genuinely sad about what parliament has done. I am sad because I know what the consequences will be. I am sad because I know nervous first time parents might give way to doubt and opt out of parenthood and how the reality of that means they'll be denied the greatest gift life will ever give them and instead inherit a life of monstrous guilt. I am sad because, now, healthy babies will be destroyed. I am really sorry that the UK has legalised full term abortion. For what it's worth, I voted NO. I am going to squeeze my children a little tighter and thank the universe a little more than normal this morning. You cannot become unpregnant. You just become the parent of a child you killed. That is the reality of life. We must face it. My babies.
James McMurdock MP tweet media
ben weller 🪴 ✟@flowerpotweller

The House of Lords have voted narrowly in favour of allowing abortion up-to-birth in England & Wales. The only solace is that one day they will meet Jesus.

English
513
1.3K
7.3K
487.9K
Ben Sim
Ben Sim@ben_sim·
Dan Burmawi@DanBurmawy

Islam in the West is the ring of power in The Lord of the Rings. Everyone thinks they can handle it. They think they can use it, moderate it, integrate it, tame it, or negotiate with it. The Ring serves only one master, and it is not the one wearing it. As long as the West thinks it can use Islam, Islam ends up using the West. Just like the Ring amplifies the worst impulses of the one who carries it, Islam reshapes whatever institution allows it inside: Human-rights language becomes a shield for illiberal politics. Free-speech norms become a platform for anti-free-speech doctrines. Religious liberty becomes legal cover for parallel legal systems. Democracy becomes a staircase to end democracy. This is the rule of the Ring: Whoever tries to wield it eventually becomes its servant. Even the well-intentioned fall. Especially the well-intentioned. The West keeps trying different strategies: "Support moderates, integrate communities, counter the extremists, not the ideology, dialogue will soften them, maybe they don’t really mean what they say, economic uplift will change their worldview, second and third generations will modernize." Every one of these is the Council of Elrond arguing that maybe someone, somewhere, might use the Ring differently. But Tolkien’s world and Islam world share the same truth: You can't reform an object built for domination. You can't tame an ideology constructed for supremacy. The Ring can't be debated, reasoned with, or negotiated into moderation. It was forged for one purpose, and it retains that purpose regardless of who wears it. Islam is the same. The only way to destroy the Ring is to take it back to the place where it was forged, the fires of Mount Doom, and burn it in its original source. The same is true for Islam: You can't defeat it with counterterrorism alone. You can't defeat it with border policy alone. You can't defeat it with intelligence operations alone. You can't defeat it through elections, speeches, or interfaith dinners. You must go to its Mordor, its theology, its texts, its jurisprudence, its political creed, its doctrinal foundations, and you must burn it there. Confront the doctrine of jihad. Expose the political blueprint. Discredit the historical narrative. Challenge the legal theory that divides humanity. Break the ideological architecture. Expose it's master. Only then does the Ring lose its power. Everything else is delay. The danger is not in extremism. The danger is in believing you can harness extremism for your benefit. Like the Ring, Islam corrupts even those who oppose it. It drags the center toward its worldview. It forces institutions to accommodate its demands. It shapes the political discourse through intimidation, guilt, or demographic leverage. The Ring does not want to be hidden. It wants to be worn. Islam does not want to coexist. It wants to rule. There is no path to victory that avoids the mountain. There is no shortcut around theology. There is no peace purchased through appeasement. There is no safety in pretending the ideology is harmless. There is no future if you refuse to confront the source of the problem. The West keeps walking in circles around Mount Doom, hoping for an easier route. But there isn’t one. If you want to destroy the Ring, you must go to Mordor. If you want to combat Islam, you must confront its theology. That is the fire in which the ideology was forged. And that is the only fire in which it can be destroyed.

QME
0
0
0
1
Kosher
Kosher@koshercockney·
Wow. Douglas Murray. A single minute. Give yourself a single minute to listen to this. This man is something else 👏🏽
English
1.1K
6.6K
19.4K
515.2K
Ben Sim
Ben Sim@ben_sim·
Dan Burmawi@DanBurmawy

Islam in the West is the ring of power in The Lord of the Rings. Everyone thinks they can handle it. They think they can use it, moderate it, integrate it, tame it, or negotiate with it. The Ring serves only one master, and it is not the one wearing it. As long as the West thinks it can use Islam, Islam ends up using the West. Just like the Ring amplifies the worst impulses of the one who carries it, Islam reshapes whatever institution allows it inside: Human-rights language becomes a shield for illiberal politics. Free-speech norms become a platform for anti-free-speech doctrines. Religious liberty becomes legal cover for parallel legal systems. Democracy becomes a staircase to end democracy. This is the rule of the Ring: Whoever tries to wield it eventually becomes its servant. Even the well-intentioned fall. Especially the well-intentioned. The West keeps trying different strategies: "Support moderates, integrate communities, counter the extremists, not the ideology, dialogue will soften them, maybe they don’t really mean what they say, economic uplift will change their worldview, second and third generations will modernize." Every one of these is the Council of Elrond arguing that maybe someone, somewhere, might use the Ring differently. But Tolkien’s world and Islam world share the same truth: You can't reform an object built for domination. You can't tame an ideology constructed for supremacy. The Ring can't be debated, reasoned with, or negotiated into moderation. It was forged for one purpose, and it retains that purpose regardless of who wears it. Islam is the same. The only way to destroy the Ring is to take it back to the place where it was forged, the fires of Mount Doom, and burn it in its original source. The same is true for Islam: You can't defeat it with counterterrorism alone. You can't defeat it with border policy alone. You can't defeat it with intelligence operations alone. You can't defeat it through elections, speeches, or interfaith dinners. You must go to its Mordor, its theology, its texts, its jurisprudence, its political creed, its doctrinal foundations, and you must burn it there. Confront the doctrine of jihad. Expose the political blueprint. Discredit the historical narrative. Challenge the legal theory that divides humanity. Break the ideological architecture. Expose it's master. Only then does the Ring lose its power. Everything else is delay. The danger is not in extremism. The danger is in believing you can harness extremism for your benefit. Like the Ring, Islam corrupts even those who oppose it. It drags the center toward its worldview. It forces institutions to accommodate its demands. It shapes the political discourse through intimidation, guilt, or demographic leverage. The Ring does not want to be hidden. It wants to be worn. Islam does not want to coexist. It wants to rule. There is no path to victory that avoids the mountain. There is no shortcut around theology. There is no peace purchased through appeasement. There is no safety in pretending the ideology is harmless. There is no future if you refuse to confront the source of the problem. The West keeps walking in circles around Mount Doom, hoping for an easier route. But there isn’t one. If you want to destroy the Ring, you must go to Mordor. If you want to combat Islam, you must confront its theology. That is the fire in which the ideology was forged. And that is the only fire in which it can be destroyed.

QME
0
0
0
4
Rupert Lowe MP
Rupert Lowe MP@RupertLowe10·
Britain is not an Islamic country, yet. We should not change our way of life to accommodate practices that have no place in any civilised society - sharia law, the burqa, halal slaughter, cousin marriage and more. Britain is a Christian country, and under a Restore Britain Government it would remain that way. We would not tolerate mass dominating Islamic prayer overtaking public spaces, entire schools would not be closed for Eid. None of this is controversial. None of this should generate hysteria. But of course it will. If a Muslim wants to live under sharia law, there are many countries to choose from. I wish them well on their travels. But this is Britain, and we have already tolerated the intolerable for too long. That must end. There is finally a political party that has the courage to unapologetically stand up and defend the British way of life - one that is absolutely rooted in Christianity. That party is Restore Britain.
English
839
5.1K
31.3K
285.2K
Ben Sim
Ben Sim@ben_sim·
I don't know if it's already the case, but have you considered not basing any metrics at all on unpaid accounts? It might kill the statistics you can provide to advertisers, but it would also kill the bots? Also, how about only monetising likes, and not interactions? Otherwise you're feeding the trolls.
English
0
0
0
4
Nikita Bier
Nikita Bier@nikitabier·
We tried something. It didn’t work. And we took those learnings and decided to reward Articles instead of single posts. Articles have grown 20x since December and they are now the largest blogging product on the internet by traffic. In consumer product development, you sometimes take non-linear paths to discover opportunity.
English
342
65
5.2K
207.4K
SPEC
SPEC@___4o____·
Nikita launched this retarded feature and it was immediately forgotten and left unused. They have 60 employees. It’s beyond me how this guy hasn’t been fired seeing he clearly belongs in some big corpo machine. Elon lost his balls.
SPEC tweet media
English
54
12
846
135K
Ben Sim
Ben Sim@ben_sim·
Dan Burmawi@DanBurmawy

Islam in the West is the ring of power in The Lord of the Rings. Everyone thinks they can handle it. They think they can use it, moderate it, integrate it, tame it, or negotiate with it. The Ring serves only one master, and it is not the one wearing it. As long as the West thinks it can use Islam, Islam ends up using the West. Just like the Ring amplifies the worst impulses of the one who carries it, Islam reshapes whatever institution allows it inside: Human-rights language becomes a shield for illiberal politics. Free-speech norms become a platform for anti-free-speech doctrines. Religious liberty becomes legal cover for parallel legal systems. Democracy becomes a staircase to end democracy. This is the rule of the Ring: Whoever tries to wield it eventually becomes its servant. Even the well-intentioned fall. Especially the well-intentioned. The West keeps trying different strategies: "Support moderates, integrate communities, counter the extremists, not the ideology, dialogue will soften them, maybe they don’t really mean what they say, economic uplift will change their worldview, second and third generations will modernize." Every one of these is the Council of Elrond arguing that maybe someone, somewhere, might use the Ring differently. But Tolkien’s world and Islam world share the same truth: You can't reform an object built for domination. You can't tame an ideology constructed for supremacy. The Ring can't be debated, reasoned with, or negotiated into moderation. It was forged for one purpose, and it retains that purpose regardless of who wears it. Islam is the same. The only way to destroy the Ring is to take it back to the place where it was forged, the fires of Mount Doom, and burn it in its original source. The same is true for Islam: You can't defeat it with counterterrorism alone. You can't defeat it with border policy alone. You can't defeat it with intelligence operations alone. You can't defeat it through elections, speeches, or interfaith dinners. You must go to its Mordor, its theology, its texts, its jurisprudence, its political creed, its doctrinal foundations, and you must burn it there. Confront the doctrine of jihad. Expose the political blueprint. Discredit the historical narrative. Challenge the legal theory that divides humanity. Break the ideological architecture. Expose it's master. Only then does the Ring lose its power. Everything else is delay. The danger is not in extremism. The danger is in believing you can harness extremism for your benefit. Like the Ring, Islam corrupts even those who oppose it. It drags the center toward its worldview. It forces institutions to accommodate its demands. It shapes the political discourse through intimidation, guilt, or demographic leverage. The Ring does not want to be hidden. It wants to be worn. Islam does not want to coexist. It wants to rule. There is no path to victory that avoids the mountain. There is no shortcut around theology. There is no peace purchased through appeasement. There is no safety in pretending the ideology is harmless. There is no future if you refuse to confront the source of the problem. The West keeps walking in circles around Mount Doom, hoping for an easier route. But there isn’t one. If you want to destroy the Ring, you must go to Mordor. If you want to combat Islam, you must confront its theology. That is the fire in which the ideology was forged. And that is the only fire in which it can be destroyed.

QME
0
0
0
0
Ben Sim retweetledi
Dan Burmawi
Dan Burmawi@DanBurmawy·
Islam in the West is the ring of power in The Lord of the Rings. Everyone thinks they can handle it. They think they can use it, moderate it, integrate it, tame it, or negotiate with it. The Ring serves only one master, and it is not the one wearing it. As long as the West thinks it can use Islam, Islam ends up using the West. Just like the Ring amplifies the worst impulses of the one who carries it, Islam reshapes whatever institution allows it inside: Human-rights language becomes a shield for illiberal politics. Free-speech norms become a platform for anti-free-speech doctrines. Religious liberty becomes legal cover for parallel legal systems. Democracy becomes a staircase to end democracy. This is the rule of the Ring: Whoever tries to wield it eventually becomes its servant. Even the well-intentioned fall. Especially the well-intentioned. The West keeps trying different strategies: "Support moderates, integrate communities, counter the extremists, not the ideology, dialogue will soften them, maybe they don’t really mean what they say, economic uplift will change their worldview, second and third generations will modernize." Every one of these is the Council of Elrond arguing that maybe someone, somewhere, might use the Ring differently. But Tolkien’s world and Islam world share the same truth: You can't reform an object built for domination. You can't tame an ideology constructed for supremacy. The Ring can't be debated, reasoned with, or negotiated into moderation. It was forged for one purpose, and it retains that purpose regardless of who wears it. Islam is the same. The only way to destroy the Ring is to take it back to the place where it was forged, the fires of Mount Doom, and burn it in its original source. The same is true for Islam: You can't defeat it with counterterrorism alone. You can't defeat it with border policy alone. You can't defeat it with intelligence operations alone. You can't defeat it through elections, speeches, or interfaith dinners. You must go to its Mordor, its theology, its texts, its jurisprudence, its political creed, its doctrinal foundations, and you must burn it there. Confront the doctrine of jihad. Expose the political blueprint. Discredit the historical narrative. Challenge the legal theory that divides humanity. Break the ideological architecture. Expose it's master. Only then does the Ring lose its power. Everything else is delay. The danger is not in extremism. The danger is in believing you can harness extremism for your benefit. Like the Ring, Islam corrupts even those who oppose it. It drags the center toward its worldview. It forces institutions to accommodate its demands. It shapes the political discourse through intimidation, guilt, or demographic leverage. The Ring does not want to be hidden. It wants to be worn. Islam does not want to coexist. It wants to rule. There is no path to victory that avoids the mountain. There is no shortcut around theology. There is no peace purchased through appeasement. There is no safety in pretending the ideology is harmless. There is no future if you refuse to confront the source of the problem. The West keeps walking in circles around Mount Doom, hoping for an easier route. But there isn’t one. If you want to destroy the Ring, you must go to Mordor. If you want to combat Islam, you must confront its theology. That is the fire in which the ideology was forged. And that is the only fire in which it can be destroyed.
English
148
1K
3.1K
50.3K
Daily Caller
Daily Caller@DailyCaller·
KENT: “The last time I saw Charlie Kirk on this earth was in June, in the West Wing… He said, ‘Joe, stop us from getting into a war with Iran.’”
English
434
104
1.1K
2M
Ben Sim retweetledi
James Lindsay, anti-Communist
James Lindsay, anti-Communist@ConceptualJames·
Listen you human pieces of garbage and anyone else here in the comments who wants to get this straight. First off, this isn't news. You're spreading salacious horseshit from propagandists, and we all know you're doing it on purpose and with malicious intent. That's nasty. Nasty, nasty. But now let's look at some things seriously, like you would if you had a responsible bone left in your sorry outfit. Charlie died in September of 2025. This conflict started in February 2026. Joe said this conversation happened in June 2025. Operation Midnight Hammer happened in June 2025. So we can establish that Charlie was talking to Joe in the context of Operation Midnight Hammer, but Charlie said those exact same things on camera to the world at the time. This isn't new information at all. It was always public straight from Charlie. Then Trump executed Operation Midnight Hammer, and a nervous Charlie Kirk said he supported President Trump 100%, though he didn't want a "regime-change war." He later said the operation was a success. Charlie Kirk backed President Trump 100%, even though he voiced his concerns before Trump made his decisions, both in public and in private. He supported Trump when he made these decisions and stood strongly with him, for him, and with and for the United States of America, even when he was nervous about it. Charlie's words in June of 2025 cannot be construed in any way to be applicable to the circumstances that led Trump to make these decisions in early 2026. It isn't hard to guess how Charlie would have felt about this situation, though, since he already demonstrated it for us in June last year. 1) He would be publicly and privately nervous about getting into such a war and would strongly caution against regime-change as a goal and boots on the ground as a strategy; 2) He would have voiced these concerns both on camera and in private and maintained a pro-Trump and pro-America, while "America First," messaging about the looming conflict; 3) Once things started in late February/early March, he would have backed President Trump 100% like he did on 100% of the other things he backed President Trump on 100%, 100% of the time; 4) He would have stood by the operation and President Trump's decision-making, even while voicing his anxieties, concerns, and beliefs about wanting the war/conflict to wrap up quickly and avoid boots on the ground and a deliberate strategy of regime change; 5) He would have reassured Americans that President Trump has the best intelligence, the best instincts, and the best capabilities to redefine conflict in the 21st century and to guide us through this war, consistently. To suggest anything else is to fail to have known Charlie Kirk or even to have paid attention to what he actually said in the relevant situation Kent is bringing up, standing on the silence of Charlie's coffin to do so. To tie this to Charlie's murder is nothing short of reckless and heinous, and it is likely so reckless that it will possibly interfere with bringing Charlie's murderer to justice, given the idiotic and opportunistic things he said. You are all vultures and skanks, and your judgment will be ruthless.
English
117
233
2K
53.2K
Ben Sim retweetledi
Dan Burmawi
Dan Burmawi@DanBurmawy·
Lebanon is a perfect model of what happens when two civilizations share geography without sharing a political philosophy. It’s a small country, same language, same food, same weather, same ancient history. No walls. No checkpoints. But each community, Christian and Muslim, lives behind invisible civilizational lines. They don’t mix in political life, educational life, or social life. These lines have existed since the Ottomans, and they hardened after the civil war. The Christian areas built their society around a European-influenced political culture: secular schools, mixed-gender social norms, individual rights, and a relatively open civic space. The Muslim areas built "Islamic society". The result is not “diversity," but dual sovereignty inside one state. In 2023, the country literally split into two time zones during daylight-saving time, one Muslim and one Christian. Neighbors who live in the same building had different times. It was an honest reflection of two separate civilizational logics refusing to follow the same clock. Lebanon is a failed state because it tried to fit two incompatible political visions under one flag. The West is repeating Lebanon’s experiment but pretending it will end differently. There is no historical precedent for that working.
English
164
1.5K
6.3K
235.6K
Ben Sim retweetledi
Jake Novak
Jake Novak@jakejakeny·
It’s so illuminating that the same people who have spent decades fighting nativity scenes on public land for a week a year & church groups renting public school spaces for a few Sundays are now fighting tooth & nail to allow loud, 5am Muslim calls to prayer every damn day.
English
44
940
4.7K
43.1K