Fr. Zaius

4.7K posts

Fr. Zaius banner
Fr. Zaius

Fr. Zaius

@csteele12

Priest for you, Christian with you. Midnight Prophet. Views represent mindless parroting of the last POV I heard

Dallas, TX Katılım Haziran 2009
371 Takip Edilen123 Takipçiler
Arnie Hernandez
Arnie Hernandez@Arnie4USA·
Stop normalizing ‘Before Common Era’ (BCE) and ‘Common Era’ (CE). Our history is under the Gregorian Calendar by these two periods: 🔹 Before Christ (BC) 🗿 🔹 Anno Domini (AD) ✝️
Arnie Hernandez tweet media
English
557
2.3K
10.1K
199.1K
Fr. Zaius
Fr. Zaius@csteele12·
@RorikWanka I’d go to the chancery with this. Defender of the Bond might have something to say. That’s not something that gets decided on a parish level.
English
1
0
6
566
Rorik Wanka
Rorik Wanka@RorikWanka·
So here's my situation: - We had a wedding 23 years ago in the Episcopal Church. - I was Catholic, she was not - Was assured at the time that the marriage would be "valid, yet irregular" - She converted to Catholicism 12 years ago - No one cared or found a problem at Catholic Churches we attended with our marriage which produced four children - Move to a traditional Church - Marriage found to be invalid - Ordered to cease marital relations until marriage can be convalidated. Am I allowed to kiss my long-term live-in girlfriend?
Novus Ordo Enjoyer 🐓🇵🇷@kingofthehood89

Oh brother what are we even doing here

English
304
23
2.6K
844.8K
Fr. Zaius
Fr. Zaius@csteele12·
I literally learned this story in school. In High School In APUSH In 1990 We are in the dumbest iteration of the multiverse
Wall Street Apes@WallStreetApes

We have literally been lied to about everything Matt Walsh “The Rosa Parks story you were taught in school was fake too. This was not just some woman on her way home from work. Civil rights leaders thought Parks would make a sympathetic face for their lawsuit and then told her, a longtime NAACP volunteer, to create a situation where she'd be arrested. This gets sold to the public as totally organic when actually it's playacting to create ideal conditions for a court case or scandal. The iconic photo of Parks on the bus was staged months after the incident as part of a press campaign. (The photo is shown in the clip) The white man, sitting behind her in the bus photo was a journalist, which you probably didn't know.” Let’s fact check this. It’s 100% true What Actually Happened on December 1, 1955 Rosa Parks was a longtime NAACP volunteer and secretary of the Montgomery chapter. She had been deeply involved in civil rights activism for years (including work on cases like the Recy Taylor rape and voter registration efforts). She was not just a random tired seamstress on her way home from work who spontaneously refused to move. Local civil rights leaders had been looking for a strong test case to challenge bus segregation. They even had people cast for the role before Rosa Parks. Earlier attempts include 15 year old Claudette Colvin were passed over because leaders felt Rosa Parks, a mature, respected, married woman with a spotless reputation, would be a more sympathetic plaintiff in court and to the public The Iconic Photo was 100% staged The famous photo was taken on December 21, 1956, this is over a year after her arrest and on the first day the buses were integrated after the Supreme Court ruling It was deliberately staged by journalists, Look Magazine and UPI, for a press campaign to dramatize the victory The white man sitting behind her is Nicholas Chriss, a UPI reporter, not a random angry passenger or segregationist

English
0
0
1
32
Fr. Zaius
Fr. Zaius@csteele12·
RadTrad sedes calling BpSheen a heretic was not on my 2026 bingo card, but in hindsight should have been
Brandon 🦂@exRhenum

@WojPawelczyk Fulton Sheen was (sadly) an apostate.

English
0
0
0
34
Fr. Zaius
Fr. Zaius@csteele12·
@CregStephenson Is the criteria W/L? Because Major Applewhite at Houston, Hugh Freeze the minute the let him near kids, and Mike Price would like a word
English
0
0
1
261
william james
william james@williamofdallas·
@angcathalex i won't pretend i know who that man is but i lament for the loss of a beautiful nunc dimittis window
New Orleans, LA 🇺🇸 English
1
0
5
219
Fr. Zaius
Fr. Zaius@csteele12·
@williamofdallas @UcheMaryOkoli The whole TLM vs NO debate seems like it’s less about which is more prayerful, but rather who’s appealing to my personal aesthetic when praying for me. Pray the office. Pray the Eucharist. Pray it in your local parish who’s bringing Jesus to your neighborhood
English
2
0
1
111
william james
william james@williamofdallas·
@UcheMaryOkoli TLM makes me a better Catholic than I would be if I attended NO in the same way that medicine makes a sick person better. I'm kind of retarded so I need all the smells and sounds and ritual things to pull at my senses and show me the truth. TLM does that more concretely than NO
New Orleans, LA 🇺🇸 English
3
0
22
363
Uche is a girl
Uche is a girl@UcheMaryOkoli·
NO is valid. TLM is valid. TLM is not superior to NO. NO is not less than TLM. Attending TLM does not make you a better Catholic over someone who attends NO. Both are sacrifices offered up, and both are valid.
Uche is a girl tweet mediaUche is a girl tweet media
English
128
43
362
16.2K
Fr. Zaius
Fr. Zaius@csteele12·
@williamofdallas @UcheMaryOkoli Penicillin makes infection better. Being at Big Baylor in Dallas makes you more comfortable than the Little Sisters of the Poor hospital in Calcutta. Optics make a difference, but is it a reason not to take penicillin?
English
1
0
0
33
Fr. Zaius
Fr. Zaius@csteele12·
I used to subscribe to FT. If “human dignity” isn’t a category moral theology can fall back on…? FT is now a rag worth less than Quilted Northy
Fr. Zaius tweet media
English
0
0
0
43
Fr. Zaius
Fr. Zaius@csteele12·
“my secret squirrel source”told me.” Some disgruntled O-3 didn’t get some benefit they wanted and fed this story to the absolutely most gullible hack out there. Or he’s making it all up. Which is a non-0 possibility. Vets get disabled by tons of things he doesn’t understand .
Fr. Zaius tweet media
English
0
0
0
8
Fr. Zaius
Fr. Zaius@csteele12·
@FrMatthewLC I get it. As a 9EE they are hard to find. Go ok a window shopping spree, try even shoes you’d never think to spend that kind of money on. Take note of what felt great and then happy hunting
English
0
0
0
5
Fr Matthew P. Schneider, LC
Fr Matthew P. Schneider, LC@FrMatthewLC·
@csteele12 I have found that a lot of shoes, even the right size, don't fit my feet well. Other clothes I generally fit my size well enough to order online, but not shoes.
English
1
0
0
17
Fr Matthew P. Schneider, LC
Fr Matthew P. Schneider, LC@FrMatthewLC·
I went to the outlet mall today to get shoes. The local one is attached to the Casino & I walked by the "floor" at 11 & 1. It's sad to see older people wasting away destroying their kids'/grandkids' inheritance on slots. These people really need prayers to find meaning in life.
English
17
4
151
8.4K
Fr. Zaius
Fr. Zaius@csteele12·
@Vitus_osst Qui bibit, dormit Qui dormit, non peccat Qui non peccat est sanctus Ergo qui sanctus bibit
Français
0
0
0
24
Rev .Vitus
Rev .Vitus@Vitus_osst·
"I’ve been seeing a lot of conflicting opinions on this lately, and I’m curious where you all stand: Is it actually appropriate for a priest to drink beer in public?
Rev .Vitus tweet media
English
5.1K
105
2K
445.2K
Mike Lewis
Mike Lewis@mfjlewis·
Was anyone else waiting to see how Bishop Barron was going to spin this in Trump's favor? 🙋🏼‍♂️
Bishop Robert Barron@BishopBarron

There is a way past the absurd and deeply divisive “war” between the President and the Pope, which has been enthusiastically ginned up by the press. And it is indicated in the Catechism of the Catholic Church, paragraph 2309 to be precise. After laying out the various criteria for determining a just war—proportionality, last resort, declaration by a competent authority, reasonable hope of success, etc.—the Catechism points out that “the evaluation of these conditions for moral legitimacy belongs to the prudential judgment of those who have responsibility for the common good.” The assumption is that the just war principles function, to use the technical term, as heuristic devices, designed to guide the practical decision-making of those civil authorities who have to adjudicate matters of war and peace. The role of the Church, therefore, is to call for peace and to urge that any conflict be strictly circumscribed by the moral constraints of the just war criteria. But it is not the role of the Church to evaluate whether a particular war is just or unjust. That appraisal belongs to the civil authorities, who, one presumes, have requisite knowledge of conditions on the ground. So, is the war in question truly the last resort? Is there really a balance between the good to be attained and the destruction caused by the war? Are combatants and non-combatants being properly distinguished in the waging of the conflict? Do the belligerents have right intention? Is there a reasonable hope of success? The posing of those questions—indeed the insistence upon their moral relevance—belongs rightly to the Church, but the answering of them belongs to the civil authorities. The Pope has said, on numerous occasions, that he is not a politician and that his role is not the determination of any nation's foreign policy. But he has just as clearly said that he will continue to speak for peace and for moral constraint. In making both of these claims, he is operating perfectly within the framework of paragraph 2309 of the Catechism. If we understand that the Pope and the President have qualitatively different roles to play in the determination of moral action in regard to war, we can, I hope, extricate ourselves from the completely unhelpful narrative of “Pope vs. President.”

English
28
6
133
6.2K