JA’s Lament

1.7K posts

JA’s Lament

JA’s Lament

@ctmancix

Katılım Haziran 2009
96 Takip Edilen16 Takipçiler
JA’s Lament
JA’s Lament@ctmancix·
@Stupid_Interweb @micah_erfan If you’re not happy about it you have to find a way to change the primary process rather than circumventing it like the DNC did in 2024. You’re just moving the goalposts from my original statement.
English
1
0
0
4
Rudy
Rudy@Stupid_Interweb·
@ctmancix @micah_erfan So independent voters like me in Michigan should be happy that it was Iowa that picked and not the party?
English
1
0
0
11
JA’s Lament
JA’s Lament@ctmancix·
@Strandjunker Were you this distraught over those who “bled for the right to vote” when you were handed a professional election loser as a 2024 presidential candidate without the people getting to vote on it? How about in 2020 when the DNC necromanced Biden’s run the day before Super Tuesday?
English
0
0
0
34
Andrea Junker
Andrea Junker@Strandjunker·
The systematic demolition of the Voting Rights Act is complete: 6 people in robes just spit on the graves of every civil rights hero who bled for the right to vote. This isn’t a ruling. It’s a betrayal of our history and a direct assault on our future. Wake the hell up, America!
English
854
3.1K
7.6K
66.2K
JA’s Lament
JA’s Lament@ctmancix·
@Stupid_Interweb @micah_erfan The people in the early primary states before the other candidates dropped out. That’s the process. He wasn’t picked by the party brass.
English
1
0
0
7
wintheday
wintheday@oregonduck99·
@Kbez23 Even if he was down (he was) they still had the ball and were driving for a winning FG. Very unfortunately
English
1
0
8
654
JA’s Lament
JA’s Lament@ctmancix·
@WalkIn2DDLG @SteveDeaceShow It was a hearing about the FACE act which can and has put men in jail. They shouldn’t be allowed to speak? If you want to narrow the debate to abortion, perhaps only the babies should speak since they’re the ones on the literal chopping block.
English
0
0
0
4
Brenda
Brenda@WalkIn2DDLG·
Why is there even a male modeling the debate. Shall be only females vs females for the closer debate. This is sorta bias 😳 and gross hear male voice speak on behalf of the female structures. Like stay in your lane with those nut sacs for real and worry about solutions to man's ED.
English
9
0
1
1.9K
Oregon E𝕏posed
Oregon E𝕏posed@Jax_4_Oregon·
I know an 18 year-old girl who lived at home. Her dad filled out her ballot and made her sign it. She was obligated to vote for Trump or get kicked out of the house. Women’s rights in Oregon are being ripped from us. End. Vote. By. Mail. End vote by males!
English
2.2K
148
1.6K
136.5K
Political Punk
Political Punk@actingliketommy·
So... you can't draw a district that gives black voters voting power but you CAN draw a district that takes their power away? Got it.
Political Punk tweet media
English
3.7K
14.6K
53.3K
565.3K
Jake Cobb
Jake Cobb@jakecobb·
@BarackObama Republicans are salivating at the chance to do more voter suppression, especially of minority voters. The logical solution to all of this is to finally outlaw gerrymandering. Neither side likes it and voters hate it.
English
332
19
216
40.2K
Barack Obama
Barack Obama@BarackObama·
Today’s Supreme Court decision effectively guts a key pillar of the Voting Rights Act, freeing state legislatures to gerrymander legislative districts to systematically dilute and weaken the voting power of racial minorities - so long as they do it under the guise of “partisanship” rather than explicit “racial bias.” And it serves as just one more example of how a majority of the current Court seems intent on abandoning its vital role in ensuring equal participation in our democracy and protecting the rights of minority groups against majority overreach. The good news is that such setbacks can be overcome. But that will only happen if citizens across the country who cherish our democratic ideals continue to mobilize and vote in record numbers - not just in the upcoming midterms or in high profile races, but in every election and every level.
English
48.6K
46.7K
281.6K
67.4M
JA’s Lament
JA’s Lament@ctmancix·
@RepShriThanedar Remember when the mantra was “safe, legal, and RARE”? Rare is now accessible…I.e. plentiful. The bloodlust…
English
0
0
1
4
Congressman Shri Thanedar
Congressman Shri Thanedar@RepShriThanedar·
My favorite kind of abortion is the kind that's safe, legal, accessible, and none of your damn business to regulate. And no amount of fearmongering by describing what goes on to a half-ounce fetus with no consciousness, self-awareness, or feeling of pain is going to change that.
Brandon Gill@realBrandonGill

Which abortion is your favorite? The one where the unborn baby's body is crush and sucked out with a hose or the one where the baby is cut apart with a knife? Please enlighten us.

English
10.3K
323
2.4K
2.2M
𝐉𝐑 𝐂𝐎𝐎𝐊
@SteveGuest Major copage happening from the people they tricked into donating to the KKK right now. But but but... informants! Ok, so the leaders of these organizations are informers... Right
English
2
1
7
1K
Steve Guest
Steve Guest@SteveGuest·
Bombshell CBS News segment on the Southern Poverty Law Center indictment where the SPLC lied to donors, paid violent extremists millions, and “manufactured racism” for its own purposes “The SPLC was not dismantling these groups. It was instead manufacturing the extremism it purports to oppose.” Per Todd Blanche The Charlottesville rally leader attended “at the direction of SPLC” and made racist posts “under the supervision” of SPLC.
English
1.7K
12.5K
42.7K
17.7M
JA’s Lament
JA’s Lament@ctmancix·
@UrbanistaRamon @SteveGuest Not informants. Planted agitators. “The Charlottesville rally leader attended ‘at the direction of SPLC’ and made racist posts ‘under the supervision’ of SPLC.”
English
0
0
0
6
UrbanistaRamon
UrbanistaRamon@UrbanistaRamon·
@SteveGuest Paying informants to gather intel on extremist groups, then sharing it with the FBI (who signed off on it), doesn’t really sound like a crime.
English
335
12
180
31.7K
steelersburgh
steelersburgh@steelerslover23·
@geoffschwartz Yeah you seem like a really good qb analysis I’ll go with your opinion on them
English
2
0
3
2K
Geoff Schwartz
Geoff Schwartz@geoffschwartz·
So Drew Allar, Mason Rudolph and Will Howard in the Steelers QB room at the moment. Oh boy.
English
43
69
2.3K
82.4K
JA’s Lament
JA’s Lament@ctmancix·
@BlakeBohne @LayoffAI Let’s assume your causation is correct. Seems like the solution is ending government checks to able-bodied citizens.
English
0
0
0
143
Reformer
Reformer@BlakeBohne·
This isn’t Indians “stealing” jobs. This is companies hiring people who actually show up and want to work. Let’s be real — how many Americans right now would rather sit home collecting government checks than take a job? Walk down any street in America and you’ll see “Now Hiring” signs everywhere. I’ve personally offered homeless people rides to work, bus cards, everything — zero have taken me up on it. If these companies are hiring Indians, it’s not because they’re taking your job. It’s because too many Americans don’t want to work. Legal immigration isn’t the problem. A culture that glorifies not working is.
English
91
4
102
7K
Official Layoff
Official Layoff@LayoffAI·
Yesterday, graphics on illegal immigration into the country went viral. So we built one for legal immigration. 6.9M Department of Labor LCA filings, required by law before H-1B petitions are filed. 11 years. Every red dot is a filing for an Indian to be hired instead of you.
English
1.2K
11.1K
32.2K
2.3M
Rod ✝️
Rod ✝️@theMarginMind·
@elonmusk Following the money here, could it be ALSO true that Israel funded hamas and hezbollah? 🧐
English
6
0
11
805
SleeperNFL
SleeperNFL@SleeperNFL·
S Dillon Thieneman might have been the SNEAKIEST pick of Round 1. Chicago just got a DAWG.
SleeperNFL tweet media
English
17
70
2.1K
41.9K
Art
Art@ZarkFiles·
Texas voter IDs are integers. Whole numbers. No decimals, ever. The Bexar County primary poll book contained 4,110 IDs like this: 1,253,115,467.79993 That alone proves something fishy. But the math goes further — and it’s airtight. When those 4,110 records are sorted in order, the spacing between every consecutive pair is 22,084.82189 — the same non-integer value, repeating 4,109 times. That uniformity is already impossible by accident. Then: 90,746,533.16339 ÷ 22,084.82189 = 4,109.0000 The total span of the sequence, divided by the gap, returns a perfect integer with zero remainder. A randomly generated or accidentally corrupted sequence cannot do that. Only deliberate computation produces that result. Every one of these fractional IDs was created after polls closed — and we can prove it from the IDs themselves. The gap value of 22,084.82189 was derived from the alphabetical positions of specific voters within the completed check-in list. Those positions cannot be known until every voter has checked in and the full list is in hand. The fractional IDs could not have existed before the genuine list existed. They are timestamped by their own construction. The records were not random fabrications. Each was anchored to a real registered voter. 735 real people each had 5 or 6 synthetic duplicates generated in their name — up to 4,110 fraudulent ballot opportunities in a single county primary, executed by someone with back-end write access to the poll book system. The attack vector was an internet-accessible poll book platform reachable from anywhere in the world with a valid username and password. No VPN. No hardware credential. No cryptographic verification on the export that produces the official check-in record. The post-election export workflow contains no hash check and no independent audit mechanism. Anyone with valid credentials could alter the official record for any participating jurisdiction remotely, at any time. That access was used. The fractional ID components functioned as a precise machine-executable deletion key — invisible to poll workers under normal display settings, but recoverable by a single database query after the fact. The injection itself broke the chain of custody. The file was then replaced before formal examination could occur, compounding an evidentiary void that was already irreversible. Officials attributed the anomalies to an export error or electronic glitch. Neither explanation survives contact with the data. A glitch does not solve a two-equation integer system, sort 735 voters alphabetically, derive sequence endpoints from algebraic positions within that sort, and optimize its output for numerical elegance. Glitches do not have specifications. This one did. The fraud in this election is proven. The scale of its impact cannot be determined from any currently available record. An election whose outcome cannot be separated from an unknown quantity of fraudulent ballots cannot be legally certified The same platform operates across 29 states. The Bexar County file was caught only because it was captured during the active window before deletion. A more careful cleanup leaves nothing. The absence of detected anomalies in other jurisdictions is not evidence of integrity — it is evidence that no one was looking at the right moment. This is not a software reliability problem. Unreliable software fails randomly. This algorithm solved a two-equation integer system, sorted 735 names alphabetically, derived its sequence endpoints from algebraic positions within that sort, and deliberately discarded six real voter records in order to produce output whose internal quantities share a common factor of 15. That is a specification. Glitches do not optimize for numerical elegance. The conclusion is the same whether you approach it from this specific case or from my multi-state database analysis published in the Journal of Information Warfare earlier this week: electronic poll book and voter registration systems built on internet-accessible architectures with no cryptographic audit trail cannot be trusted. Not this platform. Not any platform built on the same design. Partial fixes and software patches do not solve the problem when the attack surface is the architecture itself. The only remedy that eliminates rather than mitigates the risk is full replacement — paper poll books, hand counts conducted publicly at the precinct, results posted before anything leaves the building. A paper system cannot be altered from a laptop at 11pm by someone with a stolen password. Peer-reviewed multi-state analysis: Journal of Information Warfare, 2026, 25.2 If you are in one of the 29 states, this concerns you.
Art tweet media
English
246
2.4K
5.3K
93.2K
JA’s Lament
JA’s Lament@ctmancix·
@The_Crack_Emcee @pmarca @grok Perhaps you should re-read his post…he never even came close to saying they did what they are accused of. x.com/pmarca/status/…
Marc Andreessen 🇺🇸@pmarca

So @grok, we all just discovered that the SPLC has allegedly been funding some of the worst of the people and groups it claims to oppose. What are other activist pressure groups that advocate censorship/deplatforming of their enemies that could be doing the same thing?

English
0
0
1
171
The Crack Emcee
The Crack Emcee@The_Crack_Emcee·
@pmarca @grok So @grok, we all just discovered that there's a lot of people who don't believe in "innocent until proven guilty" after the SPLC indictment, and Marc Andreessen is one of them. Who are other rich activist assholes that claim to be American but advocate for anti-American ideas?
English
18
2
20
6.2K
Marc Andreessen 🇺🇸
So @grok, we all just discovered that the SPLC has allegedly been funding some of the worst of the people and groups it claims to oppose. What are other activist pressure groups that advocate censorship/deplatforming of their enemies that could be doing the same thing?
English
821
3.1K
17.1K
34.6M
JA’s Lament
JA’s Lament@ctmancix·
@conorjrogers I’m in. None of them get DC offices either. They stay home and live with us commoners.
English
0
0
1
314
Conor Rogers
Conor Rogers@conorjrogers·
No one is ready for the real solution to Gerrymandering: A return to the Constitution's original standard of 1 Member of Congress for every 30,000 Americans, resulting in an 11,000-member House with city-council sized districts so small you can't Gerrymander them if you tried.
English
842
2.2K
43.7K
3.7M
KSS
KSS@FreedomLives26·
@allenanalysis Redistricting is a sham that is a party motive that that disenfranchises franchises voters . Does not matter what party is doing it. It’s not how this is supposed to work . It’s bullshit
English
1
0
9
6.9K
Brian Allen
Brian Allen@allenanalysis·
Let me explain what just happened in Virginia. Yesterday, 2.5 million Virginians voted. They passed a redistricting amendment 50.7% to 49.3%. Today, one judge threw out every single vote. 🧵
Brian Allen tweet mediaBrian Allen tweet media
English
7.5K
873
4.6K
1.4M