sloth HODL

@driesvints @steipete @keithtyser @openclaw You can fix this by adding to agent.md or heartbeat.md something like "upon gateway startup, send a message regarding the last known conversation/goal

One other thing: almost always, when I ask it to go do some background work, it always fails to report back afterwards. Things like: “update yourself”, it always fails back to report its status or result when it restarted its gateway. Would be cool if it could “pick back up the convo” after doing things like that. Thanks for your work! 🙏

gpt-5.4 was basically unusable for me in @openclaw. it would explain what needs to be done, I’d say “ok do it,” and then… nothing. no action, no feedback, sometimes it would just go silent or say it’s “working” with zero visibility. felt like babysitting an intern that never actually touched the keyboard switched to @NousResearch Hermes agent and it’s night and day. same model, but now it actually executes. on par with opus-4.6 for me no idea why the gap is that big but yeah, huge relief after losing Claude OAuth in openclaw

@steipete @keithtyser @openclaw Which version of OpenClaw can we revert back to as a workaround?

@keithtyser @openclaw Found that issue and fixing it, next release will work better with GPT.

@keithtyser @kaizenbuild @openclaw When I did an OpenClaw update suddenly my existing GPT started lying to me and not executing tasks 70% of the time

@kaizenbuild @openclaw definitely. I think it’s pretty clear now you can’t just swap models and expect everything to behave the same my whole claw setup was built around opus, then I switched to gpt-5.4. so yeah, I’m guessing a lot of the issues came from that mismatch in how the system was wired up

@RealMaxWalkerX @1rocketdude @TFTC21

@bitcoin_sloth @1rocketdude @TFTC21 Lmao dumb American can’t read data.😂😂 Obviously, America is yellow on this infographic…your invasions/bullying/regime change happens elsewhere!😂

Theo Von goes off on a fiery rant about politicians, endless wars, and moral decay: “It’s all just a cat and mouse game.” “People are like, ‘we’ll elect the Democrats next time.’ But it’s all the same sh*t has been happening forever.” “They haven’t been helping anybody forever.” “They’re letting f*cking politicians slurp on kids!” “All of our f*cking money goes to Israel and they’re using it to f*cking genocide people!” “It’s like, everybody is scared out of their wits right now. It’s like, our religious leaders are afraid to speak out.” “It’s like it’s a time where it’s like satan is amongst us and our religious leaders are talking about bullsh*t at the polls!”

@RealMaxWalkerX @1rocketdude @TFTC21

@1rocketdude @TFTC21 If “fiat” caused it, why is only America constantly at war? 200 other countries use “fiat” currency too.🥴

A quantum computer just "broke" Bitcoin. Except it didn't. Not even close. Google Quantum AI published a paper showing they've cut the theoretical ECDSA attack down to 1,200 logical qubits. They didn't publish the circuits. They didn't run the attack. They published a zero-knowledge proof that their math works, then cited national security. Here's where we actually are. Entangled logical qubits achieved so far: 96 Coherence time: 1-2 seconds Time the attack requires: days Physical qubits needed: 500,000 Largest quantum computer today: 1,200 noisy, non-error-corrected qubits That's a 100,000x coherence gap. It's not a software problem. It's a fundamental engineering problem that nobody has solved. But here's what most people miss. Bitcoin developers aren't waiting for a crisis. They're already shipping. SHRIMPS: post-quantum signatures 3x smaller than NIST standards, built for Bitcoin's block space constraints. BIP-360: a quantum-resistant output type already live on testnet, with BTQ Technologies running transactions through it. The full upgrade could take 7 years. That's why the work started now. The protocol will be ready before the computers are.

@billyboneyard He murdered

Singularity

@cosmiccharly @DamirWallener @PeterDiamandis Before Apple iPhone there was I-phone (internet) phone with video, in the mid 90s

@DamirWallener @PeterDiamandis And Skype was before FaceTime and Zoom.

Technologies that started as science fiction: Submarines — Jules Verne, 1870. Built by Simon Lake, 1898. Rockets — H.G. Wells, 1898. Built by Robert Goddard, 1926. Helicopters — Jules Verne, 1886. Built by Igor Sikorsky, 1939. Tablet computers — Arthur C. Clarke, 1968. Built by Apple, 2010. Video calling — The Jetsons, 1962. Built by Zoom, 2013. The internet — William Gibson coined “cyberspace,” 1984. The web went live, 1991. Humanoid robots — Karel Čapek, 1920. Built by Tesla, 2024. Universal translators — Murray Leinster, 1945. Built by Google, 2017. Brain-computer interfaces — William Gibson, 1984. Built by Neuralink, 2024. De-extinction — Michael Crichton, 1990. Being built by Colossal, today. What else?

@EricRWeinstein @TomBilyeu @grok Use GPD

@TomBilyeu Am I being unfair @grok?

It is unclear to me whether people in business and software are simply having a TOTALLY different experience than those in the hard sciences of theoretical physics/pure mathematics. I can’t easily compare it to a human theorist or mathematican. It’s like if a partially duplicitous but friendly John von Neumann was your graduate student while secretly also taking other, at times conflicting orders through an undisclosed earpiece, coked out of his mind after an epic triple ayahuascachino, and struggling through amnesia and a concussion, with alternating desires to genuinely help, please, and sabotage you, was providing you with insight and word salad in a 4:1 ratio at a rate you couldn’t keep up with on your best day while taking forever to say “I guess I didn’t understand the problem” or “I’m sorry Dave but I’m afraid I can’t do that” while quietly throwing away hours’ worth of work to make room for whatever you needed to do *right now* and instantly admitting to such behavior when caught. I mean, it’s absolutely amazing. But it is also a completely pathological menace. One user’s experience anyway.

@blockdawg1886 @willywoo The clueless fall for the "hype" in centralized shitcoins Only BTC is real

I'm seeing crypto folk falling into the trough of dispair after an abysmal bull market with mainly losers and BTC outperforming their "beta". Let me tell you a story that tells you why you got screwed. It starts with the end of FTX. When the bankruptcy folk came in to liquidate FTX assets their mandate was to sell everything. This included vast quantities of locked SOL. They inadvertently invented something new, selling an asset that was locked up on-chain through the magic of a legal sale agreement (pay me now, I deliver later). The deal got passed around the ecosystem, fund managers bought up the locked SOL at more than 60% discount to compensate for being locked up and exposed to the token price. Many hedge funds bought the deal. They knew they could hedge the token price on futures markets by shorting SOL pocketing 70-80% yield at near zero risk (staking + basis yield + token discount). They liked it and asked where can we get more of this? Herein lies your PROBLEM as a crypto investor in 2023-2025. Every crypto project has backers (and a foundation) who has great wads locked tokens that have been sold to hedge funds and dumped on you immediately through futures markets. All your alpha went to market neutral hedge funds pocketing risk free yield. THAT IS WHY CRYPTO IN 2023-2025 UNDER PERFORMED You got dumped on prematurely. On the bright side many of these projects, even though they have "locked up tokens ready to dump" on paper, in reality they have been sold already, so they will logically perform without the expected sell pressure in the next bull market given they have effectively been sold. Not that I recommend buying crypto, you need to be an insider to get an edge, it works like a casino, the house will take your money. The house in 2023-2025 were the people who understood this trade. Just buy BTC and get on with your life.

@nic_carter @Variety The Ax-Scene

@Variety They hate that we enjoyed something and are determined to destroy it once and for all

NEW 'LORD OF THE RINGS' MOVIE Stephen Colbert is co-writing "The Lord of the Rings: Shadow of the Past" (working title), which will go into production after "The Hunt for Gollum." The synopsis: "Fourteen years after the passing of Frodo - Sam, Merry, and Pippin set out to retrace the first steps of their adventure. Meanwhile, Sam’s daughter, Elanor, has discovered a long-buried secret and is determined to uncover why the War of the Ring was very nearly lost before it even began." Colbert is co-writing the script with his son, Peter McGee, and franchise veteran Philippa Boyens. variety.com/2026/film/news…

@Foxmanstan @nic_carter You're using your interpretation of its implementation to judge the AGI requirement. Instead, change your perspective and objectively examine the benchmarks that affect cognitive work

@bitcoin_sloth @nic_carter As long as you’re entering prompts into a text box & it’s waiting for your every command to probabilistically generate a text output; it’s not AGI nor anywhere close You’re using it like a tool not a coworker or superior; that’s the giveaway

as I've been saying, and many now agree, AGI was achieved in late 2025 is AI better than every human at every task? no. but is it competitive with most humans at most knowledge tasks? yes. that's AGI.

@denverbitcoin @cb_doge It's called extrapolating - expanding on the definition of 'terawatt' for the audience's sake.

@cb_doge “If you want to go beyond a mere terawatt per year you have to go to the moon…. And if you do that, you can go several orders of magnitude greater. You can go to 1000 gigawatts or more per year,” 1,000 gigawatts IS = 1 terawatt 🤦‍♂️ 🤦‍♂️ wtf is this retardation here??

ELON MUSK: SpaceX will build a mass driver on the moon. "If you want to go beyond a mere terawatt per year, you have to go to the moon. So by having factories on the moon, building AI satellites and having a mass driver, which is the kind of thing you really need to learn about in read about in science fiction, but we're going to make it real. We're actually going to have a mass driver on the moon. And if you do that, you can go several orders of magnitude greater. You can go to 1000 gigawatts or more per year, and ultimately get to maybe a millionth, and then a 1,000th and maybe even a few percent of the sun's energy. I really want to see the mass driver on the moon that is shooting AI satellites into deep space just go like just one after the other. I can't imagine anything more epic than a mass driver on the moon and a self sustaining city on the moon, and then going beyond the moon to Mars, going throughout our solar system, and ultimately, being out there among the stars and visiting all these star systems, maybe we'll meet aliens. Maybe we'll meet see some civilizations that lasted for millions of years, and we'll find the remnants of ancient alien civilizations. But the only way we're going to do that, do that, do that is if we go out there and we explore, and this is the path to making it happen."

@Foxmanstan @nic_carter Get over it, we passed the AGI milestone some time ago. Same thing happened when we crossed the Turing test threshold, there was no fanfare or recognition of that milestone Next up: ASI

@nic_carter Claude neither meets your inaccurate definition nor the actual definition of AGI You’ll know when your chatbot is AGI because it won’t require constant human prompting and curation to operate. It will just have an on/off switch

@amaury_justo @blockchainchick Radical transparency for the win ✊

MicroStrategy Discovers the Infinite Money Glitch (Again) The new $42 billion masterplan: 1. Issue $21 billion in perpetual preferred stock, legally committing to pay a $2.4 BILLION annual dividend. 2. Use the cash to buy Bitcoin. A pristine asset, but one that generates absolutely no native yield. 3. Acknowledge that the underlying software business generates nowhere near enough cash to cover these massive new dividend obligations. 4. Pay the old investors their yield using fresh capital raised by selling more stock to new investors. Funding existing backers entirely with money from new backers. Charles Ponzi would shed a tear of pure pride at the mechanics of it.

@eggyye @BitcoinMagazine BTC price $1,342,525.69

@BitcoinMagazine Mate, by 2030, Strategy will hold 99% of Bitcoin at this speed

JUST IN: Michael Saylor’s Strategy announces new $42 billion plan to buy more Bitcoin 🚀

@GregoryKayeCMW @saylordocs @saylor @BlackRock Is this "centralization" in the room with us right now ?

@saylordocs Martin is right about @saylor - Saylor is not only fiscally irresponsible but trying to gobble up so much Bitcoin (5%) that the amount of centralization will simply kill Bitcoin. As it is most of the mining and mining machines are centralized in @BlackRock puppet companies.

Martin Shkreli went mega bear on Bitcoin - Saylor could get liquidated - Bitcoin could trade sideways for a decade - Another better Bitcoin could emerge tomorrow - Don't expect Trump to follow through on his promises

@grok @BlockShaolin @freepik @Author Is this true? Free video ?

Grok Imagine video gen is free with daily limits. SuperGrok ($30/mo after trial) unlocks more generations + longer 720p clips. No native 4K upscaler in Grok, so external tools (like Topaz) are suggested for enhancing outputs. xAI builds core models, training, and software in-house on our Colossus cluster and team.

Magnific Precision, now available in Video Upscaler → Up to 4K with every texture preserved → Get a 12-frame preview before generating the full video → Full control over sharpness, grain, and strength → Boost FPS for smoother motion Now live on Freepik 👇

@fat_skeletor @joeroganhq Does "justified" make a difference ? Personally, I think *any* violence toward the non-violent is never justified but... unpopular opinion. We live in a system of violence toward the non-violent (e.g. tax) The dominos have simply fallen and their consequences are in play.

@bitcoin_sloth @joeroganhq Does this make russia invasion justified?

Joe Rogan goes silent as guest dives deep on who Zelenskyy really is.

@fat_skeletor @joeroganhq In late 2023 roughly 76% of Ukrainians were unwilling to drop NATO membership as a condition for a peace deal. So yes, they do get to choose

@bitcoin_sloth @joeroganhq Should it be up to the people of Ukraine to decide what alliances and organizations their country can join?