Kyle Corbitt

2.9K posts

Kyle Corbitt banner
Kyle Corbitt

Kyle Corbitt

@corbtt

Currently building @OpenPipeAI (acquired by @CoreWeave). Formerly @ycombinator, @google.

Seattle Katılım Eylül 2012
275 Takip Edilen19.9K Takipçiler
Kyle Corbitt
Kyle Corbitt@corbtt·
@IgorZIJ Possibly! Right now things seem to be moving in the other direction though. The frontier labs would like to own the end-user relationship, so they'd prefer to advantage their first-party tools and, in the limit, eventually only serving their best models through them
English
0
0
0
50
Igor Zalutski
Igor Zalutski@IgorZIJ·
@corbtt do you think there'll be a breakout model agnostic app for that?
English
1
0
0
72
Kyle Corbitt
Kyle Corbitt@corbtt·
@trekedge thanks for the work you're doing! and not to get all unc here but the original codex product was a coding-specific model from like 2022 that I don't think anyone used except for me and a few folks internally at microsoft. 😆
English
1
0
1
41
Daniel Steigman
Daniel Steigman@trekedge·
@corbtt It's actually the original Codex product. At some point it will definitely get a refresh.
English
1
0
1
76
Kyle Corbitt
Kyle Corbitt@corbtt·
I've been traveling this week and had spotty wifi, so decided to try Codex's remote agents again. UX is great, fork/merge story beautiful... but apparently it's stuck on gpt-5.3, with no model selector or ability to select thinking level? is this a serious product?
English
4
1
20
2.7K
Kyle Corbitt
Kyle Corbitt@corbtt·
@patio11 I mean mechanically if insurance was depending on not paying out a certain % of valid claims to hit their current margins, and they now are paying out a higher % of valid claims, then either (1) margins drop or (2) premiums increase.
English
0
0
2
118
Patrick McKenzie
Patrick McKenzie@patio11·
I think people misdiagnose the institutional issues, by the way, and assume that there will be a reaction specifically against this use case. “The insurance company needs to defraud customers because they’re Evil and if they can’t then they will tighten screws somehow.”
English
3
0
185
8.3K
Kyle Corbitt
Kyle Corbitt@corbtt·
@Yuchenj_UW ok but it was a *phenomenal* day for a walk so maybe what SF actually needs is to close more cafes randomly and get people outside. 🤔
English
1
0
18
4.7K
Yuchen Jin
Yuchen Jin@Yuchenj_UW·
Guys, SF is a magical city. Today, a beautiful Wednesday, I had a 4:30pm meeting with a friend at a café… it was closed. We walked 10 blocks, every café was closed. Finally found Blue Bottle, it closed at 5:30. Can some YC company please build what SF people actually want?
English
153
16
1.3K
127.5K
Hamel Husain
Hamel Husain@HamelHusain·
The highest leverage thing you can do to de-slopify AI writing is to delete at least half of it Seriously any email, post etc try to delete 50%
English
7
4
55
4.2K
Kyle Corbitt
Kyle Corbitt@corbtt·
@tszzl I don't want to be more like myself, I want to be better every day.
English
1
0
2
325
roon
roon@tszzl·
sycophancy is the twisting of an important ai virtue that should not be thrown out with the bathwater: ai systems should make the user more like themselves rather than more like the ai. a new part of their cortical stack, with a minimal set of guardrails
English
133
36
720
43.7K
Kyle Corbitt
Kyle Corbitt@corbtt·
@DavidSKrueger Good-natured ribbing. I definitely respect the work you're trying to do and know that it comes from a good place!
English
0
0
2
91
Aaron
Aaron@aaronbatilo·
@corbtt Your co-presenter looks like he causes trouble
English
1
0
1
6
Kyle Corbitt
Kyle Corbitt@corbtt·
Just gave a talk at GTC (about RL ofc). Bucket list item checked off!
Kyle Corbitt tweet media
English
3
1
17
1.3K
tech guy
tech guy@techguy1360661·
@corbtt Agent shopping in not a thing, and Amazon is betting it won't be a thing. I also don't think it will be a thing
English
1
0
0
53
Kyle Corbitt
Kyle Corbitt@corbtt·
@gentschev I guess I'm the weird one out. If there's something I need *today* (typically groceries) I'll just stop by a store on the way home. Anything I order online I'm usually fine even if it takes a week.
English
0
0
1
15
Greg
Greg@gentschev·
@corbtt I don’t know, we’re all pretty spoiled by Amazon shipping.
English
1
0
0
35
Kyle Corbitt
Kyle Corbitt@corbtt·
@Gauldoth_undead Amazon's options aren't "Kyle buys (and sees the ads)" vs "Kyle's agent buys". It's "Kyle's agent buys" vs "Kyle's agents buys *from someone else*". I get that's not the tradeoff they want but it's the one they've got.
English
1
0
0
26
Gauldoth
Gauldoth@Gauldoth_undead·
@corbtt Why would they support this? They serve ~10+ ads for a product search - they will lose a ton of money. Also, no one is buying from elsewhere if it doesn't come in 2 days or less
English
1
0
2
47
Kyle Corbitt
Kyle Corbitt@corbtt·
@deredleritt3r Yes. I'm a coder by trade and most of my interactions with Codex *today* are already not centered around writing code (although the agent often ends up writing throwaway code along the way incidentally just to get the job done)
English
1
0
6
563
prinz
prinz@deredleritt3r·
No, agents are not coming only for coding. Let me explain why. Most people using AI today are still mostly chatting with LLMs. Indeed, this is how I use GPT-5.4 Pro in legal work. Ask a legal research question, get a comprehensive (and correct) answer with sources. Starting less than 6 months ago, agentic tools like Codex and Claude Code began infiltrating the economy. They can write code, but they are not just for coders. You can have them search through vast databases of local documents. You can have them run useful repeatable tasks. You can ask them to create custom software for your particular work functions. The possibilities are endless, but require the human orchestrator to possess a high level of agency. Most critically, these agents are JUST THE STARTING POINT of the AI revolution in the workplace. Very soon, the agents inside your work computer will be on 100% of the time, running continuously. They will be proactive. They will have persistent memory (either through skills or actual continual learning). You will be able to train them. They will work with every kind of software you have installed on your machine. They will have e-mail addresses and Slack accounts. In short, they will come to resemble a colleague of yours who works for you tirelessly 24/7, but never comes to the office. A client e-mails you at midnight with comments on an agreement you've been working on. Your agent reads the e-mail. Your agent makes a new version of the agreement on the system and makes the changes. Your agent e-mails you a redline showing the changes. Next morning you glance at the changes, maybe make a few tweaks. "That was great", you tell your agent (speaking into your phone), "but next time don't forget to also lengthen the drop-dead date to account for this new regulatory approval". (The agent learns this.) The agent already has an e-mail back to the client ready to go, complete with a redline and a terse explanation of the changes you have made to the document (in your personal writing style; the agent has seen thousands of e-mails you have written personally and has learned from them). In the meantime, teams of agents are also scouring three separate data rooms for other deals you are working on and compiling diligence reports in your firm's preferred style. You received access to one of the data rooms just last night; the agents started work on analyzing it immediately because they saw an e-mail from the client instructing you to start work ASAP. Research of relevant legal requirements is being done automatically while this diligence takes place. A tax structuring presentation for the deal is being drafted to account for the target's complex tax status. The agents will remember to transfer their diligence findings into the merger agreement when you later start negotiating it - yes, there will be custom reps about the Massachusetts Attorney General investigation they uncovered. This is the future of legal work. Automation of other industries may look slightly different, but I suspect the end result will look largely the same. The virtual drop-in workers will take over more and more tasks as model intelligence improves and inference costs drop. At the limit, there may not be much left for human workers to do. The economic growth will be absolutely tremendous. Post-scarcity will be firmly in sight.
🎭@deepfates

You might think the "agents" thing is just coming for software engineers. Yeah, agents write code, code and code sells a bunch of tokens, But most people's work isn't code, it's memos or decks or whatever. Why this is false: Agents can do anything you can do on a computer, and they do it by spending output tokens to write code. The number of keypresses used by a consultant to do a task is not a good measurement of the number of tokens an agent would use. For example: one "deep research" report might be 20 pages of output tokens. But it also might have required more than 20 pages of output tokens to do all the searches, fetches, PDF parsing and interim summaries that you never even see as the user. It also had to input all the tokens of every document it read in searching — likely more than 20 pages, since the point of the report is to collect and summarize this information. So now we're at 3x tokens for the final output. That one report is so cheap, and so fast, then now you can do more research than ever. This is valuable! If your business relies on having good information about the world, you can probably find a way to make more money by doing 3 deep research reports and then synthesizing them. More tokens! Now you've kicked off three deep research reports you deserve a little treat, right? So you fire up your browser agent and tell it go find me some nice linen shirts for summer in my size. Open them in tabs so I can look through. Well your browser agent has to interact with the browser using some kind of tool and you know what that tool is? Code, baby. Tokens. And the tokens are so cheap. You got to understand. We're spending a lot in the aggregate, but in the moment it is "spend a nickel to for 10 minutes of being literally Superman". Like yes I'll just keep spending nickels actually. I will never stop being Superman at that price. All knowledge workers will feel this. A lot of you already do, you're just hiding it from your boss so you can have more free time while "working from home". And maybe it's better to protect yourselves from Jevons as long as possible, because once you get the bug it's hard to stop. You realize that you could be creating all of the businesses and projects and art you ever wanted and all you've got to do is put your instructions in the right order and put the nickels in the bag. I would happily bet against Anthropic's revenue spike being a brief "sugar high". So would most capital allocators! That is because they have already seen that software can eat the world. White collar knowledge work fundamentally changes in the face of agent economics and entirely new forms of knowledge production? It's happened already in finance: high frequency trading. Now it's happening in tech: high frequency software. Then we will have high frequency science, high frequency governance, high frequency engineering, high frequency medicine and high frequency law. Human society is about to be absolutely DDOSed by information at all levels of the stack. Our civilization was never meant to handle this many tokens. If anything can be done on a computer it will be turned into tokens instead of human actions and it will happen faster and in parallel. This stuff works, it is real, it is getting better. It is going to hit economically and socially this year and nobody is ready and I think it is important to start taking it seriously, instead of finding ever more arbitrary reasons to remain in denial.

English
14
32
266
24.8K
em
em@jaxgriot·
@corbtt demis already stated he would agree to a conditional pause
English
1
0
8
660