E

35 posts

E

E

@coruncanius

Novus homo :)

Katılım Aralık 2025
649 Takip Edilen9 Takipçiler
E
E@coruncanius·
@ThreadbareModel @Nick_Davidov There is simply no way to "distinguish" one from other immigrants under current system-- it's a list of applications. Furthermore, many who then became "actually important" in the states were not necessarily notable prior to arrival in their countries of origin.
English
1
0
3
36
Grain And Salt
Grain And Salt@ThreadbareModel·
@Nick_Davidov Well considering the vast, vast, vast majority of O1/H1B are NOT top scientists, founders of billion dollar companies, etc., maybe it was a mistake for the actually important immigrants to lump themselves in with the many millions of useless visa holders.
English
1
2
14
973
Nick Davidov
Nick Davidov@Nick_Davidov·
The biggest bullshit move by DHS in its history. So everyone on a O1 or H1B visa would have to stop working legally in the US, go back to their country and wait for years of backlog? This includes top scientists in our universities, founders of billion dollar companies (at least 3 just in our portfolio would be affected by the way). And if we look at individual countries it becomes even more bs. Indians would have to wait decades. Russians don’t have anywhere to go (there is no US embassy in Russia, hello?). This is the worst imaginable way to disrupt important work for the country and pretend you’re fighting some loophole.
Homeland Security@DHSgov

An alien who is in the U.S. temporarily and wants a Green Card must return to their home country to apply. This policy allows our immigration system to function as the law intended instead of incentivizing loopholes. The era of abusing our nation’s immigration system is over.

English
4.4K
3K
19.4K
7.8M
E
E@coruncanius·
@HellenicVibes @BrookingsInst think it's a bit less about literacy, and more about not putting in the time and effort to write it (or rewrite it, if optimistic). This does beg the question as to why, then, the end product is believed to be worth our time & attention.
English
0
0
0
55
Zoomer Alcibiades
Zoomer Alcibiades@HellenicVibes·
> Essay on job automation from senior fellow at @BrookingsInst > Entire essay is AI generated (Claude) You can’t make this shit up!
Zoomer Alcibiades tweet mediaZoomer Alcibiades tweet media
English
9
2
95
65.7K
E
E@coruncanius·
@patdennis This is neat, thank you!
English
0
0
0
18
E
E@coruncanius·
@seedtheclouds @megievalist I suspect it's because while some young men may convert to orthodoxy out of genuine faith-seeking, others may do so in an attempt to justify pre-existing worldviews that may not be very respectful of women's agency or women more generally.
English
0
0
0
16
Megan | @megievalist
Megan | @megievalist@megievalist·
Your daughter tells you she is dating someone. Which option scares you the most?
English
103
19
160
34.5K
E
E@coruncanius·
@AGoldmund Never have I ever prior considered being grateful for having had a sane, on-topic microeconomics professor, but I certainly am now. What's the point of the class if the material isn't taught?
English
0
0
13
2.4K
Alex Goldman
Alex Goldman@AGoldmund·
His rate my professor is wild
Alex Goldman tweet mediaAlex Goldman tweet mediaAlex Goldman tweet media
English
39
211
4.2K
335.4K
E
E@coruncanius·
@dotn @Nomads4Pritzker a) absolutely, and b) would you mind sharing the title/author please? it sounds pretty awesome, and I'm curious :)
English
1
0
1
170
dotn
dotn@dotn·
@Nomads4Pritzker I’m currently reading a book about the history of rust. Does that count?
English
4
0
22
3.7K
E
E@coruncanius·
@augustiner_h @visakanv @goblinodds anecdata, but primarily the view that ai requires immense amounts of water, though I've also seen the "plagiarism machine" accusation bandied about. I think it comes across as a social justice issue, at least for some subset, or a laziness bit for others.
English
1
0
4
335
E
E@coruncanius·
@DastDn It's a bipartisan effort.
English
0
0
0
5
✝️🇺🇸 The Intern 🌐🔆
What I believe defines American nationhood: 1. Creedal Liberalism 2. Diasporal Frontier Thesis ("Nation of Immigrants") 3. Anglophonic Melting Pot 4. Civic Democracy 5. Geographic Commonwealth 6. Shared National Story
English
4
25
206
4.4K
E
E@coruncanius·
@AndrewSabisky I mean he followed incentives. Not particularly patriotic, and likely detrimental to the US, sure, but not necessarily a purely ideological move. The Chinese offered pretty solid resources.
English
0
0
0
116
Andrew Sabisky
Andrew Sabisky@AndrewSabisky·
This ought to prompt some soul-searching (it won't). Afaict this guy isn't some crazy commie, just a nerd who wants to do science. US puts him in jail on pretty meh charges, China chucks him inf money and a giant lab.
UnveiledChina@Unveiled_ChinaX

A convicted former Harvard scientist is now the architect of China’s push to "blur the distinction between electronics and the human brain." Charles Lieber, once the world’s top-ranked chemist and chair of Harvard’s chemistry department, has resurfaced as the founding director of i-BRAIN in Shenzhen. Just three years after his U.S. federal conviction for lying about ties to the Thousand Talents Program, Lieber is overseeing a state-funded institute bankrolled by a government that has declared brain-computer interfaces a "national priority." The resource gap between his new lab and Harvard is staggering: Unlimited Primate Access: Lieber now has access to 2,000 primate cages at the Brain Science Infrastructure Shenzhen—a resource far beyond what was available at Harvard, which closed its primate center in 2015. Cutting-Edge Hardware: His lab recently installed a $2 million deep ultraviolet lithography system from ASML to print the microscopic circuits essential for neural implants. Billion-Dollar Backing: i-BRAIN is part of a "manicured" science hub where parent institutions operate with five-year budgets totaling roughly $2 billion. While Lieber’s work aims to treat conditions like ALS, the U.S. Defense Department warns that China’s military is investigating this exact technology to engineer "super soldiers" with enhanced situational awareness. Analysts call Lieber "Exhibit A" for why U.S. safeguards are failing; despite being caught and punished, one of America’s greatest scientific minds simply took his expertise to the very regime the U.S. was trying to keep it from. As Lieber told a Shenzhen conference in December: "I arrived with a dream... my own goals are to make Shenzhen a world leader." #CharlesLieber #ChinaTech #BrainComputerInterface #NationalSecurity #Shenzhen #Harvard #AI #Neurotech

English
5
8
105
6.1K
E
E@coruncanius·
@gucaslelfond @clereviewbooks cool piece! agree with your take on successful collabs existing-- imho edwin land & polaroid generally was another pretty awesome direct engineering/art hybrid that seemed to take art seriously.
English
0
0
1
181
lucas gelfond
lucas gelfond@gucaslelfond·
we must end the quirk chungus terrible creative technology project industrial complex (i’m in the @clereviewbooks today about the arts collaborations at Bell Labs and RAND in the 70s!)
lucas gelfond tweet media
English
29
53
700
89.7K
E retweetledi
First To Hear It
First To Hear It@firsttohearit·
REPORTER: You mentioned that, staying on as Fed governor, you intend to keep a low profile. Could you give us a little more detail on what that looks like? JEROME POWELL: *ducks down*
English
208
2.3K
31.7K
4.1M
E
E@coruncanius·
@xwanyex I mean the risk-reward ratio, excepting possibly some white collar crime, seems frankly abysmal, even assuming no moral qualms.
English
0
0
1
436
E
E@coruncanius·
@IAPolls2022 Curious what Ossoff's numbers would be. I'm not sure how viable of a candidate he's considered outside of X, but if I recall correctly he had a fairly diverse coalition particularly among younger voters.
English
0
0
1
2.1K
InteractivePolls
InteractivePolls@IAPolls2022·
Harvard Harris: Dem Primary Crosstabs Black Dems 🔵 Harris: 71% (+8) 🔵 Newsom: 15% (-8) 🔵 Pritzker: 5% 🔵 Shapiro: 4% 🔵 AOC: 3% —— White Dems 🔵 Harris: 41% (+10) 🔵 Newsom: 26% (-6) 🔵 Shapiro: 11% 🔵 Pritzker: 10% 🔵 AOC: 7% —— Hispanic Dems 🔵 Harris: 50% (+13) 🔵 Newsom: 23% (+2) 🔵 AOC: 11% (-13) 🔵 Shapiro: 8% 🔵 Pritzker: 5% —— Asian Dems 🔵 Harris: 50% (-4) 🔵 Shapiro: 16% (+1) 🔵 Newsom: 12% (-7) 🔵 AOC: 9% 🔵 Pritzker: 0% Harvard/Harris | 4/23-26 | (+/- vs Mar)
InteractivePolls tweet media
InteractivePolls@IAPolls2022

📊 2028 PRESIDENTIAL PRIMARIES 🔵 Harris: 50% (+9) 🔵 Newsom: 22% (-4) 🔵 Shapiro: 9% (-1) 🔵 AOC: 8% (=) 🔵 Pritzker: 6% ⚪ Other: 6% —— 🔴 Vance: 48% (+6) 🔴 Trump Jr: 18% (-2) 🔴 Rubio: 16% 🔴 DeSantis: 9% 🔴 Carlson: 4% ⚪ Other: 5% Harvard/Harris | 4/23-26 | RV

English
312
186
855
1M
E
E@coruncanius·
@JacobALinker What on earth is going on in Lithuania? The other stats seem to track with my understanding, and are somewhat expected, but the 23% especially is throwing me off, bit of a shock.
English
0
0
2
1.6K
Jacob Ben-David Linker 🇺🇸🕎🇺🇸✡️🇺🇸🕎🇺🇸
Ukraine is the country in eastern Europe with the most favorable public attitudes towards Jews. Which is why their President is a Jew whose parents go to a Chabad.
Jacob Ben-David Linker 🇺🇸🕎🇺🇸✡️🇺🇸🕎🇺🇸 tweet media
AP@Average_NY_Guy

Ukraine has one of the darkest track records when it comes to Jews, and it goes back a long time. It didn’t start with the Holocaust. In the 1600s, during the Cossack uprisings under Bohdan Khmelnytsky, Jewish communities were wiped out one after the other. Tens of thousands were slaughtered. For Jews in Eastern Europe, these events became part of how they understood their place in the world. But it didn’t stop there. Late 1800s into the early 1900s, pogrom after pogrom. It was not in just one city, or just one moment. Repeated waves of violence. Looting, killings, entire towns terrorized. Estimates run between 30,000 and 100,000 Jews murdered in those years, with some historians putting it even higher. When something repeats like that across decades, it’s not random anymore, it’s a pattern. Then the Holocaust, and Ukraine became one of the main killing grounds. Around 1.5 million Jews were murdered there. It wasn’t in gas chambers for the most part, but face to face. Forests, pits, ravines. The “Holocaust by bullets.” The most known example is Babi Yar, where over 33,000 Jews were shot in two days. Two days. That scale is hard to even process. And it wasn’t done by only the Germans. There was widespread local collaboration. Auxiliary police, nationalist groups, civilians helping identify Jews, round them up, sometimes taking part themselves. That fact gets people uncomfortable, but leaving it out doesn’t change what happened. After the war, it didn’t disappear. Under Soviet rule it was pushed under the rug, but it stayed there. After independence, it shows up in different forms. Polls over the years have found a meaningful percentage of people still buying into the same old ideas about Jews and power, influence, money. You also have the continued honoring of figures like Stepan Bandera. For many Ukrainians he’s a nationalist hero. For Jews and Poles, his movement is tied to collaboration and mass violence. Add to that far-right groups that use symbols and rhetoric straight out of the neo-Nazi playbook. They aren't a majority, but they exist, and they’re not exactly hiding. Now to be fair, Ukraine today is not Nazi Germany. They elected Volodymyr Zelenskyy, who is Jewish. There are laws against antisemitism. You’re not seeing mass violence against Jews in the streets. But that doesn’t mean the deeper issue is gone. Attitudes don’t just vanish because laws change. And when you zoom out, it’s not just history or fringe groups. Ukraine has consistently voted against Israel in the UN, including after October 7. You can argue politics, alignments, or legacy voting blocs, but it still shows where things tend to land in practice. I traveled through Europe a few years ago, went to about 9 countries. Different places, different people, no issues. The one place where we got yelled at and even ran after a few times was Ukraine. That’s one experience, not a dataset. But at a certain point, when the history is this long and the signals keep lining up, it stops feeling like coincidence.

English
47
89
1.6K
63.6K
E
E@coruncanius·
@GreatValueArhat ...this kind of interview sounds quite fun, actually? Puzzles, clear objectives-- vastly preferable to the alternative, in my view.
English
0
0
1
873
E
E@coruncanius·
@jaggedmallards @Lib_Development :| so TSA-type security theater? (Also, is the subway security really that effective? Genuinely wondering, I've not any experience with it)
English
2
0
0
149
JaggedMallard
JaggedMallard@jaggedmallards·
@Lib_Development They barely even care. My experience in mainland China metros in several cities is putting your bag through an x-ray with no one watching a screen and having a bored looking security guard ignore you setting the metal detector off or give a perfunctory wave with the wand.
English
2
0
14
826
Lib Development
Lib Development@Lib_Development·
Third worldists be like “hey look, our subway is good because you have to WAIT IN A FUCKING SECURITY LINE” Unironically I’ll stick to the crazy people and weed smell
Kane 謝凱堯@kane

Beijing subway is nice and clean because every bag goes through an xray and every rider goes through a metal detector. If you evade fare, facial detection systems deprioritize/disqualify you from social services. People caught with drugs for sale are executed.

English
22
2
254
16.2K
E
E@coruncanius·
@CheeseGalaxy3 @sam_d_1995 Good news for both human lives and car insurance rates, then, at the cost of frustration to the few remaining drivers.
English
0
0
1
1.1K
CheeseGalaxy
CheeseGalaxy@CheeseGalaxy3·
@sam_d_1995 You may be joking, but I think there’s truth to this. There’s probably some critical threshold where the percentage of autonomous cars is high enough to effectively make speeding impossible. Accidents among human drivers will likely nosedive once that threshold is met.
English
9
3
426
24.2K