Daina Bloom

1.2K posts

Daina Bloom banner
Daina Bloom

Daina Bloom

@dainabloom

Educator. Introvert. Book lover. “What Paul says about Peter tells us more about Paul than about Peter"

Toronto, Ontario Katılım Mayıs 2011
375 Takip Edilen119 Takipçiler
FindPeace
FindPeace@LLGnine·
@ValerieAnne1970 @MelissaInTexas I had actual chickenpox when I was 8, 50 yrs ago, before the vaccine. I got shingles when I turned 40 and still get breakouts a couple times per year. How exactly is it due to the vaccine?
English
2
0
1
104
Valerie Anne Smith
Valerie Anne Smith@ValerieAnne1970·
"Many don’t realize, the Chickenpox Vaccine Causes Shingles Epidemics." ~RFK Jr "When the CDC was thinking about mandating the chickenpox vaccine for your children...they hired a scientist named Gary Goldman, who did a long-term study in California." "What he found is that if you give the chickenpox vaccine, mass vaccinate, it stops chickenpox, but causes shingles epidemics later on; which is 20X deadlier." "Despite those studies, we mandated it for American children in this country, but in Europe they don’t." "If you go to the British National Health Service website right now, you can read that it will say, 'We do not recommend chickenpox vaccines because it causes shingles epidemics later on'… and that’s the problem."
English
133
2.3K
5.6K
129.8K
Daina Bloom
Daina Bloom@dainabloom·
@whotown @MargaretAtwood This just came to my attention as I’m reading her new biography- too bad- I thought she had more nuanced opinions about Israel. That one hurts!
English
1
0
0
11
Daina Bloom retweetledi
Moshe Emilio Lavi
Moshe Emilio Lavi@MosheELavi·
There is a genre of October 7 commentary that works by constructing a historical arc so compressed and so selective that the conclusion becomes inevitable. A people wronged, hemmed in, their world dismantled across generations. Rage follows. What else would you expect? The history offered in support of this arc is not really history. It begins where it needs to begin, omits what complicates it, and arrives at a destination that was chosen before the argument started. The Arab population of Mandatory Palestine never held sovereignty that was taken from them. There was no state. A significant portion immigrated to the land only in the 19th and early 20th centuries. The land passed from Ottoman to British control, and two national movements competed within that framework. One of them, the Jewish national movement, was not a colonial project arriving from outside. Jewish communities had existed without interruption in Jerusalem, Hebron, Safed, Gaza, Tiberias, the Galilee and elsewhere, through centuries of pre-modern colonial empires, Roman, Byzantine, several Arab Caliphates, the Crusaders, and Ottoman, and long before any of them emerged. The Zionist movement was a national liberation movement of a people with three thousand years of documented connection to that land, rejecting the exile that was imposed on many of them, and building upon a presence that had never left. The other national movement, the Arab Palestinian one, crystallised largely in reaction to Zionism rather than predating it, which is why the sovereign state being projected backwards into history as ancient and continuous is itself part of the inversion, not a foundation for it. Arab leaders, who rarely called themselves Palestinians then and most of whom saw themselves as part of greater Syria, rejected partition in 1937 and again in 1947. That rejection, and the violence that accompanied it across the three decades of the Mandate period, is precisely what this genre of argument leaves out. What does the enforcing are films like "Palestine 36," marketed as historical drama about the bloody Arab Revolt, but functioning as something closer to historical replacement. They strip Jewish indigeneity and continuity from the record, recast a people with millennia of connection to that land as recent colonial arrivals, and present the conflict as a simple story of indigenous resistance to foreign imposition. The purpose is not to inform Western audiences about a complex national conflict. It is to recruit them to a conclusion: that Jews and Israel are an illegitimate implant in the region, that the appropriate remedy is dismantlement, and that what would follow, the imagined state from the river to the sea, would be a tolerant, secular, democratic alternative, where Jews can live in peace under their Arab Palestinian Muslim rulers, not as a national group but as a religious minority. That last part is perhaps the most dishonest element of the entire narrative. The movements driving that agenda in the Middle East are neither democratic nor secular, and whatever secular veneer some of them maintain is precisely that, a veneer. The model being implicitly promised has no precedent among Muslim-majority states in the region, and sits in direct and unacknowledged tension with the political and religious character of the organisations whose cause these films are made to serve, like Hamas. Without all of this, October 7 cannot be made to look like the inevitable product of accumulated injustice. It looks instead like what it was: a brutal, sadistic rampage by Arab Palestinian Islamist terrorist organisations, and the civilians who joined them, to murder, rape, and kidnap Israeli citizens, residents, and foreign nationals. No historical narrative, however artfully constructed, changes what happened that morning. It only changes who the audience is willing to hold responsible for it. This is the genre James represents, and he is far from alone in it. It is not engagement with history. It is the use of a selective version of it to launder a conclusion that was held before the argument began.
James Melville 🚜@JamesMelville

I’ve just watched Palestine 36: So many people need a history lesson. October 7th wasn’t the start. It goes back a long long way. Imagine being a citizen to a place that lost status, sovereignty, human rights, freedom and land. And then for decades got hemmed in, encroached, destroyed and an appropriation of the land unchecked. Destinies of people who have lived there for generations completely torn up. Grief turns into rage. It would anywhere. But apparently it’s “antisemitic” to raise any concerns about this.

English
124
360
1.5K
117.7K
Jennifer Hyland for SBISD Position 5
The thing that helped my dyslexic learn to read more than anything else was spelling. Her specialty private school used a homeschool spelling curriculum and after not being able to read through 3rd grade she learned in 5 months at this amazing school - mainly due to the spelling curriculum.
English
1
0
5
744
Daina Bloom retweetledi
Laurie Moonbeam
Laurie Moonbeam@LindaDressler8·
@JimMcMurtry01 The sad part is the money is often used for causes the union members do not support. Unions dues for over and above the interest their members doing their job should be optional .
English
0
1
3
53
Daina Bloom
Daina Bloom@dainabloom·
@aziz0nomics The brain rot is everywhere. I’m a teacher and our union has been a victim of this for a long time!
English
0
1
9
498
John Aziz
John Aziz@aziz0nomics·
Rational people in Arab countries: "please, stop the jihadism, we had to live with this nightmare for many years, we just want to live normal lives" Fashionable diaspora Arabs and radical Western leftists: "Shut up you racist. Jihad just means struggle for decolonisation!"
English
14
194
1.1K
15.5K
Daina Bloom
Daina Bloom@dainabloom·
@HistoryBoomer …and promote antisemitic conspiracy theories to young, impressionable kids.
English
0
0
1
14
Selina Robinson
Selina Robinson@SelinaMRobinson·
It’s wrong and it’s divisive … but this isn’t a new course for @bctf … they’ve been at this for years. Their hatred of Jews is well known and disgusting. And let’s not forget the $ they are sending to UNWRA …. Because they believe they collect union dues for that purpose.
Azim Jiwani@AzimAJiwani

Jewish children in British Columbia should be able to go to BC public school without worrying that international politics will follow them into the classroom. This is just plain wrong.

English
15
26
146
4.3K
Daina Bloom retweetledi
Luiza Jarovsky, PhD
Luiza Jarovsky, PhD@LuizaJarovsky·
Schools should go back to pen-and-paper only (and everyone knows it).
English
280
1.3K
10.6K
260.2K
Daina Bloom retweetledi
Rabbi Poupko
Rabbi Poupko@RabbiPoupko·
Dear Khaled Shawwash of British Columbia's Teachers union, You justify the unions 40,000 teacher BDS resolution against Israel hoping this will lead to "Muslim Christian and Jewish children playing along the shore of Gaza". I remember being able to play on the shores of Gaza alongside Christian and Muslim children when I was a child. That was before the IDF and Israel handed the Gaza strip to Palestinian control. Since then, the only Jews to ever enter Gaza are Jews who were kidnapped from their homes and taken into captivity in the most horrific conditions. While Canadian teachers passing this anti-semitic resolution will not change anything for Palestinians, it will surely make Jewish Canadian students even less safe than they are already and educating a generation of Canadians to hate an antisemitism. I very much hope this decision is rescinded.
Rabbi Poupko tweet media
English
36
172
623
11.7K
Daina Bloom
Daina Bloom@dainabloom·
@FNAuntieBoujee @JohnRustad4BC Forcing teachers to pay these union dues to be certified and then donating $$$ to UNWRA? What recourse will teachers have if they refuse to pay dues?
English
0
0
1
26
Boujee
Boujee@FNAuntieBoujee·
@JohnRustad4BC Unions are known for supporting humanitarian and political causes, this is not new and you shouldn't pretend like it is. They support anywhere that teachers are impacted. You should try empathy.
English
10
0
9
570
John Rustad
John Rustad@JohnRustad4BC·
This is completely out of control The BC Teachers’ Federation is supposed to represent teachers and support education in British Columbia, not pass motions on foreign political movements and push activist campaigns that have nothing to do with our kids’ success in the classroom. Parents are watching this and asking: who exactly is running our schools? Because it’s clearly not families anymore #cdnpoli #bcpoli
John Rustad tweet media
English
114
234
1.1K
29.9K
DRUIDESS157
DRUIDESS157@druidess157·
Labour unions should not have political talking points on geopolitical matters. Stick to working conditions in the classrooms. Stick to collective bargaining issues, like class composition, funding inadequacies, issues of children’s learning. Any union taking dues should stick to their lane. Why? Because you may have other members who politically disagree with you. It’s a waste of money. Do we need to change what unions can and should do with the money and advocacy? Because it’s obvious to me this is a metapolitical points, and they are not a collective for this.
English
3
4
45
936
Harsha Walia (she/her)
Harsha Walia (she/her)@HarshaWalia·
The BC Teachers Federation, the province wide labour union representing over 40,000 teachers, has just passed a resolution in support of BDS! The first province-wide motion to support BDS in solidarity with Palestine!!
Harsha Walia (she/her) tweet media
English
317
626
1.9K
157.7K
Daina Bloom retweetledi
Elisha Wiesel
Elisha Wiesel@ElishaWiesel·
"Through the infamous Durban conference, History is giving us Jews a signal. And we had better learn to decode it." - Elie Wiesel ### Today, Mayor Mamdani celebrated St. Patrick's Day by spreading the vicious blood libel against the Jews, claiming that we had perpetrated a genocide in Gaza. He platformed and praised Mary Robinson, the previous President of Ireland, whose leadership of UNHCR was forever marked by the stain of the antisemitic Durban conference, from which the American delegation resigned in protest. Read here what my father wrote in September 2001, days before 9/11, expressing his profound disappointment in Mary Robinson and the hatred against Jews she had allowed to foment at Durban through the United Nations. Elisha Wiesel - March 17th, 2026 ### FROM ELIE WIESEL'S PRIVATE ARCHIVES: The Durban Conference will go down in History as an enterprise of shame. Instead of being an important international gathering of goodwill, it became a circus of slander. Conceived as a world gathering against hatred, it turned into a mean spirited meeting of hatred. I was supposed to be there. Both Kofi Annan and Mary Robinson tried their best to persuade me, especially since I was a member of the small "Committee of Eminent Persons", created by the UN High Commissioner, to help with the proceedings. But when I read the working documents I resigned. Antisemitism, which is the oldest group prejudice in History, didn't even figure in the program. What did figure was something about "holocausts such as the ethnic cleansing of Palestinians by the Israelis". Mrs Robinson called me several times. I had lunch with the UN Secretary General, whom I had known for years. I explained to both why I simply cannot be part of an event that is so outrageously anti-Israeli and anti-Jewish. They claimed that the language would be changed. But the trouble was the content. I warned the UN Secretary General that the Conference, the way it was being prepared, will remain a moral disaster in the annals of social and political conduct among nations. For the content was sheer vicious hatred whose reverberations must revolt all decent and civilized people. Secretary Powell and his colleagues were outraged. Their courageous stand deserves support and praise. The American and Israeli delegations left; others did not. I wish European and South-American delegations had followed their example. Their explanation is that they will work from the inside to work out another draft resolution. It's too late. The damage was done. Hatred is like cancer. It goes from cell to cell, from limb to limb, from person to person, from group to group. We have seen it at work in Durban. Even respected personalities such as Kofi Annan somehow lost his way and said things that are unworthy of him. With the Durban scandal in the background, how can the world expect Israel to trust the United Nations? And how can good people, idealistic people have faith in its mission to bring nations together in an atmosphere of dignity? The Durban conference will be remembered as a forum dominated not by anti-Israelis but by antisemites. That militant Palestinians hate Jews that is known. It is enough to hear the various Islamic leaders harangues and read schoolbooks printed by the Palestinian Authority: they preach hatred and violence not against Zionists but against Jews. Their slogan, naked and brutal, which is everywhere the same, has been felt and heard in Durban too: "Kill the Jews!" What hurts is not that Palestinians and Arabs voiced their hatred but that so few delegates had the courage to dissociate themselves from them. It is as if in a weird and frightening moment of collective catharsis, they all dropped their masks and showed their true faces. Through the infamous Durban conference, History is giving us Jews a signal. And we had better learn to decode it. Elie Wiesel - September 4th, 2001
Elisha Wiesel tweet media
English
169
1.2K
3.5K
146.3K