Dan
2.4K posts

Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Dan retweetledi

@allie__voss @Taggerung848 If you used to work in data centre policy, you know new data centres being built now aren't for services that existed <2020. This is an embarrassingly obtuse "gotcha" argument that avoids the spirit of the objection by taking colloquialisms literally.
English

@Taggerung848 I used to work on data center policy and the number of people who think "the cloud" is some magical technology apart from data centers is truly concerning
English

The main thing I've learned about data centers is that everyone is utterly confident they don't use data centers
Luke Hogg@LEHogg
They’re gonna be shocked when they figure out how QR codes work
English

@allie__voss @MWC_author This whole framing is totally disingenuous. Even if most opponents don't understand the distinction, they're right to suspect that the new wave of data centres has nothing to do with internet infrastructure we take for granted. It is not the least bit hypocritical to oppose them.
English

@ruthlesdebunker @RuxandraTeslo @credenzaclear2 1) Child-rearing doesn't end with toddlers. This is an arbitrary cut-off chosen purely to insult their target.
2) There'a no reason why this would be the limiting factor on cognition.
3) Modern women provide overwhelming contrary evidence.
English

@danobroin @RuxandraTeslo @credenzaclear2 Because women were evolutionary restricted by this role - to teach toddlers the basic simplified morals (don't do that, don't do this), in time when men participated in inter-band affairs and organisation of the entire society's life.
English


@ruthlesdebunker @RuxandraTeslo @credenzaclear2 Regardless of the merit of any one argument, very obviously a philosopher whose whole academic career deals with utilitarianism is a utilitarian.
English

@danobroin @RuxandraTeslo @credenzaclear2 "I think of myself as quite utilitarian in my moral outlook."
To think and to be are 2 different things. If all the predators were killed, there would be no one to control the herbivores' population, then they would eat all the plants, and then even more of them would die.
English

@IsabelAphrael @follynomics But wouldn't you expect and equal distribution of nice laptops in groups that do and don't get them? And further, since this would also be a factor in the real world, isn't it still a good test of the policy?
English

On an econometrics exam we were asked if there is bias if a uni compares grades after a grant to give some people free laptops. I said yes bc the people who apply for the grant might be different than ppl who do not and got 0/10. When I fought him on it he said no, its random.
Rothmus 🏴@Rothmus
English

@ruthlesdebunker @RuxandraTeslo @credenzaclear2 >Because it is?
Please explain how hunting is intrinsically more utilitarian than raising children.
>That person isn't a utilitarian.
"I think of myself as quite utilitarian in my moral outlook."
askell.blog/utilitarians-a…
English

@danobroin @RuxandraTeslo @credenzaclear2 > hunting is more utilitarian.
Because it is?
> And lastly, again, the person he is criticising *is a utilitarian*.
That person isn't a utilitarian.
English

@ruthlesdebunker @RuxandraTeslo @credenzaclear2 I understand his claim. It's just absurd and the evidence he offers is worthless. Is there anything like it in men or elsewhere in human cognition at all?
It's not even clear why hunting is more utilitarian. And lastly, again, the person he is criticising *is a utilitarian*.
English

@danobroin @RuxandraTeslo @credenzaclear2 No, you don't understand. It's just that men and women evolved for different purposes. Men were hunters, and so they evolved to be more utilitarian and less "child-rearing."
English

@BryantWood97287 @willmacaskill Your first sentence should end in a colon.
English

@willmacaskill This doesn’t even qualify as a weak argument. Without being a parent she nor anyone else has the required exposure for the tasks she’s been assigned.
What comes from parenting children is intrinsict to us but can only be accessed by going through it.
End of discussion.
English

@ruthlesdebunker @RuxandraTeslo @credenzaclear2 2/2 Others are brief, modern, context dependent one-offs (e.g. 'ban bossy") to justify their whole model of half of all people. Even so, it just kicks my question down the road . Do men have temperments like Gazelles then?
English

@ruthlesdebunker @RuxandraTeslo @credenzaclear2 Sorry, thought the opening was the whole tweet. Impressively, it manages to keep the bar this low throughout. Much of what they cite just *doesn't happen, ever*, e.g. indulging burglars. 1/2
English

@ruthlesdebunker @RuxandraTeslo @credenzaclear2 Above all else, that being selected to skillfully interact with some other entitiy would constrain your reasoning levels to that of the entity. Following from this, are men who were selected to hunt unable to reason beyond the level of a Gazelle?
English

@RuxandraTeslo @credenzaclear2 What was dumb about his assumptions?
English

@TomChivers I know editors pick headlines, etc. but I think if you're going to allow your byline to be under a headline, you have to accept that its thesis will be attributed to you. The alternative is that publications have the right to ritualistically lie to hijack our attention.
English

predictably, if you actually read this piece, it's an argument against banning trophy hunting, not an argument for going out and killing all predators qz.com/497675/to-trul… the world is just so full of people who loudly misunderstand things for clout
Josh Rainer@JoshRainerGold
I think you’re actually just too stupid
English

@TomChivers @BunnAndrew I've always wondered about this. Thanks for confirming.
English

@BunnAndrew yup, I checked. A marriage-related name change slightly more complicated than "took husband's surname", details not important
English

@richiepooooo @rose__brunk @GBBranstetter Yes, that's the point. Seems like you tried to use a template response to sound aloof without thinking what the words actually mean in context.
English

Who was it that said "if you live in a 15 minute city but your barista has an hour-long commute you don't live in a city; you live in an amusement park"
Wrath Of Gnon@wrathofgnon
A walkable city is where you have cafes like this. A livable city is where the waiter also lives within walking distance of the cafe.
English

@CJHandmer @paulg @patrickc Wouldn't both figures overstate the case since most businesses would turn to alternatives instead of ceasing to exist? What matters is surely value over replacement payment processor.
English

Ireland has the second fewest homes per capita in Europe, the highest electricity prices, and the least electrified railways.
What’s gone wrong? Like Britain, it has outsourced government to paperclip-maximiser independent agencies & NGOs. The answer is to restore its democracy.

The Irish Times@IrishTimes
John Collison of Stripe: Ireland is going backwards. Here’s how to get it moving irishtimes.com/life-style/peo…
English

@bazzdgrogan @bato_don_lo @s8mb Surely the number of independent systems isn't a good metric and could even be a symptom of bureaucratic dysfunction. The appropriate measure is surely something like % of Dubliners who can achieve some respectable average speed in a given area without personal transport.
English

@bato_don_lo @s8mb Alot less? What urban areas of 1.5m people in those countries have substantially more than that?
English

@TheBrianMcManus And yes, the same dynamics apply with other modes but they probably just don't matter in practice because driving is uniquely space-inefficient. 4/4
English

@TheBrianMcManus Yes, in the limit, adding 20 lanes or whatever might solve traffic forever, but that's geometrically (and probably fiscally) incompatible with good cities. 3/4
English









