Dark Canuck

Nobody that I know is saying a hybrid system isn't a good one. Renewables outpaced all other systems in the 'new build' category in 2025. It is the future, but until storage is more efficient, hydro, nuclear and fossil fuels will be a required component. Renewables will, like all things in a market driven economy win on cost. Fossil fuel subsidies world wide are enormous and far in excess of renewables.

@blemmy @JoshYoung @SenatorBrophy @guardian All being funded by NGOs which a wind/solar/battery axe to grind. Wind/solar/batteries are the most expensive energy known to man and cannot stand on their own without vast subsidies. One cannot run a civilization on them as UK and Germany are currently demonstrating.

Denmark "soured on Solar" because it's a bad idea in the current form beyond a certain scale. Solar is not "green" or "clean" - but it has been a fulcrum for government intervention, redistribution and fraud. I've been talking about this for years, good to see some waking up.

@walther_jeff @JoshYoung @SenatorBrophy @guardian This is not a US centric issue. Int'l viewpoints tend to be more unbiased than ones from a particular in-country organization. However there are many other studies to confirm the IEA pov.

@blemmy @JoshYoung @SenatorBrophy @guardian Maybe learn about Garbage In, Garbage Out. The IEA is not a reliable organization and has not been since about 2018. US EIA has reliable numbers.

@parthebar @Reuters Can't handle the truth?

@Reuters So now Reuters is openly rooting for Communist Chinese government-owned ar to be in US. Go Fuck Yourself Reuters!

Some US car buyers envy what they cannot have - affordable Chinese EVs reut.rs/3PFe98h reut.rs/3PFe98h

@bob_bobbings1 @MikeHudema The fossil industry receives far more subsidies than renewables.

@MikeHudema Oh look a really heavy tax payer subsidized industry is booming. If you heavily subsidized any industry its going to boom. The problem no one ever answers is: If renewables were so good and cost effective why wasn't companies doing this without the subsidies.

Solar is set to overtake generation capacity of all other power sources by 2027. In three years, it will overtake gas. In four years, it will push past coal. And it's creating jobs as it does it. We have the solutions. Implement them. #ActOnClimate #climate #energy #renewables

@mahabibimahubi @JaymzAFish @adammocklerr Correct. I don't think the OP understands the concept and he is either not capable or refuses to get the facts.

@JaymzAFish @blemmy @adammocklerr Since 2021, these have been reduced to about 16% (the same level as Germany). Total defense spending is a different matter altogether. The U.S. is constantly involved in wars or initiates wars on its own. It is clear that the U.S. incurs significant expenses for this purpose.

CONSERVATIVE: why won’t NATO help us MOCKLER: that’s not how NATO works

@JaymzAFish @kyochan_fr @adammocklerr That's it? That's all you've got. You f'g americans are dumb goddamn lot. All mouth and no brains.

@kyochan_fr @blemmy @adammocklerr I know it's a fact, I don't give a fuck how you feel about it because you're an ignorant cunt who doesn't know the basic history of NATO.

Ships arrive when there is sufficient product to fill them. They don't sit at the wharf waiting to be loaded. You made the point that ships take 10 days to load. You know nothing about business. No operator pays wharfage and demurrage for 10 days to load a ship. The pipelines work at capacity and ships are scheduled so that they can be loaded quickly. How old are you? You seem very immature and not very aware of the ways of the world. This is a waste of my time. I have better things to do. I'm out.

@blemmy Lol, how do u fill the tanks?? Duh, pipeline flow rate. Once u load a tanker, u have to refill the tanks. Duh. Onsite storage gets filled by the pipelines retard. The pipelines takes days to push 3 million barrels through. Duh. The only asshole is your wife. She got stuck with u.

@blemmy A Bank of Canada study shows 40% of Canadians capable of reaching top 1% U.S. earnings have already left for the United States. Another 30–50% of the next tier? Also gone.

@drhubir @ShaleTier7 @jleqc Canada alreay exports LNG through a modern facility in BC.

@ShaleTier7 @jleqc How canada will export gas? By air ?

I don’t know why everyone is worried about the LNG market. Canada is HERE TO BACKFILL QATAR’S LOST VOLUMES. If we start today, and work all-out around the clock, in just a FEW SHORT YEARS Canada can confidently deliver a preliminary environmental impact assessment. After that it’ll just be a couple of hundred weeks before the indigenous consulting is complete after which the ascension to final decision by the federal environment minister can take place. When the federal agencies make their decisions, we can FINALLY BEGIN provincial permitting. This won’t take long, and once provincial permitting is complete we just have to execute a short 5 year ecosystem monitoring study. After that, when we submit final plans to the provincial government, we should be GOOD TO GO AHEAD AND BUILD a very comprehensive community information pamphlet for the mandatory 720 day public comment period. When the public comment period is complete, and the final investment decision is reached, it’ll be SHOVELS IN THE GROUND on the local fencing needed to secure the site for 2 years to give migratory species enough time to change their patterns. Once migration patterns are changed, and the final hazardous emissions diffusion studies are complete, the community is consulted, and all permits are obtained, CONSTRUCTION WILL BE UNDERWAY on the monitoring systems needed to ensure that no local Salmon population feel personally slighted by any new infrastructure. While this sounds like an arduous process, it’s TOTALLY necessary to ensure Canada remains carbon-competitive. Have no fear all those that may be unable to heat their homes in a few short weeks, Canada is here to deliver ENERGY SECURITY TO THE WORLD… unless it impacts the livelihood of one single snail, then you’re on your own kid.

I have provided a numeric table to clearly prove my point. I have asked for proof to support your position because there is no documented evidence. It's quit simple. It looks like another case of the loud mouth, not very bright Yank, with a lot to say but no facts. You're a lot like your president.

@kyochan_fr @blemmy @adammocklerr One of the main gripes about NATO is the U.S. pays for most of it. You not knowing that proves you don't understand the topic, which is up to you to remedy.

@Brian8683373421 @Microinteracti1 Trump sides with Putin more often than NATO so does it really make sense anymore?

@Microinteracti1 I hope the US pulls out of Nato. Europe does not support the US anymore. IT S time break ties with Spain,UK, Germany and France We can no longer depend on them to be a real ally anymore.

Spanish NATO troops in Iraq pull out and head home via Turkey. Europe is not in love with Trump to say it mildly

@JaymzAFish @adammocklerr That was a quick fold.

@blemmy @adammocklerr Gave you all you need to figure it out. buh-bye

@JaymzAFish @adammocklerr Hollywood and American propaganda is not fact. Let's see some facts. All you have is the bullsh!t that dumb americans have been fed all their lives.

@blemmy @adammocklerr History.

@JaymzAFish @adammocklerr So first it was 100%. Now it is 67%, but there is no source??

@blemmy @adammocklerr There's easily found, common knowledge about the United States paying 2/3rds of All NATO expenses for most of its history. It speaks volumes about you, not knowing this.

@JaymzAFish @adammocklerr Develop an understanding. Do your own research. What was your source when you indicated my cost sharing arrangement within NATO was incorrect?

@blemmy @adammocklerr Point out in Article V what you're quoting.

@JaymzAFish @adammocklerr We are talking about NATO and article five. None of that meets the article 5 threshold. Stay on point.

@blemmy @adammocklerr Iran was funding the Houthi's, Hezbollah and Hamas during Bidens' term dumbass.

@JaymzAFish @adammocklerr You're backing away from your point. I've ask you specifically for your source to indicate that my information was incorrect. Stay on point. Do you have a source or was it just your bullsh!t opinion.

@blemmy @adammocklerr Countries not paying their share into NATO has been an issue since it was established, odd you don't know that.

@JaymzAFish @adammocklerr I’ve proved my point. Do your own research. I haven’t checked pre 24. That’s all the info on the NATO website. What was your source suggesting that the US payed 100%. I would be interested in looking at that.

@blemmy @adammocklerr What do you have before 2024?

@JaymzAFish @adammocklerr Current affairs. We are dealing today in an offensive war. That’s the decision making process.

@blemmy @adammocklerr Your ignorance of the history of all the Americans killed by Iran since 1979 isn't helping you.

@JaymzAFish @adammocklerr You're saying the NATO website is wrong? What is your source?

@blemmy @adammocklerr I have, you're wrong.