Mark

1.8K posts

Mark banner
Mark

Mark

@callmeMBob

Patriot, family man, fan of the gifts God put on this Earth for us.

Katılım Nisan 2016
265 Takip Edilen74 Takipçiler
Bob Ferguson
Bob Ferguson@BobFergusonGov·
It looks like voters will get a say on whether to maintain the tax on income over $1 million that was passed earlier this year- and I look forward to the public having their say on this important policy. To be clear, this reform of our regressive tax code included expansion of tax credits for working families, relief for small businesses, and investments in K-12 and affordable childcare. One more thing voters should know: so long as I am Governor I will veto ANY attempt to lower the threshold or raise the rate of this tax-- we are asking those who make the most to pay a little more, and providing relief to workers and small businesses. Let's keep it that way.
English
1.7K
65
316
385.3K
Governor Bob Ferguson
Governor Bob Ferguson@GovBobFerguson·
Today, we remember the courageous service members who fought and died for our country. Their sacrifice preserved the freedoms and rights guaranteed to all people under the United States Constitution, ensuring that liberty endures for future generations. We are grateful for their sacrifice, and we honor their memory.
English
86
10
62
9.9K
Mark
Mark@callmeMBob·
@Gentleman_Ways This puts exactly into words how I’m trying to raise my children with adventures and stories of heroes and heroines.
English
1
0
1
21
Mark retweetledi
The Ways of A Gentleman
The Ways of A Gentleman@Gentleman_Ways·
“Since it is so likely that children will meet cruel enemies, let them at least have heard of brave knights and heroic courage. Otherwise you are making their destiny not brighter but darker.” -C.S. Lewis
The Ways of A Gentleman tweet media
English
34
1.3K
5.8K
67.5K
Mark retweetledi
Danny Deraney
Danny Deraney@DannyDeraney·
Every year, I share this video of French caretakers who take sand from Omaha Beach in Normandy, and scrub them into the letters to give them the gold coloring. They do this for all 9,386 US soldiers who died. France also gave us this land as American soil. #MemorialDayWeekend
English
1.6K
26.6K
190.8K
8.4M
Mark
Mark@callmeMBob·
@NYCMayor Coming from a government official this ideological take is… ignorant.
English
0
0
0
1
Nick shirley
Nick shirley@nickshirleyy·
@GavinNewsom In Californias case it might be good to fight fire with water
English
863
3.9K
67.8K
382.9K
Gavin Newsom
Gavin Newsom@GavinNewsom·
We will lose our country if we don’t stand up and fight fire with fire.
English
8K
2.1K
11.1K
2.4M
Mark retweetledi
Brivael Le Pogam
Brivael Le Pogam@brivael·
Tu confonds deux choses, et c'est exactement le piège que la French Theory a tendu. Liberté, égalité, fraternité — égalité *de droits*, égalité *devant la loi*, égalité *de dignité*. C'est la promesse républicaine, et personne ici ne l'attaque. Le wokisme, ce n'est pas ça. C'est l'égalitarisme des résultats. Et l'égalitarisme des résultats, contrairement à l'égalité des droits, n'est pas un élargissement de la liberté — c'est sa négation. Quelques exemples concrets : — San Francisco supprime les classes de maths avancées au collège pour "réduire les inégalités". Résultat : les écarts entre élèves explosent, les familles aisées prennent des cours privés, les pauvres se font enterrer. L'égalitarisme a creusé l'inégalité. — Les politiques de discrimination positive à Harvard : étudiants admis avec des scores très en dessous de leurs camarades, taux d'échec dispropportionné, sentiment d'imposture, ressentiment généralisé. On a saboté ceux qu'on voulait aider. — L'aide humanitaire qui distribue du riz gratuit pendant 30 ans en Afrique : effondrement des filières agricoles locales, dépendance institutionnalisée. Donner un poisson, c'est empêcher d'apprendre à pêcher. Le wokisme ne détruit pas l'humanité dans le sens dramatique. Il fait pire : il dessert systématiquement ceux qu'il prétend protéger, et il génère du ressentiment des deux côtés — ceux qu'on infantilise et ceux qu'on culpabilise. La fraternité républicaine dit : tu es mon égal, donc je te traite en adulte capable. Le wokisme dit : tu es ma victime, donc je dois te protéger de toi-même. L'un élève. L'autre infantilise. Ce n'est pas la même chose, et confondre les deux est exactement le tour de passe-passe qu'on dénonce.
Eduardo Suarez@EduardoSuarez25

@brivael Francia exporta libertad, igualdad y fraternidad desde hace 237 años. Quienes invocan el "wokismo" como destrucción de la humanidad simplemente reflejan su falta de respeto de la identidad ajena, y su necedad de valores, mientras piden respeto a sus ideas niegan las de los demás.

Français
1.1K
8.4K
33.8K
55.7M
History With Jacob
History With Jacob@HistoryWJacob·
This is my fiction bookshelf Roast me accordingly
History With Jacob tweet media
English
107
4
221
10.4K
Mark retweetledi
US Oil & Gas Association
Hey Big G - Here's some info you can take and put in the vault. (See what I did there? Pretty good.) 98% US oil and gas companies are classified as small businesses (500 or fewer employees). 70% have less than 10 employees. These small companies drill 90% of all new U.S. oil and natural gas wells and are responsible for the majority of new production brought online each year. Yet these small companies are price-takers - be it a high or low price. Just like the small farmers who don't set the price of wheat or milk - we all have to take the prices as they are set. These small companies produce a commodity at a price they don't set, send it to market where someone else turns it into something else at a different price at the pump. That's how it works. And you can put that in the vault. BUT - if you still want to talk about being unjustly enriched.... Guess what? Of the 15 largest oil companies in the world. 10 are actually state-owned enterprises, controlled by foreign goverments. Of the remaining 5, only 2 of those 15 are U.S. companies. Go ahead and investigate Exxon and Chevron if you want if it makes you feel better. But your investigation will come up empty - like Al Capone's vault. Here are the top 15 companies by production. Saudi Aramco (Saudi Arabia) — ~10.3 mbpd State-owned enterprise (majority-owned by the Saudi government). Iraq National Oil Company (INOC) — ~3.9 mbpd State-owned enterprise (Iraqi government-owned). Rosneft (Russia) — ~3.7 mbpd State-controlled (Russian government holds a majority stake through Rosneftegaz). National Iranian Oil Company (NIOC) — ~3.3 mbpd State-owned enterprise (fully owned by the Iranian government). ExxonMobil (USA) — ~3.0 mbpd Privately owned (publicly traded multinational). ADNOC (Abu Dhabi National Oil Company) (UAE) — ~3.0 mbpd State-owned enterprise (owned by the Abu Dhabi government). PetroChina (China) — ~2.6 mbpd State-controlled (listed subsidiary of China National Petroleum Corporation, CNPC, which is state-owned). Kuwait Oil Company — ~2.4 mbpd State-owned enterprise (part of Kuwait Petroleum Corporation, fully government-owned). Petrobras (Brazil) — ~2.2 mbpd State-controlled (Brazilian government holds majority voting shares and significant influence, though publicly traded). Lukoil (Russia) — ~1.7 mbpd Privately owned (one of the largest privately held Russian oil companies, though subject to government oversight). Chevron (USA) — ~1.6 mbpd Privately owned (publicly traded multinational). Shell (UK/Netherlands) — ~1.5 mbpd Privately owned (publicly traded multinational). Gazprom Neft (Russia) — ~1.4 mbpd State-controlled (majority-owned by Gazprom, which is majority state-owned). TotalEnergies (France) — ~1.3 mbpd Privately owned (publicly traded multinational). Surgutneftegas (Russia) — ~1.1 mbpd Privately owned (though with close ties to the Russian state). The more you know....
Geraldo Rivera@GeraldoRivera

Oil companies are being unjustly enriched. They are war profiteers. POTUS should impose an excess profits tax. They are blood suckers.

English
226
2K
7.2K
141.4K
Mark retweetledi
John Ʌ Konrad V
John Ʌ Konrad V@johnkonrad·
Ha. Ya’ll see. I don’t disagree with Ryan on everything. How to Hide an Empire is a fantastic book. Except we learned completely different lessons from it. Who did Puerto Rican freedom fighters try to assassinate? Harry Truman Who gave away our jewel in the pacific, the Philippines, to prevent tens of millions of brown Catholics from voting? FDR Who tried to block Hawaii from becoming a state because there were too many brown people? The Democrats! Who segregated the federal workforce, screened Birth of a Nation at the White House, and occupied Haiti under racist administration? Wilson Woke democrats have been playing race games for over a century. And who loved our Philippine-American nations the most? Who gave Japan the most progressive business friendly constitution that allowed them to succeed? Who refused to subjugate Germany? Who took a sledgehammer to the colonial system up to and including not allowing them to retaking the Suez Canal? MacArthur and Eisenhower… both strong Republicans. This book tries very hard to be woke but, in fact, it’s a study in why governing without racism and sexism is a Republican tradition that has served our nation well. P.S. it also shows how William Henry Seward, a Republican, purchased Alaska and prevented famine in the US with the Guano Act. We couldn’t have won the Civil War without his diplomacy that kept Britain and France from recognizing the Confederacy,
Ryan Holiday@RyanHoliday

Cosigning on this recommendation with Daniel Radcliffe because it is an incredible book that not only changed how I understood America, but it changed how I understood the world.

English
37
348
1.8K
126.5K
Mark retweetledi
mike bski
mike bski@BskiMike22802·
The USDA's own data says 52% of women on SNAP are obese. The #1 purchase? Sugary drinks. $9 BILLION a year. @AOC wants to talk about theft? I teach anatomy. Let us talk about what SUPPLEMENTAL actually means. 👇
mike bski@BskiMike22802

Dear @AOC, Ah yes. The $50 billion wage theft number. I have been waiting for someone to trot that one back out, because it never gets old watching a congresswoman who just flew on a PRIVATE JET during the "Fighting Oligarchy" tour -- at a reported $15,000 an hour to charter, by the way -- lecture the rest of us about workers not getting what they are owed. Let us talk about ACTUAL theft for a moment, since you brought it up. The Social Security system has collected mandatory payroll taxes from American workers for decades and operates exactly like what you would call a Ponzi scheme if a private citizen ran it -- early investors paid by later ones, with no actual reserve, and a trust fund that holds nothing but IOUs from the Treasury. But that is apparently the GOOD kind of theft. Then there is the program called SUPPLEMENTAL Nutrition Assistance. You know what the S stands for? I teach anatomy for a living, so I am genuinely fascinated by the data. The USDA -- not a conservative think tank, the USDA itself, the agency that runs the program -- found that 39% of adult SNAP recipients are obese. Women enrolled in SNAP? 52% obese, compared to 40% for low-income women who never enrolled. And the single largest category of SNAP purchases? Sugary drinks. Nine billion dollars a year in Mountain Dew and energy drinks from a program called SUPPLEMENTAL NUTRITION ASSISTANCE. I own a dog. My vet prescribes a specific diet for her. If I feed her that diet AND let her vacuum up table scraps and Milk Bones all day, and she gets fat and diabetic and goes blind and needs daily insulin shots, would I be right to blame the vet? That is what is happening here. The "supplemental" in SNAP stopped being supplemental a long time ago. That is not the vet's fault -- and it is not the taxpayer's fault either. But someone keeps signing the checks. And you want to talk about "unearned wealth?" Every single dollar I spend to feed my family of six -- and I do it on a teacher's salary for about $520 a month by shopping at Aldi and cooking real food -- is a dollar I EARNED. Every dollar a business owner risks to start a company, hire people, buy equipment, and make payroll while absorbing 100% of the risk when things go wrong, is a dollar that was EARNED. The CEO takes the loss when the company fails. The employee finds a new job. But apparently Quinn's Second Law applies here: what liberals accuse conservatives of doing is exactly what they are actually doing. You cannot earn a billion dollars? Meanwhile, @AOC has enjoyed book deals, speaking fees, and congressional salary while cosplaying as the exploited working class. If the elevator in your logic went all the way to the top floor, you might notice the irony. It does not. Quinn's Twenty-Fifth Law also applies rather neatly: liberals are extraordinarily gifted at giving away other people's money. It requires zero courage, zero sacrifice, and zero skin in the game to stand at a podium and declare that someone else's success was not really earned. I keep seeing Democrats say "TAX THE RICH" when they ARE rich -- not only knowing the loopholes but writing them into law for their own use. I have zero interest in hearing about wealth inequality from someone who cannot bring themselves to fly commercial. Lead by example. Pay DOUBLE what the IRS says you owe. File with nothing but the standard deduction. Not one itemized line. Then I will start listening. Until then, all foam, no beer. Because here is what the science teacher in me needs to point out: when your program designed to fight hunger produces an obesity epidemic, and your program designed to lift workers produces permanent dependency, and your program designed to guarantee retirement produces an unfunded liability -- at some point, Quinn's First Law is not a coincidence. Liberalism always produces the EXACT OPPOSITE of its stated intent. Always. If you want to talk about theft, @AOC, let us talk about the $9 billion in soda the NUTRITION program buys every year, the fraud waste and abuse happening in Ohio and Minnesota and most other states that DOGE keeps finding, and the forced confiscation of payroll taxes for a Social Security system that has about as much fiscal soundness as a screen door on a submarine. But I suspect you will not want that conversation. Because facts, as Jim Quinn noted, are the enemy of liberalism. @JoJoFromJerz @catturd2 @GuntherEagleman IF you agree: LIKE this post so the algorithm shows it to people who need to read it. SHARE this. COMMENT below -- do you think the S in SNAP still stands for "supplemental"? Tell me. And if you want MORE of this -- the data, the history, the science, the stories -- JOIN Bski's Classroom community on X or YouTube. But what do I know -- I am only a science teacher who actually reads the USDA's own data instead of blaming the vet while handing out Milk Bones. #MAGA #Veterans #Trump

English
0
9
25
789
Mark
Mark@callmeMBob·
Incredible story.
Hidden History@HiddenHistoryYT

On the night of May 5, 1944, the USS Buckley, a destroyer escort barely a year old, was prowling the mid-Atlantic west of the Cape Verde Islands when her radar pinged something on the surface 20,000 yards out. It was U-66. A German submarine that had been terrorizing Allied shipping for two and a half years, sinking 33 ships across two oceans. She was the deadliest U-boat still at sea. What followed is the most unhinged naval engagement of WWII. The Buckley closed in under a moonless sky. U-66's captain, exhausted and low on fuel, mistook her silhouette for the German supply sub he'd been desperately waiting to meet. He flashed a recognition signal. The Buckley flashed a random one back. It worked just long enough. At 600 yards, the Buckley opened fire. The U-boat answered with her 37mm flak gun, shells screaming past the bridge. Tracers lit up the ocean. The Buckley's captain, Lt. Cdr. Brent Abel, made a decision that wasn't in any manual. He rammed her. The Buckley's bow rode up onto U-66's forward deck and stuck there, pinning the two ships together in the middle of the Atlantic. And that's when the Germans did something no one expected. They tried to board the American destroyer. U-boat crewmen, some in pajamas, some barefoot, some clutching pistols, leapt from their sinking submarine up onto the Buckley's deck like 18th-century pirates. What followed was something out of Hornblower, not 1944. The Buckley's crew, caught at point-blank range with deck guns that couldn't depress low enough, fought back with whatever they could grab: empty shell casings hurled like bricks coffee mugs from the galley fists and boots a Thompson submachine gun swung as a club after it jammed one sailor reportedly threw a full can of coffee that knocked a German cold Gunner's Mate Jim Brown emptied a .45 into the boarders. Officers fired sidearms from the bridge wing. A German officer climbing aboard was shot in the chest and tumbled back into the sea. Another surrendered with his hands up, mid-leap. The two ships ground against each other for several minutes. Steel screaming, men screaming, the Atlantic black around them. Finally the Buckley reversed engines and tore free. Then, because the U-boat was still afloat and still dangerous, Abel turned around and rammed her a second time, crushing her conning tower and rolling her onto her side. U-66 went down at 03:39. The Buckley fished 36 surviving Germans out of the water, including the men who, twenty minutes earlier, had been trying to beat her crew to death on her own deck. American casualties: a few cuts, bruises, and one sailor with a sprained wrist from punching a Nazi in the face. They made fresh coffee and sailed home.

English
0
0
0
5
Mark retweetledi
Clint Teeples
Clint Teeples@TeeplesCY·
The most powerful protection against childhood depression is having a mother who values religion. When a mother and her child both said religion was personally important to them, the child was 80 percent less likely to develop major depression. Five times lower risk. That comes from a 10-year longitudinal study at Columbia led by psychologist Lisa Miller. It's the largest protective effect against depression she has found anywhere in the resilience literature. A decade later, Miller's team put adults from the same cohort in MRI machines. People who rated religion or spirituality as personally important had thicker cortices in the exact brain regions that thin in people at high familial risk for depression. The protection has a physical signature. The variable wasn't belief alone. It was shared, internalized importance. Mom and child both meant it. The strongest known buffer against depression in kids is a parent and child who share a faith that actually means something to both of them.
Clint Teeples tweet media
English
18
248
1.7K
57.9K
Mark retweetledi
Cynical Publius
Cynical Publius@CynicalPublius·
Let me explain the four major differences between leftwing political violence and rightwing political violence: 1. Rightwing violence comes from the fringes of the conservative movement. Leftwing violence comes from the mainstream of the progressive movement. 2. Conservatives rarely encourage or glorify rightwing violence. Progressives routinely encourage and glorify leftwing violence. 3. Leftwing violence is such a common event that we hardly take notice of it unless it involves assassinating a major political figure--think of how routine Antifa/BLM style destruction of our cities has become. Rightwing violence is notable in its rarity. 4. Leftwing violence is often falsely attributed in the mass media to conservative beliefs. The opposite never happens.
English
341
3.1K
11.5K
251.8K
Mark retweetledi
James Lindsay, anti-Communist
James Lindsay, anti-Communist@ConceptualJames·
If you are a "liberal" who hopes President Trump is killed or that conservatives should die, you have been pushed into adopting a Nazi political logic called the "friend-enemy distinction," named by Carl Schmitt, the "Crown Jurist" of the Third Reich. Look it up. It's true.
English
24
257
1.3K
14.8K