Crypto Dude retweetledi
🚨 MEGA-FRAUD & MARKET MANIPULATION ON POLYMARKET / UMA ORACLE: MILLIONS STOLEN FROM RETAIL TRADERS!
A massive, coordinated execution is happening right now on @Polymarket and @UMAprotocol.
English
Crypto Dude
22 posts
Crypto Dude retweetledi
@shayne_coplan @Polymarket your oracle just resolved the trump-xi iran/nuclear market NO
trump's exact quote: "we did discuss iran. we don't want them to have a nuclear weapon"
- WH pool note #5, filed 11:55 AM Beijing (Danny Kemp, AFP, on-camera real time)
- TVB Hong Kong yt metadata: was_live, timestamp 11:56:11 AM Beijing
- every major broadcaster ran LIVE chyrons
- kalshi resolved the same market correctly
UMA voted NO because the pavilion was "closed press." brother the broadcast happened. on live tv. it's on youtube right now with was_live attached to it.
and this is not the first time we're doing this:
- ukraine mineral deal: $7M market, resolved YES with no deal signed, one wallet swung it with ~5M UMA
- zelensky suit: $160M+ market, every outlet AND POLYMARKET'S OWN ACCOUNT called it a suit, resolved NO, ~$25M staked by whales to make it happen
- now this: $31M currently, the most active market on your platform, flipped by a low-turnout governance vote
UMA's market cap is smaller than the volume of a single disputed market on your venue. top 10 wallets control >50% of voting power in disputes. ~95% of supply held by large holders. you are running a $9B platform on top of an oracle a handful of retards can rug for eight figures
you already override baseball payouts when umpires fuck up. add a human/AI last resort layer for high volume markets with primary source evidence. it's not philosophically harder than what you're already doing
kalshi is eating your volume every week because of exactly this. traders don't want to gamble on whether a UMA whale woke up short. fix it or watch the centralized competitor win the entire prediction market category
ngmi
English
@ParetoPrincipl @033033033?tab=activity" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">polymarket.com/@033033033?tab… this guy is going nuts on NO's
English
$25,000,000 involved in financial fraud on Polymarket!
We need your attention on this matter.
The game is rigged by UMA Rocks whales, and regular traders got scammed.
Chronology:
First, at the summit, Trump says "Iran", "Strait", and "Nuclear". The market instantly reacts, and YES skyrockets to 99.5%—fully aligned with logic and truth. Period.
Then, something strange happens.
Some bad actors start spreading the idea that this was not a LIVE stream but a pre-recorded video broadcast, thus leading to a resolution of NO.
This is possible, okay, but only after a scrutiny examination of all possible sources of translation, which requires a large amount of work and analytics.
Obviously, not all evidence had been gathered at the point in time before the clarification.
Then, the Polymarket team issues a clarification stating that this was not a LIVE stream, but that is NOT TRUE - no proper examination has been done!
From this moment on, the scam starts spreading, and the market flips to NO, costing 99%.
UMA Rocks provides no self-correction to this situation and only blindly copies the Polymarket team's clarification (which is definitely WRONG)!
Our Answer:
At the moment the Polymarket team issued the clarification, not all evidence had been gathered, making it a completely unprofessional move leading to catastrophic FINANCIAL FRAUD.
Furthermore, UMA Rocks only facilitates the error, not providing any meaningful discussion, and aligns with the Polymarket team's clarification (which is WRONG).
WE ASK FOR AN IMMEDIATE RE-EVALUATION OF THE INCORRECT CLARIFICATION THAT LED TO FRAUD INVOLVING 25,000,000 DOLLARS
English
@ParetoPrincipl it was 25 million less than 12 hours ago. it'll be at 50 million by the resolution time. But going from 99c to 1 in like 30 minutes after the conditions were changed the day of the resolution is a joke
English
@MissCryptoGER Ich fühle mich so alt, habe das Gefühl das das ding wird nie ausbrechen :(
Deutsch
Crypto Dude retweetledi
@Polymarket CNN’s own JSON-LD marks the summit coverage as LiveBlogPosting with creativeWorkStatus: "live" under the official schema.org standard for real-time reporting. Timestamped updates were published during the event itself, proving this was contemporaneous live coverage
English
Crypto Dude retweetledi
@Polymarket Klshi resolved the market's for trump saying the words "Iran" and "Nuclear" on his trip based on this evidence to YES. So why does Polymarket want to scam it's users with a bogus clarification?
English
The $20M Trump-Xi bilateral market rule:
"Only remarks which are broadcast or streamed live will count."
Polymarket's clarification:
"Footage that was not broadcast live will not qualify."
But those are not the same statement.
The rules changed after the market opened.
Truebie@TruebieMarkets
trade-conflict markets around trump’s china visit are entering the part where word and phrases used will matter more than the headline. we are looking for a pause, or a framework, or a purchase announcement, or any binding deals. all worded in a specific way. the cleanest example is probably polymarket’s china-Iran mediation market. the rules say only definitive Chinese government announcements qualify. expressions of openness, general support for diplomacy, or non-definitive statements DO NOT. polymarket.com/event/trump-xi… fox reported that china “appears ready” to help Trump on Iran. “appears ready” is not a resolution source. the market needs a definitive chinese government announcement. trade markets have the same problem. reuters reported that a US-China Board of Trade mechanism could be announced, while the specific goods may be left for later meetings. kitco.com/news/off-the-w… the geneva tariff move has a similar hinge. The US and china cut tariff rates for 90 days, but the language is closer to a pause than a final deal. premarketdaily.com/is-the-us-chin… the odds will move on the news but the pro traders only care about a few specific phrases. literally monitoring
English
This time we should protect market integrity!
Endless times we can see how UMA rocks manipulate market outcomes (farming UMA tokens rewards and simultaneously trading on polymarket).
Two big problems with this market:
1.) Vague rules and inconsistent polymarket clarification.
By rules we have: Only remarks which are broadcast or streamed live will count toward this market's resolution.
By polymarket team clarification: Footage that was not broadcast live, even if filmed during the relevant events and released during market timeframe, will not qualify toward resolution.
They subverted their own rules. There is a BIG difference in meaning:
(broadcast) OR (streamed live) != (broadcast live) or (streamed live)
Polymarket's clarification is trying to manipulate the semantics - we need urgent attention to this.
2.) A lot of evidence of live translation, or at least of broadcast.
We have a lot of evidence of live translation of time-frame that clarify to market resolution on YES side.
And we also have overwhelming amount that clarifies that video fragment is broadcasting and should resolve to YES.
WHAT DO WE NEED TO DO?
"If you believe you've witnessed potentially manipulative or prohibited trading activity on Polymarket, we want to hear from you."
Send letter with complaint here - Integrity@polymarket.com
English
@ParetoPrincipl @Polymarket @coffeebreak_YT resolution is yes. no questions asked. there is more than enough evidence for it
English
@SqQwe673996 @WhaleInsider i guess there is just too much winning
English
JUST IN: 🇺🇸 U.S. national debt surpasses size of the entire United States GDP for first time since World War II.
English
English
@ChartNerdTA The screenshot looks blurry in the diagram, but the text is okay. Mind if you post a better resolution of the above diagram. I greatly appreciate it and thanks in advance..🫡
English
🔥 HUGEEEEEEEEE!!! 🔥
The European Central Bank Has ALREADY Tested The Issuance of Debt Securities (Bond Trials) & Settlements Using $XRP "Payment Transactions" In Experimentation With Axiology (Ripple Partner/XRPL) For Central Bank Money Settlement! 🇪🇺
AND NOW...
The ECB Is To Start ACCEPTING TOKENIZED SECURITIES From March 30th 2026! 📅
Axiology Runs On A Version Of The XRP Ledger, And With ALREADY Successful And Existing Pilot Trials With The ECB..
Are We About To See Those Test Runs Shift Into "Full Scale" 🤔
Diana@InvestWithD
🚨BREAKING: European Central Bank to OFFICIALLY ACCEPT Tokenized Securities as Collateral Starting MARCH 30 — XRP Ledger Code INSIDE 🇪🇺🔥 The European Central Bank has CONFIRMED that, starting March 30, banks can use certain tokenized securities as collateral when borrowing from the Eurosystem. 👀 That means BLOCKCHAIN-BASED ASSETS are being ALLOWED into Europe’s traditional financial system. 😳 An ECB report says Axiology’s trading and settlement system uses the open-source code of the XRP Ledger. 🚨 ⚠️ That does NOT mean the ECB is directly using $XRP or the public XRPL itself. It means a system connected to this NEW European tokenized finance framework is built on $XRP Ledger technology. 🚀🔥
English
@echo_pbreyer Was heißt das für chat kontrolle 2.0? Wie viel hat dies damit zu tun was aktuell im nahen osten im gange ist ? Und woher kommt es dass der unterschied so hoch zu den infos auf ihrer website ?
Danke für die details
Deutsch
🇩🇪🎉🔥 SENSATIONELLER ETAPPENSIEG: LIBE-Ausschuss lehnt heute die Verlängerung der anlasslosen #Chatkontrolle 1.0 ab – keine Mehrheit! 🛡️💪
Das digitale Briefgeheimnis lebt! Tausend Dank an alle, die Druck gemacht haben! ❤️🙏
Finale Schlacht folgt: Plenarabstimmung! 🚀🔥
Deutsch
@MissCryptoGER Und dann sieht man in Europa wie alle über CDBC und etc reden für Überwachung aber nix hiervon bei uns ankommt das der Präsident der USA im alleingang durchboxen will.
Deutsch
Der Rauswurf des Jahres: Wie Trump eine KI Firma verbietet und OpenAI den ultimativen Deal abstaubt ‼️
Donald Trump hat gerade ein beispielloses Machtwort im globalen KI Krieg gesprochen. Er hat angeordnet, dass sämtliche US Bundesbehörden die Nutzung der Technologie von Anthropic sofort einstellen müssen. Der Grund: Das Startup weigerte sich standhaft, seine KI Modelle für vollautonome Waffensysteme und die massenhafte Überwachung von US-Bürgern freizugeben.
Trump stufte das Unternehmen daraufhin öffentlich als "radikale linke" Bedrohung für die nationale Sicherheit ein und kündigte an, den Bann mit der vollen Macht der Präsidentschaft durchzusetzen.
Doch der eigentliche Plottwist kommt von der Konkurrenz. Genau in dem Moment, als Anthropic vom Hof gejagt wird, verkündet OpenAI Chef Sam Altman einen neuen Deal zur Bereitstellung seiner Modelle für das US Kriegsministerium.
Das Verrückte daran: OpenAI behauptet, das Militär habe bei ihnen exakt denselben ethischen Grenzen zugestimmt (keine Massenüberwachung, keine autonomen Waffen), für die Anthropic gerade von der Regierung abgestraft wird.
Das zeigt die harte neue Realität der Branche: Es geht hier längst nicht mehr nur um ethische Richtlinien, sondern um einen brutalen geopolitischen Machtkampf. Die US-Regierung demonstriert schonungslos, dass sie unkooperative Tech Firmen per Knopfdruck aus dem Staatsgeschäft drängen kann – während OpenAI die Gunst der Stunde eiskalt nutzt, um sich als staatlich sanktionierter Partner in Stellung zu bringen.
MissCrypto@MissCryptoGER
Das KI Ultimatum: Wie ein Startup das mächtigste Militär der Welt herausfordert (und OpenAI plötzlich eingreift) 🧐 Der Machtkampf zwischen dem US Pentagon und dem KI Entwickler Anthropic eskaliert gerade zu einem historischen Präzedenzfall. Verteidigungsminister Pete Hegseth stellte ein kompromissloses Ultimatum: Entweder Anthropic gibt seine KI für absolut alle militärischen Zwecke frei – inklusive tödlicher Einsätze und der massenhaften Überwachung von US Bürgern – oder das Unternehmen fliegt als offizielles "Sicherheitsrisiko" komplett aus der staatlichen Lieferkette. Die Antwort von Anthropic kam kurz vor Fristablauf und war unerwartet hart: Nein. Das Startup verzichtet lieber auf einen laufenden 200 Millionen Dollar Deal und künftige Regierungsaufträge, als seine ethischen roten Linien aufzugeben. Doch genau hier nimmt die Geschichte eine verrückte Wendung: Ausgerechnet Sam Altman, CEO des schärfsten Konkurrenten OpenAI, schaltet sich laut Wall Street Journal nun ein, um in letzter Sekunde einen Deal zwischen Anthropic und dem Pentagon zu vermitteln. Hier geht es um weit mehr als einen geplatzten Vertrag. Wir beobachten gerade den ersten echten Stresstest einer neuen Weltordnung. KI ist vom reinen Softwareprodukt zur ultimativen geopolitischen Waffe aufgestiegen. Dieser Fall wird die zentrale Frage unserer Zeit beantworten: Können private Tech-Firmen einer globalen Supermacht noch moralische Grenzen diktieren, oder zwingt die Logik der nationalen Sicherheit am Ende jeden Entwickler in die Knie?
Deutsch
@_Crypto_Barbie Ich schaue das Video von dieser Woche aktuell an
Deutsch
QME
@movements_ch Currently returning back to Andrews Air Force Base.
Expect POTUS to arrive in some kind of backup plane, possibly with delay.
English
Air Force One is also expected for tomorrow in the morning
English
@shanaka86 good thing that MiCA still allows yield on stablecoins that MiCA compliant. come to Europe and earn your yields here ;)
English
53 banking associations just wrote themselves a $6.6 trillion protection bill.
They called it the CLARITY Act.
Here is what they do not want you to understand.
Banks pay depositors 0.1% interest. Stablecoin issuers hold Treasury bills earning 4.5%. If stablecoins could pass that yield to users, banks lose the deposit war. They cannot compete. The math is fatal.
So they made competition illegal.
The Kansas City Fed calculated what happens if stablecoins pay competitive rates. Banks lose 25.9% of deposits. $1.5 trillion in lending capacity vanishes. The entire community banking model collapses.
Their solution was not innovation. Their solution was legislation.
The CLARITY Act everyone is celebrating contains Section 404 prohibiting yield payments through any mechanism. Not just from issuers. From exchanges. From affiliates. From partners. Every single pathway to competitive returns, closed by statute.
Brian Armstrong reviewed the 278-page draft for 48 hours. He withdrew Coinbase support at 11pm. The markup was postponed by morning. He saw what Wall Street analysts missed entirely.
This is not crypto regulation.
This is Dodd-Frank for digital assets. Incumbents writing rules that crush competitors. Regulatory capture so brazen they published the lobbying letters on their own websites.
The American Bankers Association. 52 state banking associations. The Community Bankers Council. All coordinating to eliminate an industry they cannot beat in open markets.
Meanwhile China made e-CNY interest-bearing on December 29.
America is banning stablecoin yield while Beijing is paying it.
The crypto industry spent years begging for regulatory clarity.
They got it.
Clarity that $6.6 trillion in deposits will be protected at any cost. Clarity that banks write the rules. Clarity that if you cannot win in markets, you win in Congress.
This is the largest regulatory capture event in American financial history.
And it is being sold as innovation policy.
Brian Armstrong@brian_armstrong
After reviewing the Senate Banking draft text over the last 48hrs, Coinbase unfortunately can’t support the bill as written. There are too many issues, including: - A defacto ban on tokenized equities - DeFi prohibitions, giving the government unlimited access to your financial records and removing your right to privacy - Erosion of the CFTC’s authority, stifling innovation and making it subservient to the SEC - Draft amendments that would kill rewards on stablecoins, allowing banks to ban their competition We appreciate all the hard work by members of the Senate to reach a bi-partisan outcome, but this version would be materially worse than the current status quo. We’d rather have no bill than a bad bill. Hopefully we can all get to a better draft. We'll keep fighting for all Americans and for economic freedom. Crypto needs to be treated on a level playing field with the rest of financial services so we can build this industry in a safe and trusted way in America.
English
@echo_pbreyer Seit wann ist Luxemburg dafür ? Habe ich was verpasst. Bei fightchatcontrol.eu steht das wir noch immer dagegen sind.
Deutsch
🇩🇪Irreführende Schlagzeilen: Die #Chatkontrolle ist nicht tot, sie wird privatisiert! 🚨
EU-Länder heute für:
🔍 Anlasslose Massenüberwachung
🆔 Ausweispflicht für alle (Ende der Anonymität)
🚫 Digitalen Hausarrest für Teens
Der Kampf geht weiter!
patrick-breyer.de/faktencheck-eu…
Deutsch