yaagna
3.3K posts






the tech industry has lost the plot man. where is the thinking happening? when you throw a bunch of context at claude and ask it to produce some artifact, whether it’s a “design” or a “prd”, you’re completely disconnected from the invisible but critical work of translating fuzziness into something coherent. the outputs aren’t yours. you’ve lost the mind-body connection to the artifact. you’re running blind. what’s the point? to move faster?

HYROX fitness event in Bengaluru saw around 9,000 participants. They charged ₹9,000 per person to participate, which comes to roughly ₹8.1 crore made in a single day. Same trend is showing up in marathons. People are paying ₹3,000–₹5,000 just to run for a day. Being fit is good. But why are people spending this much on a one-day event? It feels less about fitness and more about validation.



it started with an underestimation of grass. the fundamental difference between a static composition and an interactive environment is that you don't just visualise it in the most obvious sense. okay, meadow, hills, curves, depth, shadows, colour, time of day. you think about it in permutations. what if i move my hand through it. what if there's a sunset. what if there's a slight wind. what happens to the grass that's far away. what happens to the grass right in front of me. and when you start thinking like that, you realise very quickly that you have underestimated grass. our team spent an unexplainable amount of time perfecting this singular piece of the entire web experience. attention to detail, care for micro interactions, that's the fundamental difference between a website and a web experience. technically: > started with a model grass from the blender library. but it's almost impossible to animate model grass with the kind of variables we needed. > so instead of treating it as singular strands, we treated the grass as particle systems. each particle responding and reacting to wind, shadow, light, depth, and user interaction independently.












