Chris Chilton
775 posts

Chris Chilton
@chillychrisy
Labour's Candidate for Chesham and Amersham

We've gone deep to early, I've seen this script too many times under Eddie Howe









🚨 Reece James out of at least the next 2 England games with hamstring injury. Scan results to come. (@guardian_sport) theguardian.com/football/2026/…


Telegraph reporting last year warned that millions of Britain’s poorest retirees faced being dragged into the tax net when the state pension breached £12,570, dubbing it the “retirement tax”. Asked directly, Labour refused to shield the state pension from tax, confirming that once payments exceeded the allowance, the portion above would be taxed at 20% – including for pensioners reliant solely on that income. At the same time, separate leaks showed Reeves planning an income tax raid that would hit millions of pensioners, with wealthy retirees facing up to £2,500 extra a year and around nine million state pensioners facing higher bills as thresholds were frozen. The latest DWP research takes those abstract threats and turns them into mechanics: instead of relying on simple assessments and collection decades later, the system would simply withhold tax on every payment once the allowance is breached. This is not about administrative simplification; it’s about cementing a shift where state pension is treated as just another taxable source, with automatic compliance built in. If Labour refused to rule out the retirement tax and is now exploring how to implement it via automatic deductions, doesn’t that expose Reeves’s “shielding” rhetoric as a temporary political fig leaf?



















