Michael Bruno

3.8K posts

Michael Bruno banner
Michael Bruno

Michael Bruno

@brubarian

Went from grunt life to policy wonk to Wall Street. Hot takes my own. Nothing here is investment advice.

Katılım Haziran 2025
398 Takip Edilen776 Takipçiler
Michael Bruno
Michael Bruno@brubarian·
GM Citizens. Always Day 0. Frontier Mindset.
English
0
0
0
23
Michael Bruno
Michael Bruno@brubarian·
@CCrowley100 Yes - freedom to live a harmonious and rightly ordered life. And others forget that the first necessity for freedom is order. Order that prevents this modern interpretation of freedom as hedonistic nihilism
English
0
0
1
68
Chad Crowley
Chad Crowley@CCrowley100·
To understand this passage, it is necessary to clarify what Evola means by freedom and the tradition from which that concept arises, since it belongs to a conception fundamentally different from the modern understanding of the term. When Evola speaks of freedom in Revolt Against the Modern World, and throughout his work more generally, he means freedom in an aristocratic and traditional sense. This conception does not belong exclusively to Evola’s account of the Perennial Tradition, but to the older inheritance of Western aristocratic civilization itself. It is the freedom known to the Indo-European warrior, the Greek aristos, the Roman patrician, the Germanic thane, and the medieval knight. It is the freedom of the man who rules himself first. Evola is contrasting two forms of freedom. What philosophy later termed positive freedom is the ancient, hierarchical conception: the freedom to act in accordance with one’s higher nature. It is the liberty of self-mastery and command over the passions, achieved through conscious discipline and inner sovereignty. Such freedom is not granted from without, but cultivated from within. It is what Aristotle meant when he held that only the man capable of ruling himself is fit to rule others, and what the Stoics understood as a freedom of the soul that no external power can truly extinguish. Opposed to this is negative freedom, the modern egalitarian notion of liberty defined not by self-mastery but by the absence of restraint. It defines freedom as the removal of limits rather than the ordering of the self. In the traditional view, such freedom is empty. It produces men governed by impulse rather than will. A people may appear liberated outwardly, enjoying unrestricted movement and choice, while remaining inwardly enslaved to appetite, vanity, fear, or the need for approval, in short, all that is “human, all too human.” In the formulation above, Evola is describing an order in which freedom and hierarchy were once united. The ruler is great not because he subjugates, but because he governs others as he governs himself. Those who serve him are not slaves, for their obedience is freely given, arising from recognition of a higher authority that reflects their own inner discipline. To love freedom in those who serve is to affirm the same principle of inner sovereignty in them. The Roman emperor, in this sense, does not extinguish the freedom of others but gathers it into a coherent order. Each man stands within a framework of duty and obligation beyond himself, bound into a greater whole, yet remains inwardly free because he knows his place and measure and lives in accordance with his proper purpose. For Evola, true freedom rests on form and proportion. It is the steadiness of spirit that endures without surrender to external pressure. The ancients regarded such freedom as inseparable from hierarchy, since order alone gives it meaning. The Roman ideal, and it is an ideal, was to be self-governing and sovereign, holding within oneself the same discipline one embodied in command. The passage presupposes this understanding. Nobility consists in ruling free men rather than slaves, since only those who are inwardly free can sustain a civilization worthy of reverence, one oriented beyond the fleeting present toward a higher principle. Evola located that principle in what transcends the merely temporal condition of man, and it was this vertical orientation that once gave authority its legitimacy and freedom its measure. When that binding orientation is lost, freedom ceases to be a discipline of the soul and becomes a license for indulgence, while authority survives only as an empty shell. What remains is order without inner form and liberty without self-command, not simply a political failure, but the inward dissolution of a world that has lost all orientation toward what stands above it.
Chad Crowley tweet media
English
7
25
169
5.1K
Chad Crowley
Chad Crowley@CCrowley100·
“The supreme nobility of a Roman emperor does not consist in being a master of slaves, but in being a lord of free men, who loves freedom even in those who serve him.” —Julius Evola, Revolt Against the Modern World
Chad Crowley tweet media
English
12
138
960
20.2K
Michael Bruno
Michael Bruno@brubarian·
Extremely well written. The constant cycle of “analogically mapping” similar scenarios; Thucydides trap, et al, leading to blunders and impulsive decisions. For those who like the intuitive take - all life is competition and states are simply the multiplicity of their individuals. The desire to be the king of the jungle is present in human hearts and therefore in governments.
Engelsberg Ideas@EngelsbergIdeas

In Europe, America and Russia, an unhealthy obsession with grand geopolitical schemes has often clouded the judgement of statesmen and scholars. The perils of perpetual geopolitics | @VladislavZubok1 engelsbergideas.com/essays/the-per…

English
0
0
1
135
Jonas Olsson
Jonas Olsson@jonasolsson·
Just visited Estonia and got an eye-opening look at their booming defense industry, especially the drone sector leading the charge. Estonian defense firms are projected to hit $842 million in sales revenue in 2025 - a massive 347% growth since 2021. Small nation, huge impact in high-tech defense. Photo credit/copyright: Jonas Olsson
English
23
242
1.5K
54.5K
Piotr Olszewski
Piotr Olszewski@pi_olszewski·
48 godzin, w których polski minister powstrzymał Trumpa Z końcem listopada 2025 r. wyciekł plan pokojowy Donalda Trumpa dla Ukrainy. Europa czyta i… zamiera. Dokument wyglądał tak, jakby pisał go sam Putin. Marco Rubio w prywatnych rozmowach z senatorami nazywał go wprost „rosyjską listą życzeń”. W planie pojawia się też Polska. Między innymi w punkcie, że polskie i europejskie F-35 będą stacjonować na naszym terytorium… na warunkach uzgodnionych z Rosją. Amerykanie też byli gotowi zmniejszyć swoje zaangażowanie w Europie. To nie był plan pokojowy... W tym samym czasie wiceminister obrony Paweł Zalewski przebywał z kilkudniową wizytą na Forum Bezpieczeństwa w Halifax w Kanadzie. Miał już w kalendarzu spotkanie w Waszyngtonie. Timing był idealny. Z pełnym mandatem rządu i hasłem, które miało wybrzmieć: „Nic o nas bez nas” wsiadł w samolot i poleciał do stolicy Stanów Zjednoczonych. 25 listopada 2025 r., w Pentagonie spotkał się z Elbridge’em Colbym, uznawanym za najtwardszego stratega Trumpa. To on jest autorem w strategii bezpieczeństwa USA hasła: Europa musi wreszcie „sama trzymać pistolet”. Dla niego priorytetem była Azja i Pacyfik. Rozmowa była krótka, a Zalewski postawił sprawę jasno: „Polska nigdy nie zaakceptuje zapisów, które traktują nas jak pionek w grze z Rosją.”. Wstawił się też za Ukrainą: "Ukraina nie może mieć limitu na swoją własną armię." Jednocześnie negocjpował: „Jesteśmy gotowi budować hub logistyczny i infrastrukturę, żeby kontyngent USA w Polsce się zwiększył.” Colby wyczuł Zalewsiego. Szanował Polskę. Wiedział, że to najsilniejszy kraj na wschodniej flance i nie ma sensu upierać się przy punktach, które US nic nie kosztują, a mogą zdenerwować europejskiego sojusznika. Zalewski wyszedł z Pentagonu i zaraz zwołał briefing w Ambasadzie RP. Tam powiedział: „(...teraz...) Nie ma żadnego punktu dotyczącego tego, że europejskie myśliwce będą stacjonowały w Polsce (...za zgodą Rosji...). To zależy wyłącznie od decyzji Polski.” O Ukrainie: „Nie może być żadnych ograniczeń dotyczących zdolności wojska ukraińskiego czy też jego liczebności.” O obecności USA: „Uzyskałem potwierdzenie, iż nie dojdzie do zmniejszenia liczby tych jednostek. Kwestia zwiększenia amerykańskiego kontyngentu jest otwarta.” Po spotkaniu Colby potwierdził, że kontrowersyjne punkty, w tym ten o myśliwcach, zniknęły z aktualnej wersji planu. Tego samego wieczora misja była zakończona. Zalewski wrócił do Warszawy jako człowiek, który w 48 godzinach cichej dyplomacji uratował suwerenność Polski.
Piotr Olszewski tweet mediaPiotr Olszewski tweet mediaPiotr Olszewski tweet media
Polski
58
372
1.5K
69.4K
Michael Bruno retweetledi
Roman Helmet Guy
Roman Helmet Guy@romanhelmetguy·
Adam Smith thought that even in a free market, no country would ever be stupid enough to outsource industries that were necessary for national defense. Adam Smith was wrong. Time to reindustrialize America.
Roman Helmet Guy tweet media
English
23
114
1.3K
13.8K
Michael Bruno
Michael Bruno@brubarian·
I'm not equipped to comment on internal Polish domestic identity. But I'm in the middle of reading "The Oxford History of Poland-Lithuania: Volume I", and it saddens me that a nation with such a rich history is still struggling with this identity issue 800 years later.
Daniel Foubert 🇵🇱🇫🇷@Arrogance_0024

Polska A cierpi na kompletny brak poczucia narodowego. Polska B z kolei to zaściankowość, ciemnota i zabobon. Ciekawe jest to, że żadna z nich sobie nie poradzi bez drugiej i każda musi cierpieć nienawiść swojego bliskiego, jak Chrystus na krzyżu.

English
0
0
1
39
Michael Bruno
Michael Bruno@brubarian·
@JanPieklo Some of us are trying to improve that. Would love to meet and discuss, will be in Warsaw and Krakow in a few weeks.
English
0
0
1
23
Jan Pieklo
Jan Pieklo@JanPieklo·
Great point, indeed: "In Central Europe, which remains the most loyal American ally on the continent, we understand very well what Churchill meant when he said that Americans can always be trusted to do the right thing....after exhausting all other possibilities."
Sławomir Dębski@SlawomirDebski

In American strategic thinking, there are deep ruts that successive administrations fall into from time to time. In 1945, at Yalta, Democratic President Franklin Delano Roosevelt traded away the freedom of Poland and other Central European nations in exchange for Stalin’s entry into the war against Japan. Just a few months later, already after Roosevelt’s death, that deal was recognized in Washington as a profound mistake, and the policy shifted toward containing the very same Russia for the next half century. After the Trump administration became entangled in yet another war it supposedly did not want, it is difficult to have confidence in the long-term strategic foresight of successive American “geniuses.” In Central Europe, which remains the most loyal American ally on the continent, we understand very well what Churchill meant when he said that Americans can always be trusted to do the right thing....after exhausting all other possibilities. But if anyone in Washington were willing to listen earlier, here is a simple piece of advice: Russia seeks to weaken the United States and would rather live in a world dominated by China than by America. Attempts to gain something as illusory as a Russian alliance against China, at the cost of a real ally like Ukraine - which is actively resisting the expansion of Russian and Chinese influence in Europe - are not only misguided, but also undermine confidence in Washington’s elites as capable of rationally assessing the world...

English
1
5
24
2.5K
Michael Bruno
Michael Bruno@brubarian·
Run the numbers. We have three options: 1. Massive industrial policy run with private incentives and speed - fed and state govs simply issue pardons for regulatory violations, rebuild "ground to gravity" materials and refining processes, heavy industry, etc. 2. Accept constraints and save our load (pun intended) for existential threats while we rebuild at a slower pace. 3. Embrace Allies and encourage them to develop their own unique warfighting capability that strengthens the West and its Allies in a comprehensive manner. But this isn't sustainable.
Michael Bruno tweet media
English
0
1
3
66
Michael Bruno
Michael Bruno@brubarian·
@wojcikrp Colonel - would love to have your opinion, how can I contact you?
English
0
0
0
12
Colonel (ret) Ray Wojcik
Remember 🇵🇱
Institute of National Remembrance@ipngovpl_eng

🗓In March 1981, the events in Bydgoszcz became one of the most serious political crises of communist Poland. The brutal beating of Solidarity activists during a session of the regional authorities on 19 March 1981 shocked public opinion and revealed the true nature of the regime. The so-called Bydgoszcz crisis triggered a wave of nationwide solidarity. Just days later, millions of Poles took part in a warning strike, demonstrating unity and determination in the fight for dignity, workers’ rights, and freedom. Bydgoszcz became the symbolic centre of resistance, proof that a united society could challenge the communist system. On 30 March 1981, the government reached a compromise with the leaders of the trade union. Solidarity renounced the general strike, in return obtaining, among others, the legalisation of the founding committees of the Farmers’ Solidarity and the promises, never fulfilled, to have the events of 19 March in Bydgoszcz investigated, and an act on trade unions drafted. On 16 March 2026, the IPN co-organised commemorations marking the 45th anniversary of the Bydgoszcz March. The ceremonies began with the presentation of the IPN outdoor exhibition “The Bydgoszcz Crisis 1981”, recalling the dramatic events and their broader historical context. Participants gathered at key sites connected with the protests, honouring those who stood up to the communist authorities. During the commemorations, the IPN Deputy President Karol Polejowski emphasised that in March 1981 “all free Poles looked to Bydgoszcz with hope,” as it became the focal point of the struggle for rights and freedom. On the same occasion, former opposition activists were also honoured with the Cross of Freedom and Solidarity, an expression of the Republic of Poland’s gratitude to those who, in difficult times, “remained faithful to the path toward a free Poland.”

English
1
0
3
75
Michael Bruno retweetledi
Michael Bruno
Michael Bruno@brubarian·
@LBalcerowicz Professor, what is the best source, in your opinion, to read and learn more about Poland's Defense Industrial Base?
English
0
0
1
35
Leszek Balcerowicz
Leszek Balcerowicz@LBalcerowicz·
Wydatki na zbrojenia muszą być finansowane przez państwo ale produkcją uzbrojenia nie muszą się zajmować państwowe firmy. W Polsce na odtworzenie zdolności amunicyjnych w państwowych zakładach Mesco i Dezamet wydano prawie miliard zł, efekt jest skandaliczny.J.Wolski,GW i
Polski
20
35
209
11.2K
Michael Bruno
Michael Bruno@brubarian·
GM Citizens. Always Day 0. Frontier Mindset.
English
1
0
1
35
Michael Bruno
Michael Bruno@brubarian·
@markomihkelson They are not disparate goals. We all must strengthen the West and apply our unique abilities to each challenge.
English
2
0
0
21
Under Secretary of State Jacob S. Helberg
Excellent visit to the @Ericsson factory in Dallas, Texas with CEO @Borje_Ekholm. Strengthening our domestic telecommunications infrastructure and securing our 5G supply chains is a top national interest. High-tech manufacturing like this is the backbone of our future economic security. 🇺🇸 🚀
Under Secretary of State Jacob S. Helberg tweet media
English
10
22
166
10.7K
Michael Bruno
Michael Bruno@brubarian·
I think about this a lot through the paradigm of investing, geopolitics, and fatherhood/husbandry.
Michael Bruno tweet media
English
0
1
1
59
Michael Bruno
Michael Bruno@brubarian·
@TMTLongShort We need to break out the Euros. Western and Eastern. The Poles and "Tough Ten" are serious about their security and want to tie in with the U.S. The others don't know what they want, other than to spite the U.S.
English
0
0
1
42