Borentar

Disclaimer: just because I retweet something, does not mean I agree with it, I use retweeting to save posts for later reading. Apologies for any confusion.

@PicPerfectYT Are you guys ok? We've not heard anything in a few months, and we're getting concerned...

PS Plus February games are here 🎮 Some solid picks… but not all plats are created equal 👀 I’ve put together a trophy-focused breakdown so you know what you’re getting into👇 pictureperfectplats.com/ps-plus-februa… What plat are you going for? 🏆 #Playstation #gamers

@DistantCoder @Rayjhinducing Can anyone prove without reasonable doubt that RG didn't create or spot the 'mistake' before that point too? If Sky is doing it maliciously, surely the same can be said for RG, right?

@Rayjhinducing Can you prove beyond any reasonable doubt that Sergio's opponent noticed the mistake before and intentionally waited? Is it not reasonable that they may have noticed the mistake only at the time the judge was called?

So I read through the entire thread and have many thoughts. 1. The player in question here should have paid attention to their match and should be held accountable for creating a damaged gamestate. If people are willing to give him the leniency saying that it was an honest mistake that he didn't catch, I don't see how they can say that their opponent couldn't have just as easily missed the mistake. To suggest that the opponent realized the mistake and waited is genuinely unreasonable and isn't a good argument unless you can undeniably prove that they did so maliciously. If you cannot prove it beyond "it feels scummy" then your argument is invalid. 2. A lot of people are saying that the first judge's ruling of just randomly putting the extra card back was a reasonable one. This is legitimately crazy. In this situation the draws for turn would have been different and putting the card back randomly somewhere on top of the deck would alter the way the game would have gone, thus is not a correct way to fix the gamestate. In this situation the gamestate was 100% irreparable because there was no way to rewind the gamestate to a point where the game would have played out identically to how it would have had the mistake not happened. Any situation in which we create a new gamestate that is legal but isn't identical to what the gamestate WOULD have been is an unreasonable way to fix the issue in a tournament setting. 3. People are calling the opponent a shark for appealing the initial judge's decision. Let me make this very clear: You are NEVER a shark for appealing a ruling, EVER. Appealing doesn't make you an asshole, doesn't make you a shark nor does it make you "that guy". The appeal system in any TCG exists specifically so that you have the right to get a 2nd opinion when you disagree with a judge's initial ruling. This can go both ways, you can appeal and have the head judge confirm the floor judge's ruling which gives you confirmation that the initial ruling was correct, which is a good outcome OR it confirms that the floor judge made a mistake (this can happen often) and you appealing has caused you to instead get a correct ruling. The appeal system is there to protect players and make sure that they are ruled for fairly in a majority of situations. In their position I would have also appealed as the floor judge's initial ruling was not reasonable and I think that the head judge's call here was 100% correct. An irreparable gamestate caused by the player most at fault (the one who made the mistake) resulting in a game loss is the most reasonable course of action. 4. I think the only real mistake the head judge made in this situation is that they didn't also issue a warning to the opponent who didn't notice OP's mistake. They also had a reasonable amount of opportunity to catch the mistake and should be given a warning for not having caught it when it happened. However, I think it is not reasonable to assume the player maliciously waited before calling a judge as there is no way to prove it. 5. Another big thing that needs to be talked about, is that OP's thread here does not own up to their own mistake AT ALL and instead directs full blame to their opponent and accuses them of maliciously trying to force them into an illegal gamestate in order to "earn a free win off the judge call". I think it's unfair that this player is starting a witch hunt against his opponent when the opponent genuinely did everything right. If they caught a mistake and called the judge when they noticed the mistake happened, then appealed when they disagreed with the floor judge, then they did everything exactly the way they were supposed to. In Yu-Gi-Oh, this behavior of calling someone out for "maliciously trying to gain an unfair advantage due to a judge call" would result in that player making the accusation being suspended for a certain duration of time. Overall, I think it's unfortunate that this player got a game loss, but the reality is that they got a loss for their own mistake and here they are clearly attempting to deflect the blame when in reality they are the player most at fault for causing their own game loss.

@BritishGasHelp Still doesn't mean it's right....

@borentar Hi Borentar, the standing charge is a set daily charge, the charge remains the same regardless of usage. It goes towards the upkeep of the infrastructure needed to supply energy. If I can be help please DM me with your full address and email address. Thanks ^Paul.

6 weeks bill, 300% usage cost for the standing charge.... @BritishGas do better.

@RCE_Official Do you really have nothing to say about this BLASPHEMY?? youtube.com/shorts/-eWIAiG…

hey @IcyDeluxeKG i have a problem with your most recent video

@darrenshan Good evening Sire, Any thoughts on going into more depth on any of the side characters from the Demonata series? I think Kirilli and Nadia might make interesting reading..

@dshensmith You mean the woman who claimed to be on the side of green spaces, whilst being anti green policies? The same woman who claimed "political correctness is becoming a communism" That woman? That woman had a big pile of cocaine before she went out and just started talking...

Yes!!

@PiperNivenWWE How on earth do you cope with the heat and sun over in the States? When south England hits 24° wife turns lobster and I've been struggling with the heat for 8° lol

Post skincare ritual glow ✨ You need solfulholisticskin.com in your life

@SarahMarieOB Lol I feel that... I have a Terry's Chic Orange segment missing from... not important.. which I'm begging to heal faster lol

This has very nearly finished healing completely. Love to heal at the pace of a leisurely snail. Who doesn’t want a random crescent moon of cuts on their hand for 3.5 weeks? 🙃

@SarahMarieOB Some dogs just know what is needed, like the staring you down, that's an alert... It's not a perfect type of alert, but he gets your attention, and you know what it means...

@borentar I think so! He’s not trained for it but seems to do it when the situation calls for it.

Monty has started doing this thing, which unfortunately happens really frequently, where he’ll just stare me down when I have a presyncope episode. He doesn’t know what to do, he just sits right in front of me and stares at me whilst my vision goes glittery.

@SarahMarieOB Or at least an attempt at it..

@SarahMarieOB Pressure therapy

@SamsaraSings @doctordissident @ThatOtherJJ Crying TikToks at the bus stop are just the worst...

@doctordissident @ThatOtherJJ It is truly *that* insane. But you know … we are all trans if we say we’re trans 🤣🤣🤣 By the way, my pronouns are Your Highness and Your Majesty. Be sure to use them or I’ll have to make a TikTok crying and I don’t have a car 🤣🤣🤣

Just a quick reminder that I am a homosexual, not a “2SLGBTQIA+” froot- loop. Thanks.

So accurate... what a dangerous man XD

@touretteshero And this... this is why I follow you Jess XD

Today’s real #Tourettes: “Imagine trying to tuck a penguin in at night.” #Dailyoutburst

@EmergencyBod Jeremy Hunt... need I explain that one?

Thoma Higgins, a gay rights activist and allegedly the person who coined the term 'Gay Pride' once pied the anti-LGBT singer Anita Bryant on live television in 1977. That's something we don't see enough of anymore. A protest pieing Who do you think deserves a good pieing & why?

@PiperNivenWWE On a serious note though, wwe do you and Nia dirty your ring gear.... I know they say the camera adds X pounds, but to they need to add another 30 with a bad choice of gear?

*on, may have had a few orange whips already 🥴

Oh a mission from god. 🕶️

@PiperNivenWWE What on earth is an orange whip?

@Im_TheCody @bullyray5150 You've clearly never argued with a northern lass XD

Your chin also… The 2nd one… (Drops 🎤)