DrCavendish

858 posts

DrCavendish

DrCavendish

@cavendish_dr

Katılım Temmuz 2020
3K Takip Edilen82 Takipçiler
MetaHacker
MetaHacker@metahacker_·
As a man, there is no redpill more brutal than the hairpill It even beats heightpill and framepill and facepill, especially if you're in your 30s-40s And no, fraudmaxxing with transplants doesn't really work. You just average out while the guy with naturally curly, thick hair at age 40 gets all the attention
English
1
0
6
285
Rep. David Valadao
Rep. David Valadao@RepDavidValadao·
I'm proud to announce the 2026 Congressional Art Competition People's Choice winner—selected by popular vote—is Elidia by Albert Garcia, a 12th-grade student at Del Oro High School in Bakersfield. The photo portrays Albert’s abuela, Elidia, on a quiet Christmas Eve as she shares a story in the warmth of their home.
Rep. David Valadao tweet media
English
2
1
9
327
DrCavendish retweetledi
Tim Hannan
Tim Hannan@TimHannan·
Republicans destroy the economy every single time they have power.
English
297
847
5.5K
48.6K
DrCavendish
DrCavendish@cavendish_dr·
@norm_clips @mjfree Poor people won't get free healthcare after 2027. That's what setting off this debate, pretty much.
English
0
0
0
29
Fake Norm MacDonald
Fake Norm MacDonald@norm_clips·
@mjfree Who can’t afford healthcare? Poor people get free healthcare. They also don’t pay any federal taxes.
English
4
0
40
7.9K
DrCavendish
DrCavendish@cavendish_dr·
@DrDiGiorgio Going through your posts, it’s wild how much energy you spend guarding the gates of basic healthcare. You’re at the top of the heap, but somehow the thought of others getting a simple appointment sets you off. Says a lot, and exactly why doctors shouldn’t be the ones owning
English
0
0
4
387
Anthony DiGiorgio, DO, MHA
The honest answer is yes. Imagine a wealthy individual who had a traumatic brain injury. I’m talking super wealthy. He and his family build a home gym, hire a score of physical, occupational, and speech therapists. He gets 24/7 home care from RNs. He has multiple neurosurgeons a phone call away. Every minor thing is scrutinized by multiple highly paid physicians and nurses. He has access to an exoskeleton robot to help him walk. He does great. A middle class or poor person in his situation would have a much worse outcome. They might even die. The same is true for cancer. The wealthy can fly to MD Anderson or MSK, pay out of pocket, hire advocates, get second and third opinions, and rearrange their entire lives around treatment. We cannot expect everyone to have the level of access of the super wealthy. Which means many will have suboptimal outcomes because they can’t afford the same access to care. So, yes, some people will die because they can’t afford healthcare. Just like some will die because they can’t afford a personal trainer to get them to an ideal weight, or a dietician to ensure they eat healthy, or a low-stress job. It’s not fair. It’s unfortunate. But pretending it can be otherwise is a fairy tale.
Morgan J. Freeman@mjfree

Should people die because they can’t afford healthcare? Yes or no. #HealthcareNotWarfare

English
118
30
970
217.2K
DrCavendish
DrCavendish@cavendish_dr·
@DrDiGiorgio "Most Americans are paying outrageous costs for healthcare." That's the problem; healthcare is ridiculously costly in the USA. Ethical argument, someone not working already has pretty bad situation, denying being able to see a doctor is cruel. Why are you so against this?
English
0
0
1
29
Anthony DiGiorgio, DO, MHA
Some people think that asking able bodied people to do 20 hours of community service a week to is eugenics. Most Americans are paying outrageous costs for healthcare. Asking people who get free healthcare to work in exchange for taxpayers footing their bill isn’t eugenics.
Kelly@broadwaybabyto

Nebraska has enacted work requirements to receive Medicaid Healthcare should never be dependent on your ability to produce You shouldn’t have to “earn” your right to survive This won’t fix waste, fraud and abuse. It will kill people, especially the disabled. It’s eugenics.

English
8
5
86
3.4K
Lisa
Lisa@LisaMo032919·
@christianfathrs @freeholdpod @Cernovich The standards are imposed to prevent junk insurance, like short-term, limited-duration insurance, or fixed indemnity plans. And we DO need the ACA to specify coverage like preexisting conditions and lifetime max. If not, no insurance would provide the coverage.
English
1
0
2
24
Cernovich
Cernovich@Cernovich·
For a family of 6 (or even 4, depending on area), Obamacare costs more than a mortgage, and you never see that money again.
English
205
663
6.6K
685.9K
DrCavendish
DrCavendish@cavendish_dr·
@theryanjamesmil @UziCryptoo 2/ Let alone, if we continue this and extrapolate to the '60s, we're talking ~15% of an equivalent income. So your assertion is pretty much just wrong.
English
0
0
0
8
DrCavendish
DrCavendish@cavendish_dr·
@theryanjamesmil @UziCryptoo 1/ Also, rent wasn’t this brutal in the 90s. In 1995 the average rent was about $500, and the inflation‑adjusted equivalent of a $20/hr wage today would’ve been around $9 - $10/hr. People were spending roughly 30% of their income on a 1‑bedroom. Today it’s closer to 50%.
English
1
0
0
12
Uzi
Uzi@UziCryptoo·
In my area, In-N-Out and Chipotle are hiring around $20/hour for new workers. Let’s say you even land full-time at 40 hours/week: $20/hour = $800/week That’s $3,467/month before taxes. After just 12% in federal taxes, you’re left with about $3,051/month take-home. Now here’s the reality: Average one-bedroom apartment is around $2,000/month. So even working full-time in fast food, 65% of your income disappears to rent alone. That leaves you with about $1,050/month for: • food • transportation • insurance • phone • savings • emergencies This isn’t a “budgeting problem.” This is a cost of living crisis. Working full time should never mean barely surviving.
English
2.5K
2.1K
15K
1.9M
DrCavendish
DrCavendish@cavendish_dr·
@PeteRicketts This is a deflection for kicking people while they're already down. Allowing people to see a doctor for basic checkups and catch cancers early isn't a ticket to fucking party, asshole. Americans should be able to see a doctor, working or not.
English
1
0
3
33
Pete Ricketts
Pete Ricketts@PeteRicketts·
Fraudsters are stealing billions from American taxpayers. They're gaming Medicaid and abusing food stamps to fund lavish lifestyles on your dime. I voted to expand work requirements for SNAP and Medicaid. We must protect these programs for the people who truly need them. The Task Force to Eliminate Fraud is doing great work. If Democrats actually cared about taxpayers, they would stop protecting fraudsters.
Secretary Brooke Rollins@SecRollins

In just ONE state, 14,000 individuals receiving SNAP benefits were driving LUXURY VEHICLES! 🚗 3 Bentleys 🚗 3 Ferraris 🚗 11 Lamborghinis 🚗 59 Maseratis 🚗 141 Porsches 🚗 244 Alfa Romeos 🚗 306 Land Rovers 🚗 2,098 Teslas And this is just in ONE STATE. We need to defend our nutrition programs for those most in need, not for scammers gaming the system. These individuals are taking advantage of the American taxpayer. And together with @VP’s Task Force to Eliminate Fraud, this ends NOW. 4.3M Americans have been moved off of SNAP — but more work to be done!

English
46
22
69
4.8K
Anthony DiGiorgio, DO, MHA
Anthony DiGiorgio, DO, MHA@DrDiGiorgio·
I've long been a proponent of Medicaid work requirements. Not for the disabled. Not for the elderly. Not for pregnant women. Just for the able bodied, working age. Now @GavinNewsom agrees with me!
Anthony DiGiorgio, DO, MHA tweet media
English
7
2
34
1.9K
Al
Al@potatodreamguy·
@QasimRashid Strangely enough, I've been working since 1996 for insurance and I'm not dead.
English
1
0
2
13
Qasim Rashid, Esq.
Qasim Rashid, Esq.@QasimRashid·
BREAKING: Nebraska becomes first state to enact work requirements for Medicaid recipients. MAGAs claim this will "cut waste, fraud, and abuse." This is the "Big Beautiful Bill" to cut Medicaid afford giving billionaires $2.1T in tax cuts. Every study & implementation of work requirements ever done shows it saves no money and instead leads to immense harm and death. The Urban Institute estimates 10M people losing Medicaid by 2028. This will kill people. The term for this is Structural Eugenics.
English
224
1.7K
3.9K
92.3K
DrCavendish
DrCavendish@cavendish_dr·
@sj_bennett @QasimRashid Do you think someone should miss a cancer diagnosis just because they're not being productive every second? A society with no empathy is not a good place.
English
0
0
0
2
TraderSven
TraderSven@sj_bennett·
@QasimRashid Can you explain why able bodied adults should not be doing some work to benefit society if society is providing them essentials for life?
English
1
0
0
187
Johnny 12 pack
Johnny 12 pack@Johnny12pack·
@QasimRashid You don’t have to work you can volunteer.. What you can’t do is sit around and do nothing on the taxpayers money…
English
1
1
13
154
DrCavendish
DrCavendish@cavendish_dr·
@RonQwatkins @QasimRashid Its not a blank ticket to party, jackass. How about having a shred of morality and keeping the ER from being overloaded for one.
English
0
0
0
4
Ron
Ron@RonQwatkins·
@QasimRashid Finally some common sense. Able-bodied adults should work, volunteer, train,and not live off taxpayers forever. Work requirements lift people up, not keep them down.
English
42
1
32
2.2K
Fabby
Fabby@AgfAab·
Like most things, this is subjective. I remember participating in a pitching event, and one the guys pitching was a man in his 50s. The room was full of 20 something year olds. Looked a bit odd, but he was the one that went home with the investment. If he'd believed the clock was against him, he never would have walked through that door.
English
1
0
3
1.4K
bg
bg@bg_ctrl·
@bizlet7 You sure about that?
bg tweet media
English
8
3
221
9.4K