bug man

328 posts

bug man

bug man

@bugman11504282

Katılım Temmuz 2021
3 Takip Edilen0 Takipçiler
bug man
bug man@bugman11504282·
@TechWannabe23 @TripleThinkLabs @TateTheTalisman I’m saying calling someone the n word isn’t threatening them when someone reacts violently to that telling them you are armed is actually an attempt to defuse the situation you’re listening selectively is chud wrong yes is that how the law works not at all
English
0
0
0
137
Tech
Tech@TechWannabe23·
@TripleThinkLabs @TateTheTalisman He wasn’t arrested for that but this ain’t new lol. You can’t go in a bank and go to the teller and say “I got a g*n give me everything” and then try to leave like nun happen lol. That’s just words right? Freedom of speech right?
English
1
0
2
2.3K
T.A.R.S. 🏴🇻🇦
T.A.R.S. 🏴🇻🇦@TARSRel0aded·
My new favorite hotel quirk… I’m just doing my part!
T.A.R.S. 🏴🇻🇦 tweet mediaT.A.R.S. 🏴🇻🇦 tweet media
English
166
173
4.7K
298.8K
bug man
bug man@bugman11504282·
@elyawda Gettin close buddy but the KJV is too
English
0
0
0
8
Elyawda
Elyawda@elyawda·
Every single modern Bible translation, starting with the 1885 Revised Version, is evil and satanic and should be burned.
English
4
0
2
218
bug man
bug man@bugman11504282·
@elyawda Religion isn’t about all good feelings Mr milky white skin if you want true salvation but don’t like the Catholic Church then join Eastern Orthodox or SSPX they are incomplete but have valid sacraments
English
0
0
1
76
Elyawda
Elyawda@elyawda·
The only church that I officially joined and felt happiness in was the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints. But I can’t be LDS because everyone on here says Mormons aren’t Christians and I want to go to Heaven.
English
39
1
47
2.2K
Joshua
Joshua@Joshua_M_Hump·
The hotel we’re staying at left some kindling for me.
Joshua tweet media
English
253
2
213
60.7K
bug man
bug man@bugman11504282·
Scoring higher on a short quiz doesn’t prove theological accuracy lol. It just shows familiarity with certain facts or passages. You can know a lot about the Bible and still interpret it incorrectly that’s literally why different denominations exist. Knowledge of trivia ≠ correctness of doctrine.
English
0
0
0
5
Jennifer Jasper
Jennifer Jasper@jen17448·
@bugman11504282 @jonathanplumb pewresearch.org: Overall Knowledge of the Bible. Overall, Mormons score best on these items, answering an average of 5.7 of the seven Bible questions correctly. White evangelical Protestants get about five of the seven Bible items right (5.1)
English
1
0
0
13
Jonathan Plumb
Jonathan Plumb@jonathanplumb·
If we go by biblical knowledge, the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints is best. If by money management, LDS is also best. Charitable/Humanitarian aid? LDS is best. View of eternity? LDS is best. Purpose of life? LDS is best. Missionary program? LDS is best. Least blood on hands? LDS is best. Cosmology? LDS is best. Educational curricula? LDS is best. Consistent growth? LDS is best. Family structure? LDS is best. Baby rate? LDS is best. Self reliance? LDS is best. Health code? LDS is best. Youth programs? LDS is best. Genealogy/Family History? LDS is best. Personal revelation? LDS is best. The list could fill books. Add other things that Latter-day Saints are the best at in the comments.
Jonathan Plumb tweet media
English
105
47
778
15K
bug man
bug man@bugman11504282·
@404Rogue_ @BFordress925 @KINGIYK3 @ontheflipsiide I’ve already explained why it isn’t a contradiction and you keep ignoring it, then just asserting that it is without actually showing how. If you can’t engage the explanation and point out where it fails, you’re not really equipped to be having this conversation.
English
1
0
0
9
bug man
bug man@bugman11504282·
You’re arguing fairness, not contradiction. Saying “I didn’t see miracles” doesn’t make the claim false or illogical, it just means you don’t like how the evidence is distributed. And your analogy doesn’t really fit. People back then didn’t get an “answer sheet” they had testimony, debate, and plenty still didn’t believe. Same as now. You not personally witnessing something doesn’t make all historical claims invalid.
English
1
0
0
7
Solo ♟️
Solo ♟️@404Rogue_·
@bugman11504282 @BFordress925 @KINGIYK3 @ontheflipsiide It does make it illogical or false you fucking moron Imagine a teacher giving 2 people a test she gives 1 of the students a answer book and gives the other nothing A god has to be perfect he can't give 1 all the answers and let the other figure it out trough an illogical book
English
1
0
0
14
bug man
bug man@bugman11504282·
I did explain it just without the insults. Genesis 1 is a broad, structured overview of creation. Genesis 2 zooms in on Adam and the Garden. It’s not retelling the timeline step-by-step, it’s focusing on a different aspect. That’s why it’s not a contradiction. Other people calling it one doesn’t make it true. If you think the explanation fails, show how otherwise you’re just repeating yourself. You’re trying to have a conversation you’re not equipped to have. You don’t have to just get to assert that it’s objectively a contradiction. I explained how it isn’t. Show me where my explanation fails, you stupid fuck.
English
1
0
0
3
Solo ♟️
Solo ♟️@404Rogue_·
@bugman11504282 @BFordress925 @KINGIYK3 @ontheflipsiide They're one of the most known contradictions in the bible saying it ain't a contradiction is objectively false retard And you didn't explain shit idk what you're talking about all you're doing is spouting fancy words saying Christianity is logical when it isn't
English
1
0
0
10
bug man
bug man@bugman11504282·
You didn’t give a contradiction you asserted one. I responded with an explanation and you ignored it, then jumped to insults. That’s not “sticking to one point,” that’s refusing to engage the answer. If you think it’s still a contradiction, explain where my reasoning fails. Otherwise you’re just repeating yourself louder. Fucking retard 😭
English
1
0
0
7
bug man
bug man@bugman11504282·
You’re not wrong that you can’t just assume the Bible is true to prove it that’s fair. But I haven’t been doing that. I’ve been answering your points on their own terms, and you keep jumping to insults instead of engaging the responses. If you want to question the foundation, that’s fine but then actually do that instead of calling everything “illogical” and moving on. Otherwise it’s not a discussion, it’s just venting.
English
1
0
0
4
Solo ♟️
Solo ♟️@404Rogue_·
@BFordress925 @bugman11504282 @KINGIYK3 @ontheflipsiide Nah I'm actually done bruh what type of retardness is this Retard you can't confirm the bible with the bible you fucking retard you're assuming the bible is true and gods morality is perfect when that's what I'm questioning and you DARE to tell me that I'm the one who dodged
English
1
0
0
29
bug man
bug man@bugman11504282·
You’re mixing two different things fairness and truth. Even if you think it’s “unfair” you didn’t see miracles, that doesn’t make the claim illogical or false. And people back then didn’t just “get proof” either they had testimony, disputed claims, and plenty who still didn’t believe. Most of what we know about history works the same way. You can say it’s not convincing to you, but that’s different from it having “zero evidence.”
English
1
0
0
6
Solo ♟️
Solo ♟️@404Rogue_·
@bugman11504282 @BFordress925 @KINGIYK3 @ontheflipsiide You keep saying "it's a coherent view" when it isn't it's the most illogical shit ever You telling me people back then got to see Jesus raise mfs from the dead and shit so they got real proof and all we got is a retarded illogical book with 0 evidence or proof how is that fair?
English
1
0
0
12
bug man
bug man@bugman11504282·
I didn’t ignore it I explained why Genesis 1 and 2 aren’t a contradiction. You just didn’t engage the explanation. Calling it a contradiction doesn’t make it one if there’s a consistent reading. If you think it is a contradiction, point out where my explanation fails instead of just repeating it louder.
English
1
0
0
7
bug man
bug man@bugman11504282·
I did respond you just keep moving the goalposts. You asked for a contradiction, gave one, and it wasn’t actually a contradiction. Now it’s “there’s no evidence.” That’s not engaging, it’s shifting. And “if it were true scientists would prove it” misunderstands the claim. Christianity isn’t a lab experiment, it’s a historical and philosophical claim about events, testimony, and meaning. Scientists do study those fields you just don’t accept the conclusions. If you want a real discussion, stick to one point and actually engage it.
English
1
0
0
6
Solo ♟️
Solo ♟️@404Rogue_·
@BFordress925 @bugman11504282 @KINGIYK3 @ontheflipsiide Can't you read you didn't even respond properly I'm getting tired all ya'll do is dick suck Christianity not one of you actually said something that'd make me even consider Christianity is true If it had actual evidence and proof scientists would've been on it btw
English
2
0
0
31
bug man
bug man@bugman11504282·
That’s a caricature. Christianity doesn’t teach “rapist says sorry automatic heaven.” Real repentance means turning from evil and being transformed cheap words don’t cut it. And it’s not “good people vs bad people,” because Christianity teaches everyone falls short. As for belief, the claim is that God judges justly based on the light a person has (Rom 2), not arbitrarily. You can reject that, but it’s not the cartoon version you’re arguing against.
English
1
0
0
13
Solo ♟️
Solo ♟️@404Rogue_·
@bugman11504282 @BFordress925 @KINGIYK3 @ontheflipsiide A rapist turning to Christianity goes to heaven and a normal good person who doesn't believe goes to hell God does not have the right to send someone to hell for not believing when back then he did miracles and shit and all we get is a retarded book with 0 evidence or proof
English
2
0
0
26