Charles Edwards

2.5K posts

Charles Edwards

Charles Edwards

@charlesaedwards

.

Luton, England Katılım Şubat 2014
159 Takip Edilen233 Takipçiler
Charles Edwards
Charles Edwards@charlesaedwards·
An 8-year-old girl, Sofia, was injured in a devastating attack. She's lost so much and needs our help for surgeries and essentials. Please consider donating or sharing her story. Every little bit counts! gofund.me/0604be12
English
5
5
7
124
Charles Edwards
Charles Edwards@charlesaedwards·
@ediz1975 Either take the bus or drive FFS. Determined to cycle at any cost, despite the dangers. I'm sure the child is loving having wet plastic smothering them.
English
1
0
3
147
Ediz
Ediz@ediz1975·
I’ve mixed views on this ….. the child on the rear seat was getting hit by the rain protection the cyclist was wearing …. To then see it’s face being covered by this was a little bit alarming…I personally would not let my child’s face be covered by plastic under any conditions
English
20
13
42
6.2K
Charles Edwards retweetledi
boundsandbowesvoice
boundsandbowesvoice@BBvoice4all·
There's an ongoing effort to suppress the social injustice of LTNs. To counter this, just look at LTNs in Enfield. Starting point: 2021 census (disdadvantage, ethnicity, car ownership) & TfL crashmap data. Guess where have Enfield Council deemed priority areas for LTNs? (1)
boundsandbowesvoice tweet mediaboundsandbowesvoice tweet mediaboundsandbowesvoice tweet mediaboundsandbowesvoice tweet media
English
3
36
58
17.4K
Charles Edwards retweetledi
The UK LTN Résistance
The UK LTN Résistance@ioisours·
Our connections across this platform saw the reality of #LTNs since day one. They thought people would get bored of raising concerns but around the country peoples voices continue to get louder and repeat concerns until they are heard. We won't stop until every #LTN is removed.
Visit Camberwell #AnalyseTrafficOrigin With #ANPR@visitcamberwell

@allpartycycling Why are supporters of LTNs seeking shelter behind established measures such as cycle lanes & 20mph? @TransPlanSoc @BenGoldsmith @SelaineSaxby @RuthCadbury Only a review of LTNs is confirmed, and with good reason. They damage bus services & increase car ownership/mileage driven.

English
1
5
10
483
Charles Edwards retweetledi
Charles Edwards retweetledi
Social Environmental Justice
Social Environmental Justice@SocEnvJustice·
We're non-party political but any Government would be right to review LTNs, especially those rushed in in recent yrs. Put in with little homework done re: impacts on disabled people, on traffic levels on surrounding rds or how whose livelihoods depend on vehicles may be affected.
Social Environmental Justice tweet media
English
10
33
76
13.1K
Charles Edwards retweetledi
Nick Buckley MBE
Nick Buckley MBE@NickBuckleyMBE·
This is how stupid these eco terrorists are. She pours oil on the road and then slips in it. And we are suppose to trust these people that they understand the science and what is happening to our planet?
English
1.8K
2.4K
14K
1.5M
Charles Edwards retweetledi
The UK LTN Résistance
The UK LTN Résistance@ioisours·
This behaviour by your employee is utterly shameful @LSHTM @ucl This is the person, working with Rachel Aldred' #ActiveTravel academy, to push #LTN propaganda, has been appointed by @transportgovuk to 'review' LTNs @Mark_J_Harper Really? Is this how @lb_southwark and @lambeth_council ensure their #LTN consultations are 'fair'. Despite this disgusting NIMBY behaviour from a spoilt rich cycle lobby brat, the majority of residents voted AGAINST discriminatory #LTNs.
The UK LTN Résistance tweet media
English
37
194
304
52.6K
Charles Edwards retweetledi
Clean Air For All Dulwich
Clean Air For All Dulwich@DulwichCleanAir·
Dr Anna Goodman, one of the biggest LTN advocates and adored by the pro- LTN lobby, is caught tearing down a poster advertising a petition against the LTNs in West Dulwich. Is this a person who should be be trusted to present unbiased reports on LTNs?
English
19
115
205
30.4K
Charles Edwards retweetledi
The UK LTN Résistance
The UK LTN Résistance@ioisours·
Its very significant as: 1. She has worked with Rachel Aldred to push the LTN narrative UK wide. 2. Aldred et al were 'appointed' by @transportgovuk to 'review' LTNs following a national petition, but this proves she is not impartial. 3. She was used as an 'expert' witness on 'transport' and 'LTNs' by Lambeth council in a case against a disabled resident. 4. She lives in a multi milliom pound house within Dulwich LTN forced in by @lb_southwark and aggressively campaigned for it with the help of the LCC. 5. She is paid with taxpayers' money in her job at the @LSHTM but has no apparent integrity making her appointment questionable. @SocEnvJustice @LittleNinjaUK @ShimanoSteve @AirCroxted @DulwichCleanAir @DulwichReopen @AllianceDulwich @east_grove @RealOneDulwich @JohnJohnStewart
English
2
18
37
1K
Charles Edwards retweetledi
Charles Edwards retweetledi
Social Environmental Justice
Social Environmental Justice@SocEnvJustice·
This suggests @RachelAldred and her team have many questions to answer. Why do they keep silent?
The UK LTN Résistance@ioisours

BREAKING NEWS: Aldred and colleagues claim #LTNs reduce vehicle mileage but the figures show that they a increase vehicle mileage. @Mark_J_Harper @transportgovuk why is the DfT funding such poor quality research? findingspress.org/article/75470-… In her latest study Aldred et al. claim that #LTNs reduce miles driven by monitoring residents with parking permits and the mileage recorded on their MOTs between March 2020 and March 2023. Aldred et al. selected a sample set of 4% of all Lambeth registered vehicles ONLY from people who have resident parking permits for cars or vans. The paper shows heavy SELECTION BIAS as it excluded huge numbers for a variety of reasons e.g. - drove too many miles - don't live in a CPZ - recorded mileage is not deemed acceptable - did not have 'regular' MOTs They failed to address significant CONFOUNDING FACTORS including the significant number of people working from home (4-52%), the impact of the planned ULEZ extension, the impact of School Streets, or other financial constraints. Instead she claimed her 'results' were solely due to #Lambeth LTNs without addressing any other impacts. Worse still her own calculations are wrong. Aldred et al. state that people are driving 700 metres less a day inside their LTN - presumably as they can't drive out through their LTN other than the single access point they now have which is near to a their nearest boundary road - not rocket science. Aldred et al. then state that those people are driving 300 metres MORE per day near their LTN and 600 metres MORE per day in the control area which they defined to encompass the Lambeth LTNs so that is 900 metres MORE driving per day: Therefore -700m + 300m + 600m = +200m So Lambeth LTNs cause an INCREASE in driving of her heavily biased 4% sample of drivers. Conclusions: 1. LTNs INCREASE vehicle mileage 2. Aldred's studied are heavily biased and flawed. They are poor quality and this cycle lobby member should not longer receive taxpayer funding. 3. Covid era LTNs should be ripped out based on this data.

English
1
5
5
491