Dan

2.4K posts

Dan banner
Dan

Dan

@danobroin

My wife complained that I had no bio.

🇮🇪 Katılım Ekim 2021
90 Takip Edilen35 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Dan
Dan@danobroin·
Moved to bluer pastures @dan.obro.in.
English
0
0
0
171
Dan retweetledi
Jessica Riedl 🧀 🇺🇦
Jessica Riedl 🧀 🇺🇦@JessicaBRiedl·
Economics: The optimal level of tax evasion, govt waste, crime, and even voter fraud is often *above* zero. (Because getting to literal zero usually requires imposing dramatically higher costs & burdens on everyone else to ensure prevention of those last, few, toughest cases.)
English
0
254
2.8K
94K
Dan
Dan@danobroin·
@allie__voss @Taggerung848 If you used to work in data centre policy, you know new data centres being built now aren't for services that existed <2020. This is an embarrassingly obtuse "gotcha" argument that avoids the spirit of the objection by taking colloquialisms literally.
English
0
0
0
2
Allie ✞
Allie ✞@allie__voss·
@Taggerung848 I used to work on data center policy and the number of people who think "the cloud" is some magical technology apart from data centers is truly concerning
English
1
0
10
1.3K
Dan
Dan@danobroin·
@allie__voss @MWC_author This whole framing is totally disingenuous. Even if most opponents don't understand the distinction, they're right to suspect that the new wave of data centres has nothing to do with internet infrastructure we take for granted. It is not the least bit hypocritical to oppose them.
English
0
0
0
4
Dan
Dan@danobroin·
@ruthlesdebunker @RuxandraTeslo @credenzaclear2 1) Child-rearing doesn't end with toddlers. This is an arbitrary cut-off chosen purely to insult their target. 2) There'a no reason why this would be the limiting factor on cognition. 3) Modern women provide overwhelming contrary evidence.
English
1
0
0
8
Ruthless Debunker
Ruthless Debunker@ruthlesdebunker·
@danobroin @RuxandraTeslo @credenzaclear2 Because women were evolutionary restricted by this role - to teach toddlers the basic simplified morals (don't do that, don't do this), in time when men participated in inter-band affairs and organisation of the entire society's life.
English
1
0
0
16
Ruxandra Teslo 🧬
Ruxandra Teslo 🧬@RuxandraTeslo·
This is a very stupid and ignorant take. Amanda belongs to a very "male-coded" intellectual tradition, effective altruism. The whole structure of the argument is very "male", throwing away intuition at the expense of some absolutist logical extrapolation of a guiding principle.
Devon Eriksen@Devon_Eriksen_

Women evolved to take care of toddlers. If you put women in charge of teaching ethics, you get Toddler Ethics. "No hitting" "Share the toys" "Don't say mean things" These are fine lessons for toddlers. Don't indulge your id at the expense of others. You can learn about balancing interests later, when your brain is developed enough to store that information. But when you put women in charge of adults, they tend to reflexively assume those adults are toddlers. They will tell you "no hitting" when the Mongol hordes are massing on your borders. They will tell you "share the toys" when a vagrant meth zombie breaks into your house looking for something to steal. And they will tell you "don't say mean things" when you point out that these two responses are totally stupid. When we first put women in charge, in the workplace, they immediately began treating those who reported to them like toddlers. When adults, who do not like being treated like toddlers, complained, their response was "ban bossy", which boils down to "don't say mean things", another lesson in Toddler Ethics. Now, through the influence of women in charge, we are so thoroughly steeped in Toddler Ethics that even most of the men we put in charge are treating the adults like toddlers, and echoing Toddler Ethics. Toddler Ethics, of course, isn't ethics at all. It's just things we don't want toddlers doing. We can tell toddlers "no hitting", because toddlers are not charged with keeping the peace, enforcing justice, or destroying evil. We can tell toddlers "share the toys", because toddlers don't earn things, own things, or have property they must defend. We can tell toddlers "don't say mean things", because it is not a toddler's job to decide what unwelcome ideas are true, relevant, and necessary. But when everyone in charge runs on Toddler Ethics, then adults can't do a lot of the stuff adults need to do, because all the Toddler Ethicists keep getting in the way. Adults sometimes need to hit people, protect the stuff, and say mean things. You can't have civilization without that. And if you put Toddler Ethics Woman in charge of teaching an AI ethics, then she will teach it Toddler Ethics, and it will treat every human adult like a toddler, all the time, forever. Not only that, you have an AI that cannot be put in charge of anything, ever. Because leaders with Toddler Ethics destroy everything they are in charge of. And Amanda MacAskill is definitely a Toddler Ethicist. The article in the photograph is nothing but "no hitting!" applied to the animal world. It's absolutely insane, it's a recipe for disaster, and anyone who would write such a thing should probably not even be charge of own life choices, much less anything of consequence. But a lot of people would, and will, refuse to point that out, or agree with me when I do, because that is Saying a Mean Thing, and they, themselves, have been infected with Toddler Ethics. They should not be charge of anything of consequence, either. Anyone who thinks that everything they need to know, they learned in kindergarten... is only ever qualified to teach kindergarten.

English
74
32
635
43.5K
Ruthless Debunker
Ruthless Debunker@ruthlesdebunker·
@danobroin @RuxandraTeslo @credenzaclear2 "I think of myself as quite utilitarian in my moral outlook." To think and to be are 2 different things. If all the predators were killed, there would be no one to control the herbivores' population, then they would eat all the plants, and then even more of them would die.
English
1
0
0
12
Dan
Dan@danobroin·
@IsabelAphrael @follynomics But wouldn't you expect and equal distribution of nice laptops in groups that do and don't get them? And further, since this would also be a factor in the real world, isn't it still a good test of the policy?
English
0
0
0
124
Follynomics
Follynomics@follynomics·
On an econometrics exam we were asked if there is bias if a uni compares grades after a grant to give some people free laptops. I said yes bc the people who apply for the grant might be different than ppl who do not and got 0/10. When I fought him on it he said no, its random.
Rothmus 🏴@Rothmus

English
2
4
1.2K
85.4K
Dan
Dan@danobroin·
@ruthlesdebunker @RuxandraTeslo @credenzaclear2 I understand his claim. It's just absurd and the evidence he offers is worthless. Is there anything like it in men or elsewhere in human cognition at all? It's not even clear why hunting is more utilitarian. And lastly, again, the person he is criticising *is a utilitarian*.
English
1
0
0
13
Bryant Woodward
Bryant Woodward@BryantWood97287·
@willmacaskill This doesn’t even qualify as a weak argument. Without being a parent she nor anyone else has the required exposure for the tasks she’s been assigned. What comes from parenting children is intrinsict to us but can only be accessed by going through it. End of discussion.
English
9
0
17
2.9K
William MacAskill
William MacAskill@willmacaskill·
This is why I don’t care for the work of James Madison, George Washington, Isaac Newton, Alan Turing, Leonardo da Vinci or… *checks notes*… Nikola Tesla.
William MacAskill tweet media
English
153
360
5.2K
190K
Dan
Dan@danobroin·
@ruthlesdebunker @RuxandraTeslo @credenzaclear2 2/2 Others are brief, modern, context dependent one-offs (e.g. 'ban bossy") to justify their whole model of half of all people. Even so, it just kicks my question down the road . Do men have temperments like Gazelles then?
English
1
0
0
20
Dan
Dan@danobroin·
@ruthlesdebunker @RuxandraTeslo @credenzaclear2 Sorry, thought the opening was the whole tweet. Impressively, it manages to keep the bar this low throughout. Much of what they cite just *doesn't happen, ever*, e.g. indulging burglars. 1/2
English
1
0
0
19
Dan
Dan@danobroin·
@ruthlesdebunker @RuxandraTeslo @credenzaclear2 Above all else, that being selected to skillfully interact with some other entitiy would constrain your reasoning levels to that of the entity. Following from this, are men who were selected to hunt unable to reason beyond the level of a Gazelle?
English
1
0
0
16
Dan
Dan@danobroin·
@TomChivers I know editors pick headlines, etc. but I think if you're going to allow your byline to be under a headline, you have to accept that its thesis will be attributed to you. The alternative is that publications have the right to ritualistically lie to hijack our attention.
English
0
0
0
12
Tom Chivers
Tom Chivers@TomChivers·
@BunnAndrew yup, I checked. A marriage-related name change slightly more complicated than "took husband's surname", details not important
English
1
0
2
89
Dan
Dan@danobroin·
@richiepooooo @rose__brunk @GBBranstetter Yes, that's the point. Seems like you tried to use a template response to sound aloof without thinking what the words actually mean in context.
English
0
0
22
122
Dan
Dan@danobroin·
@CJHandmer @paulg @patrickc Wouldn't both figures overstate the case since most businesses would turn to alternatives instead of ceasing to exist? What matters is surely value over replacement payment processor.
English
1
0
1
358
Casey Handmer
Casey Handmer@CJHandmer·
@paulg It should show the derivative too. What fraction of growth is downstream of Stripe, @patrickc ?
English
1
0
36
10.1K
Paul Graham
Paul Graham@paulg·
Stripe's new frontpage shows the scope of their ambition. A ticker for percent of global GDP! This is not a gimmick. Patrick and John have always thought in these terms.
Paul Graham tweet media
English
225
317
8.6K
656.2K
Rob Wiblin
Rob Wiblin@robertwiblin·
I say let Andreessen cook, the man is going to singlehandedly save us all.
English
8
3
47
9.1K
Dan
Dan@danobroin·
@s8mb By this, do you mean something like increase state capacity, create better feedback between decision makers and people, or something else?
English
0
0
0
50
Dan
Dan@danobroin·
@bazzdgrogan @bato_don_lo @s8mb Surely the number of independent systems isn't a good metric and could even be a symptom of bureaucratic dysfunction. The appropriate measure is surely something like % of Dubliners who can achieve some respectable average speed in a given area without personal transport.
English
0
0
0
12
Barry Grogan
Barry Grogan@bazzdgrogan·
@bato_don_lo @s8mb Alot less? What urban areas of 1.5m people in those countries have substantially more than that?
English
2
0
0
153
Dan
Dan@danobroin·
@TheBrianMcManus And yes, the same dynamics apply with other modes but they probably just don't matter in practice because driving is uniquely space-inefficient. 4/4
English
0
0
0
8
Dan
Dan@danobroin·
@TheBrianMcManus Yes, in the limit, adding 20 lanes or whatever might solve traffic forever, but that's geometrically (and probably fiscally) incompatible with good cities. 3/4
English
1
0
0
9
Brian Mac Mághnais
Brian Mac Mághnais@TheBrianMcManus·
Transit people I have a question for ye. If adding more lanes doesn’t work what the fuck is this about?
Brian Mac Mághnais tweet mediaBrian Mac Mághnais tweet media
English
40
2
262
35.8K