Dan Goldin

7.5K posts

Dan Goldin banner
Dan Goldin

Dan Goldin

@dangoldin

Building @Twing_AI Before this led engineering @TripleLiftHQ to $1.4B exit. I hopefully fix more than I break.

Jersey City, NJ Katılım Ekim 2008
1.4K Takip Edilen913 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Dan Goldin
Dan Goldin@dangoldin·
Dr. Seuss dropping startup knowledge - just ship it
Dan Goldin tweet media
English
0
0
8
0
Dan Goldin
Dan Goldin@dangoldin·
Agree with the opportunity but think the Ops teams themselves should be able to own this with the current set of tools. Maybe having an engineer would be useful but they’re better off applying the context themselves than relying on an engineer to translate it and hope they get it right
English
1
0
2
65
Apoorva Govind
Apoorva Govind@Appyg99·
I feel like the highest alpha today is in helping ops teams become ultra efficient by building them custom tools specific to the business using AI. Every large-ish company COO should be looking at loaning 2-3 engineers to help automate old/inefficient processes.
English
18
3
96
8.4K
Amend and Pretend
Amend and Pretend@amendandpretend·
Everyone on podcasts acts like PE cutting R&D is reckless especially in the age of AI. Go look at what software companies actually spend 20% of revenue on and tell me there’s no waste, no bloat, no pet projects burning cash. They are profligate and went unchecked for too long!
English
2
2
31
3.6K
Dan Goldin
Dan Goldin@dangoldin·
@PadraicMcC Have you tried using Claude to generate PowerPoint? We’ve done a fair amount of consulting work and saw some firms just migrate from specific tools to Claude with some predefined skills/templates. Not perfect but they get to 80% and polish the rest
English
1
0
2
212
Padraic McConville
Padraic McConville@PadraicMcC·
fwiw we have demoed a bunch of these with no luck. Early view here is promising. Team demoing for the next few weeks. Keep you posted. (For us, massive efficiency if / when this gets solved).
Alibek D@FazerLand

7 years at McKinsey. A great salary and career growth. I gave it all up for an idea. One of the most painful parts of consulting was slide building. You'd spend days doing the hard thinking - structuring the argument, grounding it in data. Then burn more time building and formatting it in PowerPoint. I kept thinking: this has to be solved with technology. So my friend & co-founder @yersultansapar and I talked to 200 consultants asking what are the shortcomings of AI-generated decks. Not one of them said "make it prettier." Every single one said "make it think better." That became our north star. We officially launched Perceptis.ai - a platform that generates business-grade presentations in minutes. Built on the same frameworks McKinsey, BCG, and Bain spend years teaching. Connected to your company's knowledge base. Specific to your situation. Real business presentations demand more than good design. We're just getting started!

English
5
0
27
22.1K
Dan Goldin
Dan Goldin@dangoldin·
@iamjasonlevin I tried reaching out to get them to give me a 7k discount on the original quote but they didn’t take it
English
0
0
0
424
Jason Levin
Jason Levin@iamjasonlevin·
You call yourself a contrarian, But are your contrarian enough to hire Delve to do your SOC-2 compliance right now? I didn't think so. Well I just did. Be greedy when others are fearful. SOC-TUAH!
English
20
10
861
36.2K
Dan Goldin
Dan Goldin@dangoldin·
@deedydas The best are the couples. I know a married couple - she works at Meta and he works at an investment bank. Wild to compare their experiences
English
0
0
1
124
Deedy
Deedy@deedydas·
I’m not exaggerating, I hear from so many big software cos which don’t use Claude Code/Codex. CTOs are asleep at the wheel. Engineers are typing code by hand. Fixing a bug a day. Like it’s 2024. If youre at these cos, demand change or leave. Now. You’re in for a rude awakening.
English
314
117
1.9K
350.7K
Dan Goldin
Dan Goldin@dangoldin·
@WangUWS Gotta do whatever it takes for that SOC2 logo!
English
0
0
0
36
Dan Goldin
Dan Goldin@dangoldin·
While some zig, others zag
Dan Goldin tweet media
Ryan@ohryansbelt

Delve, a YC-backed compliance startup that raised $32 million, has been accused of systematically faking SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, and GDPR compliance reports for hundreds of clients. According to a detailed Substack investigation by DeepDelver, a leaked Google spreadsheet containing links to hundreds of confidential draft audit reports revealed that Delve generates auditor conclusions before any auditor reviews evidence, uses the same template across 99.8% of reports, and relies on Indian certification mills operating through empty US shells instead of the "US-based CPA firms" they advertise. Here's the breakdown: > 493 out of 494 leaked SOC 2 reports allegedly contain identical boilerplate text, including the same grammatical errors and nonsensical sentences, with only a company name, logo, org chart, and signature swapped in > Auditor conclusions and test procedures are reportedly pre-written in draft reports before clients even provide their company description, which would violate AICPA independence rules requiring auditors to independently design tests and form conclusions > All 259 Type II reports claim zero security incidents, zero personnel changes, zero customer terminations, and zero cyber incidents during the observation period, with identical "unable to test" conclusions across every client > Delve's "US-based auditors" are actually Accorp and Gradient, described as Indian certification mills operating through US shell entities. 99%+ of clients reportedly went through one of these two firms over the past 6 months > The platform allegedly publishes fully populated trust pages claiming vulnerability scanning, pentesting, and data recovery simulations before any compliance work has been done > Delve pre-fabricates board meeting minutes, risk assessments, security incident simulations, and employee evidence that clients can adopt with a single click, according to the author > Most "integrations" are just containers for manual screenshots with no actual API connections. The author describes the platform as a "SOC 2 template pack with a thin SaaS wrapper" > When the leak was exposed, CEO Karun Kaushik emailed clients calling the allegations "falsified claims" from an "AI-generated email" and stated no sensitive data was accessed, while the reports themselves contained private signatures and confidential architecture diagrams > Companies relying on these reports could face criminal liability under HIPAA and fines up to 4% of global revenue under GDPR for compliance violations they believed were resolved > When clients threaten to leave, Delve reportedly pairs them with an external vCISO for manual off-platform work, which the author argues proves their own platform can't deliver real compliance > Delve's sales price dropped from $15,000 to $6,000 with ISO 27001 and a penetration test thrown in when a client mentioned considering a competitor

English
4
0
9
1.2K
Alex Cohen
Alex Cohen@anothercohen·
Incredible. At this point we need to put the Forbes editors in charge of the FBI
Alex Cohen tweet media
Ryan@ohryansbelt

Delve, a YC-backed compliance startup that raised $32 million, has been accused of systematically faking SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, and GDPR compliance reports for hundreds of clients. According to a detailed Substack investigation by DeepDelver, a leaked Google spreadsheet containing links to hundreds of confidential draft audit reports revealed that Delve generates auditor conclusions before any auditor reviews evidence, uses the same template across 99.8% of reports, and relies on Indian certification mills operating through empty US shells instead of the "US-based CPA firms" they advertise. Here's the breakdown: > 493 out of 494 leaked SOC 2 reports allegedly contain identical boilerplate text, including the same grammatical errors and nonsensical sentences, with only a company name, logo, org chart, and signature swapped in > Auditor conclusions and test procedures are reportedly pre-written in draft reports before clients even provide their company description, which would violate AICPA independence rules requiring auditors to independently design tests and form conclusions > All 259 Type II reports claim zero security incidents, zero personnel changes, zero customer terminations, and zero cyber incidents during the observation period, with identical "unable to test" conclusions across every client > Delve's "US-based auditors" are actually Accorp and Gradient, described as Indian certification mills operating through US shell entities. 99%+ of clients reportedly went through one of these two firms over the past 6 months > The platform allegedly publishes fully populated trust pages claiming vulnerability scanning, pentesting, and data recovery simulations before any compliance work has been done > Delve pre-fabricates board meeting minutes, risk assessments, security incident simulations, and employee evidence that clients can adopt with a single click, according to the author > Most "integrations" are just containers for manual screenshots with no actual API connections. The author describes the platform as a "SOC 2 template pack with a thin SaaS wrapper" > When the leak was exposed, CEO Karun Kaushik emailed clients calling the allegations "falsified claims" from an "AI-generated email" and stated no sensitive data was accessed, while the reports themselves contained private signatures and confidential architecture diagrams > Companies relying on these reports could face criminal liability under HIPAA and fines up to 4% of global revenue under GDPR for compliance violations they believed were resolved > When clients threaten to leave, Delve reportedly pairs them with an external vCISO for manual off-platform work, which the author argues proves their own platform can't deliver real compliance > Delve's sales price dropped from $15,000 to $6,000 with ISO 27001 and a penetration test thrown in when a client mentioned considering a competitor

English
96
517
9.9K
1.1M
Dan Goldin
Dan Goldin@dangoldin·
@Austen We're smaller but did the same thing. The two biggest wins for us is much simpler and more controllable data model. We get to define relationships and what we want to see. That combined with being able to actually modify and fix whatever problems we see has been incredible
English
0
0
1
238
Austen Allred
Austen Allred@Austen·
We actually did this - replaced Salesforce with software we built in house. It took two engineers about half their time for maybe a month to replace everything we used Salesforce for. No “custom AWS architecture” lol. Saved us like a quarter million dollars per year.
Kyle Gawley@kylegawley

Salesforce is finished I built my own CRM from scratch all it took was: • a team of 47 engineers • custom AWS infrastructure • 6 months of development costs $85,000/month to maintain but I'm saving $150/month per seat for my 3 sales reps

English
81
16
620
135.9K
Dan Goldin
Dan Goldin@dangoldin·
@BoringBiz_ They’re pulling all nighters to respond to my Claude generating redlines
English
1
0
22
4.1K
Boring_Business
Boring_Business@BoringBiz_·
Have a few friends who have been restructuring and bankruptcy lawyers at Kirkland for a few years now I never thought it was possible, but they legitimately have worse hours and work life balance than investment bankers Talking around the clock work past midnights, weekends, and holidays. Very little room for personal life At some point, the money is not even worth it anymore
Short Squeez@shortsqueeznews

BREAKING: Law firm Kirkland is defying the private equity slowdown with a record $11.1 million partner pay for 2025. Kirkland became the first law firm to break $10 billion in annual revenues last year, advising on more than $800 billion of M&A deals in 2025.

English
63
68
2.1K
589.8K
Dan Goldin
Dan Goldin@dangoldin·
In the world of AI GTM slop how does this even happen?
Dan Goldin tweet media
English
0
1
1
88
Dan Goldin
Dan Goldin@dangoldin·
@jeffreyhuber I thought that at first but having decent success actually researching the right person to email woth the right message. Live always better but am surprised by how well cold is going
English
0
0
1
135
Jeff Huber
Jeff Huber@jeffreyhuber·
email as a channel is done completely cooked by AI SDR the value of all marketing channels trends towards zero
English
52
8
253
49.1K
Dan Goldin
Dan Goldin@dangoldin·
First Bitcoin, now OpenClaw The NSA is cooking
Lukasz Olejnik@lukOlejnik

China's biggest cybersecurity company apparently just shipped an AI assistant with its own SSL private key sitting inside the installer. Qihoo 360, think Norton or McAfee, but dominant across the entire Chinese market It appears that their new AI product, 360安全龙虾 (Security Claw) bundles a wrapper on @OpenClaw. Inside the installer package - accessible to anyone who downloaded it - was a private SSL certificate key for the domain *.myclaw.360.cn. An SSL private key is essentially the master password to a website's encrypted connection. With it, an attacker can impersonate 360's servers, silently intercept user traffic, forge a login page that looks completely legitimate, or possibly take over the AI agent altogether. The cert is valid until April 2027 and covers every subdomain on the platform. It's now public. The founder launched the product with a promise it would "never leak passwords". It did that during release? 461 million users, a $10B valuation, and nobody checked the zip file before shipping. The cert expires April 2027.

English
0
0
1
113
Dan Goldin
Dan Goldin@dangoldin·
Got another reminder last week that AI coding is fundamentally different than people. If an engineer does a db migration the same way 99 times, there's zero chance they switch it up on #100. Humans build habits. AI doesn't. Each attempt is its own. You can build the right harness but you'll never capture everything. They're stochastic machines you're just trying to hone in. Case in point: asked Claude Code to do a migration it had done dozens of times with "npx prisma migrate." This time it randomly chose "npx prisma db push." Small difference, big reminder. Every LLM implementation is a roll of the dice. We just happen to be happy with some of them.
English
0
1
1
68
Dan Goldin
Dan Goldin@dangoldin·
@toddsaunders Exactly. The entire dynamics of build vs buy completely shifted especially for personal software. You don't need it to be perfect, you just need it to be fixable and evolve with you. I'd take that any day over an enterprise software vendor that forces me to work the way they want
English
0
0
1
200
Todd Saunders
Todd Saunders@toddsaunders·
I have more bad news for the "people in the trades won't use Claude Code" mafia. You are so wrong.. but maybe you were right a year ago! This morning I had calls with 3 different people in the trades building bespoke software with Claude Code. And I know the mafia will say "but it can't scale." Does it matter? It is saving their companies time, money and resources. They are uniquely and absurdly qualified to build these tools because they have each spent decades solving these problems by hand. I don't care how much you know about code or how good of an engineer you are. You could never build what they are building. You don't have the domain expertise. But now they have yours.
English
51
6
105
15.5K
Dan Goldin
Dan Goldin@dangoldin·
@shl @GergelyOrosz @ershus Yes - people will do the work when the CEO tells them to. The point is how do you build a culture where people understand the business and care enough to do this without the CEO needing to tell them
English
0
0
4
1.2K
Dan Goldin retweetledi
@norootcause.surfingcomplexity.com on Bluesky
Coding was the bottleneck, then code reviews were the bottleneck. At some point, incidents are going to be the bottleneck.
English
51
173
2.2K
81.9K
Dan Goldin retweetledi
Bearly AI
Bearly AI@bearlyai·
Former Dropbox CTO says rise of AI code has completely changed software engineer recruiting (vastly increases value of side projects, reduces value of CVs): “One of our members recently ran about 20 work trials for engineering hires—essentially, extended, weeklong job interviews—and found zero correlation between years of experience and adaptability to AI tools. Another member told me that what predicted success in hiring people who possess that adaptability was evidence of a builder’s disposition: cool personal websites, side projects, an obvious love of making things. FAANG on the résumé and a name-brand university, meanwhile, predicted almost nothing.”
Aditya Agarwal@adityaag

x.com/i/article/2031…

English
45
114
1.5K
329.9K